National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

PAPERBACK
price:$74.00
add to cart

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

Countering the Problem of Falsified and Substandard Drugs (2013)
Board on Global Health (BGH)

Citation Manager

. "5 Weaknesses in the Drug Distribution Chain." Countering the Problem of Falsified and Substandard Drugs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2013.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
169
bottomleft bottomright
Page
169

Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 169
5 Weaknesses in the Drug Distribution Chain The modern pharmaceutical supply chain is complex. Medicines are made from ingredients sourced from different countries. Final formulations are then exported. Packaging, repackaging, and sale can happen in many other countries. Drugs change hands many times between the manufacturer and patient; every transaction is an opportunity for falsified or substandard products to infiltrate the market. Changes to the drug distribution system could improve drug quality around the world. This chapter gives an overview of the drug distribution chain, explaining differences between the system in developed and developing countries. The drug wholesale system is a weak point where the licit and illicit supply chains mix. Better controls on the wholesale market could improve the security of the distribution chain. Drug tracking systems could also improve security by preventing products that leave the legitimate supply chain from returning to it. These solutions can improve drug safety as long as the supply chain does not disintegrate at the point closest to the patient. Disorganized drug markets, both real and on the internet, undermine regulatory checks on medicines distribution. AN OVERVIEW OF DRUG DISTRIBUTION IN DEVELOPED AND DEVELOPING COUNTRIES Key Findings and Conclusions  A few national firms control most of the primary wholesale market in rich countries. In developing countries hundreds, sometimes thousands, of firms control tiny shares of the same.  Drug distribution chains in developing countries are often fragmented and complicated.  The final leg of the drug distribution chain is exceptionally expensive and inefficient in developing countries. Figure 5-1 describes the drug distribution chain in developed countries, where most patients get medicine from a doctor’s office, or a licensed pharmacy or dispensary (Yadav and Smith, 2012). For example, in the United States about three-quarters of all pharmaceuticals are bought in retail pharmacies, about half of which are national chains or food stores with an internal pharmacy (Yadav and Smith, 2012). These vendors handle a wide variety of products sold in an even wider variety of packaging. Retailers in developed countries would find it logistically impossible to buy their stock, in its many different packages, directly from manufacturers (Yadav et al., 2012). Therefore, most vendors buy their inventory from pre- wholesalers and wholesalers. The drug distribution system in low- and middle-income countries has the same basic steps as that described in Figure 5-1, but with more intermediaries between the manufacturer and patient (Yadav and Smith, 2012). Instead of having one coordinated distribution chain that 169 PREPUBLICATION COPY: UNCORRECTED PROOFS

OCR for page 170
COUNTERTING THE PROBLEM OF FALSIFIED AND SUBSTANDARD DRUGS reaches the whole country, there are many small chains and many small companies at every step (Yadav and Smith, 2012). Figure 5-2 describes the drug flow for public, private, and nongovernmental organizations, and their separate, but sometimes overlapping, intermediaries. A comparison of Figures 5-1 and 5-2, and Table 5-1 illustrate some important differences in drug distribution in developing and developed countries. For example, a few large firms generally control the national wholesale market in developed countries. Cardinal Health, McKesson, and AmerisourceBergen distribute 90 percent of drugs sold in the United States; four or five major firms distribute to 90 percent of the market in western Europe and Japan (Yadav and Smith, 2012). In developing countries, hundreds, even thousands, of companies control tiny shares of the drug wholesale market (Yadav and Smith, 2012). 170 PREPUBLICATION COPY: UNCORRECTED PROOFS

OCR for page 171
WEAKNESSES IN THE DRUG DISTRIBUTION CHAIN 171 PREPUBLICATION COPY: UNCORRECTED PROOFS

OCR for page 172
COUNTERTING THE PROBLEM OF FALSIFIED AND SUBSTANDARD DRUGS TABLE 5-1 Differences in Overall Structure of the Pharmaceutical Market in Developed and Developing Countries Factor Developed Countries Developing countries Mostly payments are made out of pocket. Social health insurance systems are expanding in many Strong presence of public or private emerging markets. Private Payer or insurance companies and limited out of insurance plans are also growing in Reimbursement pocket expenditure some emerging market countries. Weak fragmented regulatory structures, ill-defined laws in some Strong, well-defined laws and overall good instances, and poor ability to Regulatory Structure ability to enforce regulations enforce regulations. Poor regulatory structure creates a strong market for branded generics Patented, Generic vs. The market for prescription drugs consists (brand is used as a signal of quality Branded Generic of patented drugs and generics. by the patient). Retail drug shops often dispense medicines and also act as the first Prescription Prescription drugs can only be dispensed point of healthcare contact for many adherence with a formal prescription patients. Buyer (insurance companies or national health system) monopoly creates good Balance of power is tilted towards balance of power between the manufacturer the manufacturer and the and the patients. In the United States, distribution channel. The large pharmacy benefit managers and drug fraction of patients purchase using Balance of power in formularies are commonly used as a means out of pocket funds and have little the system to ensure further balance of power. bargaining power. SOURCE: Adapted from (Yadav and Smith, 2012). Excessive fragmentation is an important difference between developed and developing country drug distribution systems. In developed countries, comparatively few large firms control the market and regulatory authorities require some chain of custody documentation. In low- and middle-income countries, the system is vastly more complicated. Sometimes multiple parallel distribution systems of varying efficiency run in the same country. Box 5-1 describes the confusing drug distribution systems often found in humanitarian emergencies. 172 PREPUBLICATION COPY: UNCORRECTED PROOFS

OCR for page 173
WEAKNESSES IN THE DRUG DISTRIBUTION CHAIN BOX 5-1 Drug Distribution in Humanitarian Emergencies A donated batch of Ringer’s Lactate Infusions made its way to humanitarian aid workers in Darfur through a UN agency and other suppliers. Despite its many stops along the way, only at one of the final destinations did a volunteer doctor notice fungal spores contaminating the product (Caudron et al., 2008). The infusions had been distributed so widely and haphazardly that, despite a product recall, only 15 percent were ever collected (Caudron et al., 2008). Such problems are not uncommon during emergencies, when quality control throughout long supply chains becomes difficult. Despite the good intentions of aid agencies, nongovernmental organizations (NGOs), individual and corporate donors, the chaos inherent in humanitarian emergencies often leads to a proliferation of fake, substandard, and otherwise poorly regulated medical products. The dangers of poorly regulated drugs lead some bodies, such as the European Commission’s Directorate-General for Humanitarian Aid, stipulate that quality assurance guidelines not be relaxed during emergencies, even though quality assurance steps can slow down response (Pomatto and Schuftan, 2006). After the tsunami in Sri Lanka, only 50 percent of the drugs donated had expiration dates on them, of that half 5 percent had already expired or would expire within days; 62 percent of the medication labels were not in English, the language of the Sri Lankan health system (Mahmood et al., 2011). Such inappropriate drug donations cause serious problems because disposing of such drugs, especially in large quantities, is a lengthy and expensive project (Pomatto and Schuftan, 2006). After the 2000 floods in Venezuela, 70 percent of the drugs donated for humanitarian assistance needed to be destroyed, requiring the government to pay $16,000 to cover the extra personnel needed to sort the donations (Hechmann and Dune-Birouste, 2007). During emergencies, little about patients, their diagnoses, or medical history is collected at most health facilities. Drug quality signals can be difficult to spot when infrastructure is disrupted: patients are seen quickly and only minimal information is recorded. NGOs often arrive with few or no pharmacists on staff, and although local health workers may be aware of substandard and falsified drugs, visiting doctors often are not (Villacorta-Linaza, 2009). The World Health Organization published its “Guidelines for Drug Donations” in 1996 after particularly problematic donations during the Bosnian War (Berckmans et al., 1997; Hechmann and Dune-Birouste). At times the guidelines are followed closely; for example humanitarian emergencies in East Timor and Gujarat State saw few inappropriate donations (van Dijk et al., 2011). In Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development countries, private companies ship and transport almost all pharmaceuticals, but in developing countries, despite their vastly smaller tax base, the government does (Yadav, 2010). In sub-Saharan Africa, a government owned and operated central medical store manages the distribution of drugs, transporting goods around the country in a government-owned fleet. Donors and developing country governments favor this system, wherein the central store manager can neither hire people with business experience, nor fire incompetent workers (Yadav, 2010). Inefficient supply chain management directly drives up costs and causes drug stock-outs in low- and 173 PREPUBLICATION COPY: UNCORRECTED PROOFS

OCR for page 174
COUNTERTING THE PROBLEM OF FALSIFIED AND SUBSTANDARD DRUGS middle-income countries (Yadav, 2010). As Chapter 4 explained, this drug scarcity in turn creates a vacuum for poor quality products to fill. Of course, donor demands alone do not drive the costs of supply chain management in developing countries. It is expensive to transport products over rough terrain with poor roads. In India, for example, nearly 70 percent of the population lives in rural areas, where the health posts may be few and lacking in staff, electricity, and supplies (Langer and Kelkar, 2008). The costs of drug distribution in India are two to three times greater than in the United States or the European Union, despite vastly lower labor costs (Langer and Kelkar, 2008). Supply chain managers are always concerned with the last mile problem: the disproportionately expensive and inefficient final leg on the distribution chain. In developing countries, the last mile is exceptionally long, extending to sparsely populated villages far from a paved road and farther from a supply center (USAID, 2011). Managing the drug distribution system in developing countries means containing the costs of the last mile, moving medicines to patients quickly, and keeping records of all transactions between the manufacturer and the consumer. The first step on this chain is the drug wholesale market. Around the world, drug wholesale is a common point of vulnerability to falsified and substandard medicines. THE WHOLESALE SYSTEM There are two kinds of drugs wholesalers: primary wholesalers who have written distribution contracts with manufacturers and buy directly from them, and secondary wholesalers who buy from other intermediaries. In some countries, including the United States, there are also large regional wholesalers (Fein, 2012; White and Bothma, 2009). Regional wholesalers may be primary or secondary wholesalers (Fein, 2011). They often serve independent pharmacies or hospitals and may have strong distribution networks (Levy, 2006). As Figure 5-1 suggests, the distinction between the primary and secondary wholesalers is not always clear. Primary wholesalers may, for example, buy products from secondary wholesalers as well as manufacturers (Ziance, 2008). The back and forth sales are common among drug wholesalers, who buy and sell medicines to accommodate market demand. That is, when they see a medicine is scarce in one region, they can buy the same medicine from other wholesalers that may be flush with it. The markets are constantly fluctuating; products change hands many times. Sometimes secondary wholesalers fill a void; they supply to rural pharmacies or markets that national or regional wholesalers do not reach. But, they choose stock based on demand forecasts, price, margin, and their customers’ willingness to pay (Yadav, 2009). The costs of the transactions required when dealing with many suppliers and their generally poorer bargaining power give the secondary wholesalers weak incentives to stock a wide variety of products or brands (Yadav, 2009). 174 PREPUBLICATION COPY: UNCORRECTED PROOFS

OCR for page 175
WEAKNESSES IN THE DRUG DISTRIBUTION CHAIN Key Findings and Conclusions  The U.S. drug wholesale market is made up of a combination of primary and secondary wholesalers. There are three major national wholesalers, a few regional wholesalers, and thousands of secondary wholesalers.  Secondary wholesalers are the weakest point in the U.S. pharmaceutical distribution chain.  Wholesalers buy and sell drugs in response to market demand, repeatedly repackaging products. In wholesale repackaging illegitimate products can gain authentic packaging, and clean, authentic packaging is removed and not always destroyed.  In the United States, state pharmacy boards or other state agencies license wholesalers. Their licensing requirements vary widely. Unscrupulous wholesalers seek out states with the most lenient requirements and move from state to state when caught in violations.  There is no national database on drug wholesalers.  Raising the minimum standards for drugs wholesale in the United States could build momentum for increased control of the drug wholesale market in low- and middle-income countries. Wholesalers may sell and resell medicines repeatedly among themselves before filling a pharmacy order. Wholesalers often repackage products with every sale, or at least repackage individual containers for final sale (Catizone, 2006; Laven, 2006). Through a process called salting, legitimate and fake drugs are mixed at wholesale, and in the wholesale repackaging, the fake products gain authentic labels (Donaldson, 2010a; Liang, 2006). Salting can be done unknowingly, such as when primary wholesalers buy from other intermediaries, accidentally launder fake products, package them in authentic labels, and send them to pharmacies (Spies and VanDusen, 2003). In repackaging the manufacturer’s expensive fraud-protection packaging can be removed, and batch numbers reprinted (Satchwell, 2004). Not only does this interfere with tracking requirements, but it leaves the wholesaler repackagers with clean, unused packaging that is not always destroyed (Satchwell, 2004). Manufacturers usually have no distribution agreements with secondary wholesalers (Ziance, 2008). The firms may trade in many kinds of products other than pharmaceuticals. Their staff are not required to show skills in pharmaceutical warehousing and management, often with disastrous consequences (Ziance, 2008). In 2001, for example, a falsified version of Epogen, one of the most expensive drugs in the Medicare formulary, killed a 16-year-old boy in New York (Gressit, 2007; Ziance, 2008). Eleven secondary wholesalers had traded the Epogen that killed him (Engelberg et al., 2009; Gressit, 2007; Whoriskey, 2012). Though it is impossible to recreate the drug’s exact path, it was briefly stored in a drinks cooler above a Florida strip club (Brown, 2005). Small secondary wholesalers act negligently in part because they do not have the reputational risks major national or regional wholesalers do. There are thousands of secondary wholesalers in the United States, all legally supplying to pharmacies, the product of lax licensing requirements (Appleby, 2003). In a recommendation to the state legislature, a Florida grand jury described some of the states’ drug wholesalers as, “uneducated, inexperienced, … 175 PREPUBLICATION COPY: UNCORRECTED PROOFS

OCR for page 176
COUNTERTING THE PROBLEM OF FALSIFIED AND SUBSTANDARD DRUGS rank amateurs, many with criminal records” (Appleby, 2003). As the grand jury description implies, many of these companies are looking to increase their profits at any costs. These companies exploit problems in the regulated drug market, such as drug shortages. Hospital pharmacists are under pressure to fill prescriptions even during drug shortages, forcing them to buy from gray market vendors at up to 10 times the standard prices for some drugs, including anesthetics and cancer drugs (ISMP, 2011; Newsmax, 2011). More than half of surveyed hospitals in the United States buy cancer meds from gray market (Gatesman and Smith, 2011). A similar proportion of U.S. hospital pharmacists and drug buyers report daily inquiries from gray market pharmaceutical salesmen about their inventories (ISMP, 2011). One survey respondent told the Institute for Safe Medication Practices, an NGO, “You are hesitant to tell gray market vendors what you need because they will buy it all up if they find it, and then harass you [to buy it] for months afterwards” (ISMP, 2011). Box 5-2 describes one such gray market purchase. Some changes to the drugs wholesale system could protect the American consumer. One option would be requiring all organizations that sell wholesale medicines to hold National Association of Boards of Pharmacy (NABP) accreditation. The NABP wholesale accreditation process reviews wholesalers’ record keeping, licensing, and drug verification procedures (NABP, 2012a). Accreditation also involves criminal background checks on the most senior operations, buying, and inventory staff, their supervisors, and anyone owning greater than 10 percent interest in the company if it is not publically held (NABP, 2012a). Indiana, North Dakota, and Wyoming require NABP accreditation for wholesalers; wholesalers in other states may voluntarily seek out certification as evidence of their standards (Cherici et al., 2011). Direct to pharmacy distribution is another alternative to the current wholesale systems. In this system, manufacturers eliminate secondary wholesalers and use logistics companies to ship directly to the vendor. It has been used, with varying success, in Europe and Australia (Galve and Campos, 2011; Kanavos et al., 2011; Taylor, 2011). There is some concern, however, that direct distribution drives up medicines costs (Exel, 2003; OFT, 2007). It also puts impractical storage and warehousing demands on retailers (Exel, 2003). If direct to pharmacy distribution replaces wholesalers with an equally porous network of transport and logistics companies, then it is no improvement. More rigorous licensing and regulation of the wholesale market, especially the secondary wholesalers, is another solution. The committee believes the secondary wholesale market is the weakest link in the U.S. drug distribution system. Improvements to the secondary wholesale system could reduce the number of transactions in the drug distribution chain, thereby improving security. Recommendation 5-1: State licensing boards should only license wholesalers and distributors that meet the National Association of Boards of Pharmacy accreditation standards. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration, in collaboration with state licensing boards, should establish a public database to share information on suspended and revoked wholesale licenses. The committee finds that peculiarities of the American wholesale system account for much of the United States’ vulnerability to falsified and substandard drugs. Limiting the wholesale market to vetted firms would make the drug distribution chain less permeable to 176 PREPUBLICATION COPY: UNCORRECTED PROOFS

OCR for page 177
WEAKNESSES IN THE DRUG DISTRIBUTION CHAIN criminals (Donaldson, 2010b). Similar weaknesses plague the wholesale system in developing countries, and action in the American market might give regulators around the world an example and encouragement to tighten controls on the chaotic wholesale and distribution systems. This recommendation should be implemented in phases over the next 2 years. Collaboration between state licensing boards and the FDA should happen first. Next, the regulators should design the database and publish the processes for collecting accurate, reliable, and timely information about the suspension or revocation of wholesale licenses. The United States Wholesale Market In the United States, state governments control professional practice, including the practice of pharmacy, which includes medicine distribution and wholesale. Some states have enacted tighter regulations on the market, with unintended spillover effects (Laven, 2006). After the state of Nevada increased oversight of drugs wholesale, for example, “some wholesalers simply moved operations across the state line into California” (Flaherty and Gaul, 2003). When unscrupulous business can seek out the softest regulatory systems to work in, they do. As the previous section explains, the wholesale trade depends on buying and selling medicines in response to shortages and gluts in different parts of the country. Therefore, the weaknesses in one state licensing system can become vulnerabilities for the others. The committee recognizes the authority of states to license wholesalers, but believes that public health will be best protected if all businesses adhere to the strict standards laid out by the National Association of Boards of Pharmacy accreditation process. Every state has an interest in promoting high minimum standards for medicine sale and manufacture. The recent fungal meningitis outbreak from an steroid injection compounded under grossly unsterile conditions at New England Compounding Center in September 2012 is a reminder of the risks of competing state standards (Grady et al., 2012; Tavernise and Pollack, 2012). The outbreak and associated infections, which as of January 2013, had killed 45 patients and sickened 693 others in 19 states, was driven by the interstate sale of a compounded steroid (CDC, 2013). Compounding pharmacies are not held to the same standards as big pharmaceutical manufacturers; courts have questioned FDA’s authority over them (Grady et al., 2012). As in the wholesale market, states regulate these businesses in isolation. Though the Massachusetts Department of Health registered three complaints against New England Compounding Center, there is no mandatory national system for sharing these complaints (Grady et al., 2012). Similarly, there is no way for state authorities to share information on criminal or negligent wholesalers. As part of the stronger wholesale system, states should report violations and revocations of wholesale licenses to a national, public database. This will impede unscrupulous wholesalers from moving from state to state and starting over when caught in violation of one state’s rules. The FDA should facilitate the sharing of this information among states and with the public. The recent tragic meningitis outbreak has brought to light the importance of sharing information on dangerous actors in the drug distribution chain. While the states have the authority and staffing to license wholesalers, the nation’s interests are best served by enabling communication among the states. 177 PREPUBLICATION COPY: UNCORRECTED PROOFS

OCR for page 178
COUNTERTING THE PROBLEM OF FALSIFIED AND SUBSTANDARD DRUGS BOX 5-2 Falsified Avastin’s Circuitous Path to the United States Fake drugs originally manufactured in Turkey took a winding path to the United States in late 2011 and early 2012, where they found their way to several physicians’ offices. The drug, Avastin, is manufactured by Roche Holding AG of Switzerland and is often used alongside chemotherapy to treat certain lung, colon, and kidney cancers (Faucon and Whalen, 2012). The fake batches contained salt, starch, and various chemicals, but no active ingredients (Blair, 2012). In February and March 2012, the FDA warned approximately 20 practices that they may have received fake Avastin. Later that spring, they expanded the number to 76 potentially affected practices in 22 U.S. states (Weaver and Whalen, 2012) . The precise origins of the drugs are unknown, as the Turkish company listed on relevant paperwork was not registered with the Turkish authorities, and a trip to its stated address led investigators to a textiles warehouse (Faucon and Whalen, 2012). A Swiss drug distributor, apparently unaware of the problem, purchased the Avastin from Turkey from a Syrian middleman in Egypt, and subsequently sold it to another distributor in Copenhagen (Faucon and Whalen, 2012). From there, the drugs traveled through several companies in Britain and the United States under the parent company Canada Drugs, which operates an online pharmacy that often uses overseas companies to source discount drugs. Ultimately, two U.S. companies sold the drug directly to physicians (Weaver and Whalen, 2012) . The high cost of such drugs, at times exacerbated by shortages, may tempt physicians to seek out alternative suppliers to lower their own and their patients’ costs and assure a steady supply. At a price several hundred dollars lower per vial than the standard, the falsified Avastin was a good deal for such practices (Weaver and Whalen, 2012). The same forces that lead patients to buy unreliable drugs can lead doctors to do the same, creating yet another vulnerable link in the medicines supply chain. 178 PREPUBLICATION COPY: UNCORRECTED PROOFS

OCR for page 179
WEAKNESSES IN THE DRUG DISTRIBUTION CHAIN The Wholesale Market in Low- and Middle-Income Countries As the previous section explains, the wholesale market is a common vulnerability in medicines distribution around the world. On potential positive outcome of raising the standards for US wholesalers is that it would build international momentum for a leaner, more organized wholesale drug market. Other countries are already working towards more controlled drug wholesale. For example, in 2004 the Chinese drug regulatory authority cut the number of drug wholesalers in the country from 16,000 to 7,445 (Yadav et al., 2011). This is still many more then in the United States, Europe, or Japan, but it is an admirable move in a more sustainable direction. Proponents of the current drug wholesale system maintain that a small number of wholesalers cannot serve the drugs market of developing countries. They reason that a system of three or four large primary wholesalers may work in Europe or North America, but in developing countries a few companies could never guarantee fine-mesh distribution (Foundation Strategy Group, 2005; McCabe, 2009). Medicine shops in Kenya, for example, report buying from a range of pharmaceutical and general wholesalers both in and outside of the shop’s district, as well as mobile vendors and manufacturers (Amin and Snow, 2005). Others argue that raising the quality standards for drug distribution carries an inherent trade-off of decreased access to medicine (OFT, 2007). Analysis of successful distribution chains, such as the Coca-Cola distribution chain, suggests this is a false dichotomy, however (Yadav et al., 2013). ColaLife, a nonprofit, has been using Coca-Cola’s fine mesh distribution chain to bring oral rehydration and zinc supplements to remote areas since 2008 (ColaLife, 2012). Steps toward a more controlled and efficient wholesale market can protect patients in the markets most hurt by bad quality drugs. A reduction in the number of licensed wholesalers and use of more efficient distribution chains can help the wholesale market around the world. DRUG DIVERSION More stringent licensing requirements can improve the wholesale system, but drugs will still need to move from factory to the vendor, passing through many hands before reaching the patient. With every transaction on the chain, there is a risk of the drug supply being compromised. Criminals take advantage of places where the distribution chain breaks down and medicines depart from documented chain of custody. Drugs that leave the proper distribution system are called diverted drugs; the markets that trade diverted drugs, or more generally, markets that trade with little authorized oversight, are called gray markets. 179 PREPUBLICATION COPY: UNCORRECTED PROOFS

OCR for page 208
COUNTERTING THE PROBLEM OF FALSIFIED AND SUBSTANDARD DRUGS REFERENCES Altunkan, S. M., A. Yasemin, I. T. Aykac, and E. Akpinar. 2012. Turkish pharmaceuticals track & trace system. Paper read at Health Informatics and Bioinformatics (HIBIT), 2012 7th International Symposium on, 19-22 April 2012. Amin, A., and R. Snow. 2005. Brands, costs and registration status of antimalarial drugs in the kenyan retail sector. Malaria Journal 4(36). Anderson, C., I. Bates, D. Beck, T. P. Brock, B. Futter, H. Mercer, M. Rouse, S. Whitmarsh, T. Wuliji, and A. Yonemura. 2009. The WHO unesco FIP pharmacy education taskforce. Human Resources for Health 7(45). Appleby, J. 2003. Fake drugs show up in U.S. Pharmacies. USA Today, May 14. Attanasio, O. P., A. D. Kugler, and C. Meghir. 2009. Subsidizing vocational training for disadvantaged youth in developing countries: Evidence from a randomized trial. Bonn, Germany: Institute for the Study of Labor. Australian Government. 1999. Looking afterpharmacy in rural and remot Australia. https://www.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/Content/health-mediarel- yr1999-mw-mw99010.htm (accessed October 5, 2012). Azhar, S., M. Hassali, M. Ibrahim, M. Ahmad, I. Masood, and A. Shafie. 2009. The role of pharmacists in developing countries: The current scenario in Pakistan. Human Resources for Health 7(1):54. Baert, B., and B. De Spiegeleer. 2010. Quality analytics of internet pharmaceuticals. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry 398(1):125-136. Barlas, S. 2006. Drug companies on different RFID frequencies. http://www.healthcarepackaging.com/archives/2006/01/drug_companies_on_different_r f.php (accessed September 28, 2012). ———. 2011a. FDA's track-and-trace workshop talks turkey about item-level pharmaceutical packaging. Healthcare Packaging, March 15. ———. 2011b. Track-and-trace drug verification: FDA plans new national standards, pharmacies tread with trepidation. Pharmacy and Therapeutics 36(4). Basak, S., J. van Mil, and D. Sathyanarayana. 2009. The changing roles of pharmacists in community pharmacies: Perception of reality in India. Pharmacy World & Science 31(6):612-618. Basco, L. K. 2004. Molecular epidemiology of malaria in Cameroon. XIX. Quality of antimalarial drugs used for self-medication. The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 70(3):245-250. Bate, R. 2012. Phake: The deadly world of falsified and substandard medicines: Rowman & Littlefield Publishing Group and The American Enterprise Institute. Bate, R., K. Hess, and L. Mooney. 2010a. Antimalarial medicine diversion: Stock-outs and other public health problems. Research and Reports in Tropical Medicine 1:19-24. Bate, R., G. Z. Jin, and A. Mathur. 2012. Unveiling the mystery of online pharmacies: An audit study. National Bureau of Economic Reasearch. Bate, R., L. Mooney, and K. Hess. 2010b. Medicine registration and medicine quality: A preliminary analysis of key cities in emerging markets. Research and Reports in Tropical Medicine 1:89-93. 208 PREPUBLICATION COPY: UNCORRECTED PROOFS

OCR for page 209
WEAKNESSES IN THE DRUG DISTRIBUTION CHAIN Bendavid, Y., E. Lefebvre, L. Lefebvre, and S. F. Wamba. 2007. B-to-B e-commerce: Assessing the impacts of RFID technology in a five layer supply chain. Proceedings of the 40th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Berckmans, P., V. Dawans, G. Schmets, D. Vandenbergh, and P. Autier. 1997. Inappropriate drug-donation practices in bosnia and herzegovina, 1992 to 1996. N Engl J Med 337(25):1842-1845. Berndt, E. R., and J. P. Newhouse. 2010. Pricing and reimbursement in U.S. Pharmaceutical markets. Cambridge, Massachusetts: National Bureau of Economic Research. Blair, E. 2012. Egyptian middleman bought fake avastin from turkey (accessed. Bolton-Moore, C., M. Mubiana-Mbewe, R. A. Cantrell, N. Chintu, E. M. Stringer, B. H. Chi, M. Sinkala, C. Kankasa, C. M. Wilson, C. M. Wilfert, A. Mwango, J. Levy, E. J. Abrams, M. Bulterys, and J. S. A. Stringer. 2007. Clinical outcomes and CD4 cell response in children receiving antiretroviral therapy at primary health care facilities in Zambia. JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association 298(16):1888-1899. Bostwick, J. M., and T. W. Lineberry. 2007. Do cheap internet drugs threaten the safety of the doctor-patient relationship? Expert Opin Drug Saf 6(1):9-13. Brown, E. C. 2005. Pharmaceutical fakery: Counterfeit drugs threaten patients' health. Long Island Press, June 9-15. Bureau of Labor Statistics. 2012. Occupational outlook handbook, 2012-13 edition, pharmacy technicians. http://www.bls.gov/ooh/healthcare/pharmacy-technicians.htm (accessed October 11, 2012). Burnham, T. 2012. Arrests made in $75 million prescription drug heist. NPR, May 4. Bustreo, F., A. Harding, and H. Axelsson. 2003. Can developing countries achieve adequate improvements in child health outcomes without engaging the private sector? Bulletin of the World Health Organization 81(12):886-895. Buynak, D. 2011. Docket no. FDA-2010-n-0633: Determination of system attributes for tracking and tracing of prescription drugs. AstraZeneca. Catizone, C. A. 2006. Counterfeit drugs and states’ efforts to combat the problem. Journal of Pharmacy Practice 19(3):165-170. Caudron, J. M., N. Ford, M. Henkens, C. Macé, R. Kiddle-Monroe, and J. Pinel. 2008. Substandard medicines in resource-poor settings: A problem that can no longer be ignored. Tropical Medicine & International Health 13(8):1062-1072. CBO. 2007. Prescription drug pricing in the private sector. Congressional Budget Office. CDC. 2013. Multistate fungal meningitis outbreak - current case count. http://www.cdc.gov/hai/outbreaks/meningitis-map-large.html (accessed January 28, 2013). Cherici, C., P. McGinnis, and W. Russell. 2011. Buyer beware: Drug shortages and the gray market. Premier healthcare alliance. Clabaugh, J. 2005. Survey finds few online pharmacies sell drugs. Washington Business Journal, June 13. Cockburn, D. 2011. Implementation of falsified medcines directive: Meeting with patients and conusmer organizations, 30 November 2011. European Medicines Agency. ———. 2013. Re: Question about internet common logo, January 18. ColaLife. 2012. About. http://www.colalife.org/about/ (accessed October 31, 2012). Council of State Governments. 2008. Physician shortages and the medically underserved. CSG. 209 PREPUBLICATION COPY: UNCORRECTED PROOFS

OCR for page 210
COUNTERTING THE PROBLEM OF FALSIFIED AND SUBSTANDARD DRUGS Crawford, S. Y. 2003. Internet pharmacy: Issues of access, quality, costs, and regulation. Journal of Medical Systems 27(1):57-65. Davison, M. 2011. Indian pharmaceutical exporters must add 2D codes to all packs. http://www.bluespherehealth.com/wordpress/?p=236 (accessed October 4, 2012). DeCardenas, R. 2007. Drug pedigree systems. Oncology Issues March/April:38-41. deKieffer, D. E. 2006. The internet and the globalization of counterfeit drugs. Journal of Pharmacy Practice 19(3):171-177. Donaldson, A. 2010a. "And the ones that mother gives you don't do anything at all," combating counterfeit pharmaceuticals: The American and british perspectives. New England Journal of International and Comparative Law 16(1). ———. 2010b. Current development: "And the ones that mother gives you don't do anything at all" combating counterfeit pharmaceuticals: The American and british perspectives. New England Journal of International and Comparative Law 16(1). Dondorp, A. M., P. N. Newton, M. Mayxay, W. Van Damme, F. M. Smithuis, S. Yeung, A. Petit, A. J. Lynam, A. Johnson, T. T. Hien, R. McGready, J. J. Farrar, S. Looareesuwan, N. P. J. Day, M. D. Green, and N. J. White. 2004. Fake antimalarials in southeast Asia are a major impediment to malaria control: Multinational cross-sectional survey on the prevalence of fake antimalarials. Tropical Medicine & International Health 9(12):1241- 1246. DrugTopics. 2012. Strategies to combat online counterfeit drug supply. http://drugtopics.modernmedicine.com/drugtopics/article/articleDetail.jsp?id=782394 (accessed October 22, 2012). Ducca, A. 2011. Re: Determination of system attributes for the tracking and tracing of presription drugs; [docket no. FDA-2010-n-0633]; 76 fed. Reg. 1182 (jan. 7, 2011). http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=FDA-2010-N-0633-0012 (accessed October 12, 2012). DuPont, R. 2010. Prescription drug abuse: An epidemic dilemma. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs 42(2):127-132. EAASM. 2008. The counterfeiting superhighway. Efrati, A., and P. Loftus. 2010. Lilly drugs stolen in warehouse heist. Wall Street Journal, March 17. EMA. 2011. Falsified medicines. http://www.ema.europa.eu/ema/index.jsp?curl=pages/special_topics/general/general_co ntent_000186.jsp&mid=WC0b01ac058002d4e8 (accessed November 7, 2012). Engelberg, A. B., A. S. Kesselheim, and J. Avorn. 2009. Balancing innovation, access, and profits — market exclusivity for biologics. New England Journal of Medicine 361(20):1917-1919. EPCglobal. 2007. Electronic product code (epc): An overview. Erhun, W. O., O. O. Babalola, and M. O. Erhun. 2001. Drug regulation and control in Nigeria: The challenge of counterfeit drugs. Journal of Health and Population in Developing Countries 4(2):23-34. Exel. 2003. Role of pre-wholesalers in generic pharmaceutical manufacturers’ demand chain management strategy. Faucon, B., and J. Whalen. 2012. Fake avastin took murky path to U.S. (accessed. FDA. 2005. The possible dangers of buying medicines over the internet. 210 PREPUBLICATION COPY: UNCORRECTED PROOFS

OCR for page 211
WEAKNESSES IN THE DRUG DISTRIBUTION CHAIN ———. 2011a. CPG sec. 160.900 prescription drug marketing act -- pedigree requirements under 21 CFR part 203. http://www.fda.gov/ICECI/ComplianceManuals/CompliancePolicyGuidanceManual/uc m073857.htm (accessed October 2, 2012). ———. 2011b. Guidance for industry: Bar code label requirements- questions and answers. ———. 2012a. FDA news release: FDA takes action against thousands of illegal internet pharmacies. http://www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Newsroom/PressAnnouncements/ucm322492.htm#.U G2Q840J6nY.email (accessed October 22, 2012). ———. 2012b. National drug code directory. http://www.fda.gov/Drugs/InformationOnDrugs/ucm142438.htm (accessed October 24, 2012). Fein, A. 2011. 2011 mdm market leaders: Top pharmaceutical wholesalers. Modern Distribution Management, http://www.mdm.com/2011_pharmaceutical_mdm-market- leaders (accessed January 15, 2013). ———. 2012. Trends and top distributors in the pharmaceuticals sector. Modern Distribution Management, http://www.mdm.com/2012_pharmaceuticals_mdm-market-leaders (accessed January 15, 2013). Ferrinho, P., M. Omar, M. Fernandes, P. Blaise, A. Bugalho, and W. Lerberghe. 2004. Pilfering for survival: How health workers use access to drugs as a coping strategy. Human Resources for Health 2(1):4. Financial Times. 2012. Chasing fakes. October 7. FIP. 2006. Part I: Workforce despcription. In Global pharmacy workforce and migration report. Pp. 11-16. ———. 2009. FIP global pharmacy workforce report. The Hauge, The Netherlands. Fischer, E. 2012. Medical cargo theft: Securing supply chain. http://www.drugdevelopment- technology.com/features/featuremedical-cargo-theft-securing-the-supply-chain (accessed October 30, 2012). Flaherty, M. P., and G. Gaul. 2003. Nevada gets tough with mixed results. Washington Post, October 22. Foundation Strategy Group. 2005. Beyond R&D: Leveraging the pharmaceutical industry on issues of drug access. Foundation Strategy Group. FreightWatch. 2011a. Global threat assessment. ———. 2011b. U.S. Cargo theft: A five-year review. Fulton, B., R. Scheffler, S. Sparkes, E. Auh, M. Vujicic, and A. Soucat. 2011. Health workforce skill mix and task shifting in low income countries: A review of recent evidence. Human Resources for Health 9(1):1. Galve, Á., and P. R. R. Campos. 2011. Direct to pharmacy distribution in spain: An operational and politico-economic analysis, MIT-Zaragoza International Logistics Program, University of Zaragoza GAO. 2004. Internet pharmacies: Some pose safety risks for consumers. Garnier, L., A. Arria, K. Caldeira, K. Vincent, K. O'Grady, and E. Walsh. 2010. Sharing and selling of prescription medications in a college student sample. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 71(3):262-269. 211 PREPUBLICATION COPY: UNCORRECTED PROOFS

OCR for page 212
COUNTERTING THE PROBLEM OF FALSIFIED AND SUBSTANDARD DRUGS Gatesman, M. L., and T. J. Smith. 2011. The shortage of essential chemotherapy drugs in the United States. New England Journal of Medicine 365(18):1653-1655. Global Fund. 2012. Affordable medicines facility- malaria. http://www.theglobalfund.org/en/amfm/ (accessed October 24, 2012). Goel, P., D. Ross-Degnan, P. Berman, and S. Soumerai. 1996. Retail pharmacies in developing countries: A behavior and intervention framework. Social Science & Medicine 42(8):1155-1161. Goodman, C., S. P. Kachur, S. Abdulla, P. Bloland, and A. Mills. 2007. Drug shop regulation and malaria treatment in Tanzania—why do shops break the rules, and does it matter? Health Policy and Planning 22(6):393-403. GPhA. 2011. Comments of the generic pharmaceutical association on the Food and Drug Administration's public workshop: Determination of system attributes for the tracking and tracing of prescription drugs [docket no. FDA-2010-n-0633]. http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=FDA-2010-N-0633-0039 (accessed October 12, 2012). ———. 2012. Pedigree. http://www.gphaonline.org/issues/pedigree (accessed September 28, 2012). Grady, D., S. Tavernise, and A. Pollack. 2012. In a drug linked to a deady meningitis outbreak, a question of oversight. The New York Times, October 4. Gressit, K.-B. 2007. How can we secure the U.S. Pharmaceutical supply channel? IG Living:28- 31. GTZ. Gtz's cooperation in technical and vocational education and training. GTZ. Hawthorne, N., and C. Anderson. 2009. The global pharmacy workforce: A systematic review of the literature. Human Resources for Health 7(1):48. Hechmann, R., and A. Dune-Birouste. 2007. Drug donations in emergencies, the sri lankan post-tsunami experience. The Journal of Humanitarian Assistance. Hetzel, M., N. Iteba, A. Makemba, C. Mshana, C. Lengeler, B. Obrist, A. Schulze, R. Nathan, A. Dillip, S. Alba, I. Mayumana, R. Khatib, J. Njau, and H. Mshinda. 2007. Understanding and improving access to prompt and effective malaria treatment and care in rural Tanzania: The ACCESS programme. Malaria Journal 6(1):83. HIMMS. 2003. Implementation guide for the use of bar code technology in healthcare. Chicago, IL: HIMMS. Inciardi, J. A., H. L. Surratt, T. J. Cicero, A. Rosenblum, C. Ahwah, J. E. Bailey, R. C. Dart, and J. J. Burke. 2010. Prescription drugs purchased through the internet: Who are the end users? Drug and Alcohol Dependence 110(1–2):21-29. Inciardi, J. A., H. L. Surratt, S. P. Kurtz, and T. J. Cicero. 2007. Mechanisms of prescription drug diversion among drug-involved club- and street-based populations. Pain Medicine 8(2):171-183. Interpol. 2012a. Media release: Global crackdown on illicit online pharmacies. October 4. ———. 2012b. Operations: Operation Pangea. http://www.interpol.int/Crime- areas/Pharmaceutical-crime/Operations/Operation-Pangea (accessed October 22, 2012). ISMP. 2011. Gray market, black heart: Pharmaceutical gray market finds a disturbing niche during the drug shortage crisis. http://www.ismp.org/newsletters/acutecare/showarticle.asp?id=3 (accessed October 2, 2012). 212 PREPUBLICATION COPY: UNCORRECTED PROOFS

OCR for page 213
WEAKNESSES IN THE DRUG DISTRIBUTION CHAIN Ivanitskaya, L., J. Brookins-Fisher, I. O´Boyle, D. V. D. Erofeev, and L. Fulton. 2010. Dirt cheap and without prescription: How susceptible are young US consumers to purchasing drugs from rogue internet pharmacies? Journal of Medical Internet Research 12(2). Jagdale, S. 2010. Catching the counterfeiters. http://www.expresspharmaonline.com/20100430/packagingspecial01.shtml (accessed September 28, 2012). Kanavos, P., W. Schurer, and S. Vogler. 2011. The pharmaceutical distribution chain in the European Union and impact on pharmaceutical prices. European Commission. Khan, M. H., J. Okumura, T. Sovannarith, N. Nivanna, H. Nagai, M. Taga, N. Yoshida, M. Akazawa, T. Tanimoto, and K. Kimura. 2011. Counterfeit medicines in Cambodia- possible causes. Pharmaceutical Research 3:484-489. Kome, G., and J. Fieno. 2006. New thinking in addressing the rising chllenges of human resources for health in sub saharan Africa. African Renaissance 3(4):83-97. KPMG. 2010. Evaluation of the rural pharmacy programs: Final report. Kubic, T. 2012. Pharmaceutical Security Institute's definition of terms and information from the PSI 2011 situation report, July 11, 2012. Langer, E., and A. Kelkar. 2008. Pharmaceutical distribution in inida. BioPharm International 21(10). Laven, D. 2006. Indroduction: Drug diversion and counterfeiting, part 1. Journal of Pharmacy Practice 19(3):135-139. Lefebvre, E., A. Romero, L.-A. Lefebvre, and C. Krissi. 2011. Technological strategies to deal with counterfeit medicines: The European and north-American perspectives. International Journal of Education and Information Technologies 5(3). Levaggi, R., C. Marcantoni, L. Filippucci, and U. Gelatti. 2012. Not a good buy: Value for money of prescription drugs sold on the internet. Health policy (Amsterdam, Netherlands) 106(3):241-245. Levy, S. 2006. Regional wholesalers are holding their own. DrugTopics, http://drugtopics.modernmedicine.com/news/regional-wholesalers-are-holding-their- own (accessed January 15, 2013). Liang, B. A. 2006. Fade to black: Importation and counterfeit drugs. American Journal of Law and Medicine 32:279-323. Lim, C. K. M. V. T. S.-Y., P. L. P. P. Q. Huy, A. S. W. Quanquan, and X. Y. F. Bünning. 2009. Linking vocational training with the enterprises - asian perspectives. Bonn, Germany: InWEnt and UNESCO-UNEVOC. Lim, Z., C. Anderson, and S. McGrath. 2012. Professional skills development in a resource- poor setting: The case of pharmacy in Malawi. International Journal of Educational Development 32(5):654-664. Lon, C. T., R. Tsuyuoka, S. Phanouvong, N. Nivanna, D. Socheat, C. Sokhan, N. Blum, E. M. Christophel, and A. Smine. 2006. Counterfeit and substandard antimalarial drugs in Cambodia. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 100(11):1019-1024. Ludwig, F. 2012. Fighting counterfeit pharmaceuticals: A primer. http://www.healthcarepackaging.com/archives/2012/01/fighting_counterfeit_pharmaceu. php (accessed October 11, 2012). 213 PREPUBLICATION COPY: UNCORRECTED PROOFS

OCR for page 214
COUNTERTING THE PROBLEM OF FALSIFIED AND SUBSTANDARD DRUGS Lybecker, K. M. 2007. Rx roulette: Combatting counterfeit pharmaceuticals in developing nations. Managerial and Decision Economics 28(4-5):509-520. Mafigiri, D., J. McGrath, and C. Whalen. Task shifting for tuberculosis control: A qualitative study of community-based directly observed therapy in urban Uganda. Global Public Health 7(3):270-284. Mahmood, M., K. Riley, D. Bennett, and W. Anderson. 2011. The supply of pharmaceuticals in humanitarian assistance missions: Implications for military operations. Military Medicine 176(8):852-857. Marsh, V. M., W. M. Mutemi, A. Willetts, K. Bayah, S. Were, A. Ross, and K. Marsh. 2004. Improving malaria home treatment by training drug retailers in rural Kenya. Tropical Medicine & International Health 9(4):451-460. Mayor, S. 2008. More than half of drugs sold online are fake or substandard. BMJ 337. McCabe, A. 2009. Private sector pharmaceutical supply and distribution chains: Ghana, Mali and Malawi. Health Systems for Outcomes. McCain, J. 2011. Doing more with less? Past and present challenges for the FDA. Pharmacy and Therapeutics 36(3):145-155. McCathie, L., and K. Michael. 2005. Is it the end of barcodes in supply chain management? Paper read at Collaborative Electronic Commerce Technology and Research Conference LatAm, October 3-5, 2005, University of Talca, Chile. Medco Health. 2012. Find out about us. http://www.medcohealth.com/medco/consumer/helpcenter/help_article.jsp?accessLink= SHP_ANON_01&faq=HelpCenterUR_FindAboutMedcoHealth-VIPPS (accessed January 9, 2013). Mohanta, G., P. Manna, K. Valliappan, and R. Manavalan. 2001. Achieving good pharmacy practice in community pharmacies in India. American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy 58(9):809-810. MSH. 2005. Tanzania: Accredited drug dispensing outlets—Duka la Dawa Muhimu. ———. 2012. Drug seller initiatives. Mukherjee, R. 2012. Now send sms to find if pill is genuine. Times of India, September 23. Muskal, M. 2012. $80-million mystery solved? Brothers held in pharmaceutical heist. Los Angelos Times, May 3. NABP. 2011. VIPPS information and verification site of the National Association of Boards of Pharmacy. http://vipps.nabp.net/ (accessed October 22, 2012). ———. 2012a. Accreditation process. www.nabp.net/programs/accreditation/vawd/accreditation-process/ (accessed October 24, 2012). ———. 2012b. Buying medicine online: Online pharmacies and you. http://www.nabp.net/programs/consumer-protection/buying-medicine-online/ (accessed October 22, 2012). ———. 2012c. Find a VIPPS online pharmacy. http://www.nabp.net/programs/accreditation/vipps/find-a-vipps-online-pharmacy/ (accessed October 22, 2012). ———. 2012d. Not recommended sites. http://www.nabp.net/programs/consumer- protection/buying-medicine-online/not-recommended-sites/ (accessed October 22, 2012). 214 PREPUBLICATION COPY: UNCORRECTED PROOFS

OCR for page 215
WEAKNESSES IN THE DRUG DISTRIBUTION CHAIN ———. 2012e. VIPPS: Set yourself apart from rogue sites! http://www.nabp.net/programs/accreditation/vipps/ (accessed October 22, 2012). Newsmax. 2011. Half of hospitals buy 'back door' drugs. Newsmax Health, August 29. Nkamnebe, A. 2007. Attitude of Nigerian consumers toward made-in-India pharmaceutical products. 2nd IIMA Conference on Research in Marketing. Norman, B. 2012. User fee bill may hinge on drug tracking system. Politico, May 17. O'Neil, M., Z. Jarrah, L. Nkosi, D. Collins, C. Perry, J. Jackson, H. Kuchande, and A. Mlambala. 2010. Evaluation of Malawi's emergency human resources program. Department for International Development, Management Sciences for Health, and Management Solutions Consulting, Ltd. OFT. 2007. Medicines distribution: An OFT market study. Onwujekwe, O., H. Kaur, N. Dike, E. Shu, B. Uzochukwu, K. Hanson, V. Okoye, and P. Okonkwo. 2009. Quality of anti-malarial drugs provided by public and private healthcare providers in south-east Nigeria. Malaria Journal 8(22). Orizio, G., A. Merla, P. Schulz, and U. Gelatti. 2011. Quality of online pharmacies and websites selling prescription drugs: A systematic review. Journal of Medical Internet Research 13(3). Palmer, E. 2012. FiercePharma: It is RIP for track and trace. http://www.fiercepharma.com/story/it-rip-track-and-trace/2012-06-19 (accessed January 9, 2013). Palmer, R. 2010. FDA strengthens its stance against unethical researchers. Nature Medicine 16(7):728-728. Pedersen, C. A., P. J. Schneider, and D. J. Scheckelhoff. 2003. Ashp national survey of pharmacy practice in hospital settings: Dispensing and administration--2002. American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy 60(1):52. Pellek, A. 2009. Drug serialization and supply chain security. http://www.pharmtech.com/pharmtech/IT/Drug-Serialization-and-Supply-Chain- Security/ArticleStandard/Article/detail/601169 (accessed October 11, 2012). Peters, D. H., and G. Bloom. 2012. Developing world: Bring order to unregulated health markets. Nature 487(7406):163-165. PGA. 2011. Meet a rural pharmacist. http://www.ruralpharmacy.com.au/ACareerinRuralPharmacy/MeetaRuralPharmacist/tab id/472/language/en-US/Default.aspx (accessed October 4, 2012). ———. 2012a. Pharmacy student scholarships. http://www.ruralpharmacy.com.au/AllowancesScholarships/PharmacyStudentScholarshi ps/tabid/644/language/en-US/Default.aspx#Rural (accessed October 5, 2012). ———. 2012b. Rural pharmacy student placement allowance and administrative support to pharmacy schools. http://www.ruralpharmacy.com.au/AllowancesScholarships/Allowances/RuralPharmacy StudentPlacementAllowance/tabid/707/language/en-US/Default.aspx (accessed October 6, 2012). Pomatto, V., and C. Schuftan. 2006. Review of quality assurance (qa) mechanisms for medicines and medical supplies in humanitarian aid. European Commission for Humanitarian Aid. 215 PREPUBLICATION COPY: UNCORRECTED PROOFS

OCR for page 216
COUNTERTING THE PROBLEM OF FALSIFIED AND SUBSTANDARD DRUGS Power, G. 2008. Anti-counterfeit technologies for the protection of medicines. Geneva, Switzerland: IMPACT and WHO. Quingyun, W. 2012. Major crackdown in fake medicine scam. China Daily, August 6. Rabinowitz, H. K., J. J. Diamond, M. Hojat, and C. E. Hazelwood. 1999. Rural health research: Demographic, educational and economic factors related to recruitment and retention of physicians in rural pennsylvania. The Journal of Rural Health 15(2):212-218. Rao, K. D., S. Ramani, S. Murthy, I. Hazarika, N. Khandpur, M. Chokshi, S. Khanna, M. Vujicic, P. Berman, and M. Ryan. 2010. Health worker attitudes toward rural service in India: Results from qualitative research. World Bank. Rappeport, A., and A. Jack. 2012. FDA calls for drug tracking system. Financial Times, March 8. RFID Journal. 2012. RFID journal glossary of terms: Radio frequency identification. http://www.rfidjournal.com/glossary/radio%20frequency%20identification (accessed October 4, 2012). RFID Update. 2008. NACDS study puts price tag on pharmacy RFID systems. RFID Journal. Riley, L. W., A. I. Ko, A. Unger, and M. G. Reis. 2007. Slum health: Diseases of neglected populations. BMC International Health and Human Rights 7. Rutta, E., B. Kibassa, B. McKinnon, J. Liana, R. Mbwasi, W. Mlaki, M. Embrey, M. Gabra, E. Shekalaghe, S. Kimatta, and H. Sillo. 2011. Increasing access to subsidized artemisinin- based combination therapy through accredited drug dispensing outlets in Tanzania. Health Research Policy and Systems 9(1):22. Satchwell, G. 2004. A sick business: Counterfeit medicines and organized crime. London, UK: The Stockholm Network. SCMS. 2012. SCMS in brief: SCMS freight and logistics update. Segrè, J., and J. Tran. 2008. What worls: CareShop Ghana. World Resources Institute. Shelton, D. 2012. Fake medicine poses growing threat to consumers. The Chicago Tribune, October 16. Shepherd, M. 2007a. Drug importation and safety of drugs obtained from Canada. The Annals of Pharmacotherapy 41(7):1288-1291. ———. 2007b. Impact of drug importation on community pharmacy and patient care. Journal of the American Pharmacists Association 47:319-327. Shulman, D., K. Jobarteh, E. Makani, M. Mtwea, A. Mapwelemwe, A. Manjomo, J. Crocker, and K. Joseph. 2009. Task-shifting in the pharmacy: A framework for expanding and strengthening services in rural Malawi. 5th IAS Conference on HIV Pathogenesis and Treatment. Simonaitis, L., and C. J. McDonald. 2009. Using national drug codes and drug knowledge bases to organize prescription records from multiple sources. American Journal of Health- System Pharmacy 66(19):1743-1753. Spies, A., and V. VanDusen. 2003. Counterfeit drugs: A menace keeps growing. U.S. Pharmacist 28.1. Sproxil. 2012. Countries. http://sproxil.com/countries.html (accessed October 1, 2012). Srivastava, B. 2004. Radio frequency ID technology: The next revolution in SCM. Business Horizons 47(6):60-68. 216 PREPUBLICATION COPY: UNCORRECTED PROOFS

OCR for page 217
WEAKNESSES IN THE DRUG DISTRIBUTION CHAIN Stanton, C., A. Koski, P. Cofie, E. Mirzabagi, B. L. Grady, and S. Brooke. 2012. Uterotonic drug quality: An assessment of the potency of injectable uterotonic drugs purchased by simulated clients in three districts in Ghana. BMJ Open 2(3):1-7. Stringer, J., I. Zulu, J. Levy, E. Stringer, A. Mwango, B. Chi, V. Mtonga, S. Reid, R. Cantrell, M. Bulterys, M. Saag, R. Marlink, A. Mwinga, T. Ellerbrock, and M. Sinkala. 2006. Rapid scale-up of antiretroviral therapy at primary care sites in Zambia: Feasibility and early outcomes. JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association 296(7):782- 793. Tavernise, S., and A. Pollack. 2012. FDA details contamination at pharmacy. The New York Times, October 26. Tavrow, P., Y.-M. Kim, and L. Malianga. 2002. Measuring the quality of supervisor–provider interactions in health care facilities in Zimbabwe. International Journal for Quality in Health Care 14(suppl 1):57-066. Tavrow, P., and J. Shabahang. 2002. Vendor-to-vendor educaiton to improve malaria treatment by the private sector: A "how-to" manual for district managers. Bethesda, MD: Quality Assurance Project. Taylor, L. 2011. Pfizer's DTP system "threatens Australia's drugs supply". Pharma Times Online, July 11. Taylor, P. 2010. Safety in numbers: Brazil's medicine serialisation initiative. http://www.securingindustry.com/pharmaceuticals/safety-in-numbers-brazil-s-medicine- serialisation-initiative-/s40/a440/ (accessed October 4, 2012). TechNewsDaily. 2012. Internet pharmacy crackdown shutters 18,000 sites. October 5. Tipke, M., S. Diallo, B. Coulibaly, D. Störzinger, T. Hoppe-Tichy, A. Sie, and O. Müller. 2008. Substandard anti-malarial drugs in burkina faso. Malaria Journal 7(95). UNODC. 2010. The globalization of crime. United Nations. USAID. 2011. Using last mile distribution to increase access to health commodities. Arlington, VA: USAID | DELIVER PROJECT van Dijk, D. P. J., G.-J. Dinant, and J. A. Jacobs. 2011. Inappropriate drug donations: What has happened since the 1999 WHO guidelines? Education for Health 24(2). Versel, N. 2012. Sproxil deal offers free mobile drug authentication in 17 African countries. MobiHealthNews, August 29. Vian, T. 2008. Review of corruption in the health sector: Theory, methods and interventions. Health Policy and Planning 23:83-94. Villacorta-Linaza, R. 2009. Bridging the gap: The role of pharmacists in managing the drug supply cycle within non-governmental organizations. International Journal of Health Planning and Management 24:73-86. Wagner, M., J. Alonso, and A. Mehlhorn. 2001. Comparison of internet and community pharmacies. The Annals of Pharmacotherapy 35(1):116-119. Wasik, J. 2012. Fake medicine bought online: How to avoid counterfeits. Forbes, October 18. Weaver, C., and J. Whalen. 2012. How fake cancer drugs entered U.S. The Wall Street Journal, July 20. White, S., and J. Bothma. 2009. Pharmintercom: 7-11 september 2008 (part 3). South African Pharmaceutical Journal 76(2). 217 PREPUBLICATION COPY: UNCORRECTED PROOFS

OCR for page 218
COUNTERTING THE PROBLEM OF FALSIFIED AND SUBSTANDARD DRUGS WHO. 2008. First global conference on task shifting. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/events/meetings/task_shifting/en/index.html (accessed October 11, 2012). ———. 2010. Assessment of medicines regulatory systems in sub-saharan African countries: An overview of findings from 26 assessment reports. ———. 2011. Safety and security on the internet: Challenges and advances in member states (executive summary). Geneva, Switzerland. Whoriskey, P. 2012. Medicare overspending on anemia drug. The Washington Post. WHPA. 2011. World Health Professions Alliance (WHPA) brief to WHO member states on spurious/falsely-labelled/falsified/counterfeit medical products (sfcc). Wolinsky, H. 2006. Tagging products and people. EMBO Reports 7(10):965-968. Wondemagegnehu, E. 1999. Counterfeit and substandard drugs in Myanmar and Viet Nam: Report of a study carried out in cooperation with the governments of Myanmar and Viet Nam. Geneva: The World Health Organization. World Bank. 2005. HNP brief #2: Pharmaceuticals: Counterfeits, substandard drugs, and drug diversion. Worldmapper. 2006. Pharmacists working (map no. 17). http://www.worldmapper.org/display.php?selected=217 (accessed November 28, 2012). Wunder, G., and B. Roach. 2008. Electronic pedigrees and counterfeit pharmaceuticals: The U.S. Experience with RFID. Regional Business Review:137-159. Yadav, P. 2009. Countering drug resistance in the developing world: An assessment of incentives across the value chain and recommendations for policy intervention. Center for Global Development, working paper no. 183. ———. 2010. In-country supply chains: The weakest link in the health system. Global Health Magazine 5:18-19. Yadav, P., and L. Smith. 2012. Pharmaceutical company strategies and distribution systems in emerging markets. Elsevier Encyclopedia on Health Economics. Yadav, P., R. Smith, and K. Hanson. 2012. Pharmaceuticals and the health sector. In Health systems in low- and middle-income countries: An economic and policy perspective, edited by R. Smtih and K. Hanson. Oxford, NY: Oxford Univeristy Press. Yadav, P., O. Stapleton, and L. v. Wassenhove. 2013. Learning from Coca-Cola. Stanford Social Innovation Review. Yadav, P., H. L. Tata, and M. Babaley. 2011. The worlds medicines situation 2011: Storage and supply chain management. Geneva: WHO. Yao, W., C.-H. Chu, and Z. Li. 2010 June 17-19. The use of RFID in healthcare: Benefits and barriers. Paper presented at IEEE International Conference on RFID-Technology and Applications, Guangzhou, China. Yukhananov, A. 2012. Congress fails to agree on national drug trace plan. Reuters, June 18. Zaza, A. 2012. Importation of unregistered drugs in the UAE. http://www.tamimi.com/en/publication/publications/section-3/may/importation-of- unregistered-drugs-in-the-uae.html (accessed October 17, 2012). Ziance, R. 2008. Roles for pharmacy in combatting counterfeit drugs. Journal of the American Pharmacists Association 48(4). 218 PREPUBLICATION COPY: UNCORRECTED PROOFS