Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.
Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.
OCR for page R1
Enabling Technologies for Unified Life-cycle Engineering of Structural Components EBABLING TECHNOLOGIES FOR UNIFIED LIFE-CYCLE ENGINEERING OF STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS Committee on Enabling Technologies for Unified Life-Cycle Engineering of Structural Components National Materials Advisory Board Commission on Engineering and Technical Systems National Research Council Publication NMAB-455 National Academy Press Washington, D.C. 1991
OCR for page R2
Enabling Technologies for Unified Life-cycle Engineering of Structural Components NOTICE: The project that is the subject of this report was approved by the Governing Board of the National Research Council, whose members are drawn from the councils of the National Academy of Sciences, the National Academy of Engineering, and the Institute of Medicine. The members of the committee responsible for the report were chosen for their special competences and with regard for appropriate balance. This report has been reviewed by a group other than the authors according to procedures approved by a Report Review Committee consisting of members of the National Academy of Sciences, the National Academy of Engineering, and the Institute of Medicine. The National Academy of Sciences is a private, nonprofit, self-perpetuating society of distinguished scholars engaged in scientific and engineering research, dedicated to the furtherance of science and technology and to their use for the general welfare. Upon the authority of the charter granted to it by the Congress in 1863, the Academy has a mandate that requires it to advise the federal government on scientific and technical matters. Dr. Frank Press is president of the National Academy of Sciences. The National Academy of Engineering was established in 1964, under the charter of the National Academy of Sciences, as a parallel organization of outstanding engineers. It is autonomous in its administration and in the selection of its members, sharing with the National Academy of Sciences the responsiblity for advising the federal government. The National Academy of Engineering also sponsors engineering programs aimed at meeting national needs, encourages education and research, and recognizes the superior achievements of engineers. Dr. Robert M. White is president of the National Academy of Engineering. The Institute of Medicine was established in 1970 by the National Academy of Sciences to secure the services of eminent members of appropriate professions in the examination of policy matters pertaining to the health of the public. The Institute acts under the responsibility given to the National Academy of Sciences by its congressional charter to be an adviser to the federal government and, upon its own initiative, to identify issues of medical care, research, and education. Dr. Samuel O. Thier is president of the Institute of Medicine. The National Research Council was organized by the National Academy of Sciences in 1916 to associate the broad community of science and technology with the Academy's purposes of furthering knowledge and advising the federal government. Functioning in accordance with general policies determined by the Academy, the Council has become the principal operating agency of both the National Academy of Sciences and the National Academy of Engineering in providing services to the government, the public, and the scientific and engineering communities. The Council is administered jointly by both Academies and the Institute of Medicine. Dr. Frank Press and Dr. Robert M. White are chairman and vice chairman, respectively, of the National Research Council. This study by the National Materials Advisory Board was conducted under Contract No. MDA903-89-K-0078 with the U.S. Department of Defense and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Library of Congress Card Number 91-60825. International Standard Book Number 0-309-04492-8. This report is available from the National Academy Press, 2101 Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20418. Also, available from the Defense Technical Information Center, Cameron Station, Alexandria, VA 22304-6145. S347. Printed in the United States of America.
OCR for page R3
Enabling Technologies for Unified Life-cycle Engineering of Structural Components ABSTRACT This report addresses the application of unified life-cycle engineering approaches to the design, manufacture and application of structural components, especially structural components for advanced military weapons systems. Unified life-cycle engineering (ULCE), or concurrent engineering, is a design engineering environment in which computer-aided design technology is used to assess and improve the quality of a product not only during the active design phases but throughout its entire life cycle by integrating and optimizing design attributes for producibility and supportability as well as for performance, operability, cost, and schedule. The study identifies and evaluates priorities for research and development in life-cycle engineering with the goal of identifying the enabling technologies that underpin ULCE, their readiness for application, and the research and development required to make them commercially available in a 10-year period. The committee examined the current and desired future environments for five factors in a product's life cycle: design, manufacture, product support, materials, and information systems. Four critical issues are identified and conclusions and recommendations to support the development of an effective ULCE design engineering environment are defined.
OCR for page R4
Enabling Technologies for Unified Life-cycle Engineering of Structural Components This page in the original is blank.
OCR for page R5
Enabling Technologies for Unified Life-cycle Engineering of Structural Components COMMITTEE ON ENABLING TECHNOLOGIES FOR UNIFIED LIFE-CYCLE ENGINEERING OF STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS Chairman Michael J. Buckley, Rockwell International Science Center, Palo Alto Laboratory, California Members J. Kenneth Blundell, University of Missouri-Columbia Ronald C. Fix, McAir CAD/CAM, St. Louis, Missouri Siegfried Goldstein, Siegfried Enterprises, Inc., North Babylon, New York Charles F. Herndon, General Dynamics Corporation, Fort Worth, Texas Richard Lopatka, Pratt & Whitney Manufacturing Division, East Hartford, Connecticut Yoh-Han Pao, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio Ralph E. Patsfall, General Electric Company, Cincinnati, Ohio Robin Stevenson, General Motors Technical Center, Warren, Michigan Edison T. S. Tse, Stanford University, Stanford, California Dick Wilkins, University of Delaware, Newark David H. Withers, IBM Industrial Sector Division, Atlanta, Georgia H. Thomas Yolken, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland
OCR for page R6
Enabling Technologies for Unified Life-cycle Engineering of Structural Components Liaison Representatives Walter H. Reimann, WRCD/ML, Wright Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio Melvin C. Ohmer, WRDC/ML, Wright Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio Dan E. Good, Aviation Applied Technology Directorate, Ft. Eustis, Virginia John Mayer, National Science Foundation, Washington, DC Charles A. Zanis, Naval Sea Systems Command, Washington, DC Lewis Sloter, Naval Air Systems Command, Washington, DC Richard Weinstein, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, DC NMAB Staff Klaus M. Zwilsky, Director Stanley M. Wolf, Project Officer (1987–1988) Cathryn Summers, Senior Secretary
OCR for page R7
Enabling Technologies for Unified Life-cycle Engineering of Structural Components PREFACE The development of complex military weapons systems has always required that the design team make numerous decisions regarding the use of advanced, unproved technology to achieve improved performance and enhanced cost-effectiveness. The continuing need for better performance has generally led to the technological approach that offers the highest performance consistent with program cost and schedule constraints. Systems are often developed that require considerable modification before they can be efficiently manufactured and considerable support in the field once they are deployed. Unified life-cycle engineering (ULCE) is a concept aimed at providing designers with integrated knowledge and information needed throughout a weapon system's life cycle--from design through product support. This enlarged information set could significantly upgrade weapons systems design and performance as well as shorten development and prototype demonstration times. ULCE has the goal of providing the designer or engineer with information and tools that will permit the consideration of more issues and perform more trade-off studies within the time constraints. Just as the widespread use of word processing programs (a tool) at individual workstations has increased the quality of letters and reports by making it far easier to edit and format documents, so in principle will ULCE design stations improve the quality of design by making it far easier to consider explicitly issues that previously were addressed only with great difficulty, if at all. The Department of Defense and National Aeronautics and Space Administration requested the National Research Council, through the National Materials Advisory Board, to examine ULCE for structural components. The study was charged with identifying and evaluating priorities in R&D opportunities in the area of ULCE of structural components and with assessing the enabling technologies for ULCE (including the needs and relationships among several technologies--materials, structural design, component manufacture, product support, and information systems). This report documents the findings of the study. It emphasizes technical issues associated with ULCE and institutional issues are also considered. Its intended audiences are government and industry executives who set policy for their organizations as well as program managers in funding agencies responsible for identifying and responding to opportunities for improved system reliability.
OCR for page R8
Enabling Technologies for Unified Life-cycle Engineering of Structural Components The committee appreciates contributions from several individuals who made presentations at committee meetings and thus assisted in the completion of this study; Appendix C lists these individuals as well as summaries of the key issues they discussed. MICHAEL J. BUCKLEY CHAIRMAN
OCR for page R9
Enabling Technologies for Unified Life-cycle Engineering of Structural Components CONTENTS Executive Summary 1 1 INTRODUCTION 5 Objective 6 Approach 7 Unified Life-Cycle Engineering 9 Potential Payoff 10 Current and Future Environment 10 Validity of Study Findings for Other Products 12 References 12 2 DESIGN 13 Current Environment 13 Future Environment 16 Significance of the Change 17 References 17 3 MANUFACTURING 19 Current Environment 19 Future Environment 20 Significance of the Change 22 4 PRODUCT SUPPORT 25 Current Environment 25 Future Environment 28 Significance of the Change 28
OCR for page R10
Enabling Technologies for Unified Life-cycle Engineering of Structural Components 5 MATERIALS 29 Current Environment 29 Future Environment 30 Significance of the Changes 32 References 32 6 INFORMATION SYSTEMS 35 Current Environment 35 Future Environment 37 Significance of the Change 38 References 38 7 CRITICAL ISSUES 39 Validation 39 Critical Issue 1 42 Critical Issue 2 46 Critical Issue 3 49 Critical Issue 4 53 References 58 8 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 59 General Conclusions and Recommendations 59 Conclusions and Recommendations From First Critical Issue 62 Conclusions and Recommendations From Second Critical Issue 63 Conclusions and Recommendations From Third Critical Issue 65 Conclusions and Recommendations From Fourth Critical Issue 67 APPENDIX A Case Study of a Metallic Gas Turbine Disk 71 APPENDIX B Case Study of a Composite Airframe Structure 81 APPENDIX C Presentations to the Committee 89 APPENDIX D Biographical Sketches of Committee Members 97