National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

PAPERBACK
price:$59.75
add to cart

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

Medicare: New Directions in Quality Assurance Proceedings (1991)
Institute of Medicine (IOM)

Citation Manager

. "13. The Epidemiology of Quality Problems." Medicare: New Directions in Quality Assurance Proceedings. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 1991.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
104
bottomleft bottomright

The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.


Medicare: New Directions in Quality Assurance

Fifth, the IOM committee recommends that HCFA retain its role of preventing harm to patients from providers who are not maintaining acceptable standards of quality. The PRO evidence suggests that a relatively small number of physicians contribute disproportionately to problems in overuse, underuse, and poor technical quality. The Harvard Medical Practice Study suggests that the same is true for hospitals. Incompetent providers should receive special attention. The challenge for the federal government is for all its agencies that become involved with seriously substandard providers to cooperate with one another.

The evidence from the IOM report is clear: there is a need to ''manage for quality'' in the Medicare program. It justifies a major increase in effort in the next decade.

REFERENCES

Chassin, M.R., Kosecoff, J., Winslow, C.M., et al. Does Inappropriate Use Explain Geographic Variations in the Use of Health Care Services? A Study of Three Procedures. Journal of the American Medical Association 258:2533-2537, 1987.


Harvard Medical Practice Study. Patients, Doctors, and Lawyers: Medical Injury, Malpractice Litigation, and Patient Compensation in New York. The report of the Harvard Medical Practice Study to the State of New York, 1990.

Hsiao, W.C., Brown, P., Yntema, D., et al. Estimating Physicians' Work for a Resource-Based Relative Value Scale. New England Journal of Medicine 319:835-841, 1988.


Institute of Medicine. Medicare: A Strategy for Quality Assurance. Lohr, K.N., ed. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press, 1990. (See especially Volume I, Chapter 7.)


Leape, L.L., Park, R.E., Solomon, D.H., et al. Does Inappropriate Use Explain Small-Area Variations in the Use of Health Care Services? Journal of the American Medical Association 263:669-672, 1990.


Mills, D.H., ed. California Medical Association and California Hospital Association. Report on the Medical Insurance Feasibility Study. San Francisco, Calif.: Sutter, 1977.

Morford, T.G. An Administration Response to the Institute of Medicine Report From the Health Care Financing Administration. Pp. 179-185 in Medicare: New Directions in Quality Assurance. Donaldson, M.S., Harris-Wehling, J., and Lohr, K.N., eds. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press, 1991.

Page
104
Front Matter (R1-R10)
Part 1: Introduction (1-2)
1. Introduction (3-6)
2. The Institute of Medicine Report (7-14)
Part 2: New Directions: More Professionalism, Less Regulation (15-17)
3. The Committee View (18-21)
4. A Response (22-26)
Part 3: New Directions: Organization- and System-Focused Quality Improvement (27-30)
5. The Committee View (31-36)
6. A Response (37-44)
Part 4: New Directions: Improved Decision-Making by Patients and Clinicians (45-47)
7. The Committee View (48-53)
8. A Response (54-58)
Part 5: New Directions: A Patient Outcomes Orientation (59-62)
9. The Committee View (63-72)
10. A Response (73-78)
Part 6: New Directions: Public Accountability and Program Evaluation (79-81)
11. The Committee View (82-85)
12. A Response (86-90)
Part 7: Confronting Special Implementation Issues (91-95)
13. The Epidemiology of Quality Problems (96-104)
14. Legal Concerns (105-115)
15. Translating the Institute of Medicine Report (116-126)
Part 8: New Directions: The Research, Training, and Capacity Building Agendas (127-129)
16. Research and Capacity Building: Issues Raised by the Institute of Medicine Report (130-139)
17. The Research Agenda: An Outside View (140-144)
18. The Training and Capacity Building Agendas: An Outside View (145-150)
Part 9: Response to the Institute of Medicine Report Recommendations (151-154)
19. A Legislator's Response to the Institute of Medicine Report (155-160)
20. A Legislator's Response to the Institute of Medicine Report (161-166)
21. A Physician's Response to the Institute of Medicine Report (167-173)
22. An Administration Response to the Institute of Medicine Report from the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research (174-178)
23. An Administration Response to the Institute of Medicine Report from the Health Care Financing Administration (179-185)
24. A Peer Review Organization Response to the Institute of Medicine Report (186-190)
Part 10: Where Do We Go From Here? (191-193)
25. Where Do We Go From Here? (194-197)
26. Where Do We Go From Here? (198-204)
List of Authors (205-208)