National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: II: PROCEEDINGS
Suggested Citation:"Welcome." National Research Council. 2013. Strengthening American Manufacturing: The Role of the Manufacturing Extension Partnership: Summary of a Symposium. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18329.
×

Welcome

Charles Wessner
The National Academies

Dr. Wessner welcomed participants to the National Academies. The Academies Board on Science, Technology, and Economic Policy (STEP) has, over the past two decades, addressed the importance of innovation as a driver of economic growth and competitiveness and the challenges of transitioning new ideas to the commercial marketplace. The occasion of this meeting, he said, was to launch STEP’s review the role of the Manufacturing Extension Partnership (MEP). MEP was initiated in 1989 by the Department of Commerce’s National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). He said that the aim of this workshop was to review, clarify, and publicize the value of the MEP for U.S. manufacturing, and to recommend improvements to the program and to its assessment mechanisms.

In its reviews of innovation policies and programs around the world, said Dr. Wessner, the STEP Board had come to understand the importance of collaboration among the public and private sectors in promoting economic development.1 Seeking to become more competitive and to grow their economies, many other countries are creating effective public-private partnerships involving universities, research centers, private innovation and manufacturing firms; state and federal governments; and foundations.2 This global push for innovation, he said, is characterized by the recognition that:

•  Innovation is a key to growing and maintaining a country’s competitive position in the global economy;

_______________

1National Research Council, Government-Industry Partnerships for the Development of New Technologies, C. W. Wessner, ed., Washington, DC: The National Academies Press 2003.

2National Research Council, Rising to the Challenge: U.S. Innovation Policy for the Global Economy, C. W. Wessner and A. Wm. Wolff, eds., Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2012.

Suggested Citation:"Welcome." National Research Council. 2013. Strengthening American Manufacturing: The Role of the Manufacturing Extension Partnership: Summary of a Symposium. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18329.
×

•  Collaboration among small and large businesses, universities, and research institutes is essential for innovation;

•  Proven innovation programs, such as the Small Business Innovation Research program (SBIR), can play an important role in supporting this collaboration.

Leading countries and regions are responding to the innovation challenge, he said, through similar strategies.3 First, they are focused on growth and strength through—

•  Sustained support for universities.

•  Rapidly growing funding for research.

•  Support for innovative small businesses.

•  A focus on manufacturing.

•  Public-private partnerships to hasten the movement of new products and services to market.

In addition, they are investing substantial resources to create, attract, and retain the industries of today and tomorrow.

A COMMITMENT TO INNOVATION AROUND THE GLOBE

The commitment to innovation around the world had shifted, he said, as indicated by R&D expenditures as a share of economic output. He offered an illustration of this measure for selected countries from 1996 to 2007, with steady increases shown for South Korea, Japan, and China, which had doubled its expenditures on basic research between 2004 and 2007; in comparison, the United States and European Union evinced slow or no R&D growth.4 He also singled out the rapid rise of innovation hotspots like Shanghai and Singapore. The investments of the latter, he said, were “absolutely remarkable,” especially the construction of new science parks and a strategy of attracting and supporting top academic achievers through high salaries.5

Similarly, he said, the government of Australia had begun a program to strengthen research facilities, mobilize capital for young high-tech firms, use public procurement to stimulate commercialization, reach out more to other institutions, and strengthen the institutional framework that supports

_______________

3Ibid.

4National Science Board, Science and Engineering Indicators 2010, Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation, 2010.

5In addition to building the major new S&T parks Biopolis and Fusionopolis, Singapore has spent about $5 billion in innovation funding for a population of some 4.5 million.

Suggested Citation:"Welcome." National Research Council. 2013. Strengthening American Manufacturing: The Role of the Manufacturing Extension Partnership: Summary of a Symposium. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18329.
×

image

FIGURE 1 Global R&D: Measuring commitment to innovation.

SOURCE: National Science Board, Science and Engineering Indicators, 2010, Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation, 2010.

innovation.6 The Australians were not yet “completely successful,” he said, but they were “focused, investing, and paying attention.”

In Germany, he said, the government understood “that if you invest in job training, and if you generate enough productivity, you can offset the high wages paid for manufacturing jobs.” Germany’s notable achievement, he said, is a trade surplus, “which is very impressive.” German manufacturers are even succeeding in exporting manufactured goods to China, Dr. Wessner added, with a 55 percent rise in overall exports to that country in 2011. One reason is that Chinese consumers see German goods as superior in quality to Chinese goods.7

THE PLAYING FIELD IS NOT LEVEL

How can the U.S. compete in this environment? Dr. Wessner said that a popular view was that “on a level playing field, the United States can out-

_______________

6Commonwealth of Australia, Powering Ideas: An Innovation Agenda for the 21st Century, 2009.

7Washington Post, “Made in Germany, Sold in China,” September 17, 2010.

Suggested Citation:"Welcome." National Research Council. 2013. Strengthening American Manufacturing: The Role of the Manufacturing Extension Partnership: Summary of a Symposium. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18329.
×

compete anyone in the world.” He said that there are two errors in this view. The first is that the playing field is not level. “The rest of the world is committed to not having a level playing field,” he said, “particularly where the U.S. might win.” He quoted a foreign official who had once said to him: “Why would we give an American company like Intel a level playing field? They’d beat us every time.” The second problem is the presumption that U.S. workers would necessarily out-compete the rest of the world without sufficient investments in their education and skills development.

AN EFFECTIVE INNOVATION POLICY MUST BE HOLISTIC

Another lesson from countries with a with successful innovation strategies, he said, is how holistic they are. They are investing more in research and development (R&D), training a skilled workforce, and investing in their nation’s technology infrastructure, including the roads, utilities, and transportation needed for new manufacturing plants. They also focus on clean energy, incentives for entrepreneurship, and pro-manufacturing policies.8

Dr. Wessner said that the recent innovation strategy prepared by the Obama administration was one of the most comprehensive and well-though-out policies the country had ever had, featuring the following elements9:

•  Invest more in R&D.

•  Grow and attract a skilled workforce.

•  Invest in infrastructure for innovation.

•  Invest in clean energy innovation.

•  Reform the patent system [now partially accomplished].

•  Encourage entrepreneurship.

•  Strengthen manufacturing.

He observed that this integrated, coherent approach offers great promise on the condition that it is enacted and funded in the current budgetary environment.

AN ASSESSMENT OF U.S. MANUFACTURING IN THE 21ST CENTURY

The National Academies assessment of Manufacturing Extension Partnership, Dr. Wessner said, provides us an opportunity to review and

_______________

8National Research Council, Rising to the Challenge: U.S. Innovation Policy for the Global Economy, op. cit.

9National Economic Council, A Strategy for American Innovation: Driving Towards Sustainable Growth and Quality Jobs, Washington, DC: The White House, 2011.

Suggested Citation:"Welcome." National Research Council. 2013. Strengthening American Manufacturing: The Role of the Manufacturing Extension Partnership: Summary of a Symposium. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18329.
×

document the program's current achievements, challenges, and new opportunities; identify and review similar national programs from abroad in order to draw on foreign practices, funding levels, and accomplishments as a point of reference; and discuss current needs and initiatives in light of the global focus on advanced manufacturing.

He closed by introducing the chair of the MEP study, Philip Shapira, a Professor in the School of Public Policy at Georgia Institute of Technology and Professor of Management, Innovation and Policy at the University of Manchester. Dr. Wessner observed that Professor Shapira’s interests “encompass science and technology policy, economic and regional development, innovation management and policy, industrial competitiveness, technology trajectories and assessment, innovation measurement, and policy evaluation.”

Suggested Citation:"Welcome." National Research Council. 2013. Strengthening American Manufacturing: The Role of the Manufacturing Extension Partnership: Summary of a Symposium. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18329.
×
Page 29
Suggested Citation:"Welcome." National Research Council. 2013. Strengthening American Manufacturing: The Role of the Manufacturing Extension Partnership: Summary of a Symposium. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18329.
×
Page 30
Suggested Citation:"Welcome." National Research Council. 2013. Strengthening American Manufacturing: The Role of the Manufacturing Extension Partnership: Summary of a Symposium. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18329.
×
Page 31
Suggested Citation:"Welcome." National Research Council. 2013. Strengthening American Manufacturing: The Role of the Manufacturing Extension Partnership: Summary of a Symposium. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18329.
×
Page 32
Suggested Citation:"Welcome." National Research Council. 2013. Strengthening American Manufacturing: The Role of the Manufacturing Extension Partnership: Summary of a Symposium. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18329.
×
Page 33
Next: The National Academies Evaluation of the Manufacturing Extension Partnership »
Strengthening American Manufacturing: The Role of the Manufacturing Extension Partnership: Summary of a Symposium Get This Book
×
Buy Paperback | $43.00 Buy Ebook | $34.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

The Manufacturing Extension Partnership (MEP)-- a program of the U.S. Department of Commerce's National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)-- has sought for more than two decades to strengthen American manufacturing. It is a national network of affiliated manufacturing extension centers and field offices located throughout all fifty states and Puerto Rico. Qualified MEP Centers work directly with small and medium manufacturing firms in their state or sub-state region, providing expertise, services and assistance directed to foster growth, improve supply chain positioning, leverage emerging technologies, upgrade manufacturing processes, develop work force training, and apply and implement new information.

Strengthening American Manufacturing: The Role of the Manufacturing Extension Partnership is the summary of a symposium convened to review current operations and some of the recent MEP initiatives in the broader context of global manufacturing trends and the opportunities for high-value manufacturing companies. Business leaders, academic experts, and state and federal officials addressed the metrics and impacts of MEP and identified potential areas of improvement. The meeting drew attention to the scale and focuses of MEP, and highlighted the role it plays in supporting and enabling U.S. manufacturers to compete more effectively in the global marketplace. This report includes an overview of key issues raised at this workshop and a detailed summary of the conference presentations.

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!