National Academies Press: OpenBook

Opportunities and Priorities in Arctic Geoscience (1991)

Chapter: 7 Research Priorities

« Previous: 6 Logistic Realities and Opportunities
Suggested Citation:"7 Research Priorities." National Research Council. 1991. Opportunities and Priorities in Arctic Geoscience. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1842.
×

7
Research Priorities

Establishing priorities for solid-earth research in the Arctic requires a weighting of three factors: intrinsic importance of the work for arctic and world science, scientific and technological feasibility, and the status of necessary or desirable prerequisite research. In addition, there should be a place in an arctic geoscience program for some high-risk research of unspecified rank seeking new approaches or trying new techniques for which generally accepted guidelines or precedents do not exist, and there should be a place for "little" as well as "big" science. It is therefore unrealistic to place in priority order the proposed research solely on the basis of perceived relative importance. The committee suggests that the research proposed in this report be undertaken in general accordance with its position in the following matrix, which recognizes that some studies are prerequisite to others and that, in the Arctic, logistics commonly govern what is possible and when. This approach will yield an integrated program of studies that will most efficiently and cost-effectively advance understanding of the solid earth in the Arctic Ocean Basin.

 

 

Technologic Feasibility

 

Character of Research

Now

Soon (2 to 5 years)

Uncertain (>5 years)

Necessary prerequisite to other research

1A

2A

3A

Not necessary prerequisite to other research

1B

2B

3B

Higher risk (no clear guidelines)

1C

2C

3C

 

 

Prerequisite required

Prerequisite required

TABLE 1: Matrix for evaluating the priority of research needs in the arctic solid-earth geosciences.

Suggested Citation:"7 Research Priorities." National Research Council. 1991. Opportunities and Priorities in Arctic Geoscience. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1842.
×

Projects that are technologically feasible now (column 1) should be undertaken before those that are thought to require further development or at least additional testing and seasoning (column 2). Columns 2 and 3 include research that has a prerequisite in column 1. Projects requiring technology that is unproven (column 3) would, of course, be scheduled provisionally as well as last. Within each vertical column, those projects that are necessary or highly desirable prerequisites to other studies (row A) should be scheduled before those that, although technologically feasible, do not provide background data necessary for other studies (row B). The higher-risk studies (row C) can be scheduled concurrently with the projects in rows A and B, depending on perceived scientific promise and available funds. For each study identified in the matrix, reduction and interpretation as well as acquisition of the required data are intended. Order within categories is arbitrary. Note that more specific recommendations on sequencing research on the ridges and subbasins of the Amerasia Basin are presented in Tectonic Problems in the Amerasia Basin in Chapter 5.

Research in Category 1A

  • Establishment of a standardized network of modern digital seismograph stations entirely around the circum-arctic rim

  • Regional magnetic and gravity mapping of the entire Arctic Ocean Basin from submarines or aircraft

  • Seabed side-scan sonar imaging and bathymetric mapping of the entire Arctic Ocean Basin from submarines

Research in Category 1B

  • Paleomagnetic analysis of arctic tectonic problems from outcrops on the circum-arctic rim

  • Comparative analysis of trans-arctic geologic structure and stratigraphy

  • Analysis of paleoenvironmental history as recorded in circum-arctic nonmarine and paralic sediments

  • Sedimentation studies requiring samples from shallow cores (piston, gravity, box), high-resolution seismic reflection profiles, and continental shelf drilling

  • Gas hydrate studies requiring multichannel seismic reflection and refraction data and samples from cores or shallow drill holes on outer shelves or upper slopes in seasonally sea-ice-free or light sea-ice areas

  • Paleobiogeographic and paleoecologic research requiring samples from onshore outcrops or from shallow cores and drill holes on the continental shelf

  • Ice-rafted sediment studies that require satellite imagery and samples from sea-ice and shallow subseabed cores

Research in Category 1C

  • Paleoenvironmental indicator research requiring samples from onshore outcrops, shallow cores, or drill holes on the continental shelf

Research in Category 2A

  • Seismic reflection and seismic refraction studies of Arctic Ocean Basin ridges and subbasins (prerequisite to coring and drilling)

  • Geophysical studies along continental margin transects (prerequisite to coring and drilling)

Research in Category 2B

  • All projects (or parts thereof) requiring coring, dredging, and shallow drilling in the Arctic Ocean Basin beyond the continental shelf, including parts of the proposed studies of Arctic

Suggested Citation:"7 Research Priorities." National Research Council. 1991. Opportunities and Priorities in Arctic Geoscience. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1842.
×

Ocean Basin ridges, subbasins, and continental margins; parts of the proposed arctic ice-rafted sediment, sedimentation, paleobiogeographic and paleoecologic, and gas hydrate and offshore permafrost studies, and the magnetostratigraphy of arctic cores; and all the stratigraphic and paleoenvironmental projects that require samples from the subseabed beyond the continental shelf

  • Deep crustal refraction experiments

  • Heat flow measurements

Research in Category 2C

  • Paleoenvironmental indicator studies requiring samples from cores and shallow drill holes beyond the continental shelf

  • Search for evidence of possible solar-terrestrial interactions in the sedimentary record in the Arctic

Research in Category 3B

  • All projects that require samples from drilling deeper than about 100-m subseabed at sites beyond the continental shelf, including some of the proposed gas hydrate studies, and all proposals that look toward eventual stratigraphic and paleoenvironmental deep drilling in the Arctic Ocean Basin beyond the continental shelf

Suggested Citation:"7 Research Priorities." National Research Council. 1991. Opportunities and Priorities in Arctic Geoscience. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1842.
×
Page 56
Suggested Citation:"7 Research Priorities." National Research Council. 1991. Opportunities and Priorities in Arctic Geoscience. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1842.
×
Page 57
Suggested Citation:"7 Research Priorities." National Research Council. 1991. Opportunities and Priorities in Arctic Geoscience. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1842.
×
Page 58
Next: 8 Special Concerns »
Opportunities and Priorities in Arctic Geoscience Get This Book
×
Buy Paperback | $40.00
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

There is broad agreement in the scientific community that the solid earth beneath the Arctic Ocean basin contains answers to major unsolved problems in the earth sciences and that many of these pertain to questions that are of global scientific significance or pressing societal concern.

Recent political and technological developments, including the end of the Cold War and the prospective availability of nuclear submarines and powerful icebreakers for use as research platforms, appear to provide remedies for formidable obstacles of communication and access in harsh environmental conditions. This book recommends that the Arctic Ocean basin and its margins be the focus of a research program in three stages of study based on selected criteria: geologic framework and tectonic evolution, the sedimentary record and environmental history, and arctic geologic processes and environmental indicators.

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!