National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: References
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A: Meeting Agendas." Institute of Medicine. 2014. Review of NASA's Evidence Reports on Human Health Risks: 2013 Letter Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18575.
×
Page 41
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A: Meeting Agendas." Institute of Medicine. 2014. Review of NASA's Evidence Reports on Human Health Risks: 2013 Letter Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18575.
×
Page 42
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A: Meeting Agendas." Institute of Medicine. 2014. Review of NASA's Evidence Reports on Human Health Risks: 2013 Letter Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18575.
×
Page 43
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A: Meeting Agendas." Institute of Medicine. 2014. Review of NASA's Evidence Reports on Human Health Risks: 2013 Letter Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18575.
×
Page 44

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

A Meeting Agendas First Meeting of the Committee to Review NASA’s Evidence Reports on Human Health Risks Telephone Conference Wednesday, August 7, 2013 OPEN SESSION 11:30 a.m. Official Charge to the Committee Mark Shelhamer, Chief Scientist, Human Research Program, NASA 11:50 a.m. Discussion of Statement of Task with the Committee Facilitator: Carol Scott-Conner, Committee Chair 12:45 p.m. Public Session Adjourn 41

42 REVIEW OF NASA’S EVIDENCE REPORTS ON HUMAN HEALTH RISKS Second Meeting of the Committee to Review NASA’s Evidence Reports on Human Health Risks National Academy of Sciences Building 2101 Constitution Avenue, NW Lecture Room Washington, DC Monday, September 30, 2013 OPEN SESSION 9:00 a.m. Welcome Carol Scott-Conner, Committee Chair 9:15 a.m. Panel 1: Risk of Injury from Dynamic Loads Facilitator: Larry Young, Committee Member  Jim Brinkley, Air Force Research Laboratory, Retired  John R. Buhrman, Air Force Research Laboratory  Roger Nightingale, Duke University 10:45 a.m. Break 11:00 a.m. Panel 2: Risk of Spaceflight-Induced Intracranial Hypertension/Vision Alterations Facilitator: Prem Subramanian, Committee Member  Tom Mader, Alaska Native Medical Center  Michael Williams, Sinai Hospital of Baltimore  Neil Miller, Johns Hopkins University 12:30 p.m. Lunch

APPENDIX A 43 1:15 p.m. Panel 3: Risk of Clinically Relevant Unpredicted Effects of Medication Facilitator: Eleanor O’Rangers, Committee Member  Tina Bayuse, Wyle Science, Technology and Engineering Group  Tom Marshburn, NASA  Peter Bauer, NASA  David Nicolau, Hartford Hospital 2:45 p.m. Public Testimony—Registered Speakers Moderator: Carol Scott-Conner, Committee Chair 3:15 p.m. Public Session Adjourn

Next: Appendix B: Committee Biosketches »
Review of NASA's Evidence Reports on Human Health Risks: 2013 Letter Report Get This Book
×
Buy Paperback | $35.00 Buy Ebook | $27.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

Review of NASA's Evidence Reports on Human Health Risks: 2013 Letter Report is the first in a series of five reports from the Institute of Medicine that will independently review more than 30 evidence reports that the National Aeronautics and Space Administration has compiled on human health risks for long-duration and exploration space flights. This report builds on the 2008 IOM report Review of NASA's Human Research Program Evidence Books: A Letter Report, which provided an initial and brief review of the evidence reports.

This letter report reviews three evidence reports and examines the quality of the evidence, analysis, and overall construction of each report; identifies existing gaps in report content; and provides suggestions for additional sources of expert input. The report analyzes each evidence report's overall quality, which included readability; internal consistency; the source and breadth of cited evidence; identification of existing knowledge and research gaps; authorship expertise; and, if applicable, response to recommendations from the 2008 IOM letter report.

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!