Click for next page ( 234


The National Academies | 500 Fifth St. N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20001
Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use and Privacy Statement



Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 233
REFERENCES AEC (Atomic Energy Commission). 1957. Theoretical Possibilities and Consequences of Major Accidents in Large Nuclear Power Plants. WASH-740. Prepared by Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Atomic Energy Commission. March. AEC. 1974. Ultimate Heat Sink for Nuclear Power Plants. Regulatory Guide 1.27, Revision 1. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Atomic Energy Commission. Available at http://pbadupws.nrc.gov/docs/ML1303/ML13038A084.pdf. (Accessed June 10, 2014.) AESJ (Atomic Energy Society of Japan). 2011a. Estimated current status of Fukushima-Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant Units 1-3 (April 18). Available at http://www.aesj.or.jp/en/release/chousacom_EN_01_110418.pdf AESJ. 2011b. Lessons learned from the accident at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant (May 9). Available at http://www.aesj.or.jp/en/release/gbcom_kyokun_EN_20110530.pdf Akiba, S. 2012. Epidemiological studies of Fukushima residents exposed to ionising radiation from the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant prefecture—a preliminary review of current plans. Journal of Radiological Protection 32(1): 1-10. DOI: 10.1088/0952- 4746/32/1/1. Alvarez, R., J. Beyea, K. Janberg, J. Kang, E. Lyman, A. Macfarlane, G. Thompson, and F.N. von Hippel. 2003. Reducing the hazards from stored spent power-reactor fuel in the United States. Science and Global Security (11): 1–51. ANS (American Nuclear Society) Special Committee on Fukushima. 2012. Fukushima Daiichi: ANS Committee Report, March 2012 (Revised June 2012). La Grange, Illinois: American Nuclear Society. Aoki, M., and G. Rothwell. 2013. A comparative institutional analysis of the Fukushima nuclear disaster: Lessons and policy implications. Energy Policy 53(February): 240-247. Available through sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421512009433. (Accessed March 4, 2014.) Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico Tsunami Hazard Assessment Group, 2008. P. K-1 Bacon-Dussault, M. 2013. Independence of nuclear regulators in the aftermath of the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear accident: A comparative approach. A technical paper presented at IAEA International Conference on Effective Nuclear Regulatory Systems, Ottawa, Ontario, April 8- 12, 2013. Ottawa, Canada: Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission. Barkan, R., U. S. ten Brink, and J. Lin. 2009. Far Field Tsunami Simulations of the 1755 Lisbon Earthquake: Implications for Tsunami Hazard to the U.S. East Coast and the Caribbean. Marine Geology 264(1, August): 109-122 . DOI: 10.1016/j.margeo.2008.10.010. Benz, E. 2013. Lessons learned from Fukushima: Strengthening the international regulation of nuclear energy. William and Mary Environmental Law and Policy Review 37(3/8): 845-880. Prepublication Copy R-1

OCR for page 233
References Beyea, J., E. Lyman, and F. N. von Hippel. 2013. Accounting for long-term doses in “worldwide health effects of the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear accident”. Energy and Environmental Science 6: 1042-1045. Blanc, P.-L. 2009. Earthquakes and tsunami in November 1755 in Morocco: a different reading of contemporaneous documentary sources. Natural Hazards and Earth Systems Sciences 9: 725-738, May 14. Blanchard, G., and D. Dosa. 2009. A comparison of the nursing home evacuation experience between Hurricanes Katrina (2005) and Gustav (2008). Journal of the American Medical Directors Association 10(9): 639-643, November. Bley, D., S. Kaplan, and D. Johnson. 1992. The strengths and limitations of PSA: where we stand. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 38: 3-26. Boldoc, L. 2002. GIC observations and studies in the Hydro-Québec power system. J. Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics 64: 1793 – 1802. Bondevik, S., Løvholt, F. , Harbitz, C., Mangerud, J., Dawson, A. and Inge Svendsen, J. 2005. The Storegga Slide tsunami—comparing field observations with numerical simulations. Marine and Petroleum Geology 22(1-2): 195-208. Bratton, W. W., and J. A. McCahery. 1995. Regulatory competition, regulatory capture, and corporate self-regulation. North Carolina Law Review 73: 1861-1948. BRC (Blue Ribbon Commission on America’s Nuclear Future). 2012. Report to the Secretary of Energy, January 2012. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Energy. Available at energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2013/04/f0/brc_finalreport_jan2012.pdf. Bromet, E. J. 2014. Emotional consequences of nuclear power plant disasters. Health Physics 106(2): 206-210, February. Brumfiel, G. 2011. Fukushima reaches cold shutdown. Nature, Nature News, December 16, DOI: 10.1038/nature.2011.9674. Bye, A., E. Lois, V. N. Dang, G. Parry, J. Forester, S. Massaiu, R. Boring, P. Ø. Braarud, H. Broberg, J. Julius, I. Männistö, and P. Nelson. 2011. International Human Reliability Analysis (HRA) Empirical Study – Phase 2 Report: Results from Comparing HRA Method Predictions to Simulator Data from SGTR Scenarios. NUREG/IA-0216, Vol. 2. Prepared by OECD Halden Reactor Project, Norway; U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, U.S.A.; Paul Scherrer Institute, Switzerland; Sandia National Laboratories, U.S.A.; Scientech, U.S.A.; Technical Research Centre of Finland, Finland; Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico; and concurrently with ERIN Engineering and Research Inc., U.S.A., and Idaho National Laboratory, U.S.A. Rockville, Maryland: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. August. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission electronic library (ADAMS) access number ML11250A010. Cabinet Secretariat of the Government of Japan. 1999. Act on Special Measures Concerning Nuclear Emergency Preparedness (Act No. 156 of December 17, 1999). Tokyo, Japan: Government of Japan. Camp, A. L., J. C. Cummings, M. P. Sherman, C. F. Kupiec, R. J. Healy, J. S. Caplan, J. R. Sandhop, and J. H. Saunders. 1983. Light Water Reactor Hydrogen Manual, Sandia National Prepublication Copy R-2

OCR for page 233
References Laboratories Report. NUREG/CR-2726, SAND82-1137, Revision 3. Prepared by Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, New Mexico, and General Physics Corporation, Columbia, Maryland. CNSC (Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission). 2011. CNSC Fukushima Task Force Report.INFO-0824. Ottawa, Canada: Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission. October. Cannon-Bowers, J. A., and E. Salas. 1998. Making Decisions Under Stress: Implications for Individual and Team Training. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. Carafano, J. J. 2011. The Great Eastern Japan Earthquake: Assessing disaster response and lessons for the United States. Special Report #94. Washington, D.C.: The Heritage Foundation. Cardis, E., D. Krewski, M. Boniol, V. Drozdovitch, S. C. Darby, E. S. Gilbert, S. Akiba, J. Benichou, J. Ferlay, S. Gandini, C. Hill, G. Howe, A. Kesminiene, M. Moser, M. Sanchez, H. Storm, L. Voisin, and P. Boyle. 2006. Estimates of the cancer burden in Europe from radioactive fallout from the Chernobyl accident. International Journal of Cancer 119(6, September 15): 1224-35. Carlowicz, M. J., and R. E. Lopez. 2002. Storms from the Sun: The Emerging Science of Space Weather. Washington, D.C.: Joseph Henry Press. Chaytor, J. D., U. S. ten Brink, A. R. Solow, and B. D. Andrews. 2009. Size distribution of submarine landslides along the U.S. Atlantic margin. Marine Geology 264(1, August): 16-27. DOI:10.1016/j.margeo.2008.08.007. CENTRA (CENTRA Technology, Inc.). 2011. OECD/IFP Futures Project on “Future Gobal Shocks”: Geomagnetic Storms. IFP/WKP/FGS(2011)4. CENTRA Technology, Inc., Burlington, Massachusetts. CSIC (Center for Strategic and International Studies), Nuclear Regulatory Process Review Steering Committee. 1999. The Regulatory Process for Nuclear Power Reactors: A Review. Washington, D.C.: Center for Strategic and International Studies. Chang, Y. J., D. Bley, L. Criscione, B. Kirwan, A. Mosleh, T. Madary, R. Nowell, R. Richards, E. Roth, S. Sieben, and A. Xoulis. 2013. The SACADA database for human reliability and human performance. Proceedings of the International Topical Meeting on Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Analysis, Columbia, South Carolina, on September 22-26, 2013. Chen, S. Y., and T. S. Tenforde. 2012. Optimizing decision making for late-phase recovery one year after the Fukushima nuclear accident . Journal of Radiological Protection 32(2012): 191-192, Letters to the editor. DOI:10.1088/0952-4746/32/2/L01. Chester, F. M., C. Rowe, K. Ujiie, J. Kirkpatrick, C. Regalla, F. Remitti, J. C. Moore, V. Toy, M. Wolfson-Schwehr, S. Bose, J. Kameda, J. J. Mori, E. E. Brodsky, N. Eguchi, S. Toczko, and the Expedition 343 and 343T Scientists. 2013. Structure and composition of the plate- boundary slip zone for the 2011 Tohoku-Oki earthquake. Science 342(6163): 1208-1211, December 5. Commonwealth Edison (Commonwealth Edison Company of Chicago). 1981. Zion Probabilistic Safety Study. Prepared by Pickard, Lowe and Garrick Inc., Westinghouse Electric Corporation, and Fauske and Associates, Inc. Prepublication Copy R-3

OCR for page 233
References Conklin, C., and J. Edwards. 2000. Selection of protective action guides for nuclear incidents. Journal of Hazardous Materials 75(2-3): 131-144. Consolidated Edison (Consolidated Edison Company of New York and the New York Power Authority). 1982. Indian Point Probabilistic Safety Study. Prepared by Pickard, Lowe and Garrick Inc., Westinghouse Electric Corporation, and Fauske and Associates, Inc. Cook, D. H., S. R. Greene, R. M. Harrington, S. A. Hodge, and D. D. Yue. 1981. Station Blackout at Browns Ferry Unit One—Accident Sequence Analysis. NUREG/CR-2182, Vol. 1; ORNL/NUREG/TM-455/V1. Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy. Oak Ridge, Tennessee: Oak Ridge National Laboratory. November. Cyranoski, D. 2011. Japan faces up to failure of its earthquake preparations. Nature 471:556-557, March 29. DOI:10.1038/471556a. Dal Bó, E. 2006. Regulatory capture: A review. Oxford Review of Economic Policy 22(2): 203- 225. Dogariu, A., and R. B. Miles. 2011. Detecting localized trace species in air using radar resonance-enhanced multi-photon ionization. Applied Optics 50(4): A68-A73, February . Domenici, P. V., B. J. Lyons, and J. J. Steyn. 2004. A Brighter Tomorrow: Fulfilling the Promise of Nuclear Energy. Lanham, Maryland: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers. Dorfman, D. 2012. The changing perspectives of U.S. and Japanese nuclear energy policies in the aftermath of the Fukushima Daiichi disaster. Pace Environmental Law Review 30(1): 255-283. Driscoll, N. W., J. K. Weissel, and J. A. Goff. 2000 Potential for large-scale submarine slope failure and tsunami generation along the U.S. mid-Atlantic coast. Geology 28: 407-410, May. ENSI (Swiss Federal Nuclear Safety Inspectorate). 2011. Lessons: Fukushima 11032011, Lessons Learned and Checkpoints Based on the Nuclear Accidents at Fukushima. ENSI-AN- 8001. Aargau, Switzerland: Swiss Federal Nuclear Safety Inspectorate. October 29. EPRI (Electric Power Research Institute). 2012a. Fukushima Daiichi Accident—Technical Causal Factor Analysis: 2012. Technical Report 1024946. Prepared by EPRI, Charlotte, North Carolina, and Lucius Pitkin Inc., New York, New York. Palo Alto, California: Electric Power Research Institute. March. EPRI. 2012b. Summary of the EPRI Early Event Analysis of the Fukushima Daiichi Spent Fuel Pools Following the March 11, 2011 Earthquake and Tsunami in Japan: 2012. Technical Update 1025058. Palo Alto, California: Electric Power Research Institute. May. EPRI. 2012c. Severe Accident Management Guidance Technical Basis Report. Palo Alto, California: Electric Power Research Institute. EPRI. 2013. Fukushima Technical Evaluation: Phase 1 – MAAP5 Analysis. Technical Report 1025750. Prepared by ERIN Engineering and Research, Inc., West Chester, Pennsylvania. Palo Alto, California: Electric Power Research Institute. April. EPRI and NERC (North American Electric Reliability Corporation). 2011. Geo-magnetic Disturbances (GMD): Monitoring, Mitigation, and Next Steps (A Literature Review and Summary of the 2011 NERC GMD Workshop). Technical Report 1024629. Prepared by Prepublication Copy R-4

OCR for page 233
References Hoffman Power Consulting, Morgan Hill, California. Palo Alto, California: Electric Power Research Institute. November. Evangeliou, N., Y. Balkanski, A. Cozic, and A. P. Møller. 2014. Global and local cancer risks after the Fukushima Nuclear Power Plant accident as seen from Chernobyl: A modeling study for radiocaesium (134Cs & 137Cs). Environment International 64: 17-27. Farmer, F. R. 1967. Siting criteria – a new approach. In Proceedings of a Symposium on the Containment and Siting of Nuclear Power Plants Held by the International Atomic Energy Agency in Vienna, 3-7 April 1967, Vienna, Austria, pp. 303-329 (SM-89/34). Available at http://www.iaea.org/inis/collection/NCLCollectionStore/_Public/44/070/44070762.pdf. Federal Business Opportunities. 2013. Solicitations: Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency—Solicitation Number: DARPA-BAA-14-11. Arlington, Virginia: Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency. December 11. FEMA. 2013a. Program Manual: Radiological Emergency Preparedness. Washington, D.C.: Department of Homeland Security. June. FEMA. 2013b. Communicating During and After a Nuclear Power Plant Incident. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Homeland Security. June 1. FERC (Federal Energy Regulatory Commission). 2013. Reliability Standards for Geomagnetic Disturbances, FERC Docket No. RM12-22-000; Order No. 779. Washington, D.C.: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. May 16. Ferguson, C., and M. Jansson. 2013. FAS Issue Brief: Regulating Japanese nuclear power in the wake of the Fukushima Daiichi accident. Washington, D.C.: Federation of American Scientists. May. Figueroa, P. 2013. Risk communication surrounding the Fukushima nuclear disaster: an anthropological approach. Asia Europe Journal 11: 54-64. Fink, S. 2013. Five Days at Memorial: Life and Death in a Storm-Ravaged Hospital. New York, New York: Crown Publishing Group. Fine, I. V., A. B. Rabinovich, B. D. Bornhold, R. E. Thomson, and E. A. Kilikov. 2005. The Grand Banks landslide-generated tsunami of November 18, 1929: preliminary analysis and numerical modeling. Marine Geology 215(1): 45-57. DOI: 10.1016/j.margeo.2004.11.007. Fitzgerald, J. E., S. B. Wollner, A. A. Adalja, R. C. Morhard, A. J. Cero, and T. V. Inglesby. 2012. After Fukushima: Managing the Consequences of a Radiological Release (Final Report). Baltimore, Maryland: Center for Biosecurity of University of Pittsburgh Medical Center. March. Frankel, A. 2013a. Rupture history of the 2011 M 9 Tohoku Japan earthquake determined from strong-motion and high-rate GPS recordings: Subevents radiating energy in different frequency bands. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 103(2B): 1290-1306, May. DOI: 10.1785/0120120148. Frankel, A. 2013b. Comment on “Why earthquake hazard maps often fail and what to do about it” by S. Stein, R. Geller, and M. Liu. Tectonophysics 592: 200-206, January 28. Prepublication Copy R-5

OCR for page 233
References FSC (Food Safety Commission of Japan). 2011. Emergency Report on Radioactive Nuclides in Foods. Tokyo, Japan: Government of Japan. March. Fujii, Y., K. Satake, S. Sakai, M. Shinohara, and T. Kanazawa. 2011. Tsunami source of the 2011 off the Pacific Coast of Tohoku Earthquake. Earth Planets Space 63(7): 815-820. Fujiwara, T., S. Kodaira, T. No, Y. Kaiho, N. Takahashi, and Y. Kaneda. 2011. The 2011 Tohoku-Oki Earthquake: Displacement reaching the trench axis. Science 334(6060): 1240, December 2, DOI:10.1126/science.1211554. Furumura, T., S. Takemura, S. Noguchi, T. Takemoto, T. Maeda, K. Iwai, and S. Padhy. 2011. Strong ground motions from the 2011 off-the Pacific-Coast-of-Tohoku, Japan (Mw=9.0) earthquake obtained from a dense nationwide seismic network. Landslides 8: 333-338, July 23 (online). DOI:10.1007/s10346-011-0279-3. Garrick, B. J. 1968. Unified Systems Safety Analysis for Nuclear Power Plants. Dissertation for Doctor of Philosophy in Engineering. University of California, Los Angeles. Garrick, B. J. (and R. F. Christie, G. M. Hornberger, M. Kilger, and J. W. Stetkar, contributors). 2008. Quantifying and Controlling Catastrophic Risks. Burlington, Massachusetts: Academic Press. Gauntt, R., D. Kalinich, J. Cardoni, J. Phillips, A. Goldmann, S. Pickering, M. Francis, K. Robb, L. Ott, D. Wang, C. Smith, S. St. Germain, D. Schwieder, and C. Phelan. 2012a. Fukushima Daiichi Accident Study (Status as of April 2012). SAND2012-6173. Albuquerque, New Mexico, and Livermore, California: Sandia National Laboratories. July. Available at energy.sandia.gov/wp/wp-content/gallery/uploads/Fukushima_SAND2012-6173.pdf. (Accessed February 18, 2014.) Gauntt, R., D. Kalinich, J. Cardoni, and J. Phillips. 2012b. MELCOR simulations of the severe accident at the Fukushima IF2 reactor. Presented at the American Nuclear Society Winter Meeting and Nuclear Technology Expo, San Diego, California. Albuquerque, New Mexico: Sandia National Laboratories. November 14. Geist, E. L., and T. Parsons. 2009. Assessment of source probabilities for potential tsunamis affecting the U.S. Atlantic coast. Marine Geology 264(1): 98-108, August. Gelfand, B. E., M. V. Silnikov, S. P. Medvedev, and S. V. Khomik. 2012. Thermo-Gas Dynamics of Hydrogen Combustion and Explosion (Springer Series: Shock Wave and High Pressure Phenomena, Vol. XXI). Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag. Geller, R. J. 2014. Robert J. Geller: Back to the future: Restarting Japan's nuclear power plants. Nikkei Asian Review, March 7. Available at http://asia.nikkei.com/print/article/20248. (Accessed June 11, 2014.) Gertman, D. I., B. P. Hallbert, M. W. Parrish, M. B. Sattision, D. Brownson, and J. P. Tortorelli. 2002. Review of Findings for Human Error Contribution to Risk in Operating Events. NUREG/CR-6753, INEEL/EXT-01-01166. Prepared by Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory, Idaho Falls, Idaho. Rockville, Maryland: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission electronic library (ADAMS) access number ML020930077. Prepublication Copy R-6

OCR for page 233
References Ghofrani, H., G. M. Atkinson, K. Goda, and K. Assatourians. 2013. Stochastic Finite-Fault Simulations of the 2011 Tohoku, Japan, Earthquake. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 103(2B): 1307-1320, May. DOI:10.1785/0120120228. Goldberg, S. M., and R. Rosner. 2011. Nuclear Reactors: Generation to Generation. Cambridge, Massachusetts: American Academy of Arts and Sciences. Available at amacad.org/pdfs/nuclearreactors.pdf. (Accessed February 21, 2014). González, A. J., M. Akashi, J. D. Boice, Jr., M. Chino, T. Homma, N. Ishigure, M. Kai, S. Kusumi, J. Lee, H. Menzel, O. Niwa, K. Sakai, W. Weiss, S. Yamashita, and Y. Yonekura. 2013. Radiological protection issues arising during and after the Fukushima nuclear reactor accident. Journal of Radiological Protection 33: 497-571. DOI: 10.1088/0952-4746/33/3/497. Government of Japan. 2004. Convention on Nuclear Safety National Report of Japan for the Third Review Meeting. Tokyo, Japan: Government of Japan. August. Available at http://www.nsr.go.jp/archive/nisa/english/internationalcooperation/conventions/cns/pdf/3rd_ NationalReport.pdf. Government of Japan. 2007. Convention on Nuclear Safety National Report of Japan for the Fourth Review Meeting. Tokyo, Japan: Government of Japan. September. Available at http://www.nsr.go.jp/archive/nisa/english/internationalcooperation/conventions/cns/pdf/4th_ NationalReport.pdf. (Accessed July 2, 2014.) Government of Japan. 2010. Convention on Nuclear Safety National Report of Japan for the Fifth Review Meeting. Tokyo, Japan: Government of Japan. September. Available at http://www.nsr.go.jp/archive/nsc/NSCenglish/documents/conventions/2011.pdf. (Accessed July 2, 2014.) Government of Japan. 2011a. Report of Japanese Government to the IAEA Ministerial Conference on Nuclear Safety: The Accident at TEPCO’s Fukushima Nuclear Power Stations. June 2011. Tokyo, Japan: Government of Japan NERHQ (Nuclear Emergency Response Headquarters). Available at www.kantei.go.jp/foreign/kan/topics/201106/iaea_houkokusho_e.html. (Accessed March 4, 2014.) Government of Japan. 2011b. Additional Report of the Japanese Government to the IAEA: The Accident at TEPCO’s Fukushima Nuclear Power Stations (Second Report) (Summary). September 2011. Tokyo, Japan: Government of Japan NERHQ (Nuclear Emergency Response Headquarters). Greene, S. R., and S. A. Hodge. 1986. The role of BWR MK I secondary containments in severe accident mitigation. Presentation at the 14th Water Reactor Safety Meeting, Gaithersburg, Maryland, October 27-31, 1986. ORNL Report CONF-8610135-41. Greene, S. R.. 1986. The role of BWR MK I secondary containments in severe accident mitigation. Proc. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 14th Water Reactor Safety Information Mtg., Bethesda, Maryland. Greene, S. R. 1987. The impact of BWR MK I primary containment failure dynamics on secondary containment integrity. Presentation at the 15th Water Reactor Safety Meeting, Gaithersburg, Maryland, October 19, 1987. ORNL Report CONF-8710111-6. Prepublication Copy R-7

OCR for page 233
References Greene, S. R. 1988. The role of BWR secondary containments in severe accident mitigation: Issues and insights from recent analyses. Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Containment Integrity, Arlington, VA, June 14-17, 1988. NUREG/CR-0095, ORNL Report CONF- 8806153-1. Greene, S. R. 1990. The Role of BWR Secondary Containments in Severe Accident Mitigation: Issues and Insights from Recent Analyses. Nuclear Engineering and Design 120(1990): 75- 86, June 1. Greene, S. R. 2014. The Canary, the Ostrich, and the Black Swan: A Historical Perspective on Our Understanding of BWR Severe Accidents and Their Mitigation. Nuclear Technology 186(2, May): 115-138. dx.doi.org/10.13182/NT13-44. Guldenmund, F. 2010. (Mis)understanding safety culture and its relationship to safety management. Risk Analysis 30(10): 1466-1480. Gusman, A. R., Y. Tanioka, S. Sakai, and H. Tsushima. 2012. Source model of the great 2011 Tohoku earthquake estimated from tsunami waveforms and crustal deformation data. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 341: 234-242, August. DOI: 10.1016/j.epsl.2012.06.006. Gutierrez, J. M., and A. S. Polonsky. 2007. Fundamentals of Nuclear Regulation in the United States, Second Edition. Washington, D.C.: Morgan, Lewis and Bockius LLP. Hache, G. and H. M. Chung. 2001. The history of LOCA embrittlement criteria. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Eighth Water Reactor Safety Information Meeting, Bethesda, Maryland, October 23-25, 2000. NUREG/CP-0172, pp 205-237. Prepared by Brookhaven National Laboratory for the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Haggerty, R., (and B. Japsen, contributor). 2011. Potassium iodide and Geiger counter sales spike after Japan disaster. Chicago Tribune, March 15. On-line. Available at articles.chicagotribune.com/2011-03-15/news/ct-met-local-iodide-sales- 20110315_1_potassium-iodide-radiation-geiger. (Accessed February 12, 2014.) Hamada, N., and H. Ogino. 2012. Food safety regulations: what we learned from the Fukushima nuclear accident. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity 111: 83-99, September. Available through www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0265931X11001962. (Accessed March 4, 2014.) Hamada, N., H. Ogino, and Y. Fujimichi. 2012. Safety regulations of food and water implemented in the first year following the Fukushima nuclear accident. Journal of Radiation Research 53(5): 641-671. DOI: 10.1093/jrr/rrs032. Harbitz, C. B. 1991. Model simulations of tsunami generated by the Storegga slide. Institute of Mathematics, University of Oslo Preprint Series No. 5 (30 pp.). Hardie, S. M. L., and I. G. McKinley. 2013. Fukushima remediation: status and overview of future plans. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity 133: 75-85. Hasegawa, R. 2013. Disaster Evacuation from Japan’s 2011 Tsunami Disaster and the Fukushima Nuclear Accident. Studies No. 05/13. ISSN 2258-7535. Paris, France: Institut du Développement Durable et des Relations Internationales. Available at http://www.iddri.org/Publications/Collections/Analyses/STUDY0513_RH_DEVAST%20rep ort.pdf. Prepublication Copy R-8

OCR for page 233
References Hayano, R. S., and R. Adachi. 2013. Estimation of the total population moving into and out of the 20 km evacuation zone during the Fukushima NPP accident as calculated using “Auto- GPS” mobile phone data. Proceedings of the Japan Academy, Serial B, 89(5): 196-199, DOI: 10.2183/pjab.89.196. Hayashi, Y. 2011. Japan Officials Failed to Hand Out Radiation Pills in Quake's Aftermath. The Wall Street Journal, September 29. On-line. HERP (Headquarters for Earthquake Research Promotion), Earthquake Research Committee. 2002. 三陸沖から房総沖にかけての地震活動の長期評価について [Long-term Evaluation of Seismic Activity from Offshore Sanriku to Offshore Bousou] (Japanese). Available at http://www.jishin.go.jp/main/chousa/kaikou_pdf/sanriku_boso.pdf. (Accessed June 11, 2014.) HERP (Headquarters for Earthquake Research Promotion), Earthquake Research Committee. 2005. National Seismic Hazard Maps for Japan (2005)–March 23. Tokyo, Japan: Headquarters for Earthquake Research Promotion, Government of Japan. Available at jishin.go.jp/main/chousa/06mar_yosoku-e/NationalSeismicHazardMaps.pdf. (Accessed at February 21, 2014.) Heezen, Bruce, and Maurice Ewing. 1952. Turbidity currents and submarine slumps, and the 1929 Grand Banks Earthquake. American Journal of Science 250: 849-873, December. Helm, D. 2006. Regulatory reform, capture, and the regulatory burden. Oxford Review of Economic Policy 22(2): 169-185. Helton, D., J. Chang, N. Siu, K. Coyne, and M. Leonard. 2010. The role of severe accident management in the advancement of level 2 PRA modeling techniques. Presented at NEA/CSNI/R(2010)10/PART1 and 2, Implementation of Severe Accident Management Measures, ISAMM 2009 workshop proceedings, Schloss Böttstein, Switzerland, October 26- 28, 2009. JT03293928. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and Dycoda, LLC. Available at http://www.oecd-nea.org/html/nsd/docs/2010/csni-r2010-10-vol1.pdf. (Accessed February 18, 2014.) Hodge, S. A. , J. C. Cleveland, T. S. Kress, and M. Petek. 1992. Identification and Assessment of BWR In-Vessel Severe Accident Mitigation Strategies. NUREG/CR-5869 ORNL/TM-12080 RK. Oak Ridge, Tennessee: Oak Ridge National Laboratory. October. Hogberg, L. 2013. Root causes and impacts of severe accidents at large nuclear plants. AMBIO 42: 267-284. Hollnagel, E., D. D. Woods, and N. Leveson. 2006. Resilience Engineering: Concepts and Precepts. Burlington, Vermont: Ashgate Publishing Company. Horiuchi, A., and K. Shimizu. 2001. Did amakudari undermine the effectiveness of regulator monitoring in Japan? Journal of Banking and Finance 25(2001): 573-596. Hosono, H., Kumagai, Y., and Sekizaki, T. 2013. Development of an Information Package of Radiation Risk in Beef after the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant Accident in Agricultural Implications of the Fukushima Nuclear Accident (Chapter 17, 187-204). In T. M. Nakanishi and K. Tanoi (Eds.) Agricultural Implications of the Fukushima Nuclear Accident. Tokyo, Japan, Springer Japan. Prepublication Copy R-9

OCR for page 233
References IAEA. 1994. PSA for the Shutdown Mode for Nuclear Power Plants: Proceedings of a Technical Committee meeting held in Stockholm, 30 November-3 December 1992. IAEA-TECDOC- 751. Vienna, Austria: International Atomic Energy Agency. June. IAEA. 2002. Safety Culture in Nuclear Installations: Guidance for Use in the Enhancement of Safety Culture. IAEA-TECDOC-1329. Vienna, Austria: International Atomic Energy Agency. December. Available at www- pub.iaea.org/MTCD/publications/PDF/te_1329_web.pdf. (Accessed March 4, 2014.) IAEA. 2003. Method for Developing Arrangements for Response to a Nuclear or Radiological Emergency (Updating IAEA-TECDOC-953). Vienna, Austria: International Atomic Energy Agency. October. Available at http://www-pub.iaea.org/books/IAEABooks/6750/Method- for-Developing-Arrangements-for-Response-to-a-Nuclear-or-Radiological-Emergency- Updating-IAEA-TECDOC-953. (Accessed June 10, 2014.) IAEA. 2007. IAEA Safety Glossary: Terminology Used in Nuclear Safety and Radiation Protection, 2007 Edition. STI/PUB/1290. Vienna, Austria: International Atomic Energy Agency. June. Available at http://www- pub.iaea.org/MTCD/publications/PDF/Pub1290_web.pdf. (Accessed July 3, 2014.) IAEA. 2010. Governmental, Legal and Regulatory Framework for Safety: General Safety Requirements, Part 1. Safety Standards Series No. GSR Part 1. Vienna, Austria: International Atomic Energy Agency. September. Available at www- pub.iaea.org/MTCD/publications/PDF/Pub1465_web.pdf. (Accessed March 4, 2014.) IAEA. 2011. IAEA International Fact Finding Expert Mission of the Fukushima Dai-ichi NPP Accident Following the Great East Japan Earthquake and Tsunami—Tokyo, Fukushima Dai- ichi NPP, Fukushima Dai-ni NPP and Tokai Dai-ni NPP, Japan, 24 May-2 June 2011. Vienna, Austria: International Atomic Energy Agency. June 16. Available at http://www- pub.iaea.org/MTCD/meetings/PDFplus/2011/cn200/documentation/cn200_Final-Fukushima- Mission_Report.pdf. IAEA. 2012. IAEA Mission to Onagawa Nuclear Power Station to Examine the Performance of Systems, Structures and Components following the Great East Japanese Earthquake and Tsunami—Onagawa and Tokyo, Japan, 30 July-11 August 2012. Vienna, Austria: International Atomic Energy Agency. Available at http://www.iaea.org/newscenter/focus/actionplan/reports/onagawa0413.pdf. (Accessed May 9, 2014.) IAEA. 2013a. Preliminary Summary Report: The Follow-up IAEA International Mission on remediation of large contaminated areas off-site the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant. Tokyo and Fukushima Prefecture, Japan, 14-21, October. Vienna, Austria: International Atomic Energy Agency. Available at http://www.iaea.org/newscenter/focus/fukushima/remediation-report-211013.pdf (Accessed June 24, 2014). IAEA. 2013b. Actions to Protect the Public in an Emergency Due to Severe Conditions at a Light Water Reactor: Emergency Preparedness and Response Report. Vienna, Austria: International Atomic Energy Agency. May. Prepublication Copy R-10

OCR for page 233
References IAEA. 2014a. Nuclear Power Reactors in the World: 2014 Edition (Reference Data Series No. 2). IAEA-RDS-2/34. Vienna, Austria: International Atomic Energy Agency. May. IAEA. 2014b. Final Report: The Follow-up IAEA International Mission on Remediation of Large Contaminated Areas Off-Site the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant, Tokyo and Fukushima Prefecture, Japan, 14-21 October 2013. Vienna, Austria: International Atomic Energy Agency. January 23. ICRP (International Commission on Radiological Protection). 1991. 1990 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP Publication 60, Annals of the ICRP, volume 21, nos. 1-3. Ottawa, Canada: International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP. 2007. The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP Publication 103, Annals of the ICRP 37(2-4). Ottawa, Canada: International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP. 2011. Application of the Commission's Recommendations to the Protection of People Living in Long-term Contaminated Areas After a Nuclear Accident or a Radiation Emergency. ICRP Publication 111, Annals of the ICRP 39(3). Ottawa, Canada: International Commission on Radiological Protection. Imtihani, N., and Y. Mariko. 2013. Media coverage of Fukushima nuclear power station accident 2011 (A case study of NHK and BBC WORLD TV stations). Procedia Environmental Sciences 17(2013): 938-946. INPO (Institute of Nuclear Power Operations). 2004. Principles for a Strong Nuclear Safety Culture. Atlanta, Georgia: Institute of Nuclear Power Operations. November. Available at www.nrc.gov/about-nrc/regulatory/enforcement/INPO_PrinciplesSafetyCulture.pdf. (Accessed March 11, 2014.) INPO. 2005. Performance Objectives and Criteria. INPO 05-003. Atlanta, Georgia: Institute of Nuclear Power Operations. May. INPO. 2011. Special Report on the Nuclear Accident at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station, Revision 0. INPO 11-005. Atlanta, Georgia: Institute of Nuclear Power Operations. November. INPO. 2012. Special Report on the Lessons Learned from the Nuclear Accident at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station, Revision 0. INPO 11-005 Addendum. Atlanta, Georgia: Institute of Nuclear Power Operations. August. INPO. 2013. Traits of a Healthy Nuclear Safety Culture. INPO 12-012, Revision 1. Atlanta, Georgia: Institute of Nuclear Power Operations. April. Available at nuclearsafety.info/wp- content/uploads/2010/07/Traits-of-a-Healthy-Nuclear-Safety-Culture-INPO-12-012-rev.1- Apr2013.pdf. (Accessed March 11, 2014.) INSAG (International Nuclear Safety Group). 1986. Report by the International Nuclear Safety Advisory Group: Summary Report on the Post-Accident Review Meeting on the Chernobyl Accident. Safety Series No. 75-INSAG-1. Vienna, Austria: International Atomic Energy Agency. September. Available at ilankelman.org/miscellany/chernobyl.pdf. (Accessed March 4, 2014.) Prepublication Copy R-11

OCR for page 233
References Payne, E. 2011. Radiation fears spark run on West Coast pharmacies, health food stores. Atlanta, Georgia, Cable News Network (CNN), March 16. Pereira, A. S. 2006. The opportunity of a disaster: The economic impact of the 1755 Lisbon Earthquake. CHERRY DP 03/06. Centre for Historical Economics and Related Research at York, York University. Available at http://www.york.ac.uk/media/economics/documents/cherrydiscussionpapers/0603.pdf. (Accessed June 10, 2014.) Philadelphia Electric (Philadelphia Electric Company). 1981. Probabilistic Risk Assessment— Limerick Generating Station, USNRC Docket Nos. 50-352 and 50-353. Phillips, J., Cardoni, J., Gauntt, R., Kalinich, D., and Goldmann, A. 2012. MELCOR Simulations of the Severe Nuclear Accident at the Fukushima 1F2 Reactor. Presentation at American Nuclear Society Winter Meeting, November 15, 2012. Pöllänen, R., H. Toivonen, K. Peräjärvi, T. Karhunen, T. Ilander, J. Lehtinen, K. Rintala, T. Katajainen, J. Niemelä, and M. Juusela. 2009. Radiation surveillance using an unmanned aerial vehicle. Applied Radiation and Isotopes (from the 6th International Conference on Radionuclide Metrology - Low Level Radioactivity Measurement Techniques), 67(2009): 340-344. Povinec, P. P., M. Gera, K. Holý, K. Hirose, G. Lujaniené, M. Nakano, W. Plastino, I. Sýkora, J. Bartok, and M. Gažák. 2013. Dispersion of Fukushima radionuclides in the global atmosphere and the ocean. Applied Radiation and Isotopes 81: 383-92, November. Progress Energy. 2008. Application for Combined License for Levy Nuclear Power Plant Units 1 and 2, NRC Project Number 756 in a letter to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, from James Scarola. Serial: NPD-NRC-2008-022. Raleigh, North Carolina: Progress Energy, Inc. July 28. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission electronic library (ADAMS) access number ML082260277. (Accessed July 16, 2014.) Reason, J. 2008. The Human Contribution: Unsafe Acts, Accidents, and Heroic Recoveries. Farnham, United Kingdom: Ashgate Publishing Company. Rempe, J., M. Farmer, M. Corradini, L. Ott, R. Gauntt, and D. Powers. 2012. Revisiting insights from Three Mile Island Unit 2 postaccident examinations and evaluations in view of the Fukushima Daiichi accident. Nuclear Science and Engineering 172(3): 223-248, November. Richardson, P., K. Rickwood, and P. Rickwood. 2013. Public involvement as a tool to enhance nuclear safety. Energy Strategy Reviews 1(4): 266-271, May. Riley, P. 2012. On the probability of occurrence of extreme space weather events. Space Weather 10(2): S02012, DOI: 10.1029/2011SW000734. RJIF (Rebuild Japan Initiative Foundation’s Independent Investigation Commission on the Fukushima Nuclear Accident). 2014. The Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station Disaster: Investigating the Myth and Reality. M. K. Bricker (Ed.). London, United Kingdom: Routledge. Robb, K. R., M. W. Francis, and M. T. Farmer. 2013. Enhanced Ex-Vessel Analysis for Fukushima Daiichi Unit 1: Melt Spreading and Core-Concrete Interaction Analyses with MELTSPREAD and CORQUENCH. ORNL/TM-2012/455. Prepared by Oak Ridge National Prepublication Copy R-20

OCR for page 233
References Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee. Available at http://info.ornl.gov/sites/publications/files/Pub39382.pdf. (Accessed June 10, 2014.) Rogovin, M., G. T. Frampton, and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission Special Inquiry Group. 1980. Three Mile Island; A Report to the Commissioners and to the Public, Vols. I-II. NUREG/CR-1250. Washington, D.C.: Rogovin, Stern and Huge. January. Roth, E. M., A. Mosleh, Y. J. Chang, R. Richards, D. Bley, S. H. Shen, and A. Zoulis. 2012. Model-based framework for characterizing contextual factors for HRA applications. Presented at the 11th International Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management Conference and The Annual European Safety and Reliability Conference, Helsinki, Finland, June 25-29, 2012. Roth Cognitive Engineering, Massachusetts; University of Maryland, College Park; U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Rockville; The Idaho National Laboratory, Idaho Falls; The WreathWood Group, Virginia, U.S.A. Salame-Alfie, A., P. Mulligan, F. Fisher-Tyler, R. McBurney, and E. Fordham. 2012. Fukushima disaster response—the States’ perspective. Health Physics 102(5): 580-583, May. Sarter, N. B., D. D. Woods, and C. E. Billings. 1997. Automation surprises. In G. Salvendy (Ed.) Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics, second edition, pp 1926-1943. New York, New York: Wiley and Sons, Inc. Sasakawa, Y. 2012. Invited editorial: International expert symposium in Fukushima, September 2011. Journal of Radiological Protection 32(1): E7-E8. Satake, K., Y. Namegaya, and S. Yamaki. 2008. Numerical simulation of the AD 869 Jogan tsunami in Ishinomaki and Sendai plains. In Japanese with English abstract. Annual Report of Active Fault and Paleoearthquake Researches 8: 71-89. Satake, K., Y. Fujii, T. Harada, and Y. Namegaya. 2013. Time and space distribution of coseismic slip of the 2011 Tohoku Earthquake as inferred from tsunami waveform data. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 103(2B): 1473-1492. DOI: 10.1785/0120120122. Schaede, U. 1995. The "Old Boy" network and government-business relationships in Japan. Journal of Japanese Studies 21(2, Summer): 293-317. Available at http://www.jstor.org/stable/133010. (Accessed July 9, 2014.) SCJ (Science Council of Japan). 2011. Report to the Foreign Academies from Science Council of Japan on the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant Accident. Tokyo, Japan: Science Council of Japan. May 2. Sehgal, B. R. (ed.). 2012. Nuclear Safety in Light Water Reactors: Severe Accident Phenomenology. Waltham, Massachusetts: Academic Press. Shiroyama, H. 2012. Regulatory Failures of Nuclear Safety in Japan –The Case of Fukushima Accident, http://tokyo2013.earthsystemgovernance.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/0202- SHIROYAMA_Hideaki-.pdf Shneider, M. N., and R. B. Miles. 2005. Microwave diagnostics of small plasma objects. Journal of Applied Physics 98(2005): 033301. Prepublication Copy R-21

OCR for page 233
References Silva, K., Y. Ishiwatari, and S. Takahara. 2013. Cost per severe accident as an index for severe accident consequence assessment and its applications. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 123(2014): 110-122. Siu, N., D. Marksberry, S. Cooper, K. Coyne, and M. Stutzke. 2013. PSA Technology Challenges Revealed by the Great East Japan Earthquake. Presented at the Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management Topical Conference in Light of the Fukushima Dai-Ichi Accident, Tokyo, Japan, April 15-17, 2013. Rockville, Maryland, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission electronic library (ADAMS) access number ML13038A203. Smith, D.E., Shi, S., Cullingford, R.A., Dawson, A.G., Dawson, S., Firth, C.R. , Foster, I.D.L., Fretwell, P.T. , Haggart, B.A., Holloway, L.K., and Long, D. 2004. The Holocene Storegga Slide tsunami in the United Kingdom. Quaternary Science Reviews 23 (23-34): 2291-2321. Stein, S., and E. A. Okal. 2007. Ultralong period seismic study of the December 2004 Indian Ocean earthquake and implications for regional tectonics and the subduction process. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 97: S279-S295, January. Stein, S., R. J. Geller, and M. Liu. 2012. Why earthquake hazard maps often fail and what to do about it. Tectonophysics 562-563: 1-25, August 24. Stein, S., R. J. Geller, and M. Liu. 2013. Reply to comment by Arthur Frankel on “Why earthquake hazard maps often fail and what to do about it.” Tectonophysics 592: 207-209, April 19. Steinhauser, G., A. Brandl, and T. E. Johnson. 2014. Comparison of the Chernobyl and Fukushima Nuclear Accidents: A Review of the Environmental Impacts. Science of the Total Environment 470-471: 800-817, February 1, DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.10.029. Sugawara, D., F. Imamura, K. Goto, H. Matsumoto, and K. Minoura. 2013. The 2011 Tohoku- oki Earthquake Tsunami: Similarities and differences to the 869 Jogan Tsunami on the Sendai Plain. Pure and Applied Geophysics 170(5), 831-843, January 24. DOI: 10.1007/s00024-012-0460-1. Suzuki, W., S. Aoi, H. Sekiguchi, and T. Kunugi. Rupture process of the 2011 Tohoku‐Oki mega‐thrust earthquake (M9.0) inverted from strong‐motion data. Geophysical Research Letters 38(7): (October 20, 2011): L00G16. DOI: 10.1029/2011GL049136. Tajima, F., J. Mori, and B. L. N. Kennett. 2013. A review of the 2011 Tohoku-Oki earthquake (Mw 9.0): Large-scale rupture across heterogeneous plate coupling Tectonophysics 586: 15- 34, February 26. DOI: 10.1016/j.tecto.2012.09.014. Tanigawa, K., Y. Hosoi, N. Hirohashi, Y. Iwasaki, and K. Kamiya. 2012. Loss of life after evacuation: lessons learned from the Fukushima accident. Lancet 379(9819): 889-91, March 10. Tateno, S., and H. M. Yokoyama. 2013. Public anxiety, trust, and the role of mediators in communicating risk of exposure to low dose radiation after the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Plant explosion. Journal of Science Communication 12(2): A03, June 24. Taylor, J. M. 1996. Memorandum from James M. Taylor, Executive Director of Operations, dated April 29, 1996, to The Commissioners regarding: Status of the integration plan for Prepublication Copy R-22

OCR for page 233
References closure of severe accident issues and the status of severe accident research. Rockville, Maryland: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. ten Brink, U. 2009. Tsunami hazard along the U.S. Atlantic coast. Marine Geology 264(1-2): 1- 3, August 1. DOI: 10.1016/j.margeo.2009.03.011. ten Brink, U. S., H. J. Lee, E. L. Geist, and D. Twichell. 2009. Assessment of tsunami hazard to the U.S. East Coast using relationships between submarine landslides and earthquakes. Marine Geology 264(1, August): 65-73. DOI:10.1016/j.margeo.2008.05.011. Ten Hoeve, J. E., and M. Z. Jacobson. 2012. Worldwide health effects of the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear accident. Energy and Environmental Science 5: 8743-8757. DOI: 10.1039/C2EE22019A. TEPCO. 2011a. Fukushima Nuclear Accident Analysis Report (Interim Report). Tokyo, Japan: Tokyo Electric Power Company, Inc. December 2. Available at http://www.tepco.co.jp/en/press/corp-com/release/betu11_e/images/111202e14.pdf. (Accessed June 10, 2014.) TEPCO. 2011b. Fukushima Nuclear Accident Investigation Report: Interim Report— Supplemental Volume. Tokyo, Japan: Tokyo Electric Power Company, Inc. December 2. TEPCO. 2011c. The Nuclear Safety and Quality Assurance Meeting’s Accident Investigation Examination Committee’s Opinion of the Tokyo Electric Power Company’s “Fukushima Nuclear Accident Investigation Report (Midterm Report).” Available at http://www.tepco.co.jp/en/press/corp-com/release/betu11_e/images/111202e15.pdf. TEPCO. 2011d. Mid-and-long-Term Roadmap towards the Decommissioning of Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Units 1-4 (December 2011). Available at TEPCO. 2012a. MAAP Code-based Analysis of the Development of the Events at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station. Tokyo, Japan: Tokyo Electric Power Company, Inc. March. TEPCO. 2012b. Fukushima Nuclear Accident Analysis Report. Available at http://www.tepco.co.jp/en/nu/fukushima-np/interim/index-e.html. Tokyo, Japan: Tokyo Electric Power Company, Inc. June 20. TEPCO. 2012c. P. 1.11. TEPCO, 2013. Evaluation of the Situation of Cores and Containment Vessels of Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station Units-1 to 3 and Examination into Unsolved Issues in the Accident Progression: Progress Report No. 1 (December). Available at http://www.tepco.co.jp/en/press/corp-com/release/betu13_e/images/131213e0101.pdf. Tohoku (Tohoku Electric Power Company). 2012. Safe Shutdown of Onagawa Nuclear Power Station: The Closest BWRs to the 3/11/’11 Epicenter. Presentation to the Committee on Lessons Learned from the Fukushima Nuclear Accident for Improving Safety and Security of U.S. Nuclear Plants, Tokyo, Japan, November 29, 2012. Honcho, Japan: Tohoku Electric Power Company. Tominaga, T., M. Hachiya, H. Tatsuzaki, and M. Akashi. 2014. The accident at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant in 2011. Health Physics 106(6): 630-637, June. Prepublication Copy R-23

OCR for page 233
References Tupin, E. A., M. A. Boyd, J. E. Mosser, and J. S. Wieder. 2012. U.S. EPA response to the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant accident. Health Physics 102(5): 563-569, May, DOI: 10.1097/HP.0b013e31824cc02e. UCS (Union of Concerned Scientists). 2011a. The NRC and Nuclear Power Plant Safety in 2010: A Brighter Spotlight Needed. March. Cambridge, Mass. UCS Publications. Available at http://www.ucsusa.org/assets/documents/nuclear_power/nrc-2010-full-report.pdf UCS. 2011b. Statement by David Lochbaum, Director of Nuclear Safety Project before the U.S. Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Union of Concerned Scientists. March 29. UCS. 2012. The NRC and Nuclear Power Plant Safety in 2011: Living on Borrowed Time. March. Cambridge, Mass. UCS Publications. Available at http://www.ucsusa.org/assets/documents/nuclear_power/nrc-nuclear-safety-2011-full- report.pdf UCS. 2013a. NRC’s Failure to Enforce Reactor Fire Regulations. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Union of Concerned Scientists. June. Available at www.ucsusa.org/assets/documents/nuclear_power/ucs-nrc-fire-regulations-5-2-13.pdf. (Accessed February 28, 2014.) UCS. 2013b. The NRC and Nuclear Power Plant Safety in 2012: Tolerating the Intolerable. March. Cambridge, Mass. UCS Publications. Available at http://www.ucsusa.org/assets/documents/nuclear_power/NRC-nuclear-safety-2012-report.pdf UCS. 2014. The NRC and Nuclear Power Plant Safety in 2013: More Jekyll, Less Hyde. November. Cambridge, Mass. UCS Publications. Available at http://www.ucsusa.org/assets/documents/nuclear_power/NRC-Nuclear-Safety-Report- 2013.pdf UNSCEAR (United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation). 2011. Sources and Effects of Ionizing Radiation: United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation, UNSCEAR 2008 Report to the General Assembly with Scientific Annexes (Volume II: Scientific Annexes C, D and E). New York, New York: United Nations. April. Available at www.unscear.org/docs/reports/2008/11- 80076_Report_2008_Annex_D.pdf. (Accessed March 11, 2014.) UNSCEAR. 2013a. Sources, Effects and Risks of Ionizing Radiation: UNSCEAR 2013 Report, Volume I, Report to the General Assembly (Scientific Annex A: Levels and effects of radiation exposure due to the nuclear accident after the 2011 great east-Japan earthquake and tsunami). New York, New York: United Nations. April. Available at http://www.unscear.org/docs/reports/2013/13-85418_Report_2013_Annex_A.pdf. UNSCEAR 2013b. Sources, Effects and Risks of Ionizing Radiation: UNSCEAR 2013 Report, Volume II, Annex B - Effects of radiation exposure of children, New York, New York: United Nations. UNSCEAR. 2013c. Report of the United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation: Sixtieth session (27-31 May 2013), General Assembly Official Records-Sixty- eighth session, Supplement No. 46. A/68/46. New York, New York: United Nations. May 27-31. Prepublication Copy R-24

OCR for page 233
References USDHS (U.S. Department of Homeland Security). 2013. National Response Framework, Second Edition. Washington, D.C.: Department of Homeland Security. May. US Embassy (Embassy of the United States, Tokyo, Japan). 2011. Travel Warning. Available at japan.usembassy.gov/e/acs/tacs-travel20110317.html. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of State. March 17. USEPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency).1992. Manual of Protective Action Guides and Protective Actions for Nuclear Incidents (Revised 1991). EPA 400-R-92-001. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. May. USEPA. 2013. PAG Manual: Protective Action Guides and Planning Guidance For Radiological Incidents (Draft for Interim Use and Public Comment). Washington, D.C.: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. March. USFDA (U.S. Food and Drug Administration). 1998. Accidental Radioactive Contamination of Human Food and Animal Feeds: Recommendations for State and Local Agencies. UCM094513. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. August 13. USFDA. 2004. Supporting Document for Guidance Levels for Radionuclides in Domestic and Imported Foods. Docket No. 2003D-0558. UCM078341. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. July. USGAO (U.S. Government Accountability Office). 1983. Response to Specific Questions on the Indian Point Probabilistic Safety Study. GAO/RCED-83-158. Washington, D.C.: U.S. General Accounting Office. May 24. Available at http://gao.gov/assets/150/140084.pdf. (Accessed July 10, 2014.) USGAO. 2008. Report to Congressional Requesters—Nuclear Safety: NRC’s Oversight of Fire Protection at U.S. Commercial Nuclear Reactor Units Could Be Strengthened. GAO-08-747. Washington, D.C.: U.S. General Accounting Office. June. Available at www.gao.gov/new.items/d08747.pdf. (Accessed February 28, 2014.) USGAO. 2012. Report to Congressional Requesters—Nuclear Regulatory Commission: Oversight and Status of Implementing a Risk-Informed Approach to Fire Safety. GAO-13-8. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Accountability Office. October. Available at www.gao.gov/assets/650/649658.pdf. (Accessed February 28, 2014.) USGAO. 2014. Report to the Chairman, Subcommittee on Transportation and Infrastructure, Committee on Environment and Public Works, U.S. Senate—Nuclear Safety: Countries’ Regulatory Bodies Have Made Changes in Response to the Fukushima Daiichi Accident. GAO-14-109. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Accountability Office. March. Available at www.gao.gov/assets/670/661464.pdf. (Accessed March 14, 2014.) USNRC. 1975. Reactor Safety Study: An Assessment of Accident Risks in U.S. Commercial Nuclear Power Plants, Appendices III and IV. WASH-1400, NUREG-75/014. Rockville, Maryland: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. October. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission electronic library (ADAMS) access number ML070610293. USNRC. 1980a. NRC Action Plan Developed as a Result of the TMI-2 Accident, Vols. 1 and 2. NUREG-0660. Rockville, Maryland: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. May. U.S. Prepublication Copy R-25

OCR for page 233
References Nuclear Regulatory Commission electronic library (ADAMS) access numbers ML072470526 (vol. 1) and ML072470524 (vol. 2). USNRC. 1980b. Clarification of TMI Action Plan Requirements: Final Report. NUREG-0737. Rockville, Maryland: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. November. Available at www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/nuregs/staff/sr0737/final/index.html. (Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, September 17, 2013). (Accessed March 4, 2014.) USNRC. 1982. Guidelines for the Preparation of Emergency Operating Procedures: Resolution of Comments on NUREG-0799. NUREG-0899. Rockville, Maryland: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. August. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission electronic library (ADAMS) access numbers ML102560007. USNRC. 1983. Clarification of TMI Action Plan Requirements Requirements for Emergency Response Capability. NUREG-0737, Supplement No. 1.January. Available at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/nuregs/staff/sr0737/sup1/sr0737sup1.pdf. USNRC. 1987. Severe Accident Risks: An Assessment for Five U.S. Nuclear Power Plants – Final Summary Report. NUREG-1150. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. February. USNRC. 1990. Severe Accident Risks: An Assessment for Five U.S. Nuclear Power Plants. NUREG-1150. Rockville, Maryland: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. October. Available at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/nuregs/staff/sr1150/ (Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 29, 2012). (Accessed March 4, 2014.) USNRC. 1995. Evaluation of potential severe accidents during low power and shutdown operations at Surry, Unit 1: Evaluation of severe accident risk during mid-loop operation (Main report, Volume 6, Part 1). Rep. NUREG/CR--6144-Vol.6-Pt.1; BNL-NUREG--52399- Vol.6-Pt.1 ON: TI95013650; TRN: 95:017227. Washington, DC: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. May. Available at http://www.osti.gov/scitech/biblio/83860. USNRC. 1997a. Regulatory Analysis Technical Evaluation Handbook, Final Report. NUREG/BR-0184. Rockville, Maryland: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. January. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission electronic library (ADAMS) access number ML050190193. USNRC. 1997b. Individual Plant Examination Program: Perspectives on Reactor Safety and Plant Performance, Final Report, Vol. 1-5. NUREG-1560. Washington, D.C.: Nuclear Regulatory Commission. USNRC. 1998. Peer review for high-level waste repositories. NUREG-1297. Rockville, Maryland: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. USNRC. 2000a. Memorandum from Annette L. Vietti-Cook, Secretary of the Commission, dated December 22, 2000, regarding: SECY-00-0037 - Status of Potassium Iodide Activities - and - SECY-00-0040 - Final Amendments to 10 CFR 50.47. Rockville, Maryland: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. USNRC. 2000b. Letter from Richard A. Meserve, Chairman of U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, to Edward J. Markey, U.S. House of Representatives, dated March 9, 2000, in Prepublication Copy R-26

OCR for page 233
References response to letter of November 10, 1999. Washington, D.C.: Nuclear Regulatory Commission. March 9. USNRC. 2001. Commission Voting Record, Decision Item: SECY-02-0089, Title: Status of Potassium Iodide Activities. Rockville, Maryland: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. June 29. USNRC. 2002a. Perspectives Gained From the Individual Plant Examination of External Events (IPEEE) Program - Final Report. NUREG-1742, Volume 1. Rockville, Maryland: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. April. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission electronic library (ADAMS) access number ML0212/ML021270070. USNRC. 2002b. Commission Voting Record, Decision Item: SECY-02-0089, Title: Revised Draft Nureg-1633 and Public Information Brochure on Potassium Iodide (Ki) for the General Public. Rockville, Maryland: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. November 26. USNRC. 2004a. Effective Risk Communication: The Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s Guidelines for External Risk Communication. NUREG/BR-0308. Prepared by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C., and WPI, Gaithersburg, Maryland. January. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission electronic library (ADAMS) access number ML040690412. USNRC. 2006. Regulatory Guide 1.97: Creiteria for the Accident Monitoring Instrumentation for Nuclear Power Plants, Revision 4. June. Available at: http://pbadupws.nrc.gov/docs/ML0615/ML061580448.pdf. USNRC. 2007. Meteorological Monitoring Programs for Nuclear Power Plants, Regulatory Guide 1.23, Revision 1. Rockville, Maryland: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. March. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission electronic library (ADAMS) access number ML070350028. USNRC. 2009. Regulatory Guide 1.200, Revision 2: An Approach for Determining the Technical Adequacy of Probabilistic Risk Assessment Results for Risk-Informed Activities. Rockville, Maryland: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. March. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission electronic library (ADAMS) access number ML090410014. USNRC. 2011a. NRC News: NRC Provides Protective Action Recommendations Based on U.S. Guidelines. No. 11-050. Rockville, Maryland: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. March 16. Available at www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/news/2011/11-050.pdf. (Accessed February 21, 2014). USNRC. 2011b. Guidance on Developing Effective Radiological Risk Communication Messages: Effective Message Mapping and Risk Communication with the Public in Nuclear Plant Emergency Planning Zones. NUREG-7033. Prepared by Center for Risk Communication, New York, New York. Rockville, Maryland: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. February. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission electronic library (ADAMS) access number ML110490120. USNRC. 2011c. Developing an Emergency Risk Communication (ERC)/Joint Information Center (JIC) Plan for a Radiological Emergency. NUREG/CR-7032. Prepared by Center for Risk Communication, New York, New York. Rockville, Maryland: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Prepublication Copy R-27

OCR for page 233
References Commission. February. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission electronic library (ADAMS) access number ML110490119. USNRC. 2011d. NRC News: NRC Sees No Radiation at Harmful Levels Reaching U.S. From Damaged Japanese Nuclear Power Plants (Revised). No. 11-046. Rockville, Maryland: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. March 13. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission electronic library (ADAMS) access number ML110720002. USNRC. 2011e. Supplemental inspection for repetitive degraded cornerstones, multiple degraded cornerstones, multiple yellow inputs, or one red input. NRC Inspection Procedure 95003. Washington D.C.: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Available at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/insp-manual/inspection- procedure/ip95003.pdf. (Accessed July 2, 2014.) USNRC. 2012a. Policy Issue (Notation Vote) memorandum from R. W. Borchardt to the Commissioners, Subject: Consideration of Additional Requirements for Containment Venting Systems for Boiling Water Reactors with Mark I and Mark II Containments. SECY- 12-0157. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission electronic library (ADAMS) access number redacted version ML12345A030. (November 26). USNRC. 2012b. Letter and Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Requirements for Mitigation Strategies for Beyond-Design-Basis External Events. EA-12-049. Rockville, Maryland: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. March 12. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission electronic library (ADAMS) access number ML12054A735. USNRC. 2012c. A Proposed Risk Management Regulatory Framework: A report to NRC Chairman Gregory B. Jaczko from the Risk Management Task Force. NUREG-2150. Rockville, Maryland: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. April. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission electronic library (ADAMS) access number ML12109A277. USNRC. 2012d. Compliance with Order EA-12-049, Order Modifying Licenses With Regard To Requirements For Mitigation Strategies For Beyond-Design-Basis External Events. Interim Staff Guidance (ISG) Japan Lessons-Learned Project Directorate (JLD). JLD-ISG-2012-01. Available at http://pbadupws.nrc.gov/docs/ML1214/ML12146A014.pdf USNRC, 2012e. Long-Term Cooling and Unattended Water Makeup of Spent Fuel Pools. Federal Register 77(243): 74778-74798. USNRC, 2013a. 2013-2014 Information Digest. NUREG 1350 (v. 25). Washington, DC: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Office of Public Affairs. Available at www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/nuregs/staff/sr1350/. (Accessed February 21, 2014). USNRC. 2013b. State-of-the-Art Reactor Consequence Analyses Project, Vol. 1: Peach Bottom Integrated Analysis. NUREG/CR-7110, Revision 1. Prepared by Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, New Mexico. May. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission electronic library (ADAMS) access numbers ML13150A053. USNRC. 2013c. State-of-the-Art Reactor Consequence Analyses Project, Vol. 2: Surry Integrated Analysis. NUREG/CR-7110, Revision 1. Prepared by Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, New Mexico. August. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission electronic library (ADAMS) access numbers ML13240A242. Prepublication Copy R-28

OCR for page 233
References USNRC. 2013d. A comparison of U.S. and Japanese regulatory requirements in effect at the time of the Fukushima accident (November). Available at: http://pbadupws.nrc.gov/docs/ML1332/ML13326A991.pdf USNRC and USEPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). Task Force on Emergency Planning. 1978. Planning Basis for the Development of State and Local Government Radiological Emergency Response plans in Support of Light Water Nuclear Power Plants. NUREG-0396/EPA 520/1-78-016. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. December. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission electronic library (ADAMS) access number ML051390356. USNRC and EPRI (Electric Power Research Institute). 2012. EPRI/NRC-RES Fire Human Reliability Analysis Guidelines. NUREG-1921, EPRI 1023001. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission; Palo Alto, California: Electric Power Research Institute. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission electronic library (ADAMS) access number ML12216A104. USNRC and FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency). 1980. Criteria for Preparation and Evaluation of Radiological Emergency Response Plans and Preparedness in Support of Nuclear Power Plants. NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1, Revision 1. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and Federal Emergency Management Agency. November. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission electronic library (ADAMS) access number ML040420012. USNRC NTTF (Near-Term Task Force). 2011. Recommendations for Enhancing Reactor Safety in the 21st Century: The Near-Term Task Force Review of Insights from the Fukushima Dai- Ichi Accident. Rockville, Maryland: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. July 12. Available at: http://pbadupws.nrc.gov/docs/ML1118/ML111861807.pdf . Walker, J. S. 2004. Three Mile Island: A Nuclear Crisis in Historical Perspective. Berkeley, California: University of California Press. Wall, J., R. Elms, and D. Nock. 2004. Developing an Incident Management Simulation for Training Emergency Responders. Paper 1865. Presentation at the Interservice/Industry Training, Simulation, and Education Conference (I/ITSEC), Orlando, Florida, May 15, 2004. Wang, Q., and X. Chen. 2012. Regulatory failures for nuclear safety – the bad example of Japan – implication for the rest of the world. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 16(5): 2610-2617. Wang, Q., X. Chen, X. Yi-chong. 2013. Accident like the Fukushima unlikely in a country with effective nuclear regulation: Literature review and proposed guidelines. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 17(2013): 126-146. Whaley, A. M., J. Xing, R. Boring, S. Hendrickson, J. Joe, and K. Le Blanc. 2012. Building a Psychological Foundation for Human Reliability Analysis (Draft). NUREG-2114, INL/EXT- 11-23898. Prepared by the Idaho National Laboratory, Idaho Falls, Idaho, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C., and Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, New Mexico. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission electronic library (ADAMS) access number ML113180490. Prepublication Copy R-29

OCR for page 233
References WHO (World Health Organization). 2013. Health risk assessment from the nuclear accident after the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake and Tsunami based on a preliminary dose estimation. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization. Williamson, B., J. Lyter, D. Roniger, and P. Ellison. 2013. Revising BWR emergency procedures: The BWR owners group has completed a revision of emergency procedure guideline in light of lessons from Fukushima. Nuclear Energy International (Features): November 18. Available at www.neimagazine.com/features/featurerevising-bwr-emergency- procedures/. (Accessed February 19, 2014.) Wise, C. R. 2006. Organizing for Homeland Security after Katrina: Is Adaptive Management What’s Missing? Public Administration Review 66(3): 302-318, May/June. WNA (World Nuclear Association). 2014a. Fukushima accident. London, United Kingdom: World Nuclear Association. Available at www.world-nuclear.org/info/Safety-and- Security/Safety-of-Plants/Fukushima-Accident/. (Accessed February 19, 2014.) Yamanaka, Y. 2012. Research plan regarding improvement of simulation code for understanding the status of fuel debris in the reactor. Presentation at the International Symposium on the Decommissioning of TEPCO's Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant Unit 1-4, March 14, 2012, Tokyo, Japan. Tokyo, Japan: Tokyo Electric Power Company, Inc. Yamazaki, Y., K. F. Cheung, and T. Lay. 2013. Modeling of the 2011 Tohoku near-field tsunami from finite-fault inversion of seismic waves. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 103(2B): 1444-1455, May 2. DOI:10.1785/0120120103. Yasumura, S., M. Hosoya, S. Yamashita, K. Kamiya, M. Abe, M. Akashi, K. Kodama, and K. Ozasa. 2012. Study protocol for the Fukushima health management survey. Journal of Epidemiology 22(5): 375-383. Yasutaka, T., W. Naito, and J. Nakanishi. 2013. Cost and effectiveness of decontamination strategies in radiation contaminated areas in Fukushima in regard to external radiation dose. PLOS ONE 8(9): e75308 (1-11), September 17. Yue, H., and T. Lay. 2013. Source rupture models for the Mw 9.0 2011 Tohoku Earthquake from joint inversions of high-rate geodetic and seismic data. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 103(2B): 1242-1255, May 2. DOI: 10.1785/0120120119. Zitellini, N., F. Chierici, R. Sartori, and L. Torelli. 1999. The tectonic source of the 1755 Lisbon earthquake and tsunami. Annals of Geophysics 42(1): 49-55, February. Prepublication Copy R-30