National Academies Press: OpenBook

Protecting National Park Soundscapes (2013)

Chapter: 4 Report from the Facilities and Maintenance Breakout Group

« Previous: 3 Report from the Transportation Breakout Group
Suggested Citation:"4 Report from the Facilities and Maintenance Breakout Group." National Academy of Engineering. 2013. Protecting National Park Soundscapes. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18336.
×

4

Report from the Facilities and Maintenance Breakout Group1

The facilities and maintenance breakout group organized its discussions around the broad topics of park practices, promotion of low-noise policies, and purchasing. According to the group’s reporter, Beth Cooper, the members sought to raise issues and suggest strategies rather than devise specific solutions.

PARK PRACTICES

A construction guide or handbook for park employees would be a useful tool to prepare for noise-generating projects, allowing the establishment of acceptable noise level criteria ahead of time, said Cooper. Other agencies have noise management primers with high-level guidance about noise mitigation strategies for various situations.

A number of options were cited for eliminating or reducing noisy operations. Examination of the frequency, scope, duration, and area of coverage for operations such as lawn mowing and leaf blowing could yield opportunities to reduce noise significantly, and landscape features that require the generation of noise, such as lawns, could be modified. In addition, portable work (such as the cutting up of a fallen tree) could be transported to a place where the noise impact would be less severe, assuming the transportation itself was not noise prohibitive. Switching out power tools for hand tools in some applications is worth considering when practical. Maintenance contracts could include noise emission specifications. The group also suggested scheduling noisy operations for

_______________

1 Facilities and Maintenance Breakout Group members were Colin Campbell, Beth Cooper, Aaron Hastings, George Maling, Shashikant More, Paul Pfenniger, Kim Slininger, Karen Trevino, Frank Turina, and Eric Wood.

Suggested Citation:"4 Report from the Facilities and Maintenance Breakout Group." National Academy of Engineering. 2013. Protecting National Park Soundscapes. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18336.
×

particular times and areas based on expected visitor traffic. Establishing designated high-noise areas might be useful.

Audio programs delivered via loudspeakers, the group said, could be reduced, conducted less often, or delivered in a more directed (e.g., with wireless headphones).

Group members suggested piggybacking a low-noise campaign on an existing NPS training initiative, Call to Action.2 They also proposed an inventory and review of all noise-producing operations and of equipment for labeling according to noise level. Once in a database, equipment could be assigned to different park areas based on its noise generation, prioritizing low-noise equipment for more sensitive areas. The NASA Buy-Quiet program has a large inventory of sound levels and a system for assigning noise levels to equipment, Cooper said, which could be considered. Noise emissions could be monitored over time after purchase.

Planning a noise control project often requires guidance to identify requirements and the scope of the project. Efforts to address technical problems in the planning process will benefit greatly from the services of a board-certified noise control engineer (e.g., the Institute of Noise Control Engineering of the USA provides board certification). Breakout group participants suggested a triage approach, choosing the highest-priority problems and hiring someone to design solutions.

PROMOTION OF LOW-NOISE POLICIES

The group’s second area of focus was promotion of low-noise policies. Quiet and noisy zones or corridors could be established in parks and moved as work dictated. These zones could be promoted via the interpretive program staff and a published schedule for visitors. Noisy operations could be scheduled to avoid conflict with quiet zones or quiet times of day, which could help make low-noise policies more easily received by the public. When visitors come to expect natural quiet places and experiences, they may help serve as advocates. The Park Service also could include questions about sounds on visitor surveys to build awareness and gather information about noises in the parks.

The group emphasized the importance of including stakeholders such as concessionaires in decisions about quiet areas, since they have an interest in the success of the park. This would also help make

_______________

2 Available online at www.nps.gov/calltoaction/.

Suggested Citation:"4 Report from the Facilities and Maintenance Breakout Group." National Academy of Engineering. 2013. Protecting National Park Soundscapes. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18336.
×

concessionaires part of the campaign so they can inform visitors of the reason behind the policies. Communicating with communities near park entrances, “friends of the parks” groups, and other stakeholders can build understanding and support of low-noise policies. A website could enable sharing of best practices.

PURCHASING

Because A-weighted sound levels do not adequately capture all impacts of noise, the group urged that parks have multiple mechanisms and multiple criteria to deal with protection of the soundscape, wildlife impact, hearing loss prevention, and community noise. However, in considering multiple metrics, the Park Service should standardize its operations nationwide, as applicable, to ensure consistency and enable vendors to compete under the same terms. Moreover, sound quality (e.g., impulsive, rumbly, or hissy) needs to be considered in addition to sound level, as the latter does not convey all the dimensions of noise’s effects on humans, and visitor perceptions are important.

Noise emission requirements could be included in contracts for maintenance and other services and in purchase specifications for equipment. Standards for noise emissions and guidance for low-noise products have been developed both in the United States and in other countries. A measurement standard included in the specification would enable the Park Service to verify measurements. Some products, particularly those manufactured for sale in the European Union, may already be certified and labeled. For example, the Blue Angel3 label, which certifies products as low noise, is widely used in Europe and covers many tools and equipment of potential interest to the Park Service, such as construction machinery, garden tools, municipal vehicles, and automobile tires. As a specific example, plastic garbage cans are quieter than metal, and there is a Blue Angel label for cans that collect glass. There is also a Blue Angel label for chainsaws.

Data from manufacturers on noise emissions are preferable to data from other sources, according to the group, as they are generally more accurate and more current. The group also discussed identifying the most frequently purchased pieces of high-noise equipment in the Park Service and developing specifications for them first. Bulk purchasing, perhaps across government agencies, could also be a strategy for the

_______________

3 Online at www.blauer-engel.de/en/index.php.

Suggested Citation:"4 Report from the Facilities and Maintenance Breakout Group." National Academy of Engineering. 2013. Protecting National Park Soundscapes. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18336.
×

Park Service to work with a manufacturer to design quieter equipment or bring down the price on existing quiet equipment. Shop and field verification can ensure compliance with noise specifications.

DISCUSSION

After going over the major points, Cooper opened up the session for discussion. Participants wondered whether procurements are limited to American-made products, which would impede the use of EU guidelines, but it was pointed out that many products made for sale in the European Union are also made by American manufacturers. Products assembled in the United States may also be allowable under the Buy America provisions.4 EPA has some rules in effect for purchasing quiet products, and the Park Service could work with the agency to create or enforce purchasing criteria. A complete inventory of NPS equipment would enable the Park Service to set targets and track noise performance over time.

Several options were mentioned for enhancing NPS staff awareness of noise levels. Participants discussed the value of setting up long-term noise monitoring stations in the parks to track progress and pointed out that it would be important to differentiate between disruptive noises and appropriate sounds. Labels on equipment would raise awareness by, for example, reminding users that a chainsaw can sometimes be heard two miles away. In Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Park the management teams took generals from a nearby base into the backcountry so they could hear the impact of their jets.

There was general agreement that having choices and being informed helps visitors to feel that they are in control of their options; an Air Force study done in cooperation with NPS demonstrated that warning people about noise ahead of time raised their tolerance of it. Thus a website could list the location(s) of noisy operations on a daily basis so that visitors can avoid those areas.

Participants also discussed tracking visitor movement and noise exposure. Providing visitors with GPS trackers can be useful, but that strategy would need to be combined with reliable acoustic monitoring. Cell phones with sound-level meter applications are an option, but many attendees expressed concern about their accuracy. Another participant pointed out that letting people report their perceived noise

_______________

4 An overview of Buy America is available at www.dot.gov/highlights/buyamerica#.

Suggested Citation:"4 Report from the Facilities and Maintenance Breakout Group." National Academy of Engineering. 2013. Protecting National Park Soundscapes. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18336.
×

exposure using phones might offer some data while simultaneously raising awareness of noise issues, thus serving as an educational tool for visitors. Soundscape data also could be used to broaden exposure to the National Park experience, encouraging people to visit by enabling them to hear the parks’ natural sounds.

Suggested Citation:"4 Report from the Facilities and Maintenance Breakout Group." National Academy of Engineering. 2013. Protecting National Park Soundscapes. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18336.
×
Page 25
Suggested Citation:"4 Report from the Facilities and Maintenance Breakout Group." National Academy of Engineering. 2013. Protecting National Park Soundscapes. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18336.
×
Page 26
Suggested Citation:"4 Report from the Facilities and Maintenance Breakout Group." National Academy of Engineering. 2013. Protecting National Park Soundscapes. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18336.
×
Page 27
Suggested Citation:"4 Report from the Facilities and Maintenance Breakout Group." National Academy of Engineering. 2013. Protecting National Park Soundscapes. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18336.
×
Page 28
Suggested Citation:"4 Report from the Facilities and Maintenance Breakout Group." National Academy of Engineering. 2013. Protecting National Park Soundscapes. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18336.
×
Page 29
Next: 5 Report from the Construction Breakout Group »
Protecting National Park Soundscapes Get This Book
×
Buy Paperback | $32.00 Buy Ebook | $25.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

America's national parks provide a wealth of experiences to millions of people every year. What visitors see—landscapes, wildlife, cultural activities—often lingers in memory for life. And what they hear adds a dimension that sight alone cannot provide. Natural sounds can dramatically enhance visitors' experience of many aspects of park environments. In some settings, such as the expanses of Yellowstone National Park, they can even be the best way to enjoy wildlife, because animals can be heard at much greater distances than they can be seen. Sounds can also be a natural complement to natural scenes, whether the rush of water over a rocky streambed or a ranger's explanation of a park's history. In other settings, such as the New Orleans Jazz National Historical Park, sounds are the main reason for visiting a park.

The acoustical environment is also important to the well-being of the parks themselves. Many species of wildlife depend on their hearing to find prey or avoid predators. If they cannot hear, their survival is jeopardized—and the parks where they live may in turn lose part of their natural heritage. For all these reasons it is important to be aware of noise (defined as unwanted sound, and in this case usually generated by humans or machinery), which can degrade the acoustical environment, or soundscape, of parks. Just as smog smudges the visual horizon, noise obscures the listening horizon for both visitors and wildlife. This is especially true in places, such as remote wilderness areas, where extremely low sound levels are common. The National Park Service (NPS) has determined that park facilities, operations, and maintenance activities produce a substantial portion of noise in national parks and thus recognizes the need to provide park managers with guidance for protecting the natural soundscape from such noise. Therefore, the focus of the workshop was to define what park managers can do to control noise from facilities, operations, and maintenance, and not on issues such as the effects of noise on wildlife, noise metrics, and related topics.

To aid in this effort, NPS joined with the National Academy of Engineering (NAE) and with the US Department of Transportation's John A. Volpe National Transportation Systems Center to hold a workshop to examine the challenges and opportunities facing the nation's array of parks. Entitled "Protecting National Park Soundscapes: Best Available Technologies and Practices for Reducing Park- Generated Noise," the workshop took place October 3-4, 2012, at NPS's Natural Resource Program Center in Fort Collins, Colorado. Protecting National Park Soundscapes is a summary of the workshop.

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!