National Academies Press: OpenBook
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2013. Assessment of Inertial Confinement Fusion Targets. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18288.
×

ASSESSMENT OF

INERTIAL CONFINEMENT FUSION TARGETS

Panel on the Assessment of Inertial Confinement Fusion Targets

Board on Physics and Astronomy

Board on Energy and Environmental Systems

Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences

NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL
OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES

THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS

Washington, D.C.

www.nap.edu

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2013. Assessment of Inertial Confinement Fusion Targets. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18288.
×

THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS   500 Fifth Street, NW   Washington, DC 20001

NOTICE: The project that is the subject of this report was approved by the Governing Board of the National Research Council, whose members are drawn from the councils of the National Academy of Sciences, the National Academy of Engineering, and the Institute of Medicine. The members of the committee responsible for the report were chosen for their special competences and with regard for appropriate balance.

Support for this project was provided by Contract DE-DT0001679 between the National Academy of Sciences and the Department of Energy and the National Nuclear Security Administration. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the view of the agency that provided support for the project.

Cover: Photo of an OMEGA cryogenic implosion, courtesy of the University of Rochester’s Laboratory for Laser Energetics.

International Standard Book Number-13: 978-0-309-27062-5
International Standard Book Number-10: 0-309-27062-6

Copies of this report are available free of charge from:

Board on Physics and Astronomy
National Research Council
The Keck Center of the National Academies
500 Fifth Street, NW
Washington, DC 20001

Additional copies of this report are available from the National Academies Press, 500 Fifth Street, NW, Keck 360, Washington, DC 20001; (800) 624-6242 or (202) 334-3313; http://www.nap.edu.

Copyright 2013 by the National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.

Printed in the United States of America

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2013. Assessment of Inertial Confinement Fusion Targets. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18288.
×

THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES

Advisers to the Nation on Science, Engineering, and Medicine

The National Academy of Sciences is a private, nonprofit, self-perpetuating society of distinguished scholars engaged in scientific and engineering research, dedicated to the furtherance of science and technology and to their use for the general welfare. Upon the authority of the charter granted to it by the Congress in 1863, the Academy has a mandate that requires it to advise the federal government on scientific and technical matters. Dr. Ralph J. Cicerone is president of the National Academy of Sciences.

The National Academy of Engineering was established in 1964, under the charter of the National Academy of Sciences, as a parallel organization of outstanding engineers. It is autonomous in its administration and in the selection of its members, sharing with the National Academy of Sciences the responsibility for advising the federal government. The National Academy of Engineering also sponsors engineering programs aimed at meeting national needs, encourages education and research, and recognizes the superior achievements of engineers. Dr. Charles M. Vest is president of the National Academy of Engineering.

The Institute of Medicine was established in 1970 by the National Academy of Sciences to secure the services of eminent members of appropriate professions in the examination of policy matters pertaining to the health of the public. The Institute acts under the responsibility given to the National Academy of Sciences by its congressional charter to be an adviser to the federal government and, upon its own initiative, to identify issues of medical care, research, and education. Dr. Harvey V. Fineberg is president of the Institute of Medicine.

The National Research Council was organized by the National Academy of Sciences in 1916 to associate the broad community of science and technology with the Academy’s purposes of furthering knowledge and advising the federal government. Functioning in accordance with general policies determined by the Academy, the Council has become the principal operating agency of both the National Academy of Sciences and the National Academy of Engineering in providing services to the government, the public, and the scientific and engineering communities. The Council is administered jointly by both Academies and the Institute of Medicine. Dr. Ralph J. Cicerone and Dr. Charles M. Vest are chair and vice chair, respectively, of the National Research Council.

www.national-academies.org

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2013. Assessment of Inertial Confinement Fusion Targets. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18288.
×

This page intentionally left blank.

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2013. Assessment of Inertial Confinement Fusion Targets. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18288.
×

PANEL ON THE ASSESSMENT OF INERTIAL CONFINEMENT FUSION TARGETS

JOHN AHEARNE, NAE, Sigma Xi, Chair

DOUGLAS EARDLEY, University of California, Santa Barbara, Vice Chair

ROBERT DYNES, University of California, Santa Barbara

DAVID HARDING, University of Rochester

THOMAS MEHLHORN, Naval Research Laboratory

MERRI WOOD-SCHULTZ, Los Alamos, New Mexico

GEORGE ZIMMERMAN, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory

Staff

GREG EYRING, Study Director

SARAH CASE, Study Director (until October 2011)

LaNITA JONES, Administrative Coordinator

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2013. Assessment of Inertial Confinement Fusion Targets. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18288.
×

BOARD ON PHYSICS AND ASTRONOMY

PHILIP H. BUCKSBAUM, Stanford University, Chair

DEBRA ELMEGREEN, Vassar College, Vice Chair

RICCARDO BETTI, University of Rochester

ADAM S. BURROWS, Princeton University

TODD DITMIRE, University of Texas, Austin

NATHANIEL J. FISCH, Princeton University

PAUL FLEURY, Yale University

S. JAMES GATES, University of Maryland

LAURA H. GREENE, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

MARTHA P. HAYNES, Cornell University

MARK B. KETCHEN, IBM Thomas J. Watson Research Center

MONICA OLVERA DE LA CRUZ, Northwestern University

PAUL L. SCHECHTER, Massachusetts Institute of Technology

BORIS I. SHRAIMAN, Kavli Institute of Theoretical Physics

MICHAEL S. TURNER, University of Chicago

ELLEN D. WILLIAMS, BP International

MICHAEL S. WITHERELL, University of California, Santa Barbara

Staff

JAMES C. LANCASTER, Director

DONALD C. SHAPERO, Senior Scholar

DAVID B. LANG, Program Officer

CARYN J. KNUTSEN, Associate Program Officer

TERI G. THOROWGOOD, Administrative Coordinator

BETH DOLAN, Financial Associate

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2013. Assessment of Inertial Confinement Fusion Targets. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18288.
×

BOARD ON ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS

ANDREW BROWN, JR., Delphi Corporation, Chair

WILLIAM BANHOLZER, Dow Chemical Company

MARILYN BROWN, Georgia Institute of Technology

WILLIAM CAVANAUGH III, Progress Energy (retired), Raleigh, North Carolina

PAUL DeCOTIS, Long Island Power Authority

CHRISTINE EHLIG-ECONOMIDES, Texas A&M University

SHERRI GOODMAN, CNA, Alexandria, Virginia

NARAIN HINGORANI, Independent Consultant, Los Altos Hills, California

ROBERT HUGGETT, Independent Consultant, Seaford, Virginia

DEBBIE NIEMEIER, University of California, Davis

DANIEL NOCERA, Massachusetts Institute of Technology

MICHAEL OPPENHEIMER, Princeton University

DAN REICHER, Stanford University

BERNARD ROBERTSON, Daimler-Chrysler (retired), Bloomfield Hills, Michigan

GARY ROGERS, FEV, Inc., Auburn Hills, Michigan

ALISON SILVERSTEIN, Consultant, Pflugerville, Texas

MARK THIEMENS, University of California, San Diego

RICHARD WHITE, Oppenheimer & Company, New York City

Staff

JAMES ZUCCHETTO, Director

DANA CAINES, Financial Associate

DAVID COOKE, Associate Program Officer

ALAN CRANE, Senior Scientist

K. JOHN HOLMES, Associate Board Director

LaNITA JONES, Administrative Coordinator

ALICE WILLIAMS, Senior Program Assistant

JONATHAN YANGER, Senior Project Assistant

Page viii Cite
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2013. Assessment of Inertial Confinement Fusion Targets. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18288.
×

This page intentionally left blank.

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2013. Assessment of Inertial Confinement Fusion Targets. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18288.
×

Preface and Acknowledgments

In the fall of 2010, the Office of the U.S. Department of Energy’s (DOE’s) Under Secretary for Science asked for a National Research Council (NRC) committee to investigate the prospects for generating power using inertial confinement fusion (ICF) concepts, acknowledging that a key test of viability for this concept—ignition1—could be demonstrated at the National Ignition Facility (NIF) at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) in the relatively near term. The committee was asked to provide an unclassified report. However, DOE indicated that to fully assess this topic, the committee’s deliberations would have to be informed by the results of some classified experiments and information, particularly in the area of ICF targets and nonproliferation. Thus, an additional Panel on Fusion Target Physics (“the panel”) was assembled, composed of experts able to access the needed information (for member biographies, see Appendix A). The panel was charged with advising the committee on these issues, both by internal discussion and by this unclassified report. The statement of task for the panel is as follows:

A Panel on Fusion Target Physics (“the panel”) will serve as a technical resource to the Committee on Inertial Confinement Energy Systems (“the Committee”) and will prepare a report that describes the R&D challenges to providing suitable targets, on the basis of parameters established and provided to the Panel by the Committee.

__________________

1 The operative definition of ignition adopted by the panel, “gain greater than unity,” is the same as that used in the earlier NRC report Review of the Department of Energy’s Inertial Confinement Fusion Program, Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press (1997).

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2013. Assessment of Inertial Confinement Fusion Targets. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18288.
×

The Panel on Fusion Target Physics will prepare a report that will assess the current performance of fusion targets associated with various ICF concepts in order to understand:

1. The spectrum output;

2. The illumination geometry;

3. The high-gain geometry; and

4. The robustness of the target design.

The panel will also address the potential impacts of the use and development of current concepts for Inertial Fusion Energy on the proliferation of nuclear weapons information and technology, as appropriate. The Panel will examine technology options, but will not provide recommendations specific to any currently operating or proposed ICF facility.

The panel interpreted the terms used in its statement of task in the following way. “Illumination geometry” not only is interpreted to mean the physical arrangement and timing of laser or particle beams incident on the target but also is generalized to mean “delivering driver energy to the target.” In this way, the magnetic forces in pulsed-power schemes are also included. “High-gain geometry” is interpreted as designs that enable the energy incident on the target to be converted efficiently into fuel burn and high yield.2 “Spectrum output” is interpreted to include all of the types of emissions (photons, ions, neutrons, and debris) from the fusion target and their energy spectra. Depending on the type of reaction chamber used (solid wall, wetted wall, liquid wall, gas-filled, evacuated, and so on) these emissions may or may not reach the chamber wall; however, a detailed discussion of the effects on the wall is beyond the scope of this report. “Robustness of the target design” is interpreted in two ways: (1) the inherent “physics robustness,” which relates to the performance margins of the design being large enough compared to the physics uncertainties that reliable performance can be assured under ideal conditions, and (2) “engineering robustness,” which relates to the target’s ability to deliver reliable performance even under nonideal conditions such as variations in driver energy, target manufacturing defects, errors in target positioning, or driver beam misalignment.

This unclassified report contains all of the panel’s conclusions and recommendations. In some cases, additional support and documentation required the discussion of classified material, which appears in classified appendices in a separate version of this report. ICF is an active research field, and scientific understanding continues to evolve. The information discussed here is accurate as of the date presented to the panel (see Appendix B), although in some cases more recent updates are included; if so, this is noted in the text.

This report was reviewed in draft form by individuals chosen for their diverse perspectives and technical expertise in accordance with procedures approved by

__________________

2 High yield is defined broadly as much more than 10 times the fusion energy produced as driver energy delivered to the target.

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2013. Assessment of Inertial Confinement Fusion Targets. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18288.
×

the Report Review Committee of the National Research Council. The purpose of this independent review is to provide candid and critical comments that will assist the institution in making its published report as sound as possible and to ensure that the report meets institutional standards for objectivity, evidence, and responsiveness to the study charge. The review comments and draft manuscript remain confidential to protect the integrity of the deliberative process.

We wish to thank the following individuals for their review of this report:

Bedros Afeyan, Polymath Research Inc.,

Roger Bangerter, E.O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (retired),

Michael Corradini, University of Wisconsin,

Jill Dahlburg, Naval Research Laboratory,

Richard Garwin, IBM Thomas J. Watson Research Center,

David Hammer, Cornell University,

Frank von Hippel, Princeton University,

Arjun Makhijani, Institute for Energy and Environmental Research,

David Overskei, Decision Factors Inc.,

Robert Rosner, University of Chicago, and

Douglas Wilson, Los Alamos National Laboratory.

Although the reviewers listed above have provided many constructive comments and suggestions, they were not asked to endorse the conclusions or recommendations, nor did they see the final draft of the report before its release. The review of this report was overseen by Louis J. Lanzerotti, New Jersey Institute of Technology. Appointed by the National Research Council, he was responsible for making certain that an independent examination of this report was carried out in accordance with institutional procedures and that all review comments were carefully considered. Responsibility for the final content of this report rests entirely with the authoring committee and the institution.

The panel also thanks the NRC staff for its dedicated work, in particular Sarah Case, who got the panel started off on the correct path, and Greg Eyring, who persevered in getting both the classified and unclassified reports over many hurdles.

John F. Ahearne, Chair
Panel on the Assessment of Inertial Confinement Fusion Targets

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2013. Assessment of Inertial Confinement Fusion Targets. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18288.
×

This page intentionally left blank.

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2013. Assessment of Inertial Confinement Fusion Targets. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18288.
×
Page R1
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2013. Assessment of Inertial Confinement Fusion Targets. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18288.
×
Page R2
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2013. Assessment of Inertial Confinement Fusion Targets. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18288.
×
Page R3
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2013. Assessment of Inertial Confinement Fusion Targets. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18288.
×
Page R4
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2013. Assessment of Inertial Confinement Fusion Targets. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18288.
×
Page R5
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2013. Assessment of Inertial Confinement Fusion Targets. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18288.
×
Page R6
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2013. Assessment of Inertial Confinement Fusion Targets. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18288.
×
Page R7
Page viii Cite
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2013. Assessment of Inertial Confinement Fusion Targets. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18288.
×
Page R8
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2013. Assessment of Inertial Confinement Fusion Targets. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18288.
×
Page R9
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2013. Assessment of Inertial Confinement Fusion Targets. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18288.
×
Page R10
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2013. Assessment of Inertial Confinement Fusion Targets. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18288.
×
Page R11
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2013. Assessment of Inertial Confinement Fusion Targets. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18288.
×
Page R12
Page xiii Cite
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2013. Assessment of Inertial Confinement Fusion Targets. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18288.
×
Page R13
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2013. Assessment of Inertial Confinement Fusion Targets. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18288.
×
Page R14
Next: Summary »
Assessment of Inertial Confinement Fusion Targets Get This Book
×
Buy Paperback | $45.00 Buy Ebook | $35.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

In the fall of 2010, the Office of the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE's) Secretary for Science asked for a National Research Council (NRC) committee to investigate the prospects for generating power using inertial confinement fusion (ICF) concepts, acknowledging that a key test of viability for this concept—ignition —could be demonstrated at the National Ignition Facility (NIF) at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) in the relatively near term. The committee was asked to provide an unclassified report. However, DOE indicated that to fully assess this topic, the committee's deliberations would have to be informed by the results of some classified experiments and information, particularly in the area of ICF targets and nonproliferation. Thus, the Panel on the Assessment of Inertial Confinement Fusion Targets ("the panel") was assembled, composed of experts able to access the needed information. The panel was charged with advising the Committee on the Prospects for Inertial Confinement Fusion Energy Systems on these issues, both by internal discussion and by this unclassified report.

A Panel on Fusion Target Physics ("the panel") will serve as a technical resource to the Committee on Inertial Confinement Energy Systems ("the Committee") and will prepare a report that describes the R&D challenges to providing suitable targets, on the basis of parameters established and provided to the Panel by the Committee. The Panel on Fusion Target Physics will prepare a report that will assess the current performance of fusion targets associated with various ICF concepts in order to understand:

1. The spectrum output; 2. The illumination geometry; 3. The high-gain geometry; and 4. The robustness of the target design. The panel addressed the potential impacts of the use and development of current concepts for Inertial Fusion Energy on the proliferation of nuclear weapons information and technology, as appropriate. The Panel examined technology options, but does not provide recommendations specific to any currently operating or proposed ICF facility.

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!