| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Copyright © 2009. National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Terms of Use and Privacy Statement |
Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter.
Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.
Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.
OCR for page 57
s
OUTLOOK FOR SUPPLY OF NUCLEAR ENGINEERS
The potential supply of nuclear engineers is primarily a function of the
supply of those who obtain degrees in quantitative fields. "Quantitative
fields" include engineering, mathematics, the physical sciences, and the
computer and information sciences. In this chapter, the terms "nuclear
engineer," "engineer," "mathematician," "computer scientist," and "physical
scientist" are defined by the field of degree, not by activity subsequent to
graduation. The minimum degree level considered in this study is the
bachelor's level.
The number who obtain degrees in nuclear engineering varies, depending
on such variables as (1) the perceived and actual demand for nuclear
engineers, as indicated to students by such measures as wages and employer
recruiting activities, (2) scholarship support for such training relative to
support for training in related fields, such as other subfields of engineering
or physics, (3) social attitudes toward nuclear energy, and (4) the size and
vitality of the nuclear engineering educational infrastructure. The "swing"
in the supply of nuclear engineers is also heavily constrained by the supply
of those who have interests in and abilities to pursue quantitative fields.
Some questions about the future supply of nuclear engineers can be
answered by examining the history of and projected future of quantitative
degrees. To assess future supply, trends in degree completion over the last
decade for all fields, quantitative fields, engineering, and nuclear
engineering were examined. National Center for Education Statistics data
bases were used to describe trends in all degrees, quantitative degrees, and
engineering degrees. These statistics do not identify nuclear engineering as
an engineering subfield, so to estimate past supply of nuclear engineers,
Department of Energy (DOE) and Engineering Manpower Commission (EMC) data
bases were also used (DOE, 1984 and 1989; EMC, 1979-1989; NCES, 1980-1989~.
57
OCR for page 58
58
The committee also tried to establish the potential supply of quantitative
degree holders, as indicated by trends in students' tested mathematics and
verbal abilities that nuclear engineering undergraduate programs have
identified as required to pursue such degrees. Although the past obviously
does not necessarily predict the future, it can give some indication of future
supply. (For example, Asian immigration rates will affect the number of
quantitative degree holders, but it is difficult to predict these rates and,
therefore, their degree consequences.) To simplify the following discussion,
many of the data tables on which this chapter is based are found in Appendix
F.
DEGREE TRENDS FOR ALL FIELDS AND QUANTITATIVE FIELDS
The period from 1977 to 1987 shows an 8-percent increase (from 917,900 to
991,260) in the number of all bachelor's degrees awarded annually including
both B.A.s and B.S.s, a 9-percent decrease (from 316,602 to 289,341) in all
master's degrees (both M.A.s and M.S.s), and a 3-percent increase (from 33,126
to 34,033) in all Ph.D. degrees (see Appendix F. Table Fin. With nonresident
aliens excluded from these numbers, the bachelor's degrees awarded are
relatively unchanged, master's degrees awarded declines by 13 percent, and
Ph.D.s awarded decrease by nearly 7 percent. Over this period, nonresident
aliens increased their share of total master's degrees by almost 90 percent
and their share of total Ph.D. degrees by over 70 percent (see Table F-2~.
Table 5-1 shows a picture for quantitative degrees radically different
from that for total degrees. Between 1977 and 1987 the number of quantitative
degrees awarded increased substantially at all degree levels, regardless of
whether nonresident aliens were taken into account. The number of
quantitative degrees going to U.S. residents increased by 62 and 29 percent at
the B.S. and M.S. levels respectively, while doctorates awarded remained
stable (the increase in total Ph.D. degrees awarded is almost entirely
attributable to nonresident aliens) (see Table F-3~. An analysis of
quantitative degrees awarded as a share of all degrees awarded, for all degree
recipients, U.S. residents, and nonresident aliens, shows that this share
increased between 1977 and 1987 for all degree levels and for all three groups
(see Table F-49.
If a quantitative degree holder is viewed as a potential nuclear
engineering student, then between 1977 and 1987 the potential supply of
nuclear engineers increased substantially in absolute numbers and as a share
of all degrees awarded.
OCR for page 59
59
TABLE 5-1 Quantitative Degrees Granted by Degree Level and U.S. Residency
Status, 1977 and 1987
Total U.S. Residentsa
Percent Percent
Degree Level 1977 1987 Change 1977 1987 Change
B.S.
M.S.
Ph.D.
91,191 149,944 64.4 86,474 139,945 61.8
27,570 39,476 43.2 22,637 29,253 29.2
6,952 8,575 23.4 5,368 5,379 0.2
IS. residents includes U.S. citizens and resident aliens.
SOURCES: U.S. Department of Education (1980, 1989~.
DEGREE TRENDS IN ENGINEERING AND NUCLEAR ENGINEERING
As Table 5-2 shows, engineering degrees earned increased substantially between
1978 and 1988 at all degree levels, with the production of B.S. degrees in
engineering peaking in 1986 at 78,178 (EMC, 1979-1989~. During this period
B.S., M.S., and Ph.D. degrees in engineering increased 55, 58, and 78 percent,
respectively. Even with nonresident aliens excluded, there were substantial
increases at all degree levels.
The number of engineering degrees awarded were not a main factor in the
increase in quantitative degrees during the decade. Engineering degrees
constituted smaller shares of quantitative degrees in 1987 than in 1977 for
total engineering degrees at the B.S. and M.S. levels, for U.S. resident B.S.
degrees, and for nonresident alien B.S. and M.S. degrees. In other words,
although the absolute number of engineering degrees awarded at all levels
increased during the decade, the increases in nonengineering quantitative
degrees were generally greater. Thus, the increase in quantitative degrees is
more significant (see Table F-69.
However, as engineering gained at all degree levels, nuclear engineering
decreased at all degree levels except at the doctoral level. From 1978 to
1988 there were 44- and 52-percent decreases in nuclear engineering B.S. and
M.S. degrees, respectively, while the number of total nuclear engineering
doctorates remained relatively stable. Removing nonresident aliens from the
numbers reveals the magnitude of the decline in M.S. and Ph.D. levels for U.S.
residents: a 62 percent decline in M.S. degrees awarded and a 25 percent
decrease in the number of doctorates awarded.
OCR for page 60
60
TABLE 5-2 Engineering and Nuclear Engineering Degrees Granted, by Degree
Level and U.S. Residency Status, 1978 and 1988
Total
Field and Percent
Degree Level 1978 1988 Change
All Engineering
U S Residentsa
Percent
1978 1988 Change
B.S. 46,09171,38654.942,99765,623 52.6
M.S. 16,18225,61658.312,60318,338 45.5
Ph.D. 2,5734,57177.71,6992,538 49.4
Nuclear Engineering
B.S. 863484-43.9822463 -43.7
M.S. 486232-52.3383145 -62.1
Ph.D. 1121141.87758 -24.7
a U. S . residents includes U.S. citizens and resident aliens.
SOURCES: Engineering Manpower Commission (1979-1989), for all engineers;
U.S. Department of Energy (1984, 1989), for nuclear engineers.
DEGREE TRENDS BY GENDER, RACE, AND ETHNICITY
Historically, relatively small numbers of quantitative degrees have been
awarded to women and non-Asian minorities. Even small changes in this pattern
could provide long-term expansion of the supply of professionals in
quantitative fields.
Degree Trends for Women
Degrees awarded to women increased in all fields between 1977 and 1987, both
in absolute numbers at the bachelor's, master's, and Ph.D. levels, and as a
share of total degrees awarded at all three levels. Over the same period,
degrees awarded to men decreased at all three degree levels, both in absolute
numbers and as a share of degrees (see Table Fib.
Between 1977 and 1987 the absolute number of quantitative degrees at all
degree levels increased for both men and women. However, increases for women
were proportionally greater at all degree levels, especially at the B.S. level
(see Table 5-39. Since nonresident aliens earn a substantial fraction of the
quantitative degrees awarded, especially at the M.S. and Ph.D. levels, and
nonresident aliens are disproportionately male, eliminating nonresident aliens
OCR for page 61
61
further increases the share of U.S. resident women's quantitative degree
awards at all degree levels (see Table F-8~.
TABLE 5-3 Quantitative Degrees Granted, by Degree Level and Gender, 1977 and
1987
1977 _ 1987
Degree Percent Percent
Level MaleFemale Female Male Female Female
B.S. 78,240 14,143 15.3 111,598 38,346 25.6
M.S. 24,703 3,366 12.0 31,506 7,970 20.2
Ph.D. 6,446 520 7.5 7,504 1,071 12.5
SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education
Statistics (1980, 1989~.
Since women have increased their absolute numbers and shares of degrees in all
fields, are their increases in quantitative degree numbers and shares simply
attributable to increased numbers of women completing post-secondary degrees?
An examination of women's quantitative degrees as shares of their total
degrees shows that a woman who received a degree at any of the three levels in
1987 was more likely than her 1977 or 1981 counterpart to receive it in a
quantitative field. Thus, the data show small, but positive, shifts of women
toward quantitative fields (see Tables F-9 and F-10~.
Women in 1988 earned substantially greater numbers and shares of
engineering degrees, doubling or tripling their 1978 shares at all degree
levels (see Table F-ll), though again, even by 1988, the number of engineering
degrees earned by women was still relatively small at all degree levels.
Still, contrary to the downward B.S. and M.S. degree trends in nuclear
engineering for men during the decade, women showed a small increase by 1988
in absolute numbers and in the fraction of nuclear engineering degrees they
earned at the B.S. and M.S. levels.
Degree Trends by Race and Ethnicity
Relative to 1977, total degrees earned by White non-Hispanics and Black non
Hispanics in 1987 decreased at all degree levels, except for a minor increase
OCR for page 62
62
for Whites at the B.A./B.S. level. All other groups--Hispanics, American
Indians, and Asians--show increases at all degree levels (see Table F-12~.1
A different result emerges from the data for quantitative degrees granted
between 1977 and 1987 by race, ethnicity, and degree level. Relative to 1977,
1987 shows increases for all subgroups in quantitative degrees earned at the
B.S. and M.S. levels (see Table F-13~. The size of the college-age population
is increasing for Blacks, Hispanics, and Asians relative to Whites. The Ph.D.
level shows a mixed picture: losses for White non-Hispanics and Black non-
Hispanics and gains for Hispanics and Asians. The absolute numbers are so
small for American Indians that trends for this group are insignificant. The
decrease for Whites and the increase for Hispanics and Asians seem relatively
robust, but this is uncertain and it is difficult to separate the roles of
changes in population bases and in degree production rates in these results.
Between 1978 and 1988 all subgroups also increased in the number of
engineering degrees awarded at all levels (though American Indians showed no
change at the Ph.D. level). Except for the White subgroup, the numbers are
small, especially at the Ph.D. level, but trends in the number of engineering
degrees are uniformly positive (Table 5-49.
The story is different for nuclear engineering. Except for Whites, who
show significant losses in nuclear engineering degrees between 1978 and 1988
at all degree levels, the numbers are so small for all other subgroups as to
render interpretation meaningless. The data do show that members of non-
White subgroups are not rushing to fill nuclear engineering educational
programs (Table F-14~.
l To interpret these data, the total degree production rate for each
subgroup is needed. For example, has the B.A./B.S. degree attainment rate per
1,000 American Indian college-age youth increased in this decade? Since the
Hispanic and Asian subgroups have experienced substantial in-migration during
this decade and U.S. decennial census data are almost 10 years old, we have no
accurate measure of the size of Hispanic and Asian college-age cohorts. However,
White cohorts are declining in size, American Indian cohorts are relatively
stable, and the cohorts of all other subgroups are increasing, especially the
Hispanic and Asian. The White degree decline can be partly attributed to this
group's declining numbers, but the Black decline indicates a declining degree
production rate. The American Indian degree increases--although the absolute
numbers are small--could be attributable to an increased degree production rate.
The Hispanic and Asian degree increases should be at least partly attributable
to increases in the college-age population base; however, data gaps make it
difficult to separate the contributions of increases in degree production rates
and increased cohort sizes to increases in total degrees.
OCR for page 63
63
TABLE 5-4 Engineering Degrees Granted by Degree Level and Race and Ethnicity,
1978 and 1988a
Subgroup
B.S. M.S.
Percent Percent
1978 1988 Change 1978 1988 Change 1978
.
White, Non
Hispanics
Black, Non
Hispanics
Hispanics
American
Indians
Asians
39,79955,193 38.7
8942,211 147.3
1,0722,441 127.7
37187 405.4
1,1955,591 367.9
a Data exclude nonresident aliens.
11,77715,700 33.3 1,481
199364 82.9
239475 98.7
432 700.0
7841,767 125.4
SOURCES: Engineering Manpower Commission (1979-1989~.
Summary
Ph.D.
Percent
1988 Change
2,195 48.2
15
25
3
175
2993.3
3644.0
30
27557.1
Table 5-5 summarizes degree trends for different subgroups, including U.S.
residents, men, women, and different racial and ethnic groups. This table
tells a striking story. Trends in nuclear engineering degrees are negative
for most groups at all degree levels, especially if nonresident aliens are
excluded. Trends in total degrees are negative or only weakly positive.
However, the trends for quantitative degrees and for engineering degrees are
strongly positive for virtually all groups at all degree levels. Even if only
U.S. resident degrees are considered, the growth in quantitative and
engineering degrees between 1977 and 1987 far outstrips any loss in nuclear
engineering degrees during this period.
Nevertheless, if positive trends in the number of quantitative and
engineering degrees continue, it cannot be assumed that future shortfalls in
nuclear engineering can be--or should be--met by recruiting students from
other quantitative fields. Even relative to the demand for quantitative
degrees, the increase in the number of quantitative degrees awarded may
constitute a shortfall. In this case, shifting students from other
quantitative fields to nuclear engineering amounts to robbing Peter to pay
Paul. It is also not known if special incentives will be needed to attract
students to nuclear engineering, or whether standard incentives, such as
market wage increases, will suffice.
OCR for page 64
64
TABLE 5-5 Summary of Degree Trends for Subgroups, 1977-1978 compared to
1987-1988
Nuclear
Quantitative Engineering Engineering
Total Degrees Degrees Degrees Degrees
Subgroup B.S. M.S. Ph.D. B.S. M.S. Ph.D. B.S. M.S. Ph.D. B.S. M.S. Ph.D.
Total + - -~ + + + + + +
U.S.
Residents + - - + + ~~ + + + - - -
Non-Res.
Aliens + + + + + + + + + +
Men - - + + + + + + - - - ~
Women + ~~ + + + + + + + + + ~
Whites + - - + + - + + + - - -
Blacks - - - + + - + + + I
Hispanics + + + + + + + + +
Amer.
Indians + + + + + - + +
Asians + + + + + + + + +
+ = positive trend
- = negative trend
-~ = stable trend
Numbers too
small to be
meaningful
TRENDS IN SCHOLASTIC APTITUDE TEST SCORES
Trends in earned quantitative and engineering degrees are one way to define a
potential pool of nuclear engineers. A much broader definition is to determine
the share of college graduates who had the verbal and mathematical abilities at
college or graduate school entry to successfully complete a nuclear engineering
program. In the committee's survey of nuclear engineering degree programs,
respondents specified the minimum Scholastic Aptitude Test (SAT) mathematical and
verbal scores that they had found students needed to successfully complete the
OCR for page 65
65
nuclear engineering B.S. program. Although responses varied, their range of
variation was not large.
These scores can be used to define the proportion of the SAT test group
that could successfully complete a B.S. degree in nuclear engineering. This
proportion represents a potential pool. Note that the lowest SAT mathematics and
verbal scores that nuclear engineering departments listed are used, a score of 550
in mathematics and a verbal score of 450. The proportion of SAT test-takers who
have achieved both minimum scores cannot be identified, but data show the
following (see Tables F-15 and F-16~:
o The proportions of the SAT test group that met the verbal and
mathematics minimums were stable from 1983 to 1988, for male and female, and
for the various racial and ethnic groups.
o In 1988, about 30 percent met the minimum mathematics score, about 40
percent the minimum verbal score. For 1988, the "yield" was over 300,000
individuals who met the minimum quantitative requirement and almost half a
million individuals who met the minimum verbal requirement.
o The percent that met mathematical and verbal minimums varied by
gender, especially the mathematics minimum. In 1988 only about 23 percent of
the female, but 37 percent of the male, SAT group met the mathematical
minimum. Forty percent of the women and 45 percent of the men met the verbal
~ e
mlulmum .
O The proportion that met mathematical and verbal minimums varied
substantially by race and ethnicity. In 1988, 32 percent of the non-Hispanic
whites met the mathematical minimum and 48 percent the verbal minimum. Asian
Americans roughly reversed the white pattern: 45 percent met the mathematical
minimum and 38 percent the verbal minimum. Non-Hispanic Blacks had the
weakest performance: in 1988 only 8 percent met the mathematics minimum and 17
percent the verbal minimum. Puerto Rican SAT test-takers did only slightly
better than Blacks; other non-Asian minorities performed somewhat better than
Puerto Ricans, but not strongly.
Survey respondents often did not identify Graduate Record Examination
(ORE) score minimums for expected nuclear engineering graduate program
success. However, for whatever these data are worth, the average GRE verbal
and mathematics scores of engineering B.S. graduates taking the GRE might
indicate likely success in completing a master's degree or doctorate in
nuclear engineering.
In 1986-1987 the average mathematics score of all engineering B.S.-
degreed GRE test-takers was 680, their average verbal score, 518. Using a
cutoff score of 500 for the minimum verbal score and 650 for the minimum
quantitative score, of all 1986-1987 GRE test-takers, slightly more than one-
fifth met the quantitative criterion and more than half met the verbal
criterion. Again, there is substantial variation in test scores by race and
ethnicity, for example, 42 percent of Asian, 23 percent of White, and 4
OCR for page 66
66
percent of Black GRE test-takers met the quantitative score criterion (See
Table F-17~.
PROJECTIONS OF THE SIZE, RACIAL AND ETHNIC COMPOSITION, AND HIGHER
EDUCATION COMPLETION RATES OF YOUTH COHORTS
The size of the college-age cohort (14 to 34 years of age) will shrink in the
next two decades, and its composition will become less White and more Black,
Hispanic, and Asian. A major question about these demographic trends is their
implication for college and graduate degree completion.
The total U.S. population is projected to steadily increase in absolute
size between 1990 and 2010, but the 14- to 34-year-old age group is expected
to decline in absolute size over this period. In 1980 those 14 to 34 years
old were 37 percent of the total U.S. population; for 2010 this figure is
projected to drop to 28 percent. Although the size of the college-age group
is expected to begin to increase between 2000 and 2010, it will still be below
the 1990 level in 2010 (see Table F-18 and Figure F-1~.
These smaller college-age cohorts are also projected to change in racial
and ethnic composition: (1) declining ire White college-age cohorts from about
three of every four 14 to 34 years old in 1980, to about two of three in 2010;
(2) increasing in Black college-age cohorts from about one of eight in 1980,
to about one of six in 2010; (3) increasing in Hispanic college-age cohorts
from about one of fourteen in 1980, to about one of eight in 2010; and (4)
increasing slightly in other races, including Asians, between 1980 and 2010
(see Table F-19~.
Changes in cohort sizes and racial and ethnic composition matter only to
the extent that they affect cohort degree production rates and field choices.
A study that projects the number of B.A. and M.A./Ph.D. degrees for 1995 and
2005 indicates virtually no change between 1984, 1995, and 2005 in either B.A.
or M.A./Ph.D. production rates. For example, in 1984 the 18- to 34-year old
cohort had a B.A. production rate of 12.1 percent; for 1995 and 2005 this age
group is projected to have B.A. production rates of 12.1 and 11.3 percent
respectively. Thus, changes in cohort size, not in racial and ethnic com-
position, are projected to have the greatest effect. Since the 2005 college-
age cohort is projected to be only 90 percent the size of the 1984 cohort,
even at a constant rate of degree production, this future cohort will achieve
smaller numbers of degrees (see Tables F-18 to F-20~.
These data indicate the effects of changes in racial and ethnic
composition on quantitative-degree production rates. If While quantitative-
degree production rates are used as the baseline for estimating the
quantitative field effects of population shifts toward minorities, the higher
Asian production rates more than compensate for the lower rates of Blacks and
American Indians at all degree levels. For example, the 14.1-percent
OCR for page 67
67
production rate of quantitative bachelor's degrees for Whites can be used to
assess the effect of lower rates for Blacks and American Indians. The 31.3-
percent rate for Asians creates 5,610 more B.S. quantitative degrees than
would be expected from the White rate, a number that more than compensates for
the lower Black and American Indian rates, relative to the number of degrees
that would have been expected using the White rate, which would yield 1,103
B.S. quantitative degrees.
The 1987 numbers suggest that population shifts away from Whites and
toward minorities may have few effects--may in fact have numerically positive
effects--on the production of quantitative degrees.
BALANCE BETWEEN SUPPLY AND DEMAND
There are a number of considerations and uncertainties in making supply and
demand projections for nuclear engineering:
1. Market forces tend to correct for supply shortages if market signals
are clear and consistent (e.g., increasing wages for nuclear engineers and an
increasingly positive view in the United States of nuclear energy as an energy
supply option). Corrections do take time, not a great amount in the case of
the B.S. degree, because undergraduates can readily shift majors, but longer
for the production of M.S. and Ph.D. nuclear engineers. Market forces alone
can probably attract additional students up to the capacity of the educational
institutions. However, market forces cannot, in the near term, expand
institutional capacity. As this capacity declines, the ability of market
forces to compensate also declines.
2. Over the next 20 years, the total demand for quantitative degrees,
especially in engineering, may be high, and there may be significant shortages
of scientists and engineers. If predicted shortages develop in other
engineering fields, the market forces needed to enhance nuclear engineering
enrollments will have to be greater.
3. Standard ways to meet shortages, for example, by using foreign
engineers or retraining engineers from other fields abroad have limited
utility for nuclear engineering. The requirement for security clearances in
many nuclear engineering jobs reduces the ability of employers to draw an
increasingly international supply of professional labor. Additionally, the
reemergence of nuclear power as a U.S. energy supply option may require a
higher percentage of uniquely trained and fully accredited degreed nuclear
engineers. Also, the countries from which these nuclear engineers might come
could have their own increasing demand for this engineering pool.
4. Because of the need for security clearances and citizenship for many
both government and industry, concerns about the supply
are greater because of the decline in percent and numbers
nuclear engineers in
of nuclear engineers
OCR for page 68
68
of M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in the field being awarded to U.S. citizens. The
large portion of the graduate student population that does not contain U.S.
citizens has the potential of meeting future U.S. demand for nuclear
engineering graduates by contributing to the supply of potential employees for
non-sensitive jobs in the utility industry and in the nuclear equipment
manufacturing sector. To the extent that these graduates can fill some of
these positions, and are permanent residents or have a "green card," future
demand in sensitive areas will have a better chance of being met by recruiting
from the available U.S. citizen graduate pool. There are relatively few non-
U.S. citizen graduates in nuclear engineering from foreign institutions that
enter the U.S. work force without taking at least one degree from a U.S.
institution. Thus, the potential for non-U.S. citizen degree holders is
largely for the student who receives nuclear engineering training from U.S.
institutions.
5. The projected decline and changes in composition of the college-age
population could limit the number of degrees awarded in quantitative fields,
leading to intense competition for qualified students. However, the trends in
quantitative degrees are positive for all segments, and there is evidence that
greater numbers of women and minorities are achieving these degrees. However,
it is uncertain whether these shifts will continue, at what rate, and whether
they will be enough to satisfy demand.
A number of major employers informed the committee that they were
encountering no difficulty in recruiting nuclear engineers with the possible
exception of Ph.D.s. The committee compared starting salaries for nuclear
engineers with those for engineers from other disciplines and found them to be
generally comparable (Table 5-6~.
Although the supply and demand of nuclear engineers is in balance as of
1989, projections indicate a shortfall in supply under all scenarios (see
Chapter 3) unless significant changes are made. Figure 5-1 shows actual and
projected graduates available for employment and demand, and estimates of
additional students that could be educated each year without additional
faculty or facilities. This analysis assumes no further decline in the supply
of new graduates. While the 1988 and 1989 enrollment and degree data seem to
support the view that the decline has largely stopped, it is still too early
to tell. While several schools report increases and more healthy programs,
several other schools are still discussing phasing out their programs. These
simple projections show that for the best-estimate demand scenario, demand
will exceed supply before 1995, even if the decline in capacity slows. If
annual demand stays at about 400 new labor market entrants, shortages will
almost certainly develop before the end of the century. If it is assumed that
OCR for page 69
69
U.
o
. -
_'
Q)
s~
.,]
: -
.m
U7
u
C~
b~
.,'
a,
a'
..-
bC
L~
3
z
5-
o
U.
. -
U]
. -
U
u
U)
.,l
:^
1
U~
L~
:::
L~
z
=:
Z
O O O O O
J
ax c~ u~
~ _ _ _ _
~o ~ c~ ~ r~
C~ C~ ~ ~ ~
O O O O O
u~ ~1 C~ ~ O
U~, - ~
_ _ _ _ .
~D O ~ ~ oO
C~ ~ ~ ~ ~
O O O O O
~) oo ~ o U~
oo
_ _ _ _ _
0 c~ ~ ~ r~
~J ~ ;t J ~
O O O O O
O
U~ ~ U~
_____
C~ kD ~ a~ oo
O O O O O O ~ O O O O
C~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ C~ C~ ~ ~ ~
o~ ~ ~ U~ oo ~ o C~ oo C~ oo
___________
u~ ~ ~ u~ r~ oo ~ ~ C~ ~
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
O O O O O O O O
O ~ ~ CX:) U~
~J ~ oo
________
~ ~ ~o ~ oo O ~ C~
C~ C~ C~ C~ C~ ~ ~ ~
O O O O C~ O O O
r- J
r~ a~ ~ ~ u~ 0
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
0 c~ ~ ~ a~ ~ c~
C~ C~ C~ C~ C~ ~ ~ ~
O O O O O O O O O
0 0 0 cn In o:) c~
u~ r~ u~ a~ oo c~ ;t oO O
_________
O C~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ C~
C~ C~ C~ C~ C~ ~ ~ ~ ~
O O O O O O O O O O O
c~ r- r- 0 ~ ·~ co 0 ~ ~ c~
~ ~ ~ ~ c~ ~ ~ O
___________
CS, ~ ;t ~ ~ C~ O
C~ C~ C~ C~ C~ C~
O O O O O O O O O O
~i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~J ~ U~
O ~ ~ ~ C~ ~ O
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ oo ~ C~ ~ C~
C~ C~ C~ ~ C~ C~ C~ C~
O O O O O O O O O O O
J ~ =) r~ o O r~ ~
c~ c~ u~ r- tn U~ J ~ ~ ~ ~o
___________
co 0 c~ J u~ cO =) ~ O
~ C~ C~ C~ C~ C~ C~ C~ ~ C~
O O O O O O O O O O O
J
;t ~ ~ ~ ~ C~ ~ oo ~ ~ U~
___________
0 c~ ~ u~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a~ 0
~ C~ C~ C~ C~ C~ C~ C~ C~ C~
O O O O O O O O O O O
~ C~ ~ C~ O O
oo O ~ ~ a~ ~ ~ r~ u~ r~
___________
O c~ J ~ ~ cO a:
c~ c~ c~ c~ c~ c~ c~ c~ c~ ~
0 ~ c~ ~ J u~ ~ r~ co ax
oo oo oo oo ~ oo oo ;x~ oo oo
a ~ a~
u,
. -
bC
-
X
C:
O O
u~ ~
_ _
~ ~D
. _
v,
a)
. -
bC
a
O O O
O O
_ c~
c~ ~
u
O O ~
O ~D a'
O C~
_ _ _
J u~
c~
._
u,
5-
~u
c~
.,1
£
m- ._1
~O
S~
'- ~d
a'
.,4
~0
c:
O
o
~^
b0
. - I
a'
. -
o
O
_!
c
Vl . - 1
o
o
u
~0
a
o
C:
c/:
OCR for page 70
70
1400 _
1 200 ~ 5
1 000 _
800 C} Jobs
i
IVY
600
400
200
Grads ~ \ jet/ - ,~
-~
r ~7~
~History
O
l
1981 1985 1989 1995
YEAR
~0
Best Estimate /
~':/~/~/~
Range of Decline
in Capacity
1
2000 2005 2010
FIGURE 5-1 Supply and demand projections for new graduate nuclear engineers
in the U.S. civilian labor force (see Table 5-7 for background).
20 percent of the jobs can be filled by graduates with degrees in physics or
other fields of engineering, shortages might not develop until the year 2000
but they will eventually develop unless changes occur.
FINDINGS
Committee findings regarding the future supply of nuclear engineers include
the following:
o Current U.S. replacement needs for those with B.S., M.S., and
doctorate degrees in nuclear engineering are about 400 new labor market
entrants annually. This demand roughly balances the current output of the
educational system.
O Although the number of degrees awarded in quantitative fields between
1978 and 1988 increased at all degree levels, the number awarded annually in
OCR for page 71
71
TABLE 5-7 Calculations on which Employment Data in Figure 5-1 are Based
Three-Year Annual Rate Estimated Job
Reported Survey Moving (growth + re- Openings for
Year Employment Average placement = sum} New Graduates
1977 7,450 n.a.
1981 8,080 8,480 800
1983
9,920 9,443
1985 10,330 10,630
1987 11,640 11,203
1989 11,640a 11,640
1990
a Estimated.
496 + 314 = 810
287 + 382 = 669
11,640a 11,640
0 + 407 = 407
675
425
nuclear engineering decreased at the B.S. and M.S. levels and remained
relatively stable at the Ph.D. level. For U.S. residents, nuclear engineering
degrees decreased at all levels. If current demand trends continue, a
shortfall in supply will occur and grow with time.
o The potential for increased demand is greater than the potential for
increased supply, owing primarily to decreasing student populations.
Significant shortages in nuclear engineers may be observed as early as the
mid-1990s.
o Between 1977 and 1987, the absolute numbers and shares of total
engineering and nuclear engineering degrees earned by women increased. The
data also show small but positive structural shifts in women's field choices
towards quantitative fields.
0 Between 1977 and 1987 quantitative degrees earned by minorities
increased and there are also shifts in their field choices toward quantitative
fields. These trends present an opportunity to attract more minority
candidates to nuclear engineering. The fact that an increasing proportion of
the college-age cohort will consist of minorities makes such a strategy almost
a necessity.
o Between 1977 and 1987 trends for quantitative degrees and for
engineering degrees are strongly positive for virtually all groups at all
degree levels. For U.S. residents, this growth outstrips any loss in nuclear
engineering degrees. However, it cannot be assumed that any increased demand
OCR for page 72
72
for nuclear engineers will be met by attracting students from these other
quantitative fields, because the demand from many other quarters for these
quantitative degrees is also expected to rise.
o Simple projections show that for the best-estimate demand scenario,
demand will exceed supply before 1995, even if the decline in capacity slows
If annual demand for nuclear engineers stays at about 400, new labor market
entrants shortages will almost certainly develop before the year 2000.
Representative terms from entire chapter:
quantitative degrees