National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: 5 GNDA Analysis Framework
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2013. Performance Metrics for the Global Nuclear Detection Architecture: Abbreviated Version. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18424.
×

References

Anthony, R. 2004. A calibrated model of the psychology of deterrence. Bulletin on Narcotics 56(1/2):49-64.

Baldini, E. 2010. Preventing the theft of dangerous radiological materials. The Police Chief 77:30-39. Available at http://www.policechiefmagazine.org/magazine/index.cfm?fuseaction=display_arch&article_id=2199&issue_id=92010. Accessed August 1, 2013.

Cuellar, L., D. Kubicek, P. Stroud, M. Mathis, J. Smith, and F. Roach. 2012. Probabilistic Effectiveness Model, Data Documentation v1.2. LA-CP-12-00659. Los Alamos National Laboratory. May 3.

DHS (Department of Homeland Security). 2006. National Planning Scenarios Created for Use in National, Federal, State, and Local Homeland Security Preparedness Activities, Ver. 21.3. Available at https://www.llis.dhs.gov/content/national-planning-scenarios-final-version-213-0. Accessed August 1, 2013.

DHS. 2007. DHS’ Domestic Nuclear Detection Office Progress in Integrating Detection Capabilities and Response Protocols. DHS Office of Inspector General, OIG-08-19.

DHS. 2011a. 2011 Radiological/Nuclear Terrorism Risk Assessment, Executive Summary. (SECRET)

DHS. 2011b. 2011 Radiological/Nuclear Terrorism Risk Assessment Final Report, Volumes I, II, III. (SECRET)

DHS. 2012. The Department of Homeland Security GNDA Implementation Plan. Report to Congress Fiscal Year 2012. (OUO)

Drake, G., W. Paddon, and D. Ciechanowski. 2003. Can We Deter Terrorists from Employing Weapons of Mass Destruction on the U.S. Homeland? Carlise, PA: U.S. Army War College.

Fisher, J. J. 2012. Training, Assistance, and Exercises Overview. Presentation to the Committee on Evaluating the Effectiveness of the Global Nuclear Detection Architecture, October 10, Washington DC. (OUO)

Garrett, R. K. Jr., S. Anderson, N. T. Baron, and J. D. Moreland, Jr. 2011. Managing the interstitials, a system of systems framework suited for the ballistic missile defense system. Systems Engineering 14(1):87-109.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2013. Performance Metrics for the Global Nuclear Detection Architecture: Abbreviated Version. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18424.
×

GAO. 2008. Preliminary Observations on the Domestic Nuclear Detection Office’s Efforts to Develop a Global Nuclear Detection Architecture. GAO-08-999T. July. Available at http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-08-999T. Accessed August 1, 2013.

GAO. 2012. DHS Has Developed Plans for Its Global Nuclear Detection Architecture, but Challenges Remain in Deploying Equipment. GAO-12-941T. July. Available at http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-12-941T. Accessed August 1, 2013.

Global Nuclear Detection Architecture (GNDA). 2010. The GNDA Strategic Plan. (OUO)

GNDA. 2011a. Joint Annual Interagency Review from 2011. (OUO)

GNDA. 2011b. Joint Annual Interagency Review of the Global Nuclear Detection Architecture Data Call for the 2011 Report. (OUO)

GNDA. 2012a. Joint Annual Interagency Review from 2012. (OUO)

GNDA. 2012b. Joint Annual Interagency Review of the Global Nuclear Detection Architecture Data Call for the 2011 Report. (OUO)

Haphuriwat, N., V. M. Bier, and H. H. Willis 2011. Deterring the smuggling of nuclear weapons in container freight through detection and retaliation. Decision Analysis 8(2):88-102.

Jain, M., J. Tsai, J. Pita, C. Kiekintveld, S. Rathi, M. Tambe, and F. Ordonez. 2010. Software assistants for randomized patrol planning for the LAX airport police and the Federal Air Marshal Service. Interfaces 40:267-290.

JASON. 2012. Domestic Nuclear Detection Surge Operations, JSR-11-315, 2012. (OUO)

Kaner, C. 2009. Metrics, Qualitative Measurement, and Stakeholder Value, Conference of the Association for Software Testing, July 2009.

Keeney, R. L., and R. S. Gregory. 2005. Selecting attributes to measure the achievement of objectives. Operations Research 53(1):1-11.

Leffer, T. N. 2012. Implementation of the Global Nuclear Detection Architecture, Part II: Interagency Partnership’s Perspectives. Presentation to the committee, May 15, Washington, DC. (OUO)

Morral, A. R., and B. A. Jackson. 2009. Understanding the Role of Deterrence in Counterterrorism Security. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corp. Available at http://www.rand.org/pubs/occasional_papers/OP281. Accessed August 1, 2013.

Morral, A.R., C. C. Price, D. S. Ortiz, B. Wilson, T. LaTourrette, B. W. Mobley, S. McKay, and H. H. Willis. 2012. Modeling Terrorist Risk for the Air Transportation System. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corp. Available at http://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/monographs/2012/RAND_MG1241.pdf. Accessed August 1, 2013.

NAE/NRC (National Academy of Engineering and National Research Council). 2004. Radiological Attack: Dirty Bombs and Other Devices. Report Brief. Available at http://www.dhs.gov/xlibrary/assets/prep_radiological_fact_sheet.pdf. Accessed August 1, 2013.

NAE/NRC. 2005. Nuclear Attack. Report Brief. Available at http://www.dhs.gov/xlibrary/assets/prep_nuclear_fact_sheet.pdf. Accessed August 1, 2013.

NEHRP (National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program). 2008. Strategic Plan for the National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program Fiscal Years 2009-2013. Available at http://www.nehrp.gov/pdf/strategic_plan_2008.pdf. Accessed September 5, 2013.

NNSA (National Nuclear Security Administration). 2012a. NNSA conducts 100th WMD counterterrorism exercise. Press Release. Available at http://nnsa.energy.gov/mediaroom/pressreleases/bearcatexercise080912. Accessed August 1, 2013.

NNSA. 2012b. NNSA sees significant achievements, important improvements in 2012. Press Release. Available at http://www.nnsa.energy.gov/mediaroom/pressreleases/achievements2012. Accessed August 1, 2013.

NRC (National Research Council). 2002. Discouraging Terrorism: Some Implications of 9/11. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Available at http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=10489. Accessed September 9, 2013.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2013. Performance Metrics for the Global Nuclear Detection Architecture: Abbreviated Version. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18424.
×

NRC. 2008. Department of Homeland Security Bioterrorism Risk Assessment: A Call for Change. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Available at http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=12206. Accessed September 9, 2013.

NRC. 2010. Review of the Department of Homeland Security’s Approach to Risk Analysis. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Available at http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=12972. Accessed September 9, 2013.

NRC. 2011. Understanding and Managing Risk in Security Systems for the DOE Nuclear Weapons Complex, Abbreviated Version. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Available at http://www.nap.edu/download.php?record_id=13108. Accessed September 16, 2013.

NRC. 2012a. Deterrence and the Death Penalty. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Available at http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=13363. Accessed September 9, 2013.

NRC. 2012b. Improving Metrics for the Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction Program. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Available at http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=13289. Accessed September 9, 2013.

NRC. 2012c. The Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty: Technical Issues for the United States. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Available at http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=12849. Accessed September 9, 2013.

NTHMP (National Tsunami Hazard Mitigation Program). 2013. National Tsunami Hazard Mitigation Program 2009-2013 Strategic Plan. Available at http://nthmp.tsunami.gov/documents/nthmp_strategicplan.doc. Accessed August 1, 2013.

Oliphant, M. 2012. Red Teaming Overview. Presentation to the committee, October 10, Washington, DC. (OUO)

OMB (Office of Budget and Management). 2003. Performance Measurement Challenges and Strategies. Available at http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/omb/part/challenges_strategies.pdf. Accessed September 5, 2013.

OMB. 2012. Preparation, Submission, and Execution of the Budget. Available at http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/omb/assets/a11_current_year/a_11_2012.pdf. Accessed August 1, 2013.

Parnell, G., E. Ronald, R. Metzger, J. Merrick, and R. Eilers. 2001. Multiobjective decision analysis of theater missile defense architectures. Systems Engineering 4(1):24-34.

Rosoff, H., and D. von Winterfeldt. 2007. A risk and economic analysis of dirty bomb attacks on the Ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach. Risk Analysis 27(3):533-546.

Shea, D. 2008. The Global Nuclear Detection Architecture: Are We Building Domestic Defenses That Will Make the Nation Safer? Testimony to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs. U.S. Congress, Senate.

Smith, J. 2012. Probabilistic Effectiveness Methodology (PEM). Presentation to the Committee on Evaluating the Effectiveness of the Global Nuclear Detection Architecture, October 10, Washington, DC.

Streetman, S. 2012. Radiological and Nuclear Terrorism Risk Analysis (RNTRA): DNDO’s Risk Model. Presentation to the Committee on Evaluating the Effectiveness of the Global Nuclear Detection Architecture, June 28, Washington, DC. (OUO)

Travers, D. 2012. Developing and Using Metrics for the Water Security Program. Presentation to Committee on Evaluating the Effectiveness of the Global Nuclear Detection Architecture, October 10, Washington, DC.

U.S. Congress, Senate. 2010. Nuclear terrorism: strengthening our domestic defenses. S. Hrg. 1096 before the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, 111th Cong., 2nd Sess. Available at http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CHRG-111shrg58397/pdf/CHRG-111shrg58397.pdf. Accessed August 1, 2013.

Willis, H. H. 2012. Overview of Recent Workshop on Connecting Analysis to Strategic Planning with Examples. Presentation to the committee. June 28. Washington, DC.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2013. Performance Metrics for the Global Nuclear Detection Architecture: Abbreviated Version. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18424.
×

Willis, H. H., J. B. Predd, P. K. Davis, and W. P. Brown. 2010. Measuring the Effectiveness of Border Security Between Ports-Of-Entry. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corp. Available at http://www.rand.org/pubs/technical_reports/TR837.

Wyss, J.C. 2012. State Department’s Role in GNDA, International Implementation Plan. Presentation to committee. October 10. Washington, DC. (OUO)

Zabko, J. 2012a. DNDO comparison between the GNDA’s capabilities and expected adversary capabilities. Presentation to committee October 12. Washington, DC. (SECRET)

Zabko, J. 2012b. The global nuclear detection architecture: Metrics and evaluation. Presentation to committee May 14. Washington, DC. (OUO)

Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2013. Performance Metrics for the Global Nuclear Detection Architecture: Abbreviated Version. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18424.
×
Page 59
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2013. Performance Metrics for the Global Nuclear Detection Architecture: Abbreviated Version. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18424.
×
Page 60
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2013. Performance Metrics for the Global Nuclear Detection Architecture: Abbreviated Version. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18424.
×
Page 61
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2013. Performance Metrics for the Global Nuclear Detection Architecture: Abbreviated Version. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18424.
×
Page 62
Next: Appendix A: Presentations and Committee Information Gathering Meetings »
Performance Metrics for the Global Nuclear Detection Architecture: Abbreviated Version Get This Book
×
 Performance Metrics for the Global Nuclear Detection Architecture: Abbreviated Version
Buy Paperback | $38.00 Buy Ebook | $30.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

The Global Nuclear Detection Architecture (GNDA) is described as a worldwide network of sensors, telecommunications, and personnel, with the supporting information exchanges, programs, and protocols that serve to detect, analyze, and report on nuclear and radiological materials that are out of regulatory control. The Domestic Nuclear Detection Office (DNDO), an office within the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), coordinates the development of the GNDA with its federal partners.

Performance Metrics for the Global Nuclear Detection Architecture considers how to develop performance measures and quantitative metrics that can be used to evaluate the overall effectiveness and report on progress toward meeting the goals of the GNDA. According to this report, two critical components are needed to evaluate the effectiveness of the GNDA: a new strategic plan with outcome-based metrics and an analysis framework to enable assessment of outcome-based metrics.

The GNDA is a complex system of systems meant to deter and detect attempts to unlawfully transport radiological or nuclear material. The recommendations of Performance Metrics for the Performance Metrics for the Global Nuclear Detection Architecture may be used to improve the GNDA strategic plan and the reporting of progress toward meeting its goals during subsequent review cycles.

READ FREE ONLINE

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!