Appendix A

Statement of Task

An ad hoc committee will identify options the Department of Interior’s Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement (BSEE) could use for improving the implementation of the “best available and safest technologies” (BAST) requirement in the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act. As the committee develops options, it will review those options and issues that BSEE itself already is considering; examples of which include the feasibility and appropriateness of establishing a formal industry committee to make BAST determinations about new and improved technologies; whether it will need to develop test protocols for every technology it evaluates in order to fairly compare competing technologies; how to determine economic feasibility in a manner that is independent of industry; whether it should rely on the development of consensus standards; and whether it should initiate a more vigorous process with various possible improvements to blowout preventers. The committee will identify a range of options and the pros and cons of each, but it will not recommend a specific BAST implementation approach.

Following its initial meeting, the committee will prepare a brief report commenting on existing BSEE proposals to implement BAST. In developing its final report at the conclusion of its study, the committee will include consideration of the following:

 

•   Other relevant safety requirements that bear upon technologies for offshore oil and gas operations;

•   Relevant reports of previous NRC committees and other organizations;

•   The potential role of neutral third parties in making BAST assessments;

•   The role of human factors in the safe use of technologies by industry; and

•   Resource requirements of federal agencies for BAST implementation.



The National Academies | 500 Fifth St. N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20001
Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use and Privacy Statement



Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 55
Appendix A Statement of Task An ad hoc committee will identify options the Department of Interior’s Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement (BSEE) could use for improv- ing the implementation of the “best available and safest technologies” (BAST) requirement in the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act. As the committee devel- ops options, it will review those options and issues that BSEE itself already is considering; examples of which include the feasibility and appropriateness of establishing a formal industry committee to make BAST determinations about new and improved technologies; whether it will need to develop test protocols for every technology it evaluates in order to fairly compare competing technolo- gies; how to determine economic feasibility in a manner that is independent of industry; whether it should rely on the development of consensus standards; and whether it should initiate a more vigorous process with various possible im- provements to blowout preventers. The committee will identify a range of op- tions and the pros and cons of each, but it will not recommend a specific BAST implementation approach. Following its initial meeting, the committee will prepare a brief report commenting on existing BSEE proposals to implement BAST. In developing its final report at the conclusion of its study, the committee will include considera- tion of the following:  Other relevant safety requirements that bear upon technologies for off- shore oil and gas operations;  Relevant reports of previous NRC committees and other organizations;  The potential role of neutral third parties in making BAST assessments;  The role of human factors in the safe use of technologies by industry; and  Resource requirements of federal agencies for BAST implementation. 55