Click for next page ( 96


The National Academies | 500 Fifth St. N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20001
Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use and Privacy Statement



Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 95
6 Bibliography Branscomb, Anne W. 1988. "Who owns creativity?" Technology Review, May/June, p.43. Branscomb, A.W. 1989. Protecting the crown jewels of the information economy The legal protection of computer software as an intellectual asset: An overview of policy issues for congressional oversight. Statement given before the Subcommit- tee on Courts, Intellectual Property, and Administration of Justice, U.S. House of Representatives, Washington, D.C., November 8. Brooks, Frederick P., Jr. 1975. The Mythical Man-Month, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass. Chronicle of Higher Education. 1989a. "'Electrocopies' seen surpassing photocopies as threat to copyright," March 1. Chronicle of Higher Education. 1989b. "Court will not hear case accusing UCLA of copying software," March 29. Clapes, Anthony Lawrence. 1989. Software, Copyright, ~ Competition: The "Look and Feel" of the lout, Quorum, New York, p. 143. C1eveland, H. 1989. "Can intellectual property be protected?" Change, May/June, pp. 1 11. Computer and Business Equipment Manufacturers Association (CBEMA). 1990. The Information Technology Industry Data Book 1960-2000, CBEMA, Washington, D.C. Computer Week. 1989. "Giticism builds over impact of look-and-feel litigation," May 1. Computerworld. 1989. "Copyright regulations revised," April. COPP Report. 1989. Intellectual Property Protection-a COPP Historical Resume, IEEE, New York. Davidson, Duncan M. 1986. "Common law, uncommon software," University of Pitts- burgh Law Review, Vol. 47, pp. 1037-1117. Dyson, E. 1989. "Three weeks that shook my world," Forbes, June 12, pp. 103-108. Farrell, Joseph. 1989. "Standardization and intellectual property." Reprint of a talk given at the CESLaST conference, Phoenix, Ariz., February 1989 p. 16. Federal Computer Week. 1989. '`Microsoft Corp. downplays Apple display lawsuit," April 10. 95

OCR for page 95
96 INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ISSUES IN SOFTWARE Fisher, F.D. 1989. "The electronic lumberyard and builders' rights: technology, copy- rights, patents, and academe," Change, May/June, pp. 13-21. Foley, James D. 1987. "Interfaces for advanced computing," Scientific American, Octo- ber, pp. 127-135. Gantz, John. 1989. "Standards: What they are. What they aren't," Networking Maga- zine, May, p. 23. Garfinkel, Simson L. 1991. "Programs to the people," Technology Review 94(2), Febru- ary-March, pp. 52-60. Gasper, Elan, Ed Harris, Paul Heckel, William Hulbig, Larry Lightman, and Mike O'Malley. 1989. "Vital to small companies," New York Tines, June 8. Gilbert, S.W. and P. Lyman. 1989. "Intellectual property in the information age: issues beyond the copyright law," Change, May/June, pp. 23-28. Goldberg, Morton and John F. Burleigh. 1989. "Copyright protection for computer programs: Is the sky falling?" America Intellectual Property Law Association, Computer Law Association, New York. Jorde, T.M. and D.J. Teece. 1989. "Competition and cooperation: Striking the right balance," California Management Review Reprint Series 31(3):25-37. Kahin, Brian. 1989. "Software patents: franchising the information structure," Change, May/ June, pp. 24-25. Keefe, Patricia. 1991. "Paperback pulls spreadsheet, won't appeal Lotus victory," Computerworld, Oct. 22, p. 7. Miller, Michael W. 1989. "A brave new world: Streams of Is and us," Wall Street four- nal, Centennial Edition, p. A-15. Newell, Allen. 1986. "Response: The models are broken, the models are broken," University of Pittsburgh Law Review, Vol. 47, pp. 1023-1035. Pollack, Andrew. 1990. 'most of Xerox's suit against Apple barred," New York Times, March 24, pp. 31 and 33. Reichman, J.H. 1989. "Computer programs as applied to scientific know-how: Implica- tions of copyright protection for commercialized university research," Vanderbilt low Review 42(3):639-723. Reichman, J.H. 1991. "Design protection and the new technologies: The United States experience in a transnational perspective," 19 University of Baltimore Law Review, Part III, B-3, "Logic of a Modified Copyright Approach" (forthcoming). Samuelson, P. 1985. "Creating a new kind of intellectual property: Applying the lessons of the chip law to computer programs," Minnesota Law Review 70(2):471-531. Samuelson, P. 1989a. "Why the look and feel of software user interfaces should not be protected by copyright law," Communications of the ACM 32(5):563-72. Samuelson, P. 1989b. "Report on AIPLA survey on the patent/copyright interface for computer programs," May 12, draft. Samuelson, Pamela. 1988. "Reflections on the state of American software copyright law and the perils of teaching it," Columbia-VLA Journal of Law ~ the Arts, Vol. 13, p. 61. Scherer, F.M. 1984. Innovation and Growth, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass. Teece, D.J. 1989. "Inter-organizational requirements of the innovation process," Mana- gerial and Decision Economics, Special Issue John Wiley & Sons, New York), pp. 35- 42. U.S. Department of Commerce. 1991. "Computer equipment and software," 1990 U.S. Industrial Outlook, pp. 26-31. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. 1989. "Patentable subject matter: Mathematical al- gorithms and computer programs," Official Gazette, 1106 OG, September 5. Verity, John W. 1990. "defense against pirates or death to the clones?" Business Week, May 7.

OCR for page 95
BIBLIOGRAPHY 97 Wall Street Journal. 1989. "Software company wins case alleging violated copyright," March 6. Wall Street Journal. 1989. "U.S. companies curb pirating of some items but by no means all," March 16. Wall Street Journal. 1989. "Apple wins first round in software copyright case," March 22. Wall Street Journal. 1989. "Microsoft sees gain in ruling on Apple's suit," March 22. Wall Street Journal. 1989. '`Trade-secret fight imperils a start-up," March 22. Wall Street Journal. 1989. '`Three computer industry leaders gird for battle over copyright infringement," April 7. Washington Post. 1989. "From software to sportswear, Bangkok is the capital of counterfeit products," March 12. Washington Post. 1989. "Thailand's refusal to protect copyrights produces cheap goods, disputes with U.S.," March 12. Washington Post. 1989. '`The battle over software protection," April 2. Washington Post. 1989. "U.S. businesses urge trade sanctions to stop piracy of software in China," April 10. Watson, Thomas J., Jr., and Peter Petrel 1990. Father, Son ~ Cal., Bantam Books, New York.

OCR for page 95