National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: 8 Findings and Conclusions
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 1991. Pay for Performance: Evaluating Performance Appraisal and Merit Pay. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1751.
×

References

Abowd, J. 1990 Does performance based management compensation affect corporate performance? Industrial and Labor Relations Review 43(3):52-73.

Adams, J. 1965 Inequity in social exchange. Pp. 272-283 in L. Berkowitz, ed., Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. New York: Academic Press.

Advisory Committee on Federal Pay 1990 Advisory Committee on Federal Pay: 19th Annual Report to the President of the United States. Washington, D.C.: Advisory Committee on Federal Pay.

Allan, P., and Rosenberg, S. 1986 An assessment of merit pay administration under New York City's managerial performance evaluation system: three years of experience. Public Personnel Management 15:297-309.

Allison, G. 1983 Public and private management: are they fundamentally alike in all unimportant ways? In J. Perry and K. Kraemer, eds., Public Management: Public and Private Perspectives. Palo Alto, Calif.: Mayfield.

American Compensation Association 1987 Report on the 1987 Survey of Salary Management Practices. Scottsdale, Ariz.: American Compensation Association.

American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, and National Council on Measurement in Education 1985 Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 1991. Pay for Performance: Evaluating Performance Appraisal and Merit Pay. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1751.
×

Angoff, W. 1988 Validity: an evolving concept. Pp. 19-32 in H. Wainer and H. Braun, eds., Test Validity. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.

Argyris, C. 1964 Integrating the Individual and the Organization. New York: Wiley.

Babchuk, N., and Goode, W. 1951 Work incentives in a self-determined work group. American Social Review 16:679-687.

Balkin, D., and Gomez-Mejia, L. 1984 Determinants of R and D compensation strategies in the high tech industry. Personnel Psychology 37(4):635-650.

1987a An integrated framework for the compensation system. Pp. 1-6 in D. Balkin and L. Gomez-Mejia, eds., New Perspectives on Compensation . Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.

1987b Toward a contingent theory of compensation strategy. Strategic Management Journal 8:169-182.

1990 Matching compensation and organizational strategies. Strategic Management Journal 11:153-169.

Banks, C., and Murphy, K. 1985 Toward narrowing the research-practice gap in performance appraisal. Personnel Psychology 38:335-345.

Bann, C., and Johnson, J. 1984 Federal employee attitudes toward reform: performance evaluation and merit pay. P. 79 in P. Ingraham and C. Ban, eds., Legislating Bureaucratic Change: The Civil Service Reform Act of 1978. Albany: N.Y.: SUNY Press.

Baron, J., Dobbin, F., and Jennings, P. 1986 War and peace: the evolution of modern personnel administration in U.S. industry. American Journal of Sociology 92:350-383.

Bartlett, C., and Ghoshal, S. 1988 Organizing for worldwide effectiveness: the transnational solution. California Management Review Fall:54-74.

Beer, M., Eisenstat, R., and Spector, B. 1990 The Critical Path: Mobilizing Human Resources for Corporate Renewal. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard Business School Press.

Beer, M., Spector, B., Lawrence, P., Mills, D., and Walton, R. 1985 Human Resource Management: A General Manager's Perspective. New York: The Free Press.

Berg, N. 1965 Strategic planning in conglomerate companies. Harvard Business Review May/June:79-92.

Berkshire, J., and Highland, R. 1953 Forced-choice performance rating—a methodological study. Personnel Psychology 6:355-378.

Bernardin, H. 1977 Behavior expectation scales versus summated scales: a fairer comparison. Journal of Applied Psychology 62:422-427.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 1991. Pay for Performance: Evaluating Performance Appraisal and Merit Pay. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1751.
×

Bernardin, H., and Beatty, R. 1984 Performance Appraisal: Assessing Performance at Work. Boston: Kent Press.

Bernardin, H., and Buckley, M. 1981 Strategies in rater training. Academy of Management Review 6:205-212.

Bernardin, H., Morgan, B., and Winne, P. 1980 The design of a personnel evaluation system for police officers. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology 10:1-280.

Bialek, H., Zapf, D., and McGuire, W. 1977 Personnel Turbulence and Time Utilization in an Infantry Division . Report #FR-WD-CA 77-11. Alexandria, Va.: Human Resources Research Organization.

Bjerke, D., Cleveland, J., Morrison, R., and Wilson, W. 1987 Officer Fitness Report Evaluation Study. Navy Personnel Research and Development Center Report, TR 88-4.

Blanz, F., and Ghiselli, E. 1972 The mixed standard scale: a new rating system. Personnel Psychology 25:185-199.

Blau, P. 1955 The Dynamics of Bureaucracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Blinder, A., ed. 1990 Paying for Productivity. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.

Borman, W. 1978 Exploring upper limits of reliability and validity in job performance ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology 63(2):135-144.

1983 Implications of personality theory and research for the rating of work performance in organizations. Pp. 127-172 in F. Landy, S. Zedeck, and J. Cleveland, eds., Performance Measurement and Theory . Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.

1987 Personal constructs, performance schemata, and ''folk theories" of subordinate effectiveness: explorations in an Army officer sample. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 40:307-322.

Borreson, H. 1967 The effects of instructions and item content on three types of ratings. Educational and Psychological Measurement 27:855-862.

Brett, J. 1986 Commentary on procedural justice papers. Pp. 81-90 in R. Lewicki, B. Sheppard, and M. Bazerman, eds., Research on Negotiation in Organizations . Greenwich, Conn.: JAI Press.

Bretz, R., and Milkovich, G. 1989 Performance Appraisal in Large Organizations: Practice and Research Implications. Working paper #89-17. Center for Advanced Human Resource Studies, Cornell University, Ithaca, N.Y.

Brown, C. 1990 Firms' choice of pay method. Industrial and Labor Relations Review 43(3):165-182.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 1991. Pay for Performance: Evaluating Performance Appraisal and Merit Pay. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1751.
×

Buchanan, B., II 1975 Red tape and the service ethic: some unexpected differences between public and private managers. Administration and Society 6:423-438.

Bullock, R., and Lawler, E.E., III 1984 Gainsharing: a few questions and fewer answers. Human Resource Management 23:23-40.

Bureau of National Affairs 1974 Management performance appraisal programs. Personnel Policies Forum Survey No. 104. Washington, D.C.: Bureau of National Affairs.

1981 Wage and salary administration. Personnel Policies Forum Survey No. 131. Washington, D.C.: Bureau of National Affairs.

1984 Productivity Improvement Programs. Personnel Policies Forum Survey No. 138. Washington, D.C.: Bureau of National Affairs.

Burnett, F. 1925 An experimental investigation into repetitive work. Industrial Fatigue Research Board Report No. 30. London: H.M. Stationery Office.

Burns, T., and Stalker, G. 1961 The Management of Innovation. London: Tavistock.

Campbell, A. 1988 Statement Before the U.S. Senate Subcommittee on Government Affairs. U.S. General Accounting Office, Hearings on Design of the Civil Service Reform Act of 1978.

Campbell, D., and Fiske, D. 1959 Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix . Psychological Bulletin 56:81-105.

Campbell, J., and Pritchard, R. 1976 Motivation theory in industrial and organizational psychology. Pp. 63-130 in M. Dunnette, ed., Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology. Chicago: Rand McNally.

Campbell, J., Dunnette, M., Lawler, E., III, and Weick, K., Jr. 1970 Managerial Behavior, Performance, and Effectiveness. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Campbell, J., Dunnette, M., Arvey, R., and Hellervik, L. 1973 The development and evaluation of behaviorally based rating scales. Journal of Applied Psychology 57:15-22.

Campbell, J., McHenry, J., and Wise, L. 1990 Modeling job performance in a population of jobs. Personnel Psychology 43:313-333.

Carroll, S. 1987 Business strategies and compensation systems. Pp. 343-355 in D. Balkin and L. Gomez, eds., New Perspectives on Compensation. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.

Carson, K., Sutton, C., and Corner, P. 1990 Gender Effects in Performance Appraisal: A Meta Analysis. Unpublished manuscript, Arizona State University.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 1991. Pay for Performance: Evaluating Performance Appraisal and Merit Pay. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1751.
×

Cascio, W. 1987 Costing Human Resources: The Financial Impact of Behavior in Organizations. Boston: Kent.

Chandler, A. 1962 Strategy and Structure: Chapters in the History of American Industrial Enterprise. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

Christal, R. 1974 The United States Air Force Occupational Research Project (AFHRL-TR-73-75). Brooks Air Force Base, Tex.: Air Force Human Resources Laboratory.

Clark, C., and Primoff, E. 1979 Job elements and performance appraisal. Management: A Magazine for Government Managers 1:3-5.

Cleveland, J., Murphy, K., and Williams, R. 1989 Multiple uses of performance appraisal: Prevalence and correlates. Journal of Applied Psychology 74(1):130-135.

Cohen, R., and Greenberg, J. 1982 The justice concept in social psychology. Pp. 1-41 in J. Greenberg and R. Cohen, eds., Equity and Justice in Social Behavior. New York: Academic Press.

Conference Board 1977 Appraising managerial performance: current practices and future directions. Conference Board Report No. 723. New York: Conference Board.

1984 Pay and performance: the interaction of compensation and performance appraisal. Conference Research Bulletin No. 155. New York: Conference Board.

1990 Variable pay: new performance rewards. Conference Board Research Bulletin No. 246. New York: Conference Board.

Cook, F. 1981 When long-term incentives are not long-term incentives. Proceedings of the American Compensation Association's Regional Conferences. Scottsdale, Ariz.: American Compensation Association.

Cooper, W. 1981 Ubiquitous halo. Psychological Bulletin 90:218-244.

Cornelius, E., Hakel, M., and Sackett, P. 1979 A methodological approach to job classification for performance appraisal purposes. Personnel Psychology 32:283-297.

Cronbach, L. 1990 Essentials of Psychological Testing. New York: Harper and Row.

Deci, E. 1975 Intrinsic Motivation. New York: Plenum.

DeCotiis, T. A. 1977 An analysis of the external validity and applied relevance of three rating formats. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 19:247-267.

Deming, E. 1986 Out of the Crisis. Cambridge, Mass.: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Center for Advanced Engineering.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 1991. Pay for Performance: Evaluating Performance Appraisal and Merit Pay. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1751.
×

DeNisi, A., Cafferty, T., and Meglino, B. 1984 A cognitive model of the performance appraisal process: a model and research propositions. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 21(3):358-367.

Dipboye, R., and de Pontbriand, R. 1981 Correlates of employee reactions to performance appraisals and appraisal systems. Journal of Applied Psychology 66:248-251.

DiPrete, T. 1989 The Bureaucratic Labor Market: The Case of the Federal Civil Service. New York: Plenum.

Doeringer, P., and Piore, M. 1971 Internal Labor Markets and Manpower Analysis. Lexington, Mass.: Lexington Books.

Dornbusch, S., and Scott, W. 1975 Evaluation and the Exercise of Authority. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Doz, Y., and Pralahad, C. 1981 Headquarters influence and strategic control in MNCs. Sloan Management Review Fall:15-29.

Dyer, L., and Schwab, D. 1982 Personnel/human resource management research. Pp. 87-120 in T. Kochan, D. Mitchell, and L. Dyer, eds., Industrial Relations Research in the 1970s: Review and Appraisal. Madison, Wis.: Industrial Relations Research Association.

Dyer, L., and Theriault, R. 1976 The determinants of pay satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology 61(5):596-604.

Dyer, L., Schwab, D., and Theriault, R. 1976 Managerial perceptions regarding salary increase criteria. Personnel Psychology 29:233-242.

Edell, J., and Staelin, R. 1983 The information processing of pictures in print advertisements. Journal of Consumer Research 10(June):45-61.

Ehrenberg, R., and Milkovich, G. 1987 Compensation and firm performance. Pp. 87-122 in M. Kleiner, R. Block, M. Roomkin, and S. Salsberg, eds., Human Resources and the Performance of the Firm. Madison, Wis.: Industrial Relations Research Association.

Ellig, B. 1982 Executive Compensation: A Total Pay Perspective. New York: McGraw-Hill.

England, P., and Dunn, D. 1988 Evaluating work and comparable worth. Annual Review of Sociology 14:227-248.

Evans, P. 1989 Organizational development in the transnational enterprise. Pp. 1-38 in R. Woodman and W. Passmore, eds., Organizational Change and Development. Greenwich, Conn.: JAI Press.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 1991. Pay for Performance: Evaluating Performance Appraisal and Merit Pay. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1751.
×

Fay, C., and Latham, G. 1982 Effects of training and rating scales on rating errors. Personnel Psychology 35:105-116.

Feild, H., and Holley, W. 1982 The relationship of performance appraisal system characteristics to verdicts in selected employment discrimination cases. Academy of Management Journal 25(2):392-406.

Feldman, J. 1981 Beyond attribution theory: cognitive processes in performance appraisal. Journal of Applied Psychology 66:127-148.

1986 Instrumentation and training for performance appraisal: a perceptual-cognitive viewpoint. In K. Rowland and G. Ferris, eds., Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management. Greenwich, Conn.: JAI Press.

Flanagan, J. 1954 The critical incident technique. Psychological Bulletin 51(4):327-358.

Flanders, L., and Utterback, D. 1985 The management excellence inventory: a tool for management development. Public Management Forum May-June:403-410.

Folger, R., and Konovsky, M. 1989 Effects of procedural and distributive justice on reactions to pay raise decisions. Academy of Management Journal 32(1):115-130.

Ford, J., Kraiger, K., and Schectman, S. 1986 Study of race effects in objective indices and subjective evaluations of performance: a meta-analysis of performance criteria. Psychological Bulletin 99:330-337.

Fossum, J., and Fitch, M. 1985 The effects of individual and contextual attributes on the size of recommended salary increases. Personnel Psychology 38:587-603.

Freeman, R., and Medoff, J. 1984 What Do Unions Do? New York: Basic Books.


Gaertner, K., and Gaertner, G. 1984 Performance evaluation and merit pay results in the Environmental Protection Agency and the Mine Safety and Health Administration. Pp. 87-112 in P. Ingraham and C. Ban, eds., Legislating Bureaucratic Change. Albany, N.Y.: SUNY Press.

Galbraith, J. 1977 Organization Design. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.

Galbraith, J., and Kazanjian, R. 1986 Organizing to implement strategies of diversity and globalization. Human Resource Management 25(1):37-54.

Gawthrop, L. 1984 Public Sector Management Systems and Ethics. Bloomington, Ind.: Indiana University Press.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 1991. Pay for Performance: Evaluating Performance Appraisal and Merit Pay. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1751.
×

Gerber, A. 1988 Historical background: classification and compensation in the Federal Service. Unpublished staff paper, U.S. Office of Personnel Management.

Gerhart, B., and Milkovich, G. 1990 Organizational differences in managerial compensation and financial performance. Academy of Management Journal.

Gomez-Mejia, L., Page, R., and Tornow, W. 1982 A comparison of the practical utility of traditional, statistical, and hybrid job evaluation approaches. Academy of Management Journal 25(4): 790-809.

Graham-Moore, B., and Ross, T. 1983 Productivity Gainsharing: How Employer Incentive Programs Can Improve Business Performance. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.

Green, B., Wigdor, A., and Shavelson, R., eds. 1991 Measuring Performance in the Workplace. Committee on Performance of Military Personnel, Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, National Research Council. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.

Greenberg, J. 1986a Determinants of perceived fairness of performance evaluations. Journal of Applied Psychology 71:340-342.

1986b Organizational performance appraisal procedures: what makes them fair? Pp. 25-41 in R. Lewicki, B. Sheppard, and M. Bazerman, eds., Research on Negotiation in Organizations. Greenwich, Conn.: JAI Press.

1987 A taxonomy of organizational justice theories. The Academy of Management Review 12(1):9-22.

1990 Organizational justice: yesterday, today, and tomorrow. Journal of Management 16(2):399-432.

Greenberg, J., and Levanthal, G. 1976 Equity and the use of overreward to motivate performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 34:179-190.

Greene, C. 1978 Causal connections among managers' merit pay, job satisfaction, and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology 58:95-100.

Greller, M., and Herold, D. 1975 Sources of feedback. A preliminary investigation. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 13:144-256.

Guion, R. 1983 Comments on Hunter. Pp. 267-175 in F. Landy, S. Zedeck, and J. Cleveland, eds., Performance Measurement and Theory. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.

Guzzo, R., and Bondy, J. 1983 A Guide to Worker Productivity Experiments in the United States . Elmsford, N.Y.: Pergamon Press.

Guzzo, R., Jette, R., and Katzell, R. 1985 The effects of psychologically-based intervention programs on worker productivity. Personnel Psychology 38:275-293.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 1991. Pay for Performance: Evaluating Performance Appraisal and Merit Pay. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1751.
×

Hackman, J., and Oldham, G. 1976 Motivation through the design of work. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 16:250-279.

1980 Work Redesign. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.

Hackman, R., Lawler, E., and Porter, L. 1977 Perspectives on Behavior in Organizations. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Halaby, C. 1986 Worker attachment and workplace authority. American Sociological Review 51:634-649.

Hammer, T. 1988 New developments in profit-sharing, gainsharing and employee ownership. In J. Campbell, ed., Individual and Group Productivity in Organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Hannan, M., and Freeman, J. 1984 Structural inertia and organizational change. American Sociological Review 49:149-164.

Harrigan, K. 1988 Joint ventures and competitive strategy. Strategic Management Journal 9:149-158.

Harris, M., and Schaubroeck, J. 1988 A meta-analysis of self-supervisor, self-peer, and peer-supervisor ratings. Personnel Psychology 41:43-62.

Hartigan, J., and Wigdor, A., eds. 1989 Fairness in Employment Testing: Validity Generalization, Minority Issues, and the General Aptitude Test Battery. Committee on the General Aptitude Test Battery, Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, National Research Council. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.

Havemann, J. 1990 Overhaul of federal pay urged. The Washington Post, March 22, 1990.

HayGroup, Inc. 1989 The Hay Report: Compensation and Benefits Strategies for 1990 and Beyond. Philadelphia: HayGroup, Inc.

Heclo, H. 1978 Issue networks and the executive establishment. Pp. 87-124 in A. King, ed., The New American Political System. Washington, D.C.: American Enterprise Institute.

Hemphill, J. K. 1959 Job descriptions for executives. Harvard Business Review 37:55-67.

Heneman, H., III 1985 Pay satisfaction. Pp. 113-115 in K. Rowland and G. Ferris, eds., Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management Volume 3. Greenwich, Conn.: JAI Press.

Heneman, R. 1984 Pay for Performance: Exploring the Merit-Pay System. New York: Work in America Institute.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 1991. Pay for Performance: Evaluating Performance Appraisal and Merit Pay. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1751.
×

1990 Merit pay research. Pp. 115-139 in K. Rowland and G. Ferris, eds., Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management Volume 8. Greenwich, Conn.: JAI Press.

Heron, A. 1956 The effects of real-life motivation on questionnaire response. Journal of Applied Psychology 40:65-68.

Hewitt Associates 1985 An Overview of Productivity Based Incentives. Lincolnshire, Ill.: Hewitt Associates.

1989 Compensation Trends and Practices. Lincolnshire, Ill: Hewitt Associates.

Hills, F., Scott, K., and Markham, S. 1988 Pay System Structure as a Moderator of Pay-Performance Relationship and Employee Pay Increase Satisfaction. Paper presented at the National Academy of Management Meetings, Anaheim, Calif.

Hills, F., Scott, K., Markham, S. and Vest, M. 1987 Merit pay: just or unjust desserts. Personnel Administrator 32(1):53-59.

Holzbach, R. 1978 Comparisons of self- and superior ratings of managerial performance. Journal of Applied Psychology 63:579-588.

Hundal, P. 1969 Knowledge of performance as an incentive in repetitive industrial work. Journal of Applied Psychology 53:224-226.

Hunter, J. 1983 A causal analysis of cognitive ability, job knowledge, job performance, and supervisor ratings. Pp. 257-266 in F. Landy, S. Zedeck, and J. Cleveland, eds., Performance Measurement and Theory. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.

Hunter, J., and Hunter, R. 1984 Validity and utility of alternate predictors of job performance. Psychological Bulletin 96:72-98.

Ilgen, D. 1990 Pay for performance: Motivational Issues. Working paper prepared for the Committee on Performance Appraisal for Merit Pay. National Research Council, Washington, D.C.

Ilgen, D., and Favero, J. 1985 Limits in generalization from psychological research to performance appraisal processes. Academy of Management Review 10:311-321.

Ilgen, D., and Feldman, J. 1983 Performance appraisal: a process focus. In L. Cummings and B. Straw, eds., Research in Organizational Behavior (Vol. 5). Greenwich, Conn.: JAI Press.

Ilgen, D., and Knowlton, W., Jr. 1981 Performance attributional effects on feedback from superiors. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 25:441-456.

Ilgen, D., Barnes-Farrell, J., and McKellin, D. 1989 Performance Rating Accuracy. Paper presented at the 21st International Congress of Applied Psychology, Jerusalem.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 1991. Pay for Performance: Evaluating Performance Appraisal and Merit Pay. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1751.
×

Ilgen, D., Fisher, C., and Taylor, S. 1979 Consequences of individual feedback on behavior in organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology 64:347-371.

Ingraham, P. 1987 Building bridges or burning them? The president, the appointees and the bureaucracy. Public Administration Review September/October:425-435.

1989 The design of civil service reform: lessons in politics and rationality. Policy Studies Journal Winter.

Ingraham, P., and Barrilleaux, C. 1983 Motivating managers for retrenchment. Public Administration Review 43: 393-402.

Ingraham, P., and Rosenbloom, D. 1990 The State of Merit in the Federal Government. An Occasional Paper of the National Commission on the Public Service, Washington, D.C.

Jacobs, R., Kafry, S., and Zedeck, S. 1980 Expectations of behaviorally anchored rating scales. Personnel Psychology 33:595-640.

Jaques, E. 1961 Equitable Payment. New York: Wiley.

Jenkins, J. 1946 Validity for what? Journal of Consulting Psychology 10:93-98.


Kahn, L., and Sherer, P. 1990 Contingent pay and managerial performance. Industrial and Labor Relations Review 43(3):107-120.

Kalleberg, A., and Lincoln, J. 1988 The structure of earning inequality in the United State and Japan. American Journal of Sociology 94(Supplement):S121-S153.

Kanfer, R. 1990 Motivational theory and industrial and organizational psychology. In M. Dunnette, ed., Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology . Palo Alto, Calif.: Consulting Psychologists Press.

Katz, R. 1974 Skills of an effective administrator. Harvard Business Review Sept.-Oct.:90-102.

Kaufman, H. 1954 The growth of the federal personnel system. P. 106 in the American Assembly, The Federal Government Service. New York: Columbia University.

1978 Reflections on administrative reorganization. Pp. 214-233 in F. Lane, ed., Current Issues in Public Administration. New York: St. Martin's Press.

Kavanagh, M., MacKinney, A., and Wolins, L. 1971 Issues in managerial performance: multitrait-multimethod analyses of ratings. Psychological Bulletin 75:34-49.

Kerr, J. 1985 Diversification strategies and managerial rewards: an empirical study. Academy of Management Journal 28(1):155-179.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 1991. Pay for Performance: Evaluating Performance Appraisal and Merit Pay. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1751.
×

Kiechel, W., III 1989 When subordinates evaluate the boss. Fortune 119(13):201.

Kingstrom, P., and Bass, A. 1981 A critical analysis of studies comparing behaviorally anchored rating scales (BARS) and other rating formats. Personnel Psychology 34:263-289.

Kopelman, R. 1976 Organizational control system responsiveness, expectancy theory constructs, and work motivation: some interrelations and causal connections. Personnel Psychology 29:205-220.

1986 Objective feedback. In E. Locke, ed., Generalizing From Laboratory to Field Settings. Lexington, Mass.: Lexington Books.

Kraiger, K., and Ford, J. 1985 A meta-analysis of ratee race effects in performance ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology 70(1):56-65.

Kraut, A., Pedigo, P., McKenna, D., and Dunnette, M. 1989 The role of the manager: what's really important in different management jobs. The Academy of Management Executive 3(4):286-293.

Krzystofiak, F., Newman, J., and Krefting, L. 1982 Pay meaning, satisfaction, and size of a meaningful pay increase. Psychological Reports 51:660-662.


Lamb, R., ed. 1984 Competitive Strategic Management. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.

Landy, F., and Farr, J. 1980 Performance rating. Psychological Bulletin 87(1):72-107.

1983 The Measurement of Work Performance. New York: Academic Press.

Landy, F., Barnes-Farrell, J., and Cleveland, J. 1980 Perceived fairness and accuracy of performance evaluation: a follow-up. Journal of Applied Psychology 65:355-356.

Landy, F., Barnes, J., and Murphy, K. 1978 Correlates of perceived fairness and accuracy of performance evaluation. Journal of Applied Psychology 63:751-754.

Landy, F., Farr, J., and Jacobs, R. 1982 Utility concepts in performance measurement. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 30:15-40.

Latham, G. 1988 Human Resource Training and Development. Annual Review of Psychology 39:545-582.

Latham, G., and Wexley, K. 1977 Behavioral observation scales. Personnel Psychology 30:255-268.

1981 Increasing Productivity Through Performance Appraisal. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.

Latham, G., Fay, C., and Saari, L. 1979 The development of behavioral observation scales for appraising the performance of foremen. Personnel Psychology 32:299-311.

Lawler, E., III 1971 Pay and Organizational Effectiveness: A Psychological View. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 1991. Pay for Performance: Evaluating Performance Appraisal and Merit Pay. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1751.
×

1973 Motivation in Work Organizations. Monterey, Calif.: Brooks/Cole.

1981 Pay and Organization Development. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.

Lay, C., and Jackson, D. 1969 Analysis of the generality of trait-inferential relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 12:12-21.

Levanthal, G., Karuza, J., and Fry, W. 1980 Beyond fairness: a theory of allocation preferences. Pp. 167-218 in G. Mikula, ed., Justice and Social Interaction. New York: Springer-Verlag.

Livernash, R. 1957 The internal wage structure. Pp. 143-172 in G. Taylor and F. Pierson, eds., New Concepts in Wage Determination. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Locke, E. 1968 Toward a theory of task motivation and incentives. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 3:157-189.

Locke, E., Cartledge, N., and Knerr, C. 1970 Studies of the relationship between satisfaction, goal setting, and performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 5:135-158.

Locke, E., Shaw, K., Saari, L., and Latham, G. 1981 Goal setting and task performance, 1969-1980. Psychological Bulletin 40:125-152.

Longenecker, C. 1989 Truth or consequences: politics and performance appraisals. Business Horizons November:1-7.

Longenecker, C., and Gioia, D. 1988 Neglected at the top: executives talk about executive appraisal. Sloan Management Review Winter:41-47.

Longenecker, C., Sims, H., and Gioia, D. 1987 Behind the mask: the politics of employee appraisal. Academy of Management Executive 1:183-193.

Mahoney, T. 1979 Compensation and Reward Perspectives. Homewood, Ill.: Richard D. Irwin.

March, J. 1981 Decisions in organizations and theories of choice. Pp. 205-244 in A. Van de Ven and W. Joyce, eds., Perspective on Organization Design and Behavior. New York: Wiley.

March, J., and March, J. 1978 Performance sampling in social matches. Administrative Science Quarterly 23:434-453.

March, J., and Simon, H. 1958 Organizations. New York: Wiley.

McCormick, E. 1976 Job and task analysis. In M. Dunnette, ed., Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology. Chicago: Rand McNally.

1979 Job Analysis: Methods and Applications. New York: Amacon.

McCormick, E., Jeanneret, P., and Mecham, R. 1972 A study of job characteristics and job dimensions as based on the position analysis questionnaire (PAQ). Journal of Applied Psychology 56:247-267.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 1991. Pay for Performance: Evaluating Performance Appraisal and Merit Pay. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1751.
×

McEvoy, G., and Cascio, W. 1988 Cumulative evidence of the relationship between employee age and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology 74:11-17.

McIntyre, R., Smith, D., and Hassett, C. 1984 Accuracy of performance ratings as affected by rater training and perceived purpose of rating. Journal of Applied Psychology 69:147-156.

Merit Systems Protection Board 1988 Toward Effective Performance Management in the Federal Government . Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

1989 Government Documents and Agency Reports: Personnel Management Simplification Efforts in the Federal Government. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

1990 Working for America: A Federal Employee Survey. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

Metzger, B. 1978 Profit-Sharing in 38 Large Companies. Evanston, Ill.: Profit-Sharing Research Foundation.

Meyer, H. 1980 Self-appraisal of job performance. Personnel Psychology 33:291-295.

Meyer, H., Kay, E., and French, J. 1965 Split roles in performance appraisal. Harvard Business Review 43:123-129.

Meyer, J., and Rowan, B. 1977 Institutional organizations: formal structures as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology 83:340-363.

Miceli, M., and Lane, M. 1990 Antecedents of pay satisfaction: a review and extension. In K. Rowland and G. Ferris, eds., Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management (Vol. 9). Greenwich, Conn.: JAI Press.

Miles, R., and Snow, C. 1978 Organizational Strategy, Structure, and Process. New York: McGraw-Hill.

1983 Designing strategic human resource systems. Organization Dynamics.

Milkovich, G. 1986 Gainsharing in managing and compensating human resources. Presented at Conference on Participation and Gainsharing Systems. Johnson Foundation Wingspread International Conference Center.

Milkovich, G., and Newman, J. 1990 Compensation. Boston: Richard Irwin.

Mintzberg, H. 1973 The Nature of Managerial Work. New York: Harper and Row.

1975 The manager's job: folklore and fact. Harvard Business Review July-August:49-61.

Mitchell, D. 1985 Shifting norms in wage determination. Brookings Papers on Economic Activities 2. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.

Mitchell, D., and Broderick, R. 1991 Flexible pay systems in the American context: history, policy, research, and

Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 1991. Pay for Performance: Evaluating Performance Appraisal and Merit Pay. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1751.
×

implications. In D. Lewin, D. Lipski, and D. Sockell, eds., Advances in Industrial and Labor Relations. Greenwich, Conn.: JAI Press.

Mitchell, D., Lewin, D., and Lawler, E.E. III 1990 Alternative pay systems, firm performance, and productivity. Pp. 15-94 in A. Blinder, ed., Paying for Productivity. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.

Mohrman, A., and Lawler, E. 1983 Motivation and performance appraisal behavior. In F. Landy, S. Zedeck, and J. Cleveland, eds., Performance Measurement and Theory . Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.

Mowday, R. 1987 Equity theory predictions of behavior in organization. Pp. 89-110 in R. Stears and L. Porter, eds., Motivation and Work Behavior (4th Edition). New York: McGraw-Hill.

Murphy, K. 1982 Difficulties in the statistical control of halo. Journal of Applied Psychology 67:161-164.

Murphy, K., and Cleveland, J. 1991 Performance Appraisal: An Organizational Perspective. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Murphy, K., and Constans, J. 1988 Psychological issues in scale format research: behavioral anchors as a source of bias rating. In R. Cardy, S. Peiffer, and J. Newman, eds., Advances in Information Processing in Organizations (Vol. 3) . Greenwich, Conn.: JAI Press.

Murphy, K., and Jako, B. 1989 Under what conditions are observed intercorrelations greater than or smaller than true intercorrelations. Journal of Applied Psychology 74:827-830.

Murphy, K., Balzer, W., Kellam, K., and Armstrong, J. 1984 Effects of the purpose of rating on accuracy in observing teacher behavior and evaluating teaching performance. Journal of Educational Psychology 76:45-54.

Murphy, K., Herr, B., Lockhart, M., and Maguire, E. 1986 Evaluating the performance of paper people. Journal of Applied Psychology 72:573-579.

Murphy, K., Martin, C., and Garcia, M. 1982 Do behavioral observation scales measure observation? Journal of Applied Psychology 67:562-167.

Napier, N., and Latham, G. 1986 Outcome expectancies of people who conduct performance appraisals. Personnel Psychology 39(4):827-837.

Nathan, B., and Alexander, R. 1988 A comparison of criteria for test validation: a meta-analytic investigation. Personnel Psychology 41:517-535.

Nathan, B., and Lord, R. 1983 Cognitive categorization and dimensional schemata: a process application

Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 1991. Pay for Performance: Evaluating Performance Appraisal and Merit Pay. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1751.
×

to the study of halo in performance ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology 68:102-114.

Nathan, R. 1983 The Administrative Presidency. New York: Wiley.

National Academy of Public Administration 1983 Revitalizing Federal Management: Managers and Their Overburdened Systems. Washington, D.C.: National Academy of Public Administration.

National Commission on the Public Service 1990 Leadership for America: Rebuilding the Public Service. Report of the National Commission on the Public Service. Lexington, Mass.: Lexington Books.

National Research Council 1990 Recruitment, Retention, and Utilization of Federal Scientists and Engineers. Office of Scientific and Engineering Personnel, National Research Council. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.

Newland, C. 1983 A mid-term appraisal of the Reagan presidency: limited government and public administration. Public Administration Review January/February:16-23.

Nigro, L. 1982 CSRA performance appraisals and merit pay: growing uncertainty in the federal workforce. Public Administration Review July/August:371-375.

Nunnally, J. 1967 Psychometric Theory, Second Edition. New York: McGraw-Hill.

O'Dell, C. 1981 Gainsharing, Involvement, Incentives, and Productivity. New York: American Management Association.

1987 People, Performance and Pay. Houston, Tex.: American Productivity Center.


Padgett, M. 1988 Performance Appraisal in Context: Motivational Influences on Performance Ratings. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Psychology, Michigan State University.

Pearce, J., and Perry, J. 1983 Federal merit pay: a longitudinal analysis. Public Administration Review 43:315-325.

Pearce, J., and Porter, L. 1986 Employee responses to formal performance appraisal feedback. Journal of Applied Psychology 71(2):211-218.

Pearce, J., Stevenson, W., and Perry, J. 1985 Managerial compensation based on organizational performance: a time series analysis of the effects of merit pay. Academy of Management Journal 28:261-278.

Perry, J., and Petrakis, B. 1987 Can Merit Pay Improve Performance in Government? Paper presented at the annual research conference of the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management, October, 1987.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 1991. Pay for Performance: Evaluating Performance Appraisal and Merit Pay. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1751.
×

Perry, J., and Porter, L. 1982 Factors affecting the context for motivation in public organizations. Academy of Management Review 7(1):89-98.

Perry, J., and Rainey, H. 1988 The public-private distinction in organization theory: a critique and research strategy. The Academy of Management Review 13(2):182-201.

Perry, J., and Wise, L. 1990 The motivational bases of public service. Public Administration Review 50:367-373.

Perry, J., Petrakis, B., and Miller, T. 1989 Federal merit pay, round II: an analysis of the performance management and recognition system. Public Administration Review January/February:29-37.

Personnel Psychology 1990 Special issue on the Army Selection and Classification Project (Project A). Vol. 43.

Pfeffer, J., and Baron, J. 1988 Taking the workers back out: recent trends in the structuring of employment. Pp. 257-303 in B. Staw and L. Cummings, eds., Research in Organizational Behavior, Volume 10. Greenwich, Conn.: JAI Press.

Pfiffner, J. 1988 Hitting the Ground Running: The Strategic Presidency. Chicago: Dorsey Press.

Pinder, C. 1984 Work Motivation. Glenview, Ill.: Scott Foresman.

Pitts, R. 1976 Diversification strategies and organizational policies of large, diversified firms. Journal of Economics and Business 8:181-188.

Porter, M. 1985 Competitive Advantage. New York: Free Press.

Pritchard, R., and Curts, M. 1973 The influence of goal setting and financial incentives on task performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 10:175-183.

Professional Managers Association 1989 Legislation introduced to reform PMRS. OMA Update August:1-5. Profit-Sharing Council of America

1984 Profit-Sharing: Philosophy, Practices, and Benefits to Society . Evanston, Ill.: Profit-Sharing Council.

Rainey, H. 1990 Public management: recent developments and current prospects. Pp. 157-184 in N. Lynn and A. Wildavsky, eds., Public Administration: The State of the Discipline. Chatham, N.J.: Chatham House.

Reilly, C., and Balzer, W. 1988 Effect of Purpose on Observation and Evaluation of Teaching Performance. Unpublished manuscript, Bowling Green University.

Roethlishberger, F., and Dickson, W. 1939 Management and the Worker. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 1991. Pay for Performance: Evaluating Performance Appraisal and Merit Pay. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1751.
×

Rosen, C. 1986 Employee Ownership in America. Lexington, Mass.: Lexington Books.

Rynes, S., and Barber, A. 1990 Applicant attraction strategies: an organizational perspective. The Academy of Management Review 15(2):286-310.

Salancik, G. 1977 Commitment is too easy! Organizational Dynamics 6(1):62-80.

Salschieder, J. 1981 Divising pay strategies for diversified companies. Compensation Review Second Quarter:15-24.

Salter, M. 1973 Tailor incentive compensation to strategy. Harvard Business Review 51:181-188.

Schendel, D., and Hofer, C., eds. 1979 Strategic Management: A New View of Business Policy and Planning . Boston: Little, Brown.

Schmidt, F., and Hunter, J. 1977 Development of a general solution to the problem of validity generalization. Journal of Applied Psychology 62:529-540.

Schmitt, N., Gooding, R., Noe, R., and Kirsch, M. 1984 Meta-analyses of validity studies published between 1964 and 1982 and the investigation of study characteristics. Personnel Psychology 37:407-422.

Scholtes, P. 1987 An Elaboration on Deming's Teachings on Performance Appraisal . Madison, Wis.: Joiner Associates.

Schuster, M. 1984a The Scanlon Plan: a longitudinal analysis. Industrial and Labor Relations Review 36:415-430.

1984b Union-Management Cooperation: Structure, Process, and Impact . Kalamazoo, Mich.: W. E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.

Schwab, D., and Olsen, C. 1990 Merit pay practices: implications for pay-performance relationships. Industrial and Labor Relations Review 43:237-255.

Scott, W. 1981 Organizations: Rational, Natural, and Open Systems. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.

Sharon, A., and Bartlett, C. 1969 Effect of instructional conditions in producing leniency on two types of rating scales. Personnel Psychology 22:252-263.

Shore, L., and Thornton, G. 1986 Effects of gender on self- and supervisory ratings. Academy of Management Journal 29:115-129.

Skrowonek, S. 1982 Building a New American State: The Expansion of National Administrative Capacities, 1877-1920. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 1991. Pay for Performance: Evaluating Performance Appraisal and Merit Pay. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1751.
×

Smith, E. 1982 Strategic business planning and human resources: part I. Personnel Journal August:606-609.

Smith, P., and Kendell, L. 1963 Retranslation of expectations: an approach to the construction of unambiguous anchors for rating scales. Journal of Applied Psychology 7:149-155.

Spenner, K. 1990 The Measurement of Skill: Strategies and Dilemma with Special Reference to the Dictionary of Occupational Titles. Paper presented at a conference, ''Changing Occupational Skill Requirements: Gathering and Assessing the Evidence," Taubman Center for Public Policy, Brown University.

Sticker, L., Jacobs, C., and Kogan, N. 1974 Trait interrelations in implicit personality theories and questionnaire data. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 30:198-207.

Stone, K. 1974 The origins of job structure in the steel industry. Review of Radical Political Economics 6(Summer):113-173.

Taylor, E., and Wherry, R. 1951 A study of leniency in two rating systems. Personnel Psychology 4:39-47.

Taylor, F. 1911 The Principles of Scientific Management. New York: Harper and Row.

Terborg, J., and Miller, H. 1978 Motivation, behavior, and performance: a closer examination of goal setting and monetary incentives. Journal of Applied Psychology 63:29-39.

Thornton, G. 1980 Psychometric properties of self-appraisals of job performance. Personnel Psychology 33:263-271.

Thornton, G., and Zorich, S. 1980 Training to improve observer accuracy. Journal of Applied Psychology 65:351-354.

Tolbert, P., and Zucker, L. 1983 Institutional sources of change in the formal structure of organizations: the diffusion of civil service reform. Administrative Science Quarterly 28:22-39.

TPF & C/Towers Perrin 1990 Achieving Results Through Sharing: Group Incentive Program Survey Report . New York: TPF&C/Towers Perrin. U.S. Civil Service Commission

1974 Biography of an Ideal. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.


U.S. General Accounting Office 1981 Productivity Sharing Programs: Can They Contribute to Productivity Improvement? Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

1984 A Two Year Appraisal of Merit Pay in Three Agencies. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

1987 Status of Personnel Research and Demonstration Programs. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

1988 The Senior Executive Service: Executives' Perspectives on Their Federal Service. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 1991. Pay for Performance: Evaluating Performance Appraisal and Merit Pay. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1751.
×

U.S. Office of Personnel Management 1981 Merit Pay Systems Design. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Office of Personnel Management.

1988a Performance Management and Recognition System: FY 1986 Performance Cycle. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Office of Personnel Management.

1988b Turnover in the Navy Demonstration Laboratories, 1980-1985. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Office of Personnel Management.

Vancil, R., and Buddrus, L. 1979 Decentralization: Managerial Ambiguity by Design. Homewood, Ill.: Dow-Jones/Irwin.

Van Riper, P. 1958 History of the United States Civil Service. Evanston, Ill.: Row, Peterson.

Vaughn, Robert 1989 The United States Merit Systems Protection Board and the Office of Special Counsel. Policy Studies Journal Winter.

Vroom, V. 1964 Work and Motivation. New York: Wiley.


Wagner, J., Rubin, P. and Callahan, T. 1988 Incentive payment and nonmanagerial productivity: an interrupted time series analysis of magnitude and trend. Organization Behavior and Human Decision Processes 42:47-74.

Wainer, H., and Braun, H., eds. 1988 Test Validity. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.

Waldo, D., ed. 1971 Public Management in a Time of Turbulence. New York: Chandler.

Walker, L., Lind, E., and Thibaut, J. 1979 The relation between procedural justice and distributive justice. Virginia Law Review 65:1410-1420.

Wallace, M. 1990 Rewards and Renewal: America's Search for Competitive Advantage Through Alternative Pay Strategies. Scottsdale, Ariz.: American Compensation Association.

Walton, R. 1979 Work Innovations in the United States. Boston: Division of Research, Harvard Business Review .

1984 From Control to Commitment: Transforming Workforce Management in the United States. Boston: Division of Research, Harvard Business Review.

Weiner, N. 1980 Determinants of the behavioral consequences of pay satisfaction: a comparison of two models. Personnel Psychology 33:741-757.

Weitzman, M. 1984 The Share Economy: Conquering Stagflation. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

Whyte, W. 1955 Money and Motivation. New York: Harper and Row.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 1991. Pay for Performance: Evaluating Performance Appraisal and Merit Pay. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1751.
×

William Mercer, Inc. 1983 Employer Attitudes Toward Compensation Change and Corporate Values. New York: William M. Mercer, Inc.

Williams, K., Wickert, P., and Peters, R. 1985 Appraisal salience: effects of instructions to subjectively organize information. In Proceedings of the Southern Management Association Meetings, Orlando, Fla.

Wilmerding, L. 1935 Government by Merit. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Wyatt, S. 1934 Incentives in repetitive work: a practical experiment in a factory. Industrial Health Research Board Report No. 69. London: H.M. Stationery Office.

Wyatt Company 1987 The 1987 Wyatt Performance Management Survey. Chicago: Wyatt Company.

1989a The 1989 Survey of Locality Pay Practices in Large U.S. Corporations . Philadelphia: Wyatt Company.

1989b Results of the 1989 Wyatt survey: getting your hands around performance management. The Wyatt Communicator Fourth Quarter:4-18.

Zammuto, R., London, M., and Rowland, K. 1981 Organization and rater differences in performance appraisal. Personnel Psychology 35:643-658.

Zedeck, S., and Cascio, W. 1982 Performance appraisal decisions as a function of rater training and purpose of appraisal. Journal of Applied Psychology 67(6):752-758.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 1991. Pay for Performance: Evaluating Performance Appraisal and Merit Pay. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1751.
×
This page in the original is blank.
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 1991. Pay for Performance: Evaluating Performance Appraisal and Merit Pay. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1751.
×
Page 167
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 1991. Pay for Performance: Evaluating Performance Appraisal and Merit Pay. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1751.
×
Page 168
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 1991. Pay for Performance: Evaluating Performance Appraisal and Merit Pay. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1751.
×
Page 169
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 1991. Pay for Performance: Evaluating Performance Appraisal and Merit Pay. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1751.
×
Page 170
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 1991. Pay for Performance: Evaluating Performance Appraisal and Merit Pay. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1751.
×
Page 171
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 1991. Pay for Performance: Evaluating Performance Appraisal and Merit Pay. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1751.
×
Page 172
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 1991. Pay for Performance: Evaluating Performance Appraisal and Merit Pay. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1751.
×
Page 173
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 1991. Pay for Performance: Evaluating Performance Appraisal and Merit Pay. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1751.
×
Page 174
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 1991. Pay for Performance: Evaluating Performance Appraisal and Merit Pay. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1751.
×
Page 175
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 1991. Pay for Performance: Evaluating Performance Appraisal and Merit Pay. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1751.
×
Page 176
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 1991. Pay for Performance: Evaluating Performance Appraisal and Merit Pay. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1751.
×
Page 177
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 1991. Pay for Performance: Evaluating Performance Appraisal and Merit Pay. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1751.
×
Page 178
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 1991. Pay for Performance: Evaluating Performance Appraisal and Merit Pay. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1751.
×
Page 179
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 1991. Pay for Performance: Evaluating Performance Appraisal and Merit Pay. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1751.
×
Page 180
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 1991. Pay for Performance: Evaluating Performance Appraisal and Merit Pay. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1751.
×
Page 181
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 1991. Pay for Performance: Evaluating Performance Appraisal and Merit Pay. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1751.
×
Page 182
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 1991. Pay for Performance: Evaluating Performance Appraisal and Merit Pay. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1751.
×
Page 183
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 1991. Pay for Performance: Evaluating Performance Appraisal and Merit Pay. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1751.
×
Page 184
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 1991. Pay for Performance: Evaluating Performance Appraisal and Merit Pay. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1751.
×
Page 185
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 1991. Pay for Performance: Evaluating Performance Appraisal and Merit Pay. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1751.
×
Page 186
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 1991. Pay for Performance: Evaluating Performance Appraisal and Merit Pay. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1751.
×
Page 187
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 1991. Pay for Performance: Evaluating Performance Appraisal and Merit Pay. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1751.
×
Page 188
Next: Appendix A: Survey Descriptions »
Pay for Performance: Evaluating Performance Appraisal and Merit Pay Get This Book
×
 Pay for Performance: Evaluating Performance Appraisal and Merit Pay
Buy Paperback | $44.95
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

"Pay for performance" has become a buzzword for the 1990s, as U.S. organizations seek ways to boost employee productivity. The new emphasis on performance appraisal and merit pay calls for a thorough examination of their effectiveness. Pay for Performance is the best resource to date on the issues of whether these concepts work and how they can be applied most effectively in the workplace.

This important book looks at performance appraisal and pay practices in the private sector and describes whether—and how—private industry experience is relevant to federal pay reform. It focuses on the needs of the federal government, exploring how the federal pay system evolved; available evidence on federal employee attitudes toward their work, their pay, and their reputation with the public; and the complicating and pervasive factor of politics.

READ FREE ONLINE

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!