New York’s Nanotechnology Model

BUILDING THE INNOVATION ECONOMY

Summary of a Symposium



Charles W. Wessner, Rapporteur



Committee on Competing in the 21st Century:
Best Practice in State and Regional Innovation Initiatives

Board on Science, Technology, and Economic Policy

Policy and Global Affairs


NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL
OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES



THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS
Washington, D.C.
www.nap.edu



The National Academies | 500 Fifth St. N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20001
Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use and Privacy Statement



Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page R1
Charles W. Wessner, Rapporteur Committee on Competing in the 21st Century: Best Practice in State and Regional Innovation Initiatives Board on Science, Technology, and Economic Policy Policy and Global Affairs

OCR for page R1
THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS 500 Fifth Street NW Washington DC 20001 NOTICE: The project that is the subject of this report was approved by the Governing Board of the National Research Council, whose members are drawn from the councils of the National Academy of Sciences, the National Academy of Engineering, and the Institute of Medicine. The members of the committee responsible for the report were chosen for their special competences and with regard for appropriate balance. This study was supported by: Contract/Grant No. DE-DT0000236, TO #28 (base award DE-AM01-04PI45013), between the National Academy of Sciences and the Department of Energy. This report was prepared by the National Academy of Sciences under award number SB134106Z0011, TO# 4 (68059), from the U.S. Department of Commerce, National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). This report was prepared by the National Academy of Sciences under award number 99-06-07543-02 from the Economic Development Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce. The statements, findings, conclusions, and recommendations are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Institute of Standards and Technology, the Economic Development Administration, or the U.S. Department of Commerce. Additional support was provided by Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Hudson Valley Community College, the Center for Economic Growth, and GLOBALFOUNDRIES. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the organizations or agencies that provided support for the project. International Standard Book Number 13: 978-0-309-29317-4 International Standard Book Number 10: 0-309-29317-0 Additional copies of this report are available for sale from the National Academies Press, 500 Fifth Street, NW, Keck 360, Washington, DC 20001; (800) 624-6242 or (202) 334-3313; http://www.nap.edu/ . Copyright 2013 by the National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America

OCR for page R1
The National Academy of Sciences is a private, nonprofit, self-perpetuating society of distinguished scholars engaged in scientific and engineering research, dedicated to the furtherance of science and technology and to their use for the general welfare. Upon the authority of the charter granted to it by the Congress in 1863, the Academy has a mandate that requires it to advise the federal government on scientific and technical matters. Dr. Ralph J. Cicerone is president of the National Academy of Sciences. The National Academy of Engineering was established in 1964, under the charter of the National Academy of Sciences, as a parallel organization of outstanding engineers. It is autonomous in its administration and in the selection of its members, sharing with the National Academy of Sciences the responsibility for advising the federal government. The National Academy of Engineering also sponsors engineering programs aimed at meeting national needs, encourages education and research, and recognizes the superior achievements of engineers. Dr. C. D. Mote, Jr., is president of the National Academy of Engineering. The Institute of Medicine was established in 1970 by the National Academy of Sciences to secure the services of eminent members of appropriate professions in the examination of policy matters pertaining to the health of the public. The Institute acts under the responsibility given to the National Academy of Sciences by its congressional charter to be an adviser to the federal government and, upon its own initiative, to identify issues of medical care, research, and education. Dr. Harvey V. Fineberg is president of the Institute of Medicine. The National Research Council was organized by the National Academy of Sciences in 1916 to associate the broad community of science and technology with the Academy’s purposes of furthering knowledge and advising the federal government. Functioning in accordance with general policies determined by the Academy, the Council has become the principal operating agency of both the National Academy of Sciences and the National Academy of Engineering in providing services to the government, the public, and the scientific and engineering communities. The Council is administered jointly by both Academies and the Institute of Medicine. Dr. Ralph J. Cicerone and Dr. C. D. Mote, Jr., are chair and vice chair, respectively, of the National Research Council. www.national-academies.org

OCR for page R1

OCR for page R1
Committee on Competing in the 21st Century: Best Practice in State and Regional Innovation Initiatives* Mary L. Good (NAE), Chair W. Clark McFadden II Dean Emeritus, Donaghey College Senior Counsel of Engineering and Information Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP Technology Special Advisor to the Chancellor David T. Morgenthaler for Economic Development Founding Partner University of Arkansas Morgenthaler Ventures at Little Rock Edward E. Penhoet (IOM) Michael G. Borrus Director Founding General Partner Alta Partners X/Seed Capital Management Tyrone C. Taylor William C. Harris President President and CEO Capitol Advisors Science Foundation Arizona on Technology, LLC *As of August 2013. v

OCR for page R1
PROJECT STAFF Charles W. Wessner Sujai J. Shivakumar Study Director Senior Program Officer Alan H. Anderson David S. Dawson Consultant Senior Program Assistant (through June 2013) McAlister T. Clabaugh Program Officer David E. Dierksheide Program Officer vi

OCR for page R1
For the National Research Council (NRC), this project was overseen by the Board on Science, Technology and Economic Policy (STEP), a standing board of the NRC established by the National Academies of Sciences and Engineering and the Institute of Medicine in 1991. The mandate of the Board on Science, Technology, and Economic Policy is to advise federal, state, and local governments and inform the public about economic and related public policies to promote the creation, diffusion, and application of new scientific and technical knowledge to enhance the productivity and competitiveness of the U.S. economy and foster economic prosperity for all Americans. The STEP Board and its committees marshal research and the expertise of scholars, industrial managers, investors, and former public officials in a wide range of policy areas that affect the speed and direction of scientific and technological change and their contributions to the growth of the U.S. and global economies. Results are communicated through reports, conferences, workshops, briefings, and electronic media subject to the procedures of the National Academies to ensure their authoritativeness, independence, and objectivity. The members of the STEP Board* and the NRC staff are listed below: Paul L. Joskow, Chair Ralph E. Gomory (NAS/NAE) President Research Professor Alfred P. Sloan Foundation Stern School of Business New York University Ernst R. Berndt Louis E. Seley Professor John L. Hennessy (NAS/NAE) in Applied Economics President Massachusetts Institute Stanford University of Technology William H. Janeway Jeff Bingaman Managing Director Former U.S. Senator, New Mexico and Senior Advisor U.S. Senate Warburg Pincus, LLC Ellen Dulberger Richard K. Lester Managing Partner Japan Steel Industry Professor Ellen Dulberger Enterprises, LLC Head, Nuclear Science and Engineering Alan M. Garber (IOM) Founding Director, Industrial Provost Performance Center Harvard University Massachusetts Institute of Technology *As of August 2013. continued vii

OCR for page R1
David T. Morgenthaler Laura D'Andrea Tyson Founder S.K. and Angela Chan Professor Morgenthaler Ventures of Global Management Haas School of Business Luis M. Proenza University of California-Berkeley President University of Akron Harold R. Varian Chief Economist William J. Raduchel Google Inc. Independent Investor and Director Alan Wm. Wolff Kathryn L. Shaw Senior Counsel Ernest C. Arbuckle Professor McKenna Long & Aldridge LLP of Economics Graduate School of Business Stanford University STEP Staff Stephen A. Merrill Charles W. Wessner Executive Director Program Director Paul T. Beaton David S. Dawson Program Officer Senior Program Assistant (through June 2013) McAlister T. Clabaugh Program Officer David E. Dierksheide Program Officer Aqila A. Coulthurst Program Coordinator Sujai J. Shivakumar Senior Program Officer viii

OCR for page R1
Contents PREFACE xv I. OVERVIEW 1 II. PROCEEDINGS 37 Day 1: April 3, 2013 Welcome and Introductory Remarks 39 Drew Matonak, President, Hudson Valley Community College (HVCC) The Honorable Paul Tonko, U.S. House of Representatives Keynote Address 46 Ajit Manocha, CEO, GLOBALFOUNDRIES Panel I: Innovation and Growth: Regional, National, and International Dimensions 50 Moderator: Jason Miller, Special Assistant to the President for Manufacturing Policy, National Economic Council, The White House The Global Innovation Imperative 51 Charles Wessner, Director, Technology, Innovation, and Entrepreneurship, The National Academies The U.S. Innovation Strategy: The NIST Contribution 58 Phillip Singerman, Associate Director for Innovation and Industry Services, National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) ix

OCR for page R1
x CONTENTS Challenges and Opportunities for the New York Innovation Economy 62 Darren Suarez, Director of Government Affairs, Business Council of New York Keynote Address 68 The Honorable Shirley Ann Jackson, Ph.D., President, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Introduced by Mike Russo, Director of Government Affairs, GLOBALFOUNDRIES Panel II: The New York Nanotechnology Cluster 73 Moderator: Rex Smith, Editor, Times Union The New York Innovation Economy and the Nanotechnology Cluster: The Role of SUNY 74 Timothy Killeen, Vice Chancellor for Research, SUNY, and President, Research Foundation for SUNY New York’s Nanotechnology Model: Building the Innovation Economy 77 Ken Adams, President and CEO, Empire State Development Corporation Pioneering Innovation to Drive an Educational and Economic Renaissance in New York State 80 Pradeep Haldar, Head of Nanoeconomics Constellation, College of Nanoscale Science & Engineering, The State University of New York at Albany Day 2: April 4, 2013 Panel III: Growing the Semiconductor Industry in New York: Challenges and Opportunities 84 Moderator: Charles Wessner, Director, Technology, Innovation, and Entrepreneurship, The National Academies Breaking New Ground: The New York Advantage 84 Mike Russo, Director of Government Affairs, GLOBALFOUNDRIES Collaboration as a Way Forward for Semiconductor Technology: Albany Nanotech 91 Gary Patton, Vice President, Semiconductor Research and Development Center, IBM

OCR for page R1
CONTENTS xi Growing the Semiconductor Industry in New York: Challenges and Opportunities 95 Daniel Armbrust, President and CEO, SEMATECH Panel IV: 21st Century Universities: Drivers of Regional Growth and Employment 103 Moderator: Luis Proenza, President, The University of Akron The Power of SUNY 104 Nancy L. Zimpher, Chancellor, The State University of New York Building Innovation Infrastructure: The Role of EDA 106 Thomas Guevara, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Regional Affairs, Economic Development Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce Universities as Economic Anchors 108 Donald Siegel, Dean, School of Business, State University of New York at Albany Technical Training for Innovation-Driven Employment 111 Drew Matonak, President, Hudson Valley Community College (HVCC) Keynote Address 113 Michael Fancher, Vice President for Business Development and Economic Outreach, Center for Advanced Technology (CAT), College of Nanoscale Science and Engineering (CNSE), The State University of New York at Albany Introduced by Bob Blackman, Chair, Center for Economic Growth Panel V: Building Advanced Manufacturing Industries in New York 119 Moderator: Frank Murray, President and CEO, New York State Energy Research and Development Authority (NYSERDA) Advanced Manufacturing for New Energy Technologies 120 Minh Le, Director, Solar Energy Technologies, U.S. Department of Energy

OCR for page R1
xii CONTENTS University-Industry Partnerships for Next Generation Manufacturing 123 John Wen, Director, Center for Automation Technologies and Systems, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Lessons Learned to Date in the New “Tech Valley” 126 F. Michael Tucker, President & CEO, Center for Economic Growth Manufacturing and Innovation: The GE Perspective 129 Stephan Biller, Chief Scientist for Manufacturing, General Electric Panel VI: Nanotechnology and Biomedical Sciences 133 Moderator: David Rooney, Senior Vice President, Center for Economic Growth Innovation in Cancer Research: The Nanotechnology Opportunity 133 Larry Nagahara, Director, Office of Physical Sciences— Oncology, Center for Strategic Scientific Initiatives, National Cancer Institute Building the Brain-Computer Interface: Clinical and Experimental Needs 137 Anthony Ritaccio, Director, Epilepsy and Human Brain Mapping, Albany Medical Center Advancing Nano-Biotechnology 138 Jonathan S. Dordick, Vice President for Research, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Convergence in the Semiconductor, Pharmaceutical, and Medical Device Industries 143 Brian Toohey, President and CEO, Semiconductor Industry Association (SIA) Closing Roundtable: New York’s Innovation Future 145 Moderator: Charles Wessner, Director, Technology, Innovation, and Entrepreneurship, The National Academies Johanna Duncan-Poitier, Senior Vice Chancellor for Community Colleges and the Education Pipeline, The State University of New York Kathleen Kingscott, Senior Director for Strategic Partnerships, IBM

OCR for page R1
CONTENTS xiii Michael Liehr, Executive Vice President of Innovation and Technology, College of Nanoscale Science and Engineering, The State University of New York at Albany W. Clark McFadden, Senior Counsel, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP; Committee Member, National Academies Committee on State and Regional Innovation Initiatives Jonathan S. Dordick, Vice President for Research, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Mike Russo, Director of Government Affairs, GLOBALFOUNDRIES III. APPENDIXES A Agenda 151 B Biographies of Speakers 156 C Participants List 180 D Bibliography 186

OCR for page R1

OCR for page R1
Preface Responding to the challenges of fostering regional growth and employment in an increasingly competitive global economy, many U.S. states and regions have developed programs to attract and grow companies as well as attract the talent and resources necessary to develop innovation clusters. These state and regionally based initiatives have a broad range of goals and increasingly include significant resources, often with a sector focus and often in partnership with foundations and universities. These are being joined by recent initiatives to coordinate and concentrate investments from a variety of federal agencies that provide significant resources to develop regional centers of innovation, business incubators, and other strategies to encourage entrepreneurship and high-tech development. PROJECT STATEMENT OF TASK An ad hoc committee, under the auspices of the Board on Science, Technology, and Economic Policy (STEP), is conducting a study of selected state and regional programs to identify best practices with regard to their goals, structures, instruments, modes of operation, synergies across private and public programs, funding mechanisms and levels, and evaluation efforts. The committee is reviewing selected state and regional efforts to capitalize on federal and state investments in areas of critical national needs. This review includes both efforts to strengthen existing industries as well as specific new technology focus areas such as nanotechnology, stem cells, and energy in order to improve our understanding of program goals, challenges, and accomplishments. As a part of this review, the committee is convening a series of public workshops and symposia involving responsible local, state, and federal officials xv

OCR for page R1
xvi PREFACE and other stakeholders. These meetings and symposia will enable an exchange of views, information, experience, and analysis to identify best practice in the range of programs and incentives adopted.1 Drawing from discussions at these symposia, fact-finding meetings, and commissioned analyses of existing state and regional programs and technology focus areas, the committee will subsequently produce a final report with findings and recommendations focused on lessons, issues, and opportunities for complementary U.S. policies created by these state and regional initiatives.2 THIS SUMMARY The symposium reported in this volume convened state officials and staff, business leaders, and leading national figures in early-stage finance, technology, engineering, education, and state and federal policies to review challenges, plans, and opportunities for innovation-led growth in New York. These symposium participants assessed New York’s academic, industrial, and human resources, identified key policy issues, and engaged in a discussion of how the state might leverage regional development organizations, state initiatives, and national programs focused on manufacturing and innovation to support its economic development goals. The conference agenda, listing the speakers and their presentations, is found in Appendix A of this volume. Appendix B provides the biographies of these speakers. A full list of participants is found in Appendix C of this report. This conference, as with any single meeting, was necessarily limited in its scope; it did not (and indeed could not) describe the full variety of industries present in the state. The focus on the emerging partnerships among academia, industry, and government in nanotechnology, however, illustrates the high level of commitment by New York’s political and industry leaders to grow the state’s innovation ecosystem. 1 The Committee convened meetings to review state and regional programs in Arkansas, Hawaii, Michigan, Ohio, and Illinois. Summaries of these meetings have been prepared. See for example, National Research Council, Building the Arkansas Innovation Economy: Summary of a Symposium, C. Wessner, Rapporteur, Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2012. See also National Research Council, Building Hawaii’s Innovation Economy: Summary of a Symposium, C. Wessner, Rapporteur, Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2012. The Committee has also convened meetings to review federal and state policies to encourage the development of innovation clusters. See National Research Council, Growing Innovation Clusters for American Prosperity: Summary of a Symposium, C. Wessner, Rapporteur, Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2011. 2 The committee has prepared a consensus report, based on this study. See National Research Council, Best Practices in State and Regional Innovation Initiatives: Competing in the 21st Century, C. Wessner, ed., Washington DC: National Academies Press, 2013.

OCR for page R1
PREFACE xvii New York’s Nanotechnology Model: Building the Innovation Economy Summary of a Symposium Statement of Task The committee will cooperate with Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute and other members of the Nano Consortium, including the College of Nanoscale Science & Engineering (CNSE) of the University at Albany-SUNY, to conduct a symposium to highlight the accomplishments and growth of the innovation ecosystem in New York, while also identifying needs, challenges, and opportunities. Participants will include state officials and staff, business leaders, and leading national figures in early-stage finance, technology, engineering, education, and state and federal policies. The event will review the development of the Albany nanotech cluster and its usefulness as a model for innovation- based growth, while also discussing the New York innovation ecosystem more broadly. The event will help identify areas where federal, state, university, and non-profit contributions could generate positive synergies and also draw attention to the scale and focus of foreign competitive programs and consider their implications for New York and the nation. An individually-authored summary of the symposium will be published. This summary report includes an overview that highlights key issues raised at the meeting and a summary of the meeting’s presentations. This workshop summary has been prepared by the workshop rapporteur as a factual summary of what occurred at the workshop. The planning committee’s role was limited to planning and convening the workshop. The statements made are those of the rapporteur or individual workshop participants and do not necessarily represent the views of all workshop participants, the planning committee, or the National Academies. THE CONTEXT OF THIS PROJECT Since 1991, the National Research Council, under the auspices of the Board on Science, Technology, and Economic Policy, has undertaken a program of activities to improve policymakers' understandings of the interconnections of science, technology, and economic policy and their importance for the American economy and its international competitive position. The Board's activities have corresponded with increased policy recognition of the importance of knowledge and technology to economic growth.

OCR for page R1
xviii PREFACE One important element of STEP’s analysis concerns the growth and impact of foreign technology programs.3 U.S. competitors have launched substantial programs to support new technologies, small firm development, and consortia among large and small firms to strengthen national and regional positions in strategic sectors. Some governments overseas have chosen to provide public support to innovation to overcome the market imperfections apparent in their national innovation systems.4 They believe that the rising costs and risks associated with new potentially high-payoff technologies, and the growing global dispersal of technical expertise, underscore the need for national R&D programs to support new and existing high-technology firms within their borders. Similarly, many state and local governments and regional entities in the United States are undertaking a variety of initiatives to enhance local economic development and employment through investment programs designed to attract knowledge-based industries and grow innovation clusters.5 These state and regional programs and associated policy measures are of great interest for their potential contributions to growth and U.S. competitiveness and for the “best practice” lessons that they offer for other state and regional programs. STEP’s project on State and Regional Innovation Initiatives is intended to generate and share a better understanding of the challenges associated with the transition of research into products, the practices associated with successful state and regional programs, and their interaction with federal programs and private initiatives. The study seeks to achieve this goal through a series of complementary assessments of state, regional, and federal initiatives; analyses of specific industries and technologies from the perspective of crafting supportive public policy at all three levels; and outreach to multiple stakeholders. The overall goal is to improve the operation of state and regional programs and, collectively, enhance their impact. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS On behalf of the National Academies, we express our appreciation and recognition for the insights, experiences, and perspectives made available by the 3 For a review of growth of national programs and policies around the world to support research and accelerate innovation, and the resulting challenges facing the United States, see National Research Council, Rising the Challenge: U.S. Innovation Policies for the Global Economy, C. Wessner and A. Wm. Wolff, eds., Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2012. 4 For example, a number of countries are investing significant funds in the development of research parks. For a review of selected national efforts, see National Research Council, Understanding Research, Science and Technology Parks: Global Best Practices—Report of a Symposium, C. Wessner, ed., Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2009. 5 For a scoreboard of state efforts, see Robert Atkinson and Scott Andes, The 2010 State New Economy Index: Benchmarking Economic Transformation in the States, Kauffman Foundation and ITIF, November 2010.

OCR for page R1
PREFACE xix participants of this meeting. Their support and interest were instrumental to the quality and high-level participation of the conference. Special thanks are also due to McAlister Clabaugh of the STEP staff, for his many contributions to the organization of the conference. We are also indebted to Alan Anderson for preparing the draft introduction and summarizing the proceedings of the meeting, as we are to Sujai Shivakumar for his substantive contributions and editorial skills. ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF REVIEWERS This report has been reviewed in draft form by individuals chosen for their diverse perspectives and technical expertise, in accordance with procedures approved by the National Academies’ Report Review Committee. The purpose of this independent review is to provide candid and critical comments that will assist the institution in making its published report as sound as possible and to ensure that the report meets institutional standards for quality and objectivity. The review comments and draft manuscript remain confidential to protect the integrity of the process. We wish to thank the following individuals for their review of this report: Kathleen Kingscott, IBM Research; David Rooney, Center for Economic Growth; Hany Shawky, University at Albany, State University of New York; and Jan Youtie, Georgia Institute of Technology. Although the reviewers listed above have provided many constructive comments and suggestions, they were not asked to endorse the content of the report, nor did they see the final draft before its release. Responsibility for the final content of this report rests entirely with the rapporteur and the institution. Mary L. Good Charles W. Wessner

OCR for page R1