Appendix D

Bibliography of Suggested Resources

The following list is a compilation of participants’ suggestions of the three most relevant and useful resources in their topic area.

 

Anderson, Melissa Susan. International Research Collaborations: Much to Be Gained, Many Ways to Get in Trouble. Taylor & Francis, 2011.

Antes, Alison L., Xiaoqian Wang, Michael D. Mumford, Ryan P. Brown, Shane Connelly, and Lynn D. Devenport. Evaluating the effects that existing instruction on responsible conduct of research has on ethical decision making. Academic Medicine: Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges 85, no. 3 (March 2010): 519–526.

Antes, Alison L., Stephen T. Murphy, Ethan P. Waples, Michael D. Mumford, Ryan P. Brown, Shane Connelly, and Lynn D. Devenport. A meta-analysis of ethics instruction effectiveness in the sciences. Ethics & Behavior 19, no. 5 (2009): 379–402.

Borenstein, Jason, Matthew J. Drake, Robert Kirkman, and Julie L. Swann. The Engineering and Science Issues Test (ESIT): A discipline-specific approach to assessing moral judgment. Science and Engineering Ethics 16, no. 2 (June 1, 2010): 387–407.

Canary, Heather, Joseph Herkert, Karin Ellison, and Jameson M. Wetmore. Microethics and macroethics in graduate education for scientists and engineers: Developing and assessing instructional models. Proceedings of the 2012 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference (2012). Available online at www.cspo.org/projects/eesedaim/publications/ASEE-2012-Paper.pdf.

Committee on Assessing Integrity in Research Environments, National Research Council, Institute of Medicine. Integrity in Scientific Research: Creating an Environment That Promotes Responsible Conduct. Washington: National Academies Press, 2002.

Committee on Science, Engineering, and Public Policy, National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. On Being a Scientist: A Guide to Responsible Conduct in Research, 3rd ed. Washington: National Academies Press, 2009.

Council of Graduate Schools. Research and Scholarly Integrity in Graduate Education: A Comprehensive Approach. 2012.

Crain, A. Lauren, Brian C. Martinson, and Carol R. Thrush. Relationships between the Survey of Organizational Research Climate (SORC) and self-reported research practices. Science and Engineering Ethics (2012): 1–16.

Kalichman, Michael. Evidence-based research ethics. American Journal of Bioethics 9, no. 6–7 (2009): 85–87.



The National Academies | 500 Fifth St. N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20001
Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use and Privacy Statement



Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 83
Appendix D Bibliography of Suggested Resources The following list is a compilation of participants’ suggestions of the three most relevant and useful resources in their topic area. Anderson, Melissa Susan. International Research Collaborations: Much to Be Gained, Many Ways to Get in Trouble. Taylor & Francis, 2011. Antes, Alison L., Xiaoqian Wang, Michael D. Mumford, Ryan P. Brown, Shane Connelly, and Lynn D. Devenport. Evaluating the effects that existing instruction on responsible conduct of research has on ethical decision making. Academic Medicine: Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges 85, no. 3 (March 2010): 519–526. Antes, Alison L., Stephen T. Murphy, Ethan P. Waples, Michael D. Mumford, Ryan P. Brown, Shane Connelly, and Lynn D. Devenport. A meta-analysis of ethics instruction effectiveness in the sciences. Ethics & Behavior 19, no. 5 (2009): 379–402. Borenstein, Jason, Matthew J. Drake, Robert Kirkman, and Julie L. Swann. The Engineering and Science Issues Test (ESIT): A discipline-specific approach to assessing moral judgment. Science and Engineering Ethics 16, no. 2 (June 1, 2010): 387–407. Canary, Heather, Joseph Herkert, Karin Ellison, and Jameson M. Wetmore. Microethics and macroethics in graduate education for scientists and engineers: Developing and assessing instructional models. Proceedings of the 2012 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference (2012). Available online at www.cspo.org/projects/eese- daim/publications/ASEE-2012-Paper.pdf. Committee on Assessing Integrity in Research Environments, National Research Council, Institute of Medicine. Integrity in Scientific Research: Creating an Environment That Promotes Responsible Conduct. Washington: National Academies Press, 2002. Committee on Science, Engineering, and Public Policy, National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. On Being a Scientist: A Guide to Responsible Conduct in Research, 3rd ed. Washington: National Academies Press, 2009. Council of Graduate Schools. Research and Scholarly Integrity in Graduate Education: A Comprehensive Approach. 2012. Crain, A. Lauren, Brian C. Martinson, and Carol R. Thrush. Relationships between the Survey of Organizational Research Climate (SORC) and self-reported research practices. Science and Engineering Ethics (2012): 1–16. Kalichman, Michael. Evidence-based research ethics. American Journal of Bioethics 9, no. 6–7 (2009): 85–87. 83  

OCR for page 83
Kalichman, Michael W. Responding to challenges in educating for the responsible conduct of research. Academic Medicine: Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges 82, no. 9 (September 2007): 870–875. Kalichman, Michael W., and Dena K. Plemmons. Reported goals for responsible conduct of research courses. Academic Medicine: Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges 82, no. 9 (September 2007): 846–852. Kline, Ronald. Research ethics, engineering ethics, and science and technology studies. In Encyclopedia of Science, Technology, and Ethics, edited by Carl Mitcham, 1: xxxv–xli. New York: MacMillan, 2005. Kraus, Rachel. You must participate: Violating research ethical principles through role-play. College Teaching 56, no. 3 (2008): 131–136. Loui, Michael C. Assessment of an engineering ethics video: Incident at Morales. Journal of Engineering Education 95 (January 1, 2006): 85–91. Martinson, Brian C., Carol R. Thrush, and A. Lauren Crain. Development and validation of the Survey of Organizational Research Climate (SORC). Science and Engineering Ethics (2012): 1–22. Mumford, Michael. Validation of ethical decision making measures: Evidence for a new set of measures. Ethics & Behavior 16, no. 4 (2006): 319–345. Mumford, Michael, Shane Connelly, Ryan P. Brown, Stephen T. Murphy, Jason H. Hill, Alison L. Antes, Ethan P. Waples, and Lynn D. Devenport. A sensemaking approach to ethics training for scientists: Preliminary evidence of training effectiveness. Ethics & Behavior 18, no. 4 (2008): 315–339. Sindelar, Mark, Larry Shuman, Mary Besterfield-Sacre, Ronald Miller, Carl Mitcham, Barbara Olds, Rosa Pinkus, and Harvey Wolfe. Assessing engineering students’ abilities to resolve ethical dilemmas. Proceedings of the 33rd Annual American Society for Engineering Education / Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Frontiers in Education Conference, Westminster, Colorado (November 5–8, 2003): S2A-25–S2A-31. Sloan, Susan Sauer, and Tom Arrison. Examining Core Elements of International Research Collaboration: Summary of a Workshop. Washington: National Academies Press, 2011. Whitbeck, Caroline. Ethics in Engineering Practice and Research, 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press, 2011. 84