National Academies Press: OpenBook
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2013. New Directions in Assessing Performance Potential of Individuals and Groups: Workshop Summary. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18427.
×

New Directions in Assessing
Performance Potential
of Individuals and Groups

WORKSHOP SUMMARY

Robert Pool, Rapporteur

Committee on Measuring Human Capabilities:
Performance Potential of Individuals and Collectives

Board on Behavioral, Cognitive, and Sensory Sciences

Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education

NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL
OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES

THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS
Washington, D.C.
www.nap.edu

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2013. New Directions in Assessing Performance Potential of Individuals and Groups: Workshop Summary. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18427.
×

THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS      500 Fifth Street, NW      Washington, DC 20001

NOTICE: The project that is the subject of this report was approved by the Governing Board of the National Research Council, whose members are drawn from the councils of the National Academy of Sciences, the National Academy of Engineering, and the Institute of Medicine. The members of the committee responsible for the report were chosen for their special competences and with regard for appropriate balance.

This study was supported by Contract/Grant No. W-911NF-12-1-0504 between the National Academy of Sciences and the U.S. Department of the Army. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the organizations or agencies that provided support for the project.

International Standard Book Number-13: 978-0-309-29044-9
International Standard Book Number-10: 0-309-29044-9

Additional copies of this report are available from the National Academies Press, 500 Fifth Street, NW, Keck 360, Washington, DC 20001; (800) 624-6242 or (202) 334-3313; http://www.nap.edu.

Copyright 2013 by the National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.

Printed in the United States of America

Suggested citation: National Research Council. (2013). New Directions in Assessing Performance Potential of Individuals and Groups: Workshop Summary. R. Pool, Rapporteur. Committee on Measuring Human Capabilities: Performance Potential of Individuals and Collectives, Board on Behavioral, Cognitive, and Sensory Sciences. Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2013. New Directions in Assessing Performance Potential of Individuals and Groups: Workshop Summary. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18427.
×

THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES

Advisers to the Nation on Science, Engineering, and Medicine

The National Academy of Sciences is a private, nonprofit, self-perpetuating society of distinguished scholars engaged in scientific and engineering research, dedicated to the furtherance of science and technology and to their use for the general welfare. Upon the authority of the charter granted to it by the Congress in 1863, the Academy has a mandate that requires it to advise the federal government on scientific and technical matters. Dr. Ralph J. Cicerone is president of the National Academy of Sciences.

The National Academy of Engineering was established in 1964, under the charter of the National Academy of Sciences, as a parallel organization of outstanding engineers. It is autonomous in its administration and in the selection of its members, sharing with the National Academy of Sciences the responsibility for advising the federal government. The National Academy of Engineering also sponsors engineering programs aimed at meeting national needs, encourages education and research, and recognizes the superior achievements of engineers. Dr. C. D. Mote, Jr., is president of the National Academy of Engineering.

The Institute of Medicine was established in 1970 by the National Academy of Sciences to secure the services of eminent members of appropriate professions in the examination of policy matters pertaining to the health of the public. The Institute acts under the responsibility given to the National Academy of Sciences by its congressional charter to be an adviser to the federal government and, upon its own initiative, to identify issues of medical care, research, and education. Dr. Harvey V. Fineberg is president of the Institute of Medicine.

The National Research Council was organized by the National Academy of Sciences in 1916 to associate the broad community of science and technology with the Academy’s purposes of furthering knowledge and advising the federal government. Functioning in accordance with general policies determined by the Academy, the Council has become the principal operating agency of both the National Academy of Sciences and the National Academy of Engineering in providing services to the government, the public, and the scientific and engineering communities. The Council is administered jointly by both Academies and the Institute of Medicine. Dr. Ralph J. Cicerone and Dr. C. D. Mote, Jr., are chair and vice chair, respectively, of the National Research Council.

www.national-academies.org

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2013. New Directions in Assessing Performance Potential of Individuals and Groups: Workshop Summary. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18427.
×

This page intentionally left blank.

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2013. New Directions in Assessing Performance Potential of Individuals and Groups: Workshop Summary. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18427.
×

COMMITTEE ON MEASURING HUMAN CAPABILIITES: PERFORMANCE POTENTIAL OF INDIVIDUALS AND COLLECTIVES

Jack W. Stuster (Chair), Anacapa Sciences, Inc., Santa Barbara, CA

Georgia T. Chao, Eli Broad Graduate School of Management, Michigan State University

Randall W. Engle, School of Psychology, Georgia Institute of Technology

Leaetta Hough, Dunnette Group, Ltd., Saint Paul, MN

Patrick C. Kyllonen, Center for Academic and Workforce Readiness and Success, Educational Testing Service, Princeton, NJ

John J. McArdle, Department of Psychology, University of Southern California

Stephen Stark, Department of Psychology, University of South Florida

Cherie Chauvin, Study Director

Tina Winters, Associate Program Officer

Renée L. Wilson Gaines, Senior Program Assistant

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2013. New Directions in Assessing Performance Potential of Individuals and Groups: Workshop Summary. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18427.
×

BOARD ON BEHAVIORAL, COGNITIVE, AND SENSORY SCIENCES

John T. Cacioppo (Chair), Department of Psychology, University of Chicago

Linda M. Bartoshuk, Department of Community Dentistry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Florida

Richard J. Bonnie, Institute of Law, Psychiatry and Public Policy, University of Virginia

Jennifer S. Cole, Department of Linguistics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

Alice H. Eagly, Department of Psychology, Northwestern University

Susan T. Fiske, Department of Psychology and Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, Princeton University

Daniel R. Ilgen, Department of Psychology, Michigan State University

Nina G. Jablonski, Department of Anthropology, Pennsylvania State University

James S. Jackson, Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor

Jonathan D. Moreno, Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy and Department of History and Sociology of Science, University of Pennsylvania

Michael I. Posner, Department of Psychology, University of Oregon (Emeritus)

Marcus E. Raichle, Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University in St. Louis

Valerie F. Reyna, Human Neuroscience Institute, Cornell University

Richard M. Shiffrin, Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University

Jeremy M. Wolfe, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Departments of Ophthalmology and Radiology, Harvard Medical School

Barbara A. Wanchisen, Director

Jatryce Jackson, Program Associate

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2013. New Directions in Assessing Performance Potential of Individuals and Groups: Workshop Summary. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18427.
×

Acknowledgments

This workshop summary is based on the proceedings of a public workshop held on April 3-4, 2013, convened by the Board on Behavioral, Cognitive, and Sensory Sciences, and planned by the Committee on Measuring Human Capabilities: Performance Potential of Individuals and Collectives. The planning committee members identified research areas of interest and specific presenters, organized the agenda, and facilitated roundtable discussions; however, they did not participate in the writing of this summary. Its contents reflect their diligent planning efforts, the insightful presentations of invited experts, and the thought-provoking roundtable discussions of all invited participants as well as the general audience.

The workshop, and the larger study for which it is a part, was sponsored by the U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences (ARI). In particular, the committee wishes to thank Gerald Goodwin, chief of foundational science at ARI, and his entire research team, for their support and guidance throughout the planning process.

Among the National Research Council (NRC) staff, special thanks are due to Barbara A. Wanchisen who provided oversight to the process of planning and hosting the workshop. Additionally, special thanks to Tina Winters, associate program officer, who was in many ways the life of this workshop. She dedicated countless hours to organizing this large public event, including working extensively with each presenter and panelist to refine their planned remarks in light of the event’s goals and the planning committee’s intentions. Renée L. Wilson Gaines, senior program assistant,

Page viii Cite
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2013. New Directions in Assessing Performance Potential of Individuals and Groups: Workshop Summary. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18427.
×

also provided critical logistical and administrative support to the event, including coordinating the details of the event’s special location. We also thank NRC consultants Robert Pool for his assistance in drafting the summary and Robert Katt for final editing of the manuscript. And finally we thank the executive office reports staff of the Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, especially Kirsten Sampson Snyder, who managed the review process, and Yvonne Wise, who oversaw the final publication process.

This summary has been reviewed in draft form by individuals chosen for their diverse perspectives and technical expertise, in accordance with procedures approved by the NRC’s Report Review Committee. The purpose of this independent review is to provide candid and critical comments that will assist the institution in making its published summary as sound as possible and to ensure that the summary meets institutional standards for objectivity, evidence, and responsiveness to the study charge. The review comments and draft manuscript remain confidential to protect the integrity of the deliberative process. We wish to thank the following individuals for their review of this summary: Jennifer S. Cole, Department of Linguistics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Neal W. Schmitt, Department of Psychology and Management, Michigan State University; Robert Sternberg, Department of Psychology, Yale University; William J. Strickland, president and chief executive officer, Human Resources Research Organization, Alexandria, Virginia; and Mary D. Zalesny, office of the Chief of Staff of the Army Strategic Studies Group, Arlington, Virginia.

Although the reviewers listed above provided many constructive comments and suggestions, they were not asked to endorse the content of the report nor did they see the final draft of the report before its release. The review of this report was overseen by Nancy T. Tippins, senior vice president and managing principal, Valtera Corporation. Appointed by the NRC, she was responsible for making certain that an independent examination of this summary was carried out in accordance with institutional procedures and that all review comments were carefully considered. Responsibility for the final content of this summary rests entirely with the rapporteur and the institution.

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2013. New Directions in Assessing Performance Potential of Individuals and Groups: Workshop Summary. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18427.
×
Page R1
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2013. New Directions in Assessing Performance Potential of Individuals and Groups: Workshop Summary. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18427.
×
Page R2
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2013. New Directions in Assessing Performance Potential of Individuals and Groups: Workshop Summary. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18427.
×
Page R3
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2013. New Directions in Assessing Performance Potential of Individuals and Groups: Workshop Summary. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18427.
×
Page R4
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2013. New Directions in Assessing Performance Potential of Individuals and Groups: Workshop Summary. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18427.
×
Page R5
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2013. New Directions in Assessing Performance Potential of Individuals and Groups: Workshop Summary. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18427.
×
Page R6
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2013. New Directions in Assessing Performance Potential of Individuals and Groups: Workshop Summary. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18427.
×
Page R7
Page viii Cite
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2013. New Directions in Assessing Performance Potential of Individuals and Groups: Workshop Summary. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18427.
×
Page R8
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2013. New Directions in Assessing Performance Potential of Individuals and Groups: Workshop Summary. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18427.
×
Page R9
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2013. New Directions in Assessing Performance Potential of Individuals and Groups: Workshop Summary. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18427.
×
Page R10
Next: 1 Introduction »
New Directions in Assessing Performance Potential of Individuals and Groups: Workshop Summary Get This Book
×
Buy Paperback | $44.00 Buy Ebook | $35.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

As an all-volunteer service accepting applications from nearly 400,000 potential recruits annually from across the U.S. population, the U.S. military must accurately and efficiently assess the individual capability of each recruit for the purposes of selection, job classification, and unit assignment. New Directions for Assessing Performance Potential of Individuals and Groups is the summary of a workshop held April 3-4, 2013 to examine the future of military entrance assessments. This workshop was a part of the first phase of a larger study that will investigate cutting-edge research into the measurement of both individual capabilities and group composition in order to identify future research directions that may lead to improved assessment and selection of enlisted personnel for the U.S. Army. The workshop brought together scientists from a variety of relevant areas to focus on cognitive and noncognitive attributes that can be used in the initial testing and assignment of enlisted personnel. This report discusses the evolving goals of candidate testing, emerging constructs and theory, and ethical implications of testing methods.

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!