National Academies Press: OpenBook

Medicare: New Directions in Quality Assurance Proceedings (1991)

Chapter: Part 5: New Directions: A Patient Outcomes Orientation

« Previous: 8. A Response
Suggested Citation:"Part 5: New Directions: A Patient Outcomes Orientation." Institute of Medicine. 1991. Medicare: New Directions in Quality Assurance Proceedings. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1768.
×

PART V
New Directions: A Patient Outcomes Orientation

Suggested Citation:"Part 5: New Directions: A Patient Outcomes Orientation." Institute of Medicine. 1991. Medicare: New Directions in Quality Assurance Proceedings. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1768.
×
This page in the original is blank.
Suggested Citation:"Part 5: New Directions: A Patient Outcomes Orientation." Institute of Medicine. 1991. Medicare: New Directions in Quality Assurance Proceedings. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1768.
×

New Directions: A Patient Outcomes Orientation

Introduction

Charles J. Fahey

I would like to relate a personal experience and an underlying historical reality associated with it that have relevance for our efforts. Several times in the past few years, I have had the privilege to visit Monte Casino. Some of you are familiar with it, perhaps for no other reason than World War II. During the Italian campaign, the monastery became a symbol of resistance. What to do about it became the subject of contention among the allies. Although the presence of German troops on the slope on which the monastery was located was certain, it seemed they had refrained from entering the monastery or its immediate vicinity. However, its overarching presence became so much a symbol of the inability of the allied forces to move forward that it was decided to obliterate the abbey with intense air bombardment. Whether Germans were, in fact, inside the monastery is a moot point. However, following the destruction of the monastery, the rubble that remained became an even more formidable obstacle and was taken at a great loss of life.

Scruples about destroying the monastery came not only from the potential loss of life (many local civilians had sought sanctuary with the monks) and the beauty of the buildings and contents but also because of its place in history. You see, it was here in the sixth century that St. Benedict founded Western monasticism.

The approach to life of St. Benedict as articulated in his "rule" became a standard for virtually all communal religious life. At its heart was a commitment on the part of aspirants who wished to join this way of life to living in a spirit of poverty, chastity, and obedience with persons of like mind. When a period of training and testing were complete, the person stood before the community and made a public profession of his or her intent. This was known as making their profession.

In the Middle Ages, the guilds took upon themselves some of the responsibility for what religious communities had done. Those that were particu-

Suggested Citation:"Part 5: New Directions: A Patient Outcomes Orientation." Institute of Medicine. 1991. Medicare: New Directions in Quality Assurance Proceedings. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1768.
×

larly involved in deeply human enterprises were known as professions, precisely because they had altruistic values of service to others about which they would hold themselves publicly accountable. Their service—although it meant a return, both psychological and pecuniary—also involved a commitment to competence, selflessness, and a concern for others. If ever there has been a word that has been corrupted it is "professional." Nevertheless, it continues to be an extraordinarily important word.

This part of the conference proceedings addresses personal and corporate professionalism in the sense of personal and corporate virtue. There are really two things that we are about. First, how do we know what is good, and how do we make that knowledge relevant to people on both sides of the transaction—the helper and the helped? Second, how do we all behave better? It is interesting how much of what we are talking about involves behavior and values. In this effort we have faced a dilemma that plagues all of society. What is the appropriate role of external oversight and sanctions as contrasted with dependence on people to act virtuously? How do you protect the vulnerable without instituting oppressive structures that demoralize?

By the same token, we have struggled with how to help people to be honest about their shortcomings without becoming unduly liable because of their honesty. How do we allow humility in our context? Humility is a very good word. How do we create an atmosphere in which we can be honest as individuals and as groups of people coming together to try to make good things happen? How do we help people to be virtuous?

Laws and regulatory techniques have their limitations. Whether we are on the left or the right, the tendency is to use law to enforce on everybody else our particular view of what is the good. Yet two such diverse persons as John Courtney Murray, the distinguished Jesuit who was chiefly responsible for the Vatican II Decree On Religious Liberty, and Oliver Wendel Holmes held that American democracy is predicated upon our being a virtuous people. Laws and regulatory activity are important, but ultimately our surviving as a people will depend on how virtuous we are. Much of our effort has been to carve out a role for government that allows it to protect those who are vulnerable but at the same time encourages personal and corporate moral agency and virtue.

Moving toward a world that enhances personal choice, decisionmaking, and responsibility calls for greater attention to patient outcomes, values, and preferences. The case for the "new direction" of a patient outcome orientation is made by committee member Albert Mulley, who is chief of the Division of General Internal Medicine at the Massachusetts General Hospital. The response is offered by John Wennberg, professor of epidemiology and community medicine at Dartmouth Medical College and pioneer of several critical areas of research in health services, effectiveness, and outcomes.

Suggested Citation:"Part 5: New Directions: A Patient Outcomes Orientation." Institute of Medicine. 1991. Medicare: New Directions in Quality Assurance Proceedings. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1768.
×
Page 59
Suggested Citation:"Part 5: New Directions: A Patient Outcomes Orientation." Institute of Medicine. 1991. Medicare: New Directions in Quality Assurance Proceedings. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1768.
×
Page 60
Suggested Citation:"Part 5: New Directions: A Patient Outcomes Orientation." Institute of Medicine. 1991. Medicare: New Directions in Quality Assurance Proceedings. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1768.
×
Page 61
Suggested Citation:"Part 5: New Directions: A Patient Outcomes Orientation." Institute of Medicine. 1991. Medicare: New Directions in Quality Assurance Proceedings. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1768.
×
Page 62
Next: 9. The Committee View »
Medicare: New Directions in Quality Assurance Proceedings Get This Book
×
Buy Paperback | $59.75
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

This book contains chapters and commentaries by members of the Institute of Medicine (IOM) committee and by outstanding practitioners, researchers, legislators, and policymakers about the IOM's proposals for new directions in quality assurance as specified in Medicare: A Strategy for Quality Assurance, Volumes 1 and 2.

Sections of this new book address ideas about how to move toward increasing professionalism, implementing orgranization and system-focused quality improvement, better decision making by patients and clinicians, patient outcomes orientation, and public accountability and program evaluation. Other sections explore research questions and capacity building in the field of quality assessment and improvement, the epidemiology and quality problems, and legal issues in quality assessment.

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!