Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.
Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.
OCR for page 99
C Specific Examples of NNI Stakeholders The breadth of NNI stakeholders can be seen from the participants in the “Strategic Planning Stakeholder Workshop” held July 13-14, 2010. The goal of the NNI-sponsored workshop was “to obtain input from stakeholders, both those new to nanoscale science, engineering, and technology and those already familiar with these fields and with the NNI. . . .” The diverse nature of the workshop participants (Table C.1) is indicative of the many actors involved in translating research to technology development and commercial applications and in creating a highly capable workforce, and of the impact of scientific research on U.S. society at large. 1 TABLE C.1 NNI Stakeholders NNI Stakeholder Organization Federal Departments, Agencies, Departments of Agriculture, Commerce, Defense, Education, Energy, Laboratories, and Offices Health and Human Services, and Labor; Consumer Product Safety Commission, FDA, EPA, OSHA, NIST, National Institutes of Health (NHGRI, NIEHS, NIMH, NIOSH, MIEHA, NCMRR), Defense Threat Reduction Agency, National Science Foundation, U.S. Forest Service, USDA, National Reconnaissance Office, International Trade Administration/Commerce, Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research/Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Federal laboratories and centers (Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Navy and Marine Corps Public Health Center, Sandia National Laboratories, U.S. Forest Service, Army Research Laboratory, NASA Glenn Research Center, USACE Engineer Research and Development Center, Nanotechnology Characterization Laboratory (NIH/FDA/NIST), FDA Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Idaho National Laboratory), National Academy of Sciences, National Human Genome Research Institute, OSTP, NNCO Congress Representative Daniel Lipinski, Offices of Representative Lipinski, Senator Mark Pryor Nonprofits CNA Analysis and Solutions Labor AFL-CIO Policy Centers Center for Policy on Emerging Technologies, Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, Children’s Environmental Health Network, International Federal Technology Watch, Science and Technology Policy Institute, Institute for Advanced Sciences Convergence, Intellegere Foundation Universities Johns Hopkins Applied Physics Laboratory, University of California, Berkeley, Purdue, Norwich University Applied Research Institute, 1 This list of workshop participants shows the breadth of NNI stakeholders, and not the total number of stakeholders. The workshop listed only the stakeholders attending in person an event that ran at full capacity. Those not able to attend in person, and therefore not on the list, could also access the event via a webcast, and stakeholder input could be provided in writing. For additional information, see National Nanotechnology Initiative, available at http://www.nano.gov/node/256, accessed January 9, 2013. PREPUBLICATION COPY—SUBJECT TO FURTHER EDITORIAL CORRECTION 99
OCR for page 99
Oklahoma State, Virginia, Northeastern, Rochester, Pennsylvania State, Arizona State, Rice, Harvard, Southern California, California Institute of Technology Research Foundations The ILSI Research Foundation, Norwich Research Institutes Nano Institutes, Networking and Network for Computation Nanotechnology, NanoBusiness Alliance, Trade Associations NanoScience Exchange, Rushford Institute for Nanotechnology, Nano- Link Regional Center, Oklahoma Nanotechnology Initiative, NanoStar Institute, PA Bio Nano Systems, LLC Traditional Trade Associations American Chemistry Council, Association of Science-Technology Centers, AAAS, Council for Chemistry Research, American National Standards Institute, American Forest and Paper Association (AF&PA), Nano Association of Natural Resources and Energy Security, Council for Chemical Research News Organization Inside Washington Publishers Commercial Pixelligent Technologies, Lockheed Martin, Evonik Degussa Corp., NanoTox, Applied Nanostructured Solutions, Luna Innovations Inc., Rushford NanoElectroChemistry Co., Eikos, Inc., Zyvex, Intel, System Planning Corp., General Dynamics AIST, System Planning Corp., Science Applications International Corporation, Notable Solutions, Inc., PSI, Inc., Semiconductor Research Corporation Technology Assessments World Technology Evaluation Center, Center for Technology Assessment, International Center for Technology Assessment Law Firms Arnold & Porter, K&L Gates Other Federal Technology Watch SOURCE: Information from the final report of the Strategic Planning Stakeholder Workshop, July 13-14, 2010. PREPUBLICATION COPY—SUBJECT TO FURTHER EDITORIAL CORRECTION 100