Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.
Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.
OCR for page 91
4 U.S. Funding for the PEPFAR Initiative MAIN MESSAGES • he U.S. Government (USG) is the largest donor to the global HIV epi- T demic, and PEPFAR’s investment represents an historic contribution in countries with few resources and a great need for support in their response to HIV. • he greater part of PEPFAR’s funding has always gone to support T programs and activities implemented in partner countries. Consistent with one aspect of PEPFAR’s articulated strategy to move toward sus- tainability, more PEPFAR funding over time has been directed to local prime partners. Based on an analysis of a subset of data and countries, the increase in local prime partner funding has been driven primarily by increased funding to nongovernmental entities based in partner countries; the proportion of funding to partner country governments as prime partners has remained relatively stable over time. • EPFAR is increasingly emphasizing a range of efforts to more stra- P tegically and efficiently use its resources through the generation and use of economic and financial data; the allocation of resources based on anticipated impact; improved collaboration with partner country governments, other donors, and the Global Fund to align priorities and programs; and streamlining of business processes. PEPFAR has started to see some gains from these efforts. Continuing to identify and implement opportunities for more strategic and efficient use of resources will be critical for making progress toward optimal return on investment in the response to HIV in partner countries. • ecause of limitations in the available financial data, it was difficult to B fully assess the amount and distribution by program area and partner type of the annual direct investment of PEPFAR in partner countries. PEPFAR would benefit from the collection and reporting of financial data that not only serves for accounting purposes, but also are more closely aligned with programmatic data and program implementation. These data are critical for PEPFAR and external stakeholders to more 91
OCR for page 91
92 EVALUATION OF PEPFAR easily and effectively understand how well PEPFAR is being imple- mented and how PEPFAR’s investment relates to both the targets and goals of PEPFAR-supported programs and the broader goal of transitioning to more sustainable management of the response to HIV in partner countries.