National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

PAPERBACK
price:$140.75
add to cart

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

Restoration of Aquatic Ecosystems: Science, Technology, and Public Policy (1992)
Commission on Geosciences, Environment and Resources (CGER)

Citation Manager

. "4 Lakes." Restoration of Aquatic Ecosystems: Science, Technology, and Public Policy. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 1992.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
84
bottomleft bottomright

The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.


Restoration of Aquatic Ecosystems: Science, Technology, and Public Policy

waters may actually decrease biological uptake of trace metals and reduce their toxicity to aquatic biota.

From a perspective of water use, lake acidification has three major effects: loss of fish populations; increased water clarity, caused primarily by loss of colored organic matter (so-called humic material) from the water column; and increased abundance of acid-tolerant, filamentous algae (primarily Mougeotia), huge, unsightly masses of which may cover the bottom in littoral areas. Fish species differ widely in their sensitivity to acidity (Table 4.1). Smallmouth bass are much more sensitive than largemouth bass. Rainbow trout are impacted in the pH range 5.5 to 6.0; brook trout are much less sensitive. Perch survive and reproduce at pH 5, but survival of young-of-the-year perch is strongly affected at pH 4.7 (Brezonik et al., 1991b). Some Florida lakes with a pH as low as 4.5 have apparently healthy fish communities, although fish production is low because acidic lakes tend to be very oligotrophic. In general, fish production is much more closely related to a lake's nutritional status than to its pH. In a given species, adults are more tolerant than immature forms; lack of

TABLE 4.1 Approximate pH Range in Which Various Fish Species Suffer Reproductive Failure or Mortality

pH

Species

6.0 to 5.5

Smallmouth bass (Micropterus dolomieui)

Walleye (Stizostedion vitreum)

Rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss)

Common shiner (Notropis comutus)

Burbot (Lota lota)

5.5 to 5.2

Lake trout (Salvelinus namaycush)

Trout perch (Percopsis omiscomaycus)

Fathead minnow (Pimephales promelas)

5.2 to 4.7

Brook trout (Salvelinus fontinalis)

Brown bullhead (Ictalurus nebulosus)

White sucker (Catostomus commersoni)

Largemouth bass (Micropterus salmoides)

Rock bass (Ambloplites rupestris)

4.7 to 4.5

Cisco (Coregonus artedii)

Yellow perch (Perca flavescens)

Lake chub (Couesius plumbeus)

NOTE: Compiled by the committee from various sources.

Page
84