The Vertically Integrated Projects (VIP) Program

Lead Institution: Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA

Collaborating Institutions: Morehouse College, Purdue University, University of Strathclyde

Category: Curricular

Date Implemented: January 2009

Website: http://vip.gatech.edu, https://engineering.purdue.edu/vip, http://www.strath.ac.uk/viprojects

logo

img

Program Description: The Vertically Integrated Projects (VIP) program is an undergraduate design program that operates in a research and development context. Undergraduates on VIP teams earn academic credit for their participation in design teams that create products based on ideas from faculty research. The teams are: Large – 10-20 students per team; Multidisciplinary – drawing students from around campus; Vertically Integrated – a mix of sophomores through seniors each semester; and Long Term – undergraduates may participate for up to 3 years. The products and systems the teams design and develop are of sufficient scale and complexity to be of significant benefit to the faculty mentors’ research effort. The size and vertically integrated nature of VIP teams function like a small engineering design firm. Students progress from “entry-level” positions at the sophomore year, during which they learn about the projects and technology from the more senior students. As juniors they apply what they learn in their courses and as new team members to the design of the project. As seniors they generally lead some aspect of the project and are mentored in technical and project management tasks by the graduate students and faculty. The program works well in any discipline and is especially well-suited to multidisciplinary efforts. The VIP program traces its origin to the Engineering Projects in Community Service (EPICS) Program. We observed some weaknesses in EPICS that led to the creation of VIP. EPICS has insufficient recognition of faculty effort as team advisors in the evaluation processes leading to pay increases and promotions, which can be overcome in part by focusing the teams on projects of benefit to faculty research efforts. In EPICS, some projects drawn from the community lack sufficient technical depth to challenge the students, which can be addressed by focusing the teams on design problems embedded in faculty research efforts. Finally, projects were limited to disciplines closely associated with community issues, which can be overcome by focusing on faculty-initiated projects. Companies support VIP with donations of funds or equipment. Partners/customers of VIP teams are typically the same as those associated with each faculty advisor’s research effort. Every discipline involved contributes its own expertise to the overall collaborative effort of each VIP team.

Anticipated and Actual Outcomes: We anticipated the formation of sophisticated collaborative networks within and between VIP teams and various groups of students and tracked and characterized the networks within and between the teams at Purdue and Georgia Tech. Results show students actively interact regarding both technical and managerial advice. The number of individuals with whom students interact has increased slightly as the program has grown. The E-I index (# of contacts outside group − # of contacts inside group)/(total contacts) shows increasing integration across gender, years, and teams. Students at Purdue were slightly more interactive across graduate and undergraduate student ranks. Students tended to develop 2-3 sources of advice. Graduate students are knowledge leaders and serve as the primary resources for the range of advice and assistance, but there is important peer exchange among undergraduates. The data show not only that advice-based ties flow across undergraduate and graduate students, but that the undergraduate students are also engaging across rank regarding technical and project management information and assistance. While it is expected that information should flow within each team, results showed that significant ties exist across teams at both institutions.

Assessment Information: The critical benchmarks are the number of faculty, graduate students and undergraduates involved, the number of disciplines involved, and the total number of teams. At GT, the ultimate goals include: at least 100 teams and a total enrollment each semester of 1500 or more students; at least one VIP team in each discipline; and full integration into the curriculum. Current goals include a uniform strategy across all engineering and computing disciplines for integrating senior design/capstone courses with VIP so that VIP is both the first true vehicle for multidisciplinary senior design and students can remain members of their VIP team while satisfying senior design requirements. We are currently proposing further research to correlate student performance, as measured by design notebook grades and peer evaluations, with centrality to the collaborative network within a student’s team.

Funding/Sustainability: At both Purdue and Georgia Tech, the start-up costs were roughly: 25% release time for the lead faculty member; support for a research staff member; a TA to help with course management, oversight of the VIP lab, administration of the design notebook process and the peer evaluation process; a room large enough for a meeting of 20 or more people; projector; a few desktop and laptop machines; and access to virtual servers. Funding was raised via NSF grants, the endowment income for Prof. Coyle’s Chair and Center, ECE and the College of Computing, and gifts from several companies and donors. At Georgia Tech, all funding is recurring. The College of Engineering recently approved a request for recurring funds for a Program Manager to assist with the administration and growth of the VIP Program. VIP is thus already sustainable over the long term. To assist with the continued expansion of the program, the VIP leadership of all schools will continue to collaborate on proposals to the National Science Foundation, foundations, corporations, and potential donors.



The National Academies | 500 Fifth St. N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20001
Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use and Privacy Statement



Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 26
The Vertically Integrated Projects (VIP) Program Lead Institution: Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA Collaborating Institutions: Morehouse College, Purdue University, University of Strathclyde Category: Curricular Date Implemented: January 2009 Website: http://vip.gatech.edu, https://engineering.purdue.edu/vip, http://www.strath.ac.uk/viprojects Program Description: The Vertically Integrated Projects (VIP) program is an undergraduate design program that operates in a research and development context. Undergraduates on VIP contacts) shows increasing integration across gender, years, and teams earn academic credit for their participation in design teams. Students at Purdue were slightly more interactive across teams that create products based on ideas from faculty research. graduate and undergraduate student ranks. Students tended to The teams are: Large – 10-20 students per team; Multidiscipli- develop 2-3 sources of advice. Graduate students are knowl- nary – drawing students from around campus; Vertically edge leaders and serve as the primary resources for the range of Integrated – a mix of sophomores through seniors each semes- advice and assistance, but there is important peer exchange ter; and Long Term – undergraduates may partici- among undergraduates. The data show not only that pate for up to 3 years. The products and systems the advice-based ties flow across undergraduate and teams design and develop are of sufficient scale and graduate students, but that the undergraduate complexity to be of significant benefit to the faculty students are also engaging across rank regarding mentors’ research effort. The size and vertically technical and project management information and integrated nature of VIP teams function like a small assistance. While it is expected that information engineering design firm. Students progress from should flow within each team, results showed that “entry-level” positions at the sophomore year, significant ties exist across teams at both institutions. during which they learn about the projects and technology from Assessment Information: The critical benchmarks are the the more senior students. As juniors they apply what they learn number of faculty, graduate students and undergraduates in their courses and as new team members to the design of the involved, the number of disciplines involved, and the total project. As seniors they generally lead some aspect of the number of teams. At GT, the ultimate goals include: at least project and are mentored in technical and project management 100 teams and a total enrollment each semester of 1500 or more tasks by the graduate students and faculty. The program works students; at least one VIP team in each discipline; and full well in any discipline and is especially well-suited to multi- integration into the curriculum. Current goals include a uniform disciplinary efforts. The VIP program traces its origin to the strategy across all engineering and computing disciplines for Engineering Projects in Community Service (EPICS) Program. integrating senior design/capstone courses with VIP so that VIP We observed some weaknesses in EPICS that led to the is both the first true vehicle for multidisciplinary senior design creation of VIP. EPICS has insufficient recognition of faculty and students can remain members of their VIP team while effort as team advisors in the evaluation processes leading to satisfying senior design requirements. We are currently propos- pay increases and promotions, which can be overcome in part ing further research to correlate student performance, as by focusing the teams on projects of benefit to faculty research measured by design notebook grades and peer evaluations, with efforts. In EPICS, some projects drawn from the community centrality to the collaborative network within a student’s team. lack sufficient technical depth to challenge the students, which Funding/Sustainability: At both Purdue and Georgia Tech, the can be addressed by focusing the teams on design problems start-up costs were roughly: 25% release time for the lead embedded in faculty research efforts. Finally, projects were faculty member; support for a research staff member; a TA to limited to disciplines closely associated with community issues, help with course management, oversight of the VIP lab, which can be overcome by focusing on faculty-initiated administration of the design notebook process and the peer projects. Companies support VIP with donations of funds or evaluation process; a room large enough for a meeting of 20 or equipment. Partners/customers of VIP teams are typically the more people; projector; a few desktop and laptop machines; and same as those associated with each faculty advisor’s research access to virtual servers. Funding was raised via NSF grants, effort. Every discipline involved contributes its own expertise the endowment income for Prof. Coyle’s Chair and Center, to the overall collaborative effort of each VIP team. ECE and the College of Computing, and gifts from several Anticipated and Actual Outcomes: We anticipated the companies and donors. At Georgia Tech, all funding is recur- formation of sophisticated collaborative networks within and ring. The College of Engineering recently approved a request between VIP teams and various groups of students and tracked for recurring funds for a Program Manager to assist with the and characterized the networks within and between the teams at administration and growth of the VIP Program. VIP is thus Purdue and Georgia Tech. Results show students actively already sustainable over the long term. To assist with the interact regarding both technical and managerial advice. The continued expansion of the program, the VIP leadership of all number of individuals with whom students interact has in- schools will continue to collaborate on proposals to the Na- creased slightly as the program has grown. The E-I index (# of tional Science Foundation, foundations, corporations, and contacts outside group − # of contacts inside group)/(total potential donors. 26