An investment opportunity for CNG filling stations was published recently on the Internet (International CNG, 2012). It suggested that a $1.75 million investment is needed into a CNG station located in the District of Columbia, Maryland, or Virginia. A station would serve 1,000 cars per week, 10 gge/fill/car/week, with $0.50 margin over the cost of natural gas for a 15 percent return on investment.

The natural gas filling station infrastructure costs can be estimated based on the above investment offer by assuming one filling station per 1,000 CNG vehicles and a cost of $1.3 million per filling station (land, buildings, and equipment). On that basis, for example, for 5 million CNG vehicles, the filling station infrastructure would cost about $6.5 billion. CNG compressing and dispensing equipment is being sold by the clean-energy company IMW Industries at the writing of this report.

For municipal CNG vehicle fleets, the National Renewable Energy Laboratory report (Johnson, 2010) analyzes the business case for filling stations. A model has been developed that allows an investor to compute capital requirements and returns as a function of a number of equipment and operating variables.

The price of home-dispensed CNG can be significantly lower than filling station-dispensed CNG. As a result, CNG vehicle owners have been interested in home refueling. Honda Civic GX owners in California were able to purchase a home-fill station for overnight refueling for about $4,500 and have it installed at an additional fee. As of this writing, Honda is not recommending the home refueling of their CNG vehicles, due in part to concerns about the humidity content of home natural gas.


Blanco, S. 2010. In Depth: BWM Megacity Vehicle and Project I. Available at Accessed on January 7, 2011.

Botsford, C., and A. Sczczepanek. 2009. Fast charging vs.slow charging: Pros and cons for the new age of electric vehicles. In EVS24 International Battery, Hybrid and Fuel Cell Electric Vehicle Symposium. Stravanger, Norway.

Cromie, R., and R. Graham. 2009. Transition to Electricity as the Fuel of Choice. Presentation to the NRC Committee on Assessment of Resource Needs for Fuel Cell and Hydrogen Technologies on May 18.

Davis, R., A. Aden, and P.T. Pienkos. 2011. Techno-economic analysis of autotrophic microalgae for fuel production. Applied Energy 88(10):3524-3531.

DOE (U.S. Department of Energy). 2010a. Algenol Integrated Biorefinery for Producing Ethanol from Hybrid Algae. DOE/EA-1786. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Energy.

———. 2010b. National Algal Biofuels Technology Roadmap. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.

———. 2011. U.S. Billion-Ton Update. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Energy. Available at

EIA (Energy Information Administration). 2011. Annual Energy Outlook 2011 With Projections to 2035. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Energy.

EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). 2010a. Regulation of fuels and fuel additives: Changes to renewable fuel standard program; final rule. Federal Register 75(58):14669-15320.

———. 2010b. Renewable Fuel Standard Program (RFS2) Regulatory Impact Analysis. US EPA 420-R-10-006. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

EPRI (Electric Power Research Institute). 2004. Advanced Batteries for Electric-Drive Vehicles. A Technology and Cost-Effectiveness Assessment for Battery Electric Vehicles, Power Assist Hybrid Electric Vehicles, and Plug-In Hybrid Electric Vehicles. Palo Alto, Calif.: Electric Power Research Institute.

———. 2005. Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicles: Changing the Energy Landscape. Palo Alto, Calif.: Electric Power Research Institute.

The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine
500 Fifth St. N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20001

Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use and Privacy Statement