b
Cuttings (1735/ha)
Cuttings (2150/ha)
Seedlings (2150/ha)
Weed Control Year 1
Herbicide
Herbicide and cultivate
Cultivate and herbicide
Cultivate and herbicide
Herbicide
Weed Control Year 2
Herbicide
Herbicide and cultivate
Cultivate and herbicide
Cultivate
Herbicide
Weed Control Year 3
Cultivate
Establishment Cost ($/ha)
621
695
727
780
494
aBased on
a comparison with data in ''Cost and Cost Trends for Forestry
Practices in the South" by Straka et al. (1989), these practices
and costs are very similar to those required for establishing
loblolly pine on old-field sites in the South.
bCampbell
chose 6735 trees/ha for evaluation of costs. Using his estimate of
$0.17/seedling, the costs were modified to assume 2100 trees/ha and
use of weed control methods for 2 years instead of 1 year.
OCR for page 781
Page 781
most important factor. However, at a given yield, land rental
rates can be very important in determining the cost of production,
although at higher yields the effect of land rent becomes less
pronounced (Figure I.1). Cropland rental rates vary both within
region and between regions. Table I.2 indicates some of the land
rental estimates and other annual costs assumed by various
economists.
None of the establishment or maintenance operations summarized
in Tables I.1 and I.2 include the cost of road building, draining,
installation of drainage tile, or activities that may be required
to prevent damage from large herbivores and small mammals. These
are all activities that might be required under some circumstances
and might result in SRWC being economically unattractive.
For most analyses, it is assumed that harvest, chipping, and
transportation costs will total $20 to $24 per dry megagram (Mg; 1
Mg = 1 million grams). This is based on research by the forest
service that showed that smaller-sized feller bunchers, skidders,
and chippers were more cost-effective for SRWC when the equipment
had to handle a high density of small diameter stems (Stokes et
al., 1986). However, if the need for chipping could be eliminated
(such as by using the whole-tree burner concept) and
FIGURE I.1 SRWC delivered cost for wood chips
harvested on a 6-year rotation as a function of land cost and
yield.
OCR for page 782
Page 782
TABLE I.2 Variations in SRWC Tending Operations and Other
Annual Costs During the First Rotation
Strauss and Wright (1990)
Campbell (1988)
Lothner et al. (1988)
Heilman et al. (in press)
NCSU Hardwood Co-op Unpublished Report
Insecticide/fungicide years 2, 4, 6 at
$25/ha/appl.
NA
NA
NA
NA
Fertilizer applied years 3 and 5 at
$35/ha/appl.
Fertilizer applied year 2 at $55/ha/appl.
Fertilizer applied year 2 at $99/ha/appl.
NA
NA
Land rent at $85/ha/yr
Land rent at $66/ha/yr
Land rent at $99/ha/yr
Land rent at $123.50/ha/yr
Land renta
$88/ha/yr
Land tax at $13/ha
Land tax at $14/ha
Land tax at $12/ha
Land tax no estimate
Land tax no estimate
Labor and facilities at $35/ha
Labor and facilities at $25/ha
Labor and facilities no estimate
Labor and facilities at $61.75/ha
Labor and facilities no estimate
aBased on
average 1990 rental rates for cropland in South Carolina, Georgia,
Alabama, Mississippi, Arkansas, and Louisiana (USDA/ERS, 1989).
OCR for page 783
Page 783
greater efficiencies in harvesting and transportation operations
incorporated, it might be possible to reduce that cost to about $14
to $16 per dry ton. Some analysts of SRWC costs have used even
lower estimates (Lothner et al., 1988).
The summary of 1989 research status in Table I.3 attempts to
draw from the above estimates of cost elements and to evaluate
total delivered costs in different regions of the country. Because
the recent cost analysis by Strauss and Wright (1990) was based on
synthesizing information from a number of SRWC researchers around
the country, it was used for basic cost assumptions on
establishment, maintenance, and harvesting. A simple cost
accounting spreadsheet was used to evaluate the effect of various
levels of yield and land rental cost on the final delivered cost
with an assumed discount rate of 10 percent. The yield levels used
are not the best yields observed in experimental trials in the
region, but rather yields that are assumed to be obtainable with
currently available plant materials on a variety of cropland
conditions in the region.
OCR for page 784
Page 784
TABLE I.3 Short Rotation Woody Crops Program 1989
Research Status and Future Research Goals by Region
1989 Research Status
2010 Research Goals
Regions
Yielda
(Mg/ha/yr)
Costb
($/GJ)
Costb
($/Mg)
Yieldc
(Mg/ha/yr)
Cost ($/GJ)
Cost ($/Mg)
2010 Land Resourced
Northeast (NE)
9
2.75
54.45
15
1.90
37.62
0.5
South/Southeast (S/SE)
9
2.51
49.70
18
1.90
37.62
5.0
Midwest/Lake (MW/L)
11
2.75
54.45
20
1.90
37.62
21.0
Northwest (NW)
17
2.15
42.57
30
1.90
37.62
1.2
Subtropics
17
2.36
46.73
30
1.90
37.62
0.5
aDry
weight, above ground, leafless standing yields at harvest age.
Numbers are selected values from production research results
considered most representative of current technology in the region.
Yield after processing and storage is assumed to be 15 percent less
than standing yields.
bDelivered
costs of chips including production, harvest, in-field chipping,
and transportation costs and regional land costs, assuming yields
shown in column one and no federal subsidies. Assumed land rental
rates of $100/ha in NE, $75/ha in S/SE, $150/ha in MW/L, $150/ha in
NW, and $200/ha in subtropics.
cDry
weight, above ground, leafless standing yields at harvest age.
Numbers are based on projections of possible "average" yields if
the best available plant materials were further improved for
disease resistance and adaptability.
dThe
potential land base that is estimated to be available and capable
of sustaining economically viable energy crop production by 2010,
assuming average annual budgets of $10 million or more to allow
development of several species. With continued research, up to 77
million ha might produce economically competitive energy crops by
2030.
OCR for page 785
Page 785
Note
1. The biomass analysis presented in this report is based on
work by Wright and Ehrenshaft (1990), who helped in the development
of this section.
References
Campbell, G. E. 1988. The Economics of Short-Rotation Intensive
Culture in Illinois and the Central States. Forestry Research
Report 88-12. Urbana: Agricultural Experiment Station, University
of Illinois.
Heilman, P. E., R. F. Stettler, D. P. Hanley, and R. W. Gartner.
In press. Intensive Culture of High Yield Poplar Plantations in the
Pacific Northwest. Puyallup: Washington State University.
Lothner, D. D., E. E. Hansen, and D. A. Netzer. 1988. Growing
and utilizing intensively cultured woody crops for energy: Some
recent evidence from the north central United States. In
Proceedings of the IEA Bioenergy, Task III, Activity 4, Workshop,
Economic Evaluations of Biomass Oriented Systems for Fuel, G.
Lonner and A. Tornquist, eds. Uppsala: Swedish University of
Agricultural Sciences.
North Carolina State University Hardwood Research Cooperative.
1987. Economics and risk of SRWC in the Southeast. Unpublished
report submitted to the U.S. Department of Energy's Short Rotation
Woody Crops Program. School of Forest Resources, North Carolina
State University, Raleigh.
Stokes, B. J., J. Frederick, and D. T. Curtin. 1986. Field
trials of a short-rotation biomass feller buncher and selected
harvesting systems. North Carolina State University, School of
Forest Resources 11(3):185–204.
Straka, T. J., W. F. Watson, and M. Dubois. 1989. Costs and cost
trends for forestry practices in the South. Forest Farmer Manual
1989:8–14.
Strauss, C. H., and L. L. Wright. 1990. Woody biomass production
costs in the United States: An economic summary of commercial
Populus plantations systems. Solar Energy
45(2):105–110.
U.S. Department of Agriculture, ERS. 1989. Agricultural
Resources: Agricultural Land Values and MarketsSituation and
Outlook Report. Report AR-14. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government
Printing Office.
Wright, L. L., and A. R. Ehrenshaft. 1990. Short Rotation Woody
Crops Program: Annual Progress Report for 1986. ORNL-6635. Oak
Ridge, Tenn.: Oak Ridge National Laboratory.
Representative terms from entire chapter:
herbicide herbicide