National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: Appendix E: Acronyms
Suggested Citation:"Appendix F: Glossary." National Research Council. 2013. Performance Metrics for the Global Nuclear Detection Architecture: Abbreviated Version. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18424.
×

Appendix F

Glossary

The terms defined in this glossary are for the purpose of usage within this report.

Adaptive adversary An opponent that continually reacts to defensive actions and protective measures by adapting or inventing new pathways to do harm.

Analytic framework An analytic framework is a consistent way of thinking in a planning or decision-making context, which usually involves specific analytical tools (e.g., cost-benefit analysis, risk analysis, Bayesian analysis) and methods (e.g., statistics, expert elicitation, value of information analysis).

Architecture Often used in connection with the term “systems” as in “systems architecture.” A (systems) architecture consists of basic elements that interrelate and connect to form subsystems and the system as a whole. The definition of an architecture also includes the purpose of the system and its boundaries.

Best-effort budget An overall value that represents the GNDA budget; it is determined by reports from each of the agencies that participates in the GNDA. Each agency estimates the activities, resources and costs that are GNDA-related.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix F: Glossary." National Research Council. 2013. Performance Metrics for the Global Nuclear Detection Architecture: Abbreviated Version. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18424.
×

Capability The ability to perform tasks or assessments based on available capacities that lead to outcomes. Capacity (see below) and capability together describe the resources in place to achieve a predefined task. For example, a vaccination program may have a capacity of 10 million vaccines which would lead to the capability of vaccinating 1 million people per day.

Capacity The tools and core resources that enable action; for example, detectors, concepts of operation, and training are capacities.

Detection The action or process of determining the presence of a target object or substance, by way of passive and active detection equipment as well as by nontechnical means, such as ongoing law-enforcement information or observations, public and other government departments’ and agencies’ observations, or reporting of suspicious behavior (GNDA, 2010).

Deterrence Reduction by denial, by retribution, by other means of the likelihood that adversaries will attempt an attack.

Gap A pathway without detection capabilities (as used within the GNDA).

Goal A statement of the result or achievement toward which effort is directed. Strategic goals articulate clear statements of what the agency wants to achieve to advance its mission and address relevant national problems, needs, challenges, and opportunities. These outcome-oriented strategic goals and supporting activities should further the agency’s mission (OMB, 2012).

Goals are usually defined as specific attainment level or target on an objective or performance measure. In some contexts (e.g., GNDA, 2012; NAS, DTRA) the term goal is used synonymously with a higher-level objective.

Implementation plan An implementation plan defines the specific programs and steps to be taken to implement astrategic plan. It is usually more short term (1-3 years) than a strategic plan and it defines specific activities and desired goals and targets.

Indicator A measurable value that is used to track progress toward a goal or target. (See “metric” below.) “Agencies are encouraged to use outcome indicators … where feasible” (OMB, 2012).

Metric Synonymous with “indicator,” the actual quantity that is used to measure progress. Metrics can be quantitative or qualitative. Quantitative metrics may use numerical (e.g., a percentage or number) or constructed

Suggested Citation:"Appendix F: Glossary." National Research Council. 2013. Performance Metrics for the Global Nuclear Detection Architecture: Abbreviated Version. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18424.
×

scales (e.g., high, medium, low). A standard or indicator of measurement (OMB, 2012).

Measure Qualitative or quantitative facts that gauge the progress toward achieving a goal. These facts may be in the form of indicators, statistics, or metrics.

Mission boundary The boundary and transfer of federal responsibilities across the spectrum of nuclear counterterrorism activities.

Mission statement A brief, easy-to-understand narrative … [that] defines the basic purpose of the agency and is consistent with the agency’s core programs and activities expressed within the broad context of national problems, needs, or challenges” (OMB, 2012).

Objectives (or Strategic objectives) The outcome or impact the agency is trying to achieve (OMB, 2012).

Out of regulatory control Materials that are being imported, possessed, stored, transported, developed, or used without authorization by the appropriate regulatory authority, either inadvertently or deliberately (DHS, 2011b, Vol. I, p. 4).

Outcome A type of measure that indicates progress against achieving the intended result of a program. Indicates changes in conditions that the government is trying to influence (OMB, 2012).

Outcome-based Provides information on progress made against an intended result or can indicate changes in conditions that the customer is attempting to influence.

Output Description of the level of an activity or a program, such as the number of inspections conducted in a given day or the number of interagency meetings held per year. Outputs may not necessarily be related to outcomes.

A type of measure, specifically the tabulation, calculation, or recording of activity or effort, usually expressed quantitatively. Outputs describe the level of product or activity that will be provided over a period of time. While output indicators can be useful, there must be a reasonable connection between outputs used as performance indicators and outcomes (OMB, 2012).

Suggested Citation:"Appendix F: Glossary." National Research Council. 2013. Performance Metrics for the Global Nuclear Detection Architecture: Abbreviated Version. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18424.
×

Performance goal Goals established by an agency to monitor and understand progress toward strategic objectives (OMB 2012).

A statement of the level of performance to be accomplished within a time frame, expressed as a tangible, measurable objective or as a quantitative standard, value, or rate. For the purposes of this guidance and implementation of the GPRA Modernization Act, a performance goal includes a performance indicator, a target, and a time period. The GPRA Modernization Act requires performance goals to be expressed in an objective, quantifiable, and measurable form unless agencies in consultation with OMB determine that it is not feasible. In such cases an “alternative form” performance goal may be used. The requirement for OMB approval of an alternative-form goal applies to performance goals only. Milestones are often used as the basis of an alternative-form performance goal. Performance goals specified in alternative form must be described in a way that makes it possible to discern if progress is being made toward the goal (OMB 2012).

Performance measure “[M]easurable values that indicate the state or level” and that are “used to track progress toward a goal or target…. By definition, the indicators for which agencies set targets with time frames are performance indicators…. Agencies are encouraged to use outcome indicators as performance indicators where feasible” (OMB, 2012).

Performance metric A performance metric is a specific prescription of how to make an estimate or assessment of a decision alternative or plan on a performance measure. For example, the performance measure “Life-cycle cost” can be estimated by the metric “discounted life-cycle cost in 2012 dollars.” Often the metric is defined as part of a performance measure.

Port(s) of Entry The terms “port” and “port of entry” incorporate the geographical area under the jurisdiction of a port director (19 CFR § 101.3).

Proxy A metric that does not directly relate to a goal or objective but can be used as an indirect measure as long as a strong relationship between the metric and its objective can be made. Proxies can be useful and should not be indiscriminately avoided especially when a direct metric cannot be established. Proxy metrics are also called “indirect metrics.”

Scope (of a goal, objective, or metric) The focus or functional scope consists of three main levels as they relate to the GNDA:

Architecture—the integrated capability of all three geographic layers and the crosscutting functions of the GNDA.

Layers—the operational elements and assets in each of the three geo-

Suggested Citation:"Appendix F: Glossary." National Research Council. 2013. Performance Metrics for the Global Nuclear Detection Architecture: Abbreviated Version. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18424.
×

graphical layers of the GNDA (exterior to the United States, border, and interior of the United States).

Resources—budgets, people, assets, and capabilities.

Strategic goals The general, outcome-oriented, long-term goals for the major functions and operations of the agency (OMB, 2012).

Strategic objectives Objectives that reflect the outcome or impact the agency is trying to achieve (OMB, 2012).

Strategic plan Presents the long-term objectives an agency hopes to accomplish, set at the beginning of each new term of an Administration. It describes general and longer-term goals the agency aims to achieve, what actions the agency will take to realize those goals, and how the agency will deal with the challenges likely to be barriers to achieving the desired result. An agency’s strategic plan should provide the context for decisions about performance goals, priorities, and budget planning, and should provide the framework for the detail provided in agency annual plans and reports (OMB, 2012).

Surge A domestic operation under DNDO authority to be a temporary increase in intensity of preventive detection activities using existing limited resources, initiated by weak intelligence cues that do not constitute the basis for determining a credible threat that would otherwise trigger search operations (JASON, 2012, p. 9).

Type There are different types of goals, objectives, and metrics.

Input—indicates consumption of resources used (e.g., time, money).

Process—indicates how well a procedure, process, or operation is working.

Output—describes the level of activity (or product) that will be provided over a period of time.

Outcome—indicates progress against achieving the intended result.

Vision statement Describes the long-term goal of the organization or program (OMB 2012).

Suggested Citation:"Appendix F: Glossary." National Research Council. 2013. Performance Metrics for the Global Nuclear Detection Architecture: Abbreviated Version. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18424.
×

This page intentionally left blank.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix F: Glossary." National Research Council. 2013. Performance Metrics for the Global Nuclear Detection Architecture: Abbreviated Version. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18424.
×
Page 91
Suggested Citation:"Appendix F: Glossary." National Research Council. 2013. Performance Metrics for the Global Nuclear Detection Architecture: Abbreviated Version. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18424.
×
Page 92
Suggested Citation:"Appendix F: Glossary." National Research Council. 2013. Performance Metrics for the Global Nuclear Detection Architecture: Abbreviated Version. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18424.
×
Page 93
Suggested Citation:"Appendix F: Glossary." National Research Council. 2013. Performance Metrics for the Global Nuclear Detection Architecture: Abbreviated Version. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18424.
×
Page 94
Suggested Citation:"Appendix F: Glossary." National Research Council. 2013. Performance Metrics for the Global Nuclear Detection Architecture: Abbreviated Version. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18424.
×
Page 95
Suggested Citation:"Appendix F: Glossary." National Research Council. 2013. Performance Metrics for the Global Nuclear Detection Architecture: Abbreviated Version. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18424.
×
Page 96
Performance Metrics for the Global Nuclear Detection Architecture: Abbreviated Version Get This Book
×
 Performance Metrics for the Global Nuclear Detection Architecture: Abbreviated Version
Buy Paperback | $38.00 Buy Ebook | $30.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

The Global Nuclear Detection Architecture (GNDA) is described as a worldwide network of sensors, telecommunications, and personnel, with the supporting information exchanges, programs, and protocols that serve to detect, analyze, and report on nuclear and radiological materials that are out of regulatory control. The Domestic Nuclear Detection Office (DNDO), an office within the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), coordinates the development of the GNDA with its federal partners.

Performance Metrics for the Global Nuclear Detection Architecture considers how to develop performance measures and quantitative metrics that can be used to evaluate the overall effectiveness and report on progress toward meeting the goals of the GNDA. According to this report, two critical components are needed to evaluate the effectiveness of the GNDA: a new strategic plan with outcome-based metrics and an analysis framework to enable assessment of outcome-based metrics.

The GNDA is a complex system of systems meant to deter and detect attempts to unlawfully transport radiological or nuclear material. The recommendations of Performance Metrics for the Performance Metrics for the Global Nuclear Detection Architecture may be used to improve the GNDA strategic plan and the reporting of progress toward meeting its goals during subsequent review cycles.

READ FREE ONLINE

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!