Research to support integrated
water and environmental management
in the lower Mississippi River

Committee on Strategic Research for
Integrated Water Resources Management

Water Science and Technology Board

Division on Earth and Life Studies

                         OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES


Washington, D.C.

The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine
500 Fifth St. N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20001

Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use and Privacy Statement

Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page R1
Committee on Strategic Research for Integrated Water Resources Management Water Science and Technology Board Division on Earth and Life Studies

OCR for page R1
THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS   500 Fifth Street, NW   Washington, DC 20001 NOTICE: The project that is the subject of this report was approved by the Govern- ing Board of the National Research Council, whose members are drawn from the councils of the National Academy of Sciences, the National Academy of Engineer- ing, and the Institute of Medicine. The members of the panel responsible for the report were chosen for their special competences and with regard for appropriate balance. Support for this study was provided by The Water Institute of the Gulf under Agreement No. BRAF-2012-NRC-CG. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or rec- ommendations expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the organizations or agencies that provided support for the project. International Standard Book Number-13:  978-0-309-29216-0 International Standard Book Number-10:  0-309-29216-6 Cover: Image courtesy of the European Space Agency (ESA). Additional copies of this report are available from the National Academies Press, 500 Fifth Street, NW, Keck 360, Washington, DC 20001; (800) 624-6242 or (202) 334-3313; Copyright 2013 by the National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America.

OCR for page R1
The National Academy of Sciences is a private, nonprofit, self-perpetuating society of distinguished scholars engaged in scientific and engineering research, dedicated to the furtherance of science and technology and to their use for the general welfare. Upon the authority of the charter granted to it by the Congress in 1863, the Acad- emy has a mandate that requires it to advise the federal government on scientific and technical matters. Dr. Ralph J. Cicerone is president of the National Academy of Sciences. The National Academy of Engineering was established in 1964, under the charter of the National Academy of Sciences, as a parallel organization of outstanding en- gineers. It is autonomous in its administration and in the selection of its members, sharing with the National Academy of Sciences the responsibility for advising the federal government. The National Academy of Engineering also sponsors engineer- ing programs aimed at meeting national needs, encourages education and research, and recognizes the superior achievements of engineers. Dr. C. D. Mote, Jr., is presi- dent of the National Academy of Engineering. The Institute of Medicine was established in 1970 by the National Academy of Sciences to secure the services of eminent members of appropriate professions in the examination of policy matters pertaining to the health of the public. The Insti- tute acts under the responsibility given to the National Academy of Sciences by its congressional charter to be an adviser to the federal government and, upon its own initiative, to identify issues of medical care, research, and education. Dr. Harvey V. Fineberg is president of the Institute of Medicine. The National Research Council was organized by the National Academy of Sci- ences in 1916 to associate the broad community of science and technology with the Academy’s purposes of furthering knowledge and advising the federal government. Functioning in accordance with general policies determined by the Academy, the Council has become the principal operating agency of both the National Academy of Sciences and the National Academy of Engineering in providing services to the government, the public, and the scientific and engineering communities. The Coun- cil is administered jointly by both Academies and the Institute of Medicine. Dr. Ralph J. Cicerone and Dr. C. D. Mote, Jr., are chair and vice chair, respectively, of the National Research Council.

OCR for page R1

OCR for page R1
COMMITTEE ON STRATEGIC RESEARCH FOR INTEGRATED WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT JAMES L. WESCOAT, Jr., Chair, Massachusetts Institute of Technology XIMING CAI, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign G. MATHIAS KONDOLF, University of California, Berkeley BEN R. HODGES, University of Texas, Austin SAMANTHA B. JOYE, University of Georgia, Athens WILLIAM M. LEWIS, University of Colorado, Boulder LEONARD A. SHABMAN, Resources for the Future, Washington, DC EELCO VAN BEEK, University of Twente, Netherlands NRC Staff JEFFREY JACOBS, Study Director MICHAEL J. STOEVER, Research Associate ANITA A. HALL, Senior Program Associate v

OCR for page R1
WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY BOARD GEORGE M. HORNBERGER, Chair, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee LISA ALVAREZ-COHEN, University of California, Berkeley (through June 2013) EDWARD J. BOUWER, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland YU-PING CHIN, Ohio State University, Columbus M. SIOBHAN FENNESSY, Kenyon College, Gambier, Ohio BEN GRUMBLES, Clean Water America Alliance, Washington, DC GEORGE R. HALLBERG, The Cadmus Group, Watertown, Massachusetts KENNETH R. HERD, Southwest Florida Water Management District, Brooksville, Florida (through June 2013) CATHERINE L. KLING, Iowa State University, Ames DEBRA S. KNOPMAN, RAND Corporation, Arlington, Virginia LARRY LARSON, Association of State Floodplain Managers, Madison, Wisconsin RITA P. MAGUIRE, Maguire & Pearce PLLC, Phoenix, Arizona DAVID I. MAURSTAD, OST, Inc., McLean, Virginia DAVID H. MOREAU, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill (through June 2013) DONALD I. SIEGEL, Syracuse University, New York (Chair through June 2013) ROBERT SIMONDS, The Robert Simonds Company, Culver City, California FRANK H. STILLINGER, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey MARYLYNN V. YATES, University of California, Riverside JAMES W. ZIGLAR, SR., Van Ness Feldman, Washington, DC Staff JEFFREY JACOBS, Director LAURA J. EHLERS, Senior Program Officer STEPHANIE E. JOHNSON, Senior Program Officer M. JEANNE AQUILINO, Financial and Administrative Associate MICHAEL J. STOEVER, Research Associate ANITA A. HALL, Senior Program Associate vi

OCR for page R1
Acknowledgments T his report has been reviewed in draft form by individuals chosen for their diverse perspectives and technical expertise, in accordance with procedures approved by the National Research Council’s Report Review Committee. The purpose of this independent review is to provide candid and critical comments that will assist the institution in making its published report as sound as possible and to ensure that the report meets institutional standards for objectivity, evidence, and responsiveness to the study charge. The review comments and draft manuscript remain con- fidential to protect the integrity of the deliberative process. We wish to thank the following individuals for their review of this report: Gregory W. Characklis, University of North Carolina; Gerald E. Galloway, Jr., Univer- sity of Maryland; Ti Le-Huu, Bangkok, Thailand; Daniel P. Loucks, Cornell University; Lester A. Snow, California Water Foundation, Sacramento; Frank H. Stillinger, Princeton University; Henry J. Vaux, Jr., University of California (emeritus), Oakland. Although the reviewers listed above have provided many constructive comments and suggestions, they were not asked to endorse the conclusions or recommendations nor did they see the final draft of the report before its release. The review of this report was overseen by Michael Kavanaugh, Geosyntech Consultants (Oakland, CA), appointed as report Monitor by the NRC Report Review Committee, and A. Dan Tarlock, Chicago Kent College of Law, appointed as report Coordinator by the NRC Division on Earth and Life Studies. Appointed by the National Research Council, they were responsible for ensuring that an independent examination of this vii

OCR for page R1
viii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS report was carried out in accordance with institutional procedures and that all review comments were carefully considered. Responsibility for the final content of this report rests entirely with the authoring committee and the institution.

OCR for page R1
Preface D eltaic environments are some of the world’s most biologically rich, geophysically dynamic, and socially precarious landscapes, even under ordinary circumstances. Sedimentation, erosion, subsidence, and salinity flux are continuous processes, which occasionally are punctu- ated by flooding, coastal storm surges, and environmental hazards. The Mississippi River delta is the product of avulsive flooding, in which a river leaves its channel, and migrates to another channel. On somewhat longer geologic time scales, the lower Mississippi River has migrated back and forth across its large delta, changing and shifting the large amounts of sediments it transports, and creating its current distinctive landforms and structure. “Working coasts” like the Mississippi River delta adjust to and reap the fruits of these rich environmental systems, while accelerating some of the hazardous processes of erosion, flood damage, subsidence, and wetland loss. In addition to centuries of local knowledge, there is a wealth of deltaic research associated with water resources management in the lower Missis- sippi River, and also a need for new knowledge about emerging problems and challenges. Water and environmental resources managers in the lower Mississippi River and its delta by no means are alone in facing these challenges, and indeed they are addressing them in new ways with the enthusiastic and ambitious adoption of the Louisiana 2012 Coastal Master Plan. The state’s Master Plan is very action-oriented and, at the same time, prompts impor- tant research questions on human-environment dynamics in the delta. Ex- amples of this research would include monitoring and assessing outcomes ix

OCR for page R1
x PREFACE of large-scale proposed river water and sediment diversion projects, in the near term, and increasingly integrative research in the longer term. Placed in a larger, global perspective, research on integrated water management in the Lower Mississippi River bears comparison with issues faced and addressed in other large deltas around the world. What insights might they offer for the Mississippi delta, and what might the Mississippi delta offer in scientific understanding and expertise for other regions? This report’s sponsor, The Water Institute of the Gulf (Water Institute), asked the National Research Council’s Water Science and Technology Board to address these questions in this study. The Water Institute is a scientific organization in the Mississippi River delta established in 2011 with a focus on water and environmental resources, which will be informed and inspired in part by comparative international inquiry on large deltaic regions. We thank the Water Institute for its encouragement to think at a higher level about future research questions, both in the Mississippi River delta and in potential research connections with other deltas around the world. We are grateful to experts who shared their knowledge about the Mis- sissippi River delta. These include guest speakers at our 2012 meetings in Baton Rouge and Washington (see Appendix A), reviewers who helped greatly improve the report (listed below), and the NRC staff who provided leadership from beginning to end. Study director and Water Science and Technology Board director Jeffrey Jacobs has written a comparative paper on the Mississippi and Mekong rivers and provided expertise and guidance to the committee. Laura Ehlers served as study director when the project began, and oversaw organization of the committee’s first meeting and helped launch the project. Anita Hall and Michael Stoever ensured smooth logistics and provided editorial guidance throughout. I offer my personal thanks to the committee members who prepared this report. It was an intellectual and personal pleasure to work together. The report was able to include many but not all ideas that committee members would have liked to include. In the course of this study, we found common ground in the pragmatic needs of the current situation in the lower Mississippi River delta, and an expansive scope for comparative research that can help advance large deltaic water and environmental management in the lower Mississippi River and in its engagement with other regions and peoples around the world. It is toward that fine balance between inquiry at home and around the world that we devote this study. James L. Wescoat, Jr.

OCR for page R1
Contents SUMMARY 1 1 INTRODUCTION 15 Integrated Water Resources and Environmental Management, 19 Defining the Delta, 22 Timing of Strategic Research Opportunities for the Water Institute, 24 Report Aims, Structure, and Audience,2 4 2 LOWER RIVER AND DELTAIC SYSTEMS: COMMON PROBLEMS AND CHALLENGES 27 A Perspective on the Mississippi River Delta, 27 Delta Challenges: Agents of Change, 29 A Systems Approach to Integrated Water and Environmental Management, 51 3 STRATEGIC RESEARCH FOR INTEGRATED WATER AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT 55 A Research Synthesis, 55 Condition of the Delta Assessment, 57 Research Design for Diversion Projects, 58 Long-Term Monitoring, 60 Research on Settlement, Land Use, and Landscape Change, 61 Deltaic Zonation, 63 xi

OCR for page R1
xii CONTENTS 4 SCIENCE-POLICY ANALYSIS: AN EMERGING RESEARCH FRONTIER 67 Research Components of IWRM: An Example from the Netherlands, 67 Science-Policy Research for Master Planning in Louisiana, 73 5 RESEARCH COORDINATION AND INSTITUTE PLANNING 81 Research Coordination, 81 Institute Structure and Organizational Options, 85 6 COMPARATIVE INTERNATIONAL DELTAIC RESEARCH: TRANSFERRING AND APPLYING KNOWLEDGE 89 A Framework for Comparative International Research, 90 Examples of Comparative Deltaic Research, 92 Timescales for Knowledge Transfer, 99 REFERENCES 101 APPENDIXES A Guest Speakers at Committee Meetings 113 B Biographical Sketches of Committee Members and Staff 115