National Academies Press: OpenBook

Performance Assessment for the Workplace: Volume I (1991)

Chapter: Appendix A: Service Bibliographies

« Previous: References
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A: Service Bibliographies." National Research Council. 1991. Performance Assessment for the Workplace: Volume I. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1862.
×

Appendix A

Service Bibliographies

AIR FORCE

Alley, W.E., and M.S. Teachout 1990 Aptitude and Experience Trade-offs on Job Performance. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Boston.

Ballentine, R.D. 1986 Air Force job performance measurement research. Pp. 314-318 in D.A. Harris, chair, Joint-Service Job Performance Measurement/Enlistment Standards Project . Proceedings of the Tenth Psychology in the DoD Symposium. Colorado Springs, Colo.: U.S. Air Force Academy.

1989 Criterion measures in selection research—case study. In M. Smith and I. Robertson, eds., Advances in Personnel Selection and Assessment. Sussex, England: John Wiley and Sons.

Ballentine, R.D., and J.W. Hedge 1987 Use of job performance criteria for evaluating training technology . In H.W. Ruck, chair, Toward an Integrated Personnel System: USAF Training Research and Development. Symposium conducted at the annual meeting of the Society of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Atlanta, Ga.

Ballentine, R.D, and M.S. Lipscomb 1987 Developing performance measures and standards for accurate assessment . In J.W. Hedge and M.S. Lipscomb, eds., Walk-Through Performance Testing: An Innovative Approach to Work Sample Testing. AFHRL-TP-87-8. Brooks Air Force Base, Tex.: Training Systems Division, Air Force Human Resources Laboratory.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix A: Service Bibliographies." National Research Council. 1991. Performance Assessment for the Workplace: Volume I. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1862.
×

Bentley, B.A., K.L. Ringenbach, and J.W. Augustin 1989 Development of Army Job Knowledge Tests for Three Air Force Specialties . Technical paper. AFHRL-TP-88-11. Brooks Air Force Base, Tex.: Training Systems Division, Air Force Human Resources Laboratory.

Bentley, B.A., K.L. Ringenbach, J.W. Augustin, and T.M. Donnelly 1989 A comparison of three Air Force knowledge tests. In proceedings of the 31st annual conference of the Military Testing Association, San Antonio, Tex.

Bierstedt, S.A., and J.W. Hedge 1987 Job Performance Measurement System Trainer's Manual. Technical paper. AFHRL-TP-86-34. Brooks Air Force Base, Tex.: Training Systems Division, Air Force Human Resources Laboratory.

Bierstedt, S.A., A.H. Gillet, B.A. Bentley, and D.L. Harville 1989 Methodology to evaluate the Air Force job performance measurement system. In proceedings of the 31st annual conference of the Military Testing Association, San Antonio, Tex.

Blackhurst, J.L., and J.W. Hedge 1986 Equating Job Performance Measurement Test Scores. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Washington, D.C.

Blackhurst, J.L., R.D. Ballentine, and M.W. Pellum 1988 Air Force job performance measurement technology applied to training . In M.S. Lipscomb and J.W. Hedge, eds., Job Performance Measurement: Topics in the Performance Measurement of Air Force Enlisted Personnel. Technical paper. AFHRL-TP-87-58. Brooks Air Force Base, Tex.: Training Systems Division, Air Force Human Resources Laboratory.

Borman, W.C., and G.L. Hallam 1989 Relationships Between Individual Differences and Accuracy in Rating Air Force Jet Engine Mechanic Performance. Technical paper. AFHRL-TP-89-2. Brooks Air Force Base, Tex.: Training Systems Division, Air Force Human Resources Laboratory.

1990 Observation accuracy for assessors of work-sample performance: consistency across task and individual-differences correlates. Journal of Applied Psychology 76: 11-18.

Borman, W.C., M.A. Hanson, S.H. Oppler, E.D. Pulakos, and L.A. White 1991 The role of early supervisory experience in rating performance. In M.S. Teachout, chair, Understanding the Work Experience Construct in Personnel Research and Practice. Symposium conducted at the annual meeting of the Society of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, St. Louis, Mo.

Carpenter, M.A., S.J. Monaco, F.E. O'Mara, and M.S. Teachout 1989 Time to Job Proficiency: A Preliminary Investigation of the Effects of Aptitude and Experience on Productive Capacity. Technical paper. AFHRL-TP-88-17. Brooks Air Force Base, Tex.: Training Systems Division, Air Force Human Resources Laboratory.

Coovert, M.D., and J.P. Craiger 1991 Determining the dimensionality of work experience and the prediction of job performance. In M.S. Teachout, chair, Understanding the Work Expe-

Suggested Citation:"Appendix A: Service Bibliographies." National Research Council. 1991. Performance Assessment for the Workplace: Volume I. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1862.
×

rience Construct in Personnel Research and Practice. Symposium conducted at the annual meeting of the Society of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, St. Louis, Mo.

Craiger, J.P., and M.D. Coovert 1991 The relationship between job experience and ratings of performance . In M.S. Teachout, chair, Understanding the Work Experience Construct in Personnel Research and Practice. Symposium conducted at the annual meeting of the Society of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, St. Louis, Mo.

Dickenson, T.L. 1986 Performance Ratings: Designs for Evaluating Their Validity and Accuracy . Technical paper. AFHRL-TP-86-15. Brooks Air Force Base, Tex.: Man-power and Personnel Division, Air Force Human Resources Laboratory.

1987 Designs for evaluating the validity and accuracy of performance ratings . Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process 40: 1-21.

1987 Some comments on walk-through performance testing. In J.W. Hedge and M.S. Lipscomb, eds., Walk-Through Performance Testing: An Innovative Approach to Work Sample Testing. AFHRL-TP-87-8. Brooks Air Force Base, Tex.: Training Systems Division, Air Force Human Resources Laboratory.

1991 Structural analysis of aptitude, training, and job experience for predicting job performance. In M.S. Teachout, chair, Investigating the Construct Validity of a Job Performance Measurement System. Symposium conducted at the annual meeting of the Society of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, St. Louis, Mo.

Dickinson, T.L., and J.W. Hedge 1988 Predictive efficiency of the ASVAB for the Air Force's job performance measurement project. In M.S. Lipscomb and J.W. Hedge, eds., Job Performance Measurement: Topics in the Performance Measurement of Air Force Enlisted Personnel. Technical paper. AFHRL-TP-87-58. Brooks Air Force Base, Tex.: Training Systems Division, Air Force Human Resources Laboratory.

1989 Work Performance Ratings: Measurement Test Bed for Validity and Accuracy Research. Technical paper. AFHRL-TP-88-36. Brooks Air Force Base, Tex.: Training Systems Division, Air Force Human Resources Laboratory.

Dickinson, T.L., and M.S. Teachout 1991 Structure of the Air Force's Job Performance Measurement System and Predictability of the Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery (ASVAB). Technical paper. AFHRL-TP-90-85. Brooks Air Force Base, Tex.: Training Systems Division, Air Force Human Resources Laboratory.

Dickenson, T.L., C.E. Hasset, and S.I. Tannenbaum 1986 Work Performance Ratings: A Meta-Analysis of Multitrait-Multimethod Studies. Technical paper. AFHRL-TP-86-32. Brooks Air Force Base, Tex.: Training Systems Division, Air Force Human Resources Laboratory.

Dickenson, T.L., J.W. Hedge, and R.D. Ballentine 1987 Predictability of the Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery for the Air Force's job performance measurement system. Paper presented at the

Suggested Citation:"Appendix A: Service Bibliographies." National Research Council. 1991. Performance Assessment for the Workplace: Volume I. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1862.
×

Department of Defense/Educational Testing Service Conference on Job Performance Measurement Technologies, San Diego, Calif.

Dickenson, T.L., J.W. Hedge, and M.S. Teachout 1987 Accuracy of Performance Ratings: A Structural Model of Rater Attributes . Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, New York.

Dickenson, T.L., J.W. Hedge, R.L. Johnson, and T.A. Silverhart 1989 Work Performance Ratings: Rater Accuracy Training. Technical paper. AFHRL-TP-89-61. Brooks Air Force Base, Tex.: Training Systems Division, Air Force Human Resources Laboratory.

Duncan, R.E., D.A. Hodge, and J.L. Blackhurst 1988 Inter-service technology transfer: promise and payoff. In M.S. Lipscomb and J.W. Hedge, eds., Job Performance Measurement: Topics in the Performance Measurement of Air Force Enlisted Personnel. Technical paper. AFHRL-TP-87-58. Brooks Air Force Base, Tex.: Training Systems Division, Air Force Human Resources Laboratory.

Faneuff, R.S., L.D. Valentine, B.M. Stone, G.L. Curry, and D.C. Hageman 1988 Exploratory Models to Link Job Performance to Enlistment Standards . Technical paper. AFHRL-TP-88-39. Brooks Air Force Base, Tex.: Training Systems Division, Air Force Human Resources Laboratory.

Ford, J.K., D.J. Sego, M. Quinones, and J.L. Speer 1991 A literature review of the conceptualization and operationalization of the experience construct. In M.S. Teachout, chair, Understanding the Work Experience Construct in Personnel Research and Practice. Symposium conducted at the annual meeting of the Society of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, St. Louis, Mo.

Ford, J.K., D.J. Sego, and M.S. Teachout 1991 A test of the influence of general ability, job experience, and task experience on task level performance. In M.S. Teachout, chair, Understanding the Work Experience Construct in Personnel Research and Practice. Symposium conducted at the annual meeting of the Society of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, St. Louis, Mo.

Gott, C.D. 1988 Exploratory Models to Link Job Performance to Enlistment Standards . Technical paper. AFHRL-TP-88-39. Brooks Air Force Base, Tex.: Training Systems Division, Air Force Human Resources Laboratory.

Gould, R.B., and J.W. Hedge 1983 Air Force Job Performance Criterion Development. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Anaheim, Calif.

1984 Background and theoretical bases of walk-through performance testing . In S. Zedeck, chair, Walk-Through Performance Testing: An Innovative Approach to Work Sample Testing. Symposium conducted at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Toronto, Canada.

1987 History, background, and theoretical bases of walk-through performance testing. In J.W. Hedge and M.S. Lipscomb, eds., Walk-Through Performance Testing: An Innovative Approach to Work Sample Testing. AFHRL

Suggested Citation:"Appendix A: Service Bibliographies." National Research Council. 1991. Performance Assessment for the Workplace: Volume I. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1862.
×

TP-87-8. Brooks Air Force Base, Tex.: Training Systems Division, Air Force Human Resources Laboratory.

Hedge, J.W. 1984 The methodology of walk-through performance testing. In S. Zedeck, chair, Walk-Through Performance Testing: An Innovative Approach to Work Sample Testing. Symposium conducted at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Toronto, Canada.

1986 Issues in Job Performance Measurement Research. Symposium conducted at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Washington, D.C.

1987 The methodology of walk-through performance testing. In J.W. Hedge and M.S. Lipscomb, eds., Walk-Through Performance Testing: An Innovative Approach to Work Sample Testing. Technical paper. AFHRL-TP-87-71. Brooks Air Force Base, Tex.: Training Systems Division, Air Force Human Resources Laboratory.

Hedge, J.W., and F.J. Laue 1988 Can appraisers rate work performance accurately? In C. Lance, chair, Are People Pretty Good Judges of Others After All? Symposium conducted at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Atlanta, Ga.

Hedge, J.W., and M.S. Lipscomb 1986 The Air Force Job Performance Measurement Project. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Washington, D.C.

1986 The Identification of Surrogate Indices of Hands-On Performance. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Washington, D.C.

Hedge, J.W., and M.S. Lipscomb, eds. 1987 Walk-Through Performance Testing: An Innovative Approach to Work Sample Testing. Technical paper. AFHRL-TP-87-8. Brooks Air Force Base, Tex.: Training Systems Division, Air Force Human Resources Laboratory.

Hedge, J.W., and M.S. Teachout 1986 Job Performance Measurement: A Systematic Program of Research and Development. Technical paper. AFHRL-TP-86-37. Brooks Air Force Base, Tex.: Training Systems Division, Air Force Human Resources Laboratory.

1990 The Development and Evaluation of an Interview Work Sample Criterion Measure. Paper presented at the fifth annual conference of the Society of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Miami, Fla.

1991 The conceptual development and implementation of a job performance measurement system. In M.S. Teachout, chair, Investigating the Construct Validity of a Job Performance Measurement System. Symposium conducted at the annual meeting of the Society of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, St. Louis, Mo.

Hedge, J.W., R.D. Ballentine, and R.B. Gould 1985 Examining the Link Between Training Evaluation and Job Performance Criterion Development. Paper presented at the NATO defense research

Suggested Citation:"Appendix A: Service Bibliographies." National Research Council. 1991. Performance Assessment for the Workplace: Volume I. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1862.
×

Group Panel VIII Symposium on Transfer of Training to Military Operational Systems, Brussels, Belgium.

Hedge, J.W., T.L. Dickinson, and S.A. Bierstedt 1988 The Use of Videotape Technology to Train Administrators of Walk-Through Performance Testing. Technical paper. AFHRL-TP-87-71. Brooks Air Force Base, Tex.: Training Systems Division, Air Force Human Resources Laboratory.

Hedge, J.W., M.S. Lipscomb, and R.D. Ballentine 1985 Performance Assessment Research in the Air Force. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Los Angeles, Calif.

Hedge, J.W., M.S. Lipscomb, and M.S. Teachout 1988 Work sample testing in the Air Force Job Performance Measurement Project. In M.S. Lipscomb and J.W. Hedge, eds., Job Performance Measurement: Topics in the Performance Measurement of Air Force Enlisted Personnel. AFHRL-TP-87-58. Brooks Air Force Base, Tex.: Training Systems Division, Air Force Human Resources Laboratory.

Hedge, J.W., M.S. Teachout, and T.L. Dickenson 1987 User acceptance as a criterion for choosing performance measures. In M. Secunda, chair, Beyond Current Performance Appraisal Research: Acceptability as a New Paradigm. Symposium conducted at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, New York.

Hedge, J.W., M.S. Teachout, and F.J. Laue 1990 Interview Testing as a Work Sample Measure of Job Proficiency. Technical paper. AFHRL-TP-90-61. Brooks Air Force Base, Tex.: Training Systems Division, Air Force Human Resources Laboratory.

Hedge, J.W., K.L. Ringenbach, M.S. Slattery, and M.S. Teachout 1989 Leniency in performance ratings: implications for the use of self-ratings . In proceedings of the 31st annual conference of the Military Testing Association, San Antonio, Tex.

Kavanagh, M.J. 1987 Issues and Directions in Measuring Job Performance in the Air Force . Panel discussion conducted at the annual meeting of the Society of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Atlanta, Ga.

1988 Performance Rating Accuracy Improvement Through Changes in Individual and System Characteristics. Technical paper. AFHRL-TP-87-67. Brooks Air Force Base, Tex.: Training Systems Division, Air Force Human Resources Laboratory.

Kavanagh, M.J., W.C. Borman, J.W. Hedge, and R.B. Gould 1986 A model of performance measurement quality and its implications for research and practice. In B. Bass, P. Drenth, and P. Weissenberg, eds., Advances in Organizational Psychology: An International Review. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage Publications.

1986 Job Performance Measurement Classification Scheme for Validation Research in the Military. Technical Report. AFHRL-TR-85-51. Brooks Air Force Base, Tex.: Manpower and Personnel Division, Air Force Human Resources Laboratory.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix A: Service Bibliographies." National Research Council. 1991. Performance Assessment for the Workplace: Volume I. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1862.
×

Kavanagh, M.J., B.B. Kavanagh, T. Lee, and J.W. Hedge 1988 The Effects of the Purpose of Measurement, Acquaintance With the Job, and Research Method on Performance Measurement Rating Accuracy . Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Management, Anaheim, Calif.

Kraiger, K. 1988 Generalizability Theory: An Assessment of its Relevance to the Air Force Job Performance Measurement Project. Technical paper. AFHRL-TP-87-70. Brooks Air Force Base, Tex.: Training Systems Division, Air Force Human Resources Laboratory.

1990a Generalizability of Performance Measures Across Four Air Force Specialties . Technical paper. AFHRL-TP-89-60. Brooks Air Force Base, Tex.: Training Systems Division, Air Force Human Resources Laboratory.

1990b Generalizabiity of Walk-Through Performance Tests, Job Proficiency Ratings, and Job Knowledge Tests Across Eight Air Force Specialties. Technical paper. AFHRL-TP-90-14. Brooks Air Force Base, Tex.: Training Systems Division, Air Force Human Resources Laboratory.

1991 Generalizability theory as evidence of the validity of work sample tests and proficiency ratings. In M.S. Teachout, chair, Investigating the Construct Validity of a Job Performance Measurement System. Symposium conducted at the annual meeting of the Society of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, St. Louis, Mo.

Kraiger, K., and M.S. Teachout 1987 Generalizability theory as evidence of the construct validity of performance ratings. In G. Laabs, chair, Applications of Generalizability Theory to Military Performance Measurement . Symposium conducted at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Washington, D.C.

1990 Generalizability theory as construct-related evidence of the validity of job performance ratings. Human Performance 3(1): 19-35.

1991 Application of Generalizability Theory to the Air Force's Job Performance Measurement Project: A Summary of Research Results . AFHRL-TR-90-92.

Lance, C.E., T.M. Donnelly, and M.S. Teachout 1991 Assessing the hierarchical structure of a job performance measurement system using hierarchical confirmatory factor analysis. In M.S. Teachout, chair, Investigating the Construct Validity of a Job Performance Measurement System. Symposium conducted at the annual meeting of the Society of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, St. Louis, Mo.

Lance, C.E., J.W. Hedge, and W.E. Alley 1987 Ability, Experience, and Task Characteristic Predictors of Task Performance . Technical paper. AFHRL-TP-87-14. Brooks Air Force Base, Tex.: Training Systems Division, Air Force Human Resources Laboratory.

1989 Joint relationships of task proficiency with aptitude, experience, and task difficulty: a cross-level, interactional study. Human Performance 2(4): 249-272.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix A: Service Bibliographies." National Research Council. 1991. Performance Assessment for the Workplace: Volume I. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1862.
×

Lance, C.E., M.S. Teachout, and T.M. Donnelly 1990 Specification of the Job Performance Construct Space: An Application of Hierarchical Confirmatory Factor Analysis. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Southern Management Association, Boston.

Laue, F.J., M.S. Teachout, and D.L. Harville 1990 Assessing the substitutability of surrogate measures of job performance for hands-on work sample tests. In L.S. Gottfredson, chair, How Good are Alternative Measures of Job Performance? Symposium conducted at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Boston.

Lipscomb, M.S. 1987a A task-level domain sampling strategy: a content valid approach. In J.W. Hedge and M.S. Lipscomb, eds., Walk-Through Performance Testing: An Innovative Approach to Work Sample Testing. AFHRL-TP-87-8. Brooks Air Force Base, Tex.: Training Systems Division, Air Force Human Resources Laboratory.

1987b Criterion development and application: the Air Force Job Performance Measurement Project. In T. Watson, chair, One More Time: Means for Improving Personnel Selection Criteria. Symposium conducted at the convention of the Texas Psychological Association, San Antonio, Tex.

1990 A Comparison of Domain Sampling Procedures for Test Construction. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Texas, Austin.

Lipscomb, M.S. and T.L. Dickinson 1988 Test content selection. In M.S. Lipscomb and J.W. Hedge, eds., Job Performance Measurement: Topics in the Performance Measurement of Air Force Enlisted Personnel. Technical paper. AFHRL-TP-87-58. Brooks Air Force Base, Tex.: Training Systems Division, Air Force Human Resources Laboratory.

Lipscomb, M.S., and J.W Hedge 1987 Content Selection. Paper presented at the Department of Defense/Educational Testing Service Conference on Job Performance Measurement Technologies, San Diego, Calif.

Lipscomb, M.S., and J.W Hedge, eds. 1988 Job Performance Measurement: Topics in the Performance Measurement of Air Force Enlisted Personnel. Technical paper. AFHRL-TP-87-58. Brooks Air Force Base, Tex.: Training Systems Division, Air Force Human Resources Laboratory.

Moran, G.V., and R.D. Ballentine 1986 Effects of job experience on performance scores. In J.W. Hedge, chair, Issues in Job Performance Measurement Research. Symposium conducted at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Washington, D.C.

Pellum, M.W., and M.S. Teachout 1988 Evaluating the Effectiveness of the “4-Level” Training Program. Paper presented at the annual conference on Air Force Technology in Training and Education, Biloxi, Miss.

1988 A longitudinal evaluation of training effectiveness using multiple levels of information. In M. Teachout, chair, Understanding and Evaluating Train

Suggested Citation:"Appendix A: Service Bibliographies." National Research Council. 1991. Performance Assessment for the Workplace: Volume I. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1862.
×

ing Effectiveness: Multiple Perspectives. Symposium conducted at the fifth annual conference of the Society of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Miami, Fla.

1988 The Air Force Job Performance Measurement Project. In D.A. Harris, chair, The Joint-Service Job Performance Measurement Project. Symposium conducted at the annual conference on Air Force Technology in Training and Education, Biloxi, Miss.

1988 Evaluating training effectiveness: challenges and application. In H. Ruck, chair, Training Evaluation R & D in the Air Force. Symposium conducted at the third annual conference of the Society of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Miami, Fla.

Taylor, C.J., J.L. Blackhurst, and R.D. Ballentine 1985 Walk-through performance test development: lessons learned. Pp. 306-310 in Proceedings of the 27th Annual Conference of the Military Testing Association, San Diego, Calif.

Teachout, M.S. 1986 Developing a composite measure of job performance: problems and solutions . In J.W. Hedge, chair, Issues in Job Performance Measurement Research. Symposium conducted at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Washington, D.C.

1990 Understanding and evaluating training effectiveness: multiple perspectives . In M.S. Teachout, Chair, symposium conducted at the fifth annual conference of the Society of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Miami, Fla.

1990 Determinants of Performance Rating Accuracy: A Field Study. Unpublished PhD Dissertation, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, Va.

1991 Understanding the work experience construct in personnel research and practice. In M.S. Teachout, chair, symposium conducted at the sixth annual conference of the Society of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, St. Louis, Mo.

1991 Investigating the construct validity of a job performance measurement system. In M.S. Teachout, chair, symposium conducted at the sixth annual conference of the Society of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, St. Louis, Mo.

Vance, R.J., M.D. Coovert, R.C. MacCallum, and J.W. Hedge 1988 Construct validity of multiple job performance measures using confirmatory factor analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology 73: 74-80.

1989 Construct models of task performance. Journal of Applied Psychology 74: 447-455.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix A: Service Bibliographies." National Research Council. 1991. Performance Assessment for the Workplace: Volume I. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1862.
×

ARMY

Arabian, J., and J. Mason 1986 Relationship of SQT Scores to Project A Measures. Paper presented at the annual conference of the Military Testing Association, Mystic, Conn.

Borman, W., S. Motowidlo, S. Rose, and L. Hanser 1987 Development of a Model of Soldier Effectiveness. Technical Report 741. Alexandria, Va.: U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences .

Borman, W., L. White, and I. Gast 1984 Factors Relating to Peer and Supervisor Ratings of Job Performance . Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Toronto, Canada.

Brandt, D., D. McLaughlin, L. Wise, and P. Rossmeissl 1984 Adjustment for the Effects of Range Restriction on Composite Validity . Paper presented at the annual convention of the American Psychological Association, Toronto, Canada.

1984 Complex Cross-Validation of the Validity of a Predictor Battery. Paper presented at the annual convention of the American Psychological Association, Toronto, Canada.

Campbell, C., R. Campbell, M. Rumsey, and D. Edwards 1986 Development and Field Test of Task-Based MOS-Specific Criterion Measures . Technical Report 717. Alexandria, Va.: U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences .

Campbell, C., P. Ford, M. Rumsey, E. Pulakos, W. Borman, D. Felker, M. De Vera, and B. Riegelhaupt 1987 Development of Project A Performance Measures. Paper presented at the conference of the Society of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Atlanta, Ga.

Campbell, J.P., ed. 1987 Improving the Selection, Classification, and Utilization of Army Enlisted Personnel: Annual Report, 1985 Fiscal Year. Technical Report 746. Alexandria, Va.: U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences .

1988 Improving the Selection, Classification, and Utilization of Army Enlisted Personnel: Annual Report, 1986 Fiscal Year. Technical Report 813101. Alexandria, Va.: U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences .

Campbell, J., J. McHenry, and L. Wise 1987 Analysis of Criterion Measures: The Modeling of Performance. Paper presented at the conference of the Society of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Atlanta, Ga.

Eaton, N. 1984 The U.S. Army Research Project to Improve Selection and Classification Decisions. Paper presented at the National Security Industrial Association Conference on Personnel and Training Factors in Systems Effectiveness, Springfield, Va.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix A: Service Bibliographies." National Research Council. 1991. Performance Assessment for the Workplace: Volume I. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1862.
×

Eaton, N., and M. Goer, eds. 1983 Improving the Selection, Classification, and Utilization of Army Enlisted Personnel: Technical Appendix to the Annual Report. Research Note 83-87. Alexandria, Va.: U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences .

Eaton, N., M. Goer, J. Harris, and L. Zook, eds. 1985 Improving the Selection, Classification, and Utilization of Army Enlisted Personnel: Annual Report, 1984 Fiscal Year. Technical Report 660. Alexandria, Va.: U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences .

Eaton, N., M. Weltin, and H. Wing 1982 Validity of the Military Applicant Profile for Predicting Early Attrition in Different Educational, Age, and Racial Groups. Technical Report 567. Alexandria, Va: U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences .

Eaton, N., H. Wing, and K. Mitchell 1983 Putting the “Dollars” Into Utility Analysis. Paper presented at the annual convention of the American Psychological Association, Anaheim, Calif.

1984 Alternate methods of estimating the dollar value of performance. Personnel Psychology 38: 27-40

Friedman, D., A. Streicher, H. Wing, and F. Grafton 1982 Assessment of Practice Effects: Test-Retest Scores for FY 81 Active Army Applicants on ASVAB 8/9/10. Paper presented at the annual conference of the Military Testing Association, San Antonio, Tex.

Grafton, F., K. Mitchell, and H. Wing 1983 Final Status Report on the Comparability of ASVAB 6/7 and 8/9/10 Aptitude Area Score Scales. Selection and Classification Technical Area Working Paper 82-7. Alexandria, Va.: U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences .

Hanser, L., and F. Grafton 1983 Dusting Off Old Data: Encounters With Archival Records. Paper presented at the annual convention of the American Psychological Association, Anaheim, Calif.

Hanser, L., and K. Mitchell 1983 Factorial Invariance of the Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery . Paper presented at the annual conference of the Military Testing Association, Gulf Shores, Ala.

Hough, L., and S. Ashworth 1987 Predicting Soldier Performance: Assessment of Temperament Constructs as Predictors of Job Performance. Paper presented at the conference for Industrial and Organizational Psychology. Atlanta, Ga.

Hough, L., M. Dunnette, H. Wing, J. Houston, and N. Peterson 1984 Covariance Analyses of Cognitive and Noncognitive Measures of Army Recruits: An Initial Sample of Preliminary Battery Data. Paper presented at the annual convention of the American Psychological Association, Toronto, Canada.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix A: Service Bibliographies." National Research Council. 1991. Performance Assessment for the Workplace: Volume I. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1862.
×

Human Resources Research Organization, American Institutes for Research, Personnel Decisions Research Institute, and Army Research Institute 1983 Improving the Selection, Classification, and Utilization of Army Enlisted Personnel: Annual Report. Research Report 1347. Alexandria, Va.: U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences .

1983 Improving the Selection, Classification, and Utilization of Army Enlisted Personnel: Project A Research Plan. Research Report 1332. Alexandria, Va.: U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences .

1984 Improving the Selection, Classification, and Utilization of Army Enlisted Personnel: Appendixes to the Annual Report, 1984 Fiscal Year. Research Report 85-14. Alexandria, Va.: U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences .

1985 Improving the Selection, Classification, and Utilization of Army Enlisted Personnel: Annual Report Synopsis, 1984 Fiscal Year. Research Report 1393. Alexandria, Va: U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences .

McHenry, J., H. Hough, J. Toquam, M. Hanson, and S. Ashworth, 1987 Project A Validity Results: The Relationship Between Predictor and Criterion Domains. Paper presented at the Conference of the Society of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Atlanta, Ga.

McLaughlin, D., P. Rossmeissl, L. Wise, D. Brandt, and M. Wang 1984 Validation of Current and Alternative ASVAB Area Composites, Based on Training and SQT Information on FY1981 and FY1982 Enlisted Accessions . Technical Report 651. Alexandria, Va.: U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences .

Mitchell, K. 1984 Verbal Information Processing Paradigm: A Review of Theory and Methods . Technical Report 648. Alexandria, Va.: U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences .

Osborn, W. 1983 Issues and Strategies in Measuring Performance in Army Jobs. Paper presented at the annual convention of the American Psychological Association, Anaheim, Calif.

Oxford-Carpenter, R., and L. Schultz 1983 Reading Assessment in the Army. Selection and Classification Technical Area Working Paper 83-5. Alexandria, Va.: U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences .

Peterson, N. 1987 Development and Field Test of the Trial Battery for Project A. Technical Report 739. Alexandria, Va.: U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences .

Peterson, N., L. Hough, M. Dunnette, R. Rosse, J. Houston, J. Toquam, and H. Wing 1987 Identification of Predictor Constructs and Development of New Selection/ Classification Tests. Paper presented at the conference of the Society of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Atlanta, Ga.

Shields, J., and L. Hanser 1987 Designing, Planning, and Selling Project A. Paper presented at the confer

Suggested Citation:"Appendix A: Service Bibliographies." National Research Council. 1991. Performance Assessment for the Workplace: Volume I. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1862.
×

ence of the Society of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Atlanta, Ga.

Weltin, M., and B. Popelka, 1983 Evaluation of the ASVAB 8/9/10 Clerical Composite for Predicting Training School Performance. Technical Report 594. Alexandria, Va: U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences .

Wetrogan, L., D. Olson, and H. Sperling 1983 Job Performance and Assessment: A Systematic Model. Paper presented at the annual convention of the American Psychological Association, Anaheim, Calif.

Wise, L., M. Wang, and P. Rossmeissl 1983 Longitudinal Research Database Plan. Research Report 1346. Alexandria, Va.: U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences .

Wise, L., N. Peterson, R. Hoffman, J. Campbell, and J. Arabian, eds. 1991a Army Synthetic Validity Project: Report of Phase III Results. Volume I. Technical Report 922. Alexandria, Va.: U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences .

1991b Army Synthetic Validity Project: Report of Phase III Results. Volume II: Research Instruments. Research Product 91-08. Alexandria, Va.: U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences .

Young, W., K. Austin, J. McHenry, L. Wise, and F. Grafton 1989 Sample Concurrent Validation Codebook. Selection and Classification Draft Working Paper RS-WP-89-2. Alexandria, Va.: U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences .

Young, W., J. Harris, R. Hoffman, J. Houston, and L. Wise 1987 Large Scale Data Collection and Database Preparation. Paper presented at the conference of the Society of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Atlanta, Ga.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix A: Service Bibliographies." National Research Council. 1991. Performance Assessment for the Workplace: Volume I. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1862.
×

MARINE CORPS

Bowes, M. 1991 Average Costs of Training for First-Term Marines. Research Memorandum 90-238. Alexandria, Va.: Center for Naval Analysis.

Carey, N.B. 1990a An Assessment of Surrogates for Hands-On Tests: Selection Standards and Training Needs. Research Memorandum 90-47. Alexandria, Va.: Center for Naval Analysis.

1990b Methods to Assess the Utility of Proxies. Research Memorandum 90-311. Alexandria, Va.: Center for Naval Analysis.

Cooke, T.W., and J.M. Jondrow 1990 Costs of Improving Recruit Aptitudes: A Joint Product Approach. Research Memorandum 89-193. Alexandria, Va: Center for Naval Analysis.

Divgi, D.R., and P.W. Mayberry 1990 The Role of Aptitude Factors in Predicting Hands-On Job Performance . Research Memorandum 89-215. Alexandria, Va.: Center for Naval Analysis.

Maier, M.H., and C.M. Hiatt 1984 An Evaluation of Using Job Performance Tests to Validate ASVAB Qualification Standards. Alexandria, Va.: Center for Naval Analyses.

1985 On the Content and Measurement Validity of Hands-On Performance Tests . Research Memorandum 85-79. Alexandria, Va.: Center for Naval Analyses.

Maier, M.H., and P.W. Mayberry 1989 Evaluating Minimum Aptitude Standards. Research Memorandum 89-9. Alexandria, Va.: Center for Naval Analyses.

May, L.J. 1987 Alternative Modeling Approaches for Setting Cost-Effective Qualification Standards. Research Memorandum 87-54. Alexandria, Va.: Center for Naval Analyses.

May, L.J., and P.W. Mayberry 1986 The Rand Cost-Performance Model for Setting Qualification Standards: Preliminary Comments. Research Memorandum 86-200. Alexandria, Va.: Center for Naval Analyses.

Mayberry, P.W. 1986 Confirming Differences in Relative-Value Proficiency Marks. Research Memorandum 86-187. Alexandria, Va.: Center for Naval Analyses.

1986 Examining the Validity of Hands-On Tests as Measures of Job Performance . Research Contribution 540. Alexandria, Va.: Center for Naval Analyses.

1986 From Hands-On Measurement to Job Performance: The Issue of Generalizability . Research Memorandum 86-214. Alexandria, Va.: Center for Naval Analysis.

1987 Developing a Competency Scale for Hands-On Measures of Job Proficiency . Research Contribution 570. Alexandria, Va.: Center for Naval Analyses.

1988 Interim Results for the Marine Corps Job Performance Measurement Project. Research Memorandum 88-37. Alexandria, Va.: Center for Naval Analyses.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix A: Service Bibliographies." National Research Council. 1991. Performance Assessment for the Workplace: Volume I. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1862.
×

1989a Analysis of Data Quality for the Infantry Phase of the Marine Corps Job Performance Measurement Project. Research Memorandum 88-259. Alexandria, Va.: Center for Naval Analyses.

1989b Performance of Basic Infantry Tasks. Research Memorandum 89-45. Alexandria, Va.: Center for Naval Analyses.

1990 Validation of ASVAB Against Infantry Job Performance. Research Memorandum 90-182. Alexandria, Va.: Center for Naval Analysis.

Mayberry, P.W., and Hiatt, C.M. 1990 Incremental Validity of New Tests in Prediction of Infantry Performance . Research Memorandum 90-110. Alexandria, Va.: Center for Naval Analysis.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix A: Service Bibliographies." National Research Council. 1991. Performance Assessment for the Workplace: Volume I. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1862.
×

NAVY

Baker, H., and P. Alba 1987 Measuring the proficiency of Marine Corps J-79 jet engine mechanics . In H.G. Baker and G.J. Laabs, eds., Proceedings of the Department of Defense/Educational Testing Service Conference on Job Performance Measurement Technologies. Washington, D.C.: Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense (Force Management and Personnel).

1988 Job Performance Measurement Package for the J-79 Engine Mechanic. NPRDC TN 88-49. San Diego, Calif.: Navy Personnel Research and Development Center.

Baker, H.G., and G.J. Laabs 1985 Selecting Critical Tasks for a Radioman Hands-On Performance Test . Paper presented at the conference of the Military Testing Association, San Diego, Calif.

1987 Proceedings of the Department of Defense/Educational Testing Service Conference on Job Performance Measurement Technologies. Washington, D.C.: Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense (Force Management and Personnel).

Baker, H., J. Blackhurst, and P. Alba 1987 Interservice Technology Transfer of J-79 Jet Engine Mechanic Performance Measures. NPRDC TR 87-22. San Diego: Navy Personnel Research and Development Center.

Baker, H., P. Ford, J. Doyle, S. Schulze, S. Lammlein, and C. Owens-Kurtz 1988 Development of Performance Measures for the Navy Radioman. NPRDC TN 88-52. San Diego, Calif.: Navy Personnel Research and Development Center.

in press Pilot Test of Job Performance Measures for Navy Radiomen. San Diego, Calif.: Navy Personnel Research and Development Center.

Beardon, R. 1981 Relationship Between the Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery and Aviation Warfare Operator Performance: A Pilot Study. NPRDC SR 81-14. San Diego, Calif.: Navy Personnel Research and Development Center.

Beardon, R., M. Wagner, and R. Simon 1988 Developing Behaviorally Anchored Rating Scales for the Machinist's Mate Rating. NPRDC TN 88-38. San Diego, Calif.: Navy Personnel Research and Development Center.

Bruce, D., and M. Dittmar in press Developing Performance Measures for the Navy Gas Turbineman (GSM) Rating: Item Development, Pretest, and Pilot Test. San Diego, Calif.: Navy Personnel Research and Development Center.

Chesler, D., C. Bilinski, and M. Hamovitch 1982 Marine Corps Job Performance Tests for Three Enlisted Specialties . NPRDC TN 82-20. San Diego, Calif.: Navy Personnel Research and Development Center.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix A: Service Bibliographies." National Research Council. 1991. Performance Assessment for the Workplace: Volume I. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1862.
×

Dittmar, M., and R. Magnus 1989 Hands-On Test for the Navy Gas Turbineman (GSM) Rating. Contractor Report. San Antonio, Tex.: Maxima Corp.

Drasgow, F., A. Martinsek, D. Gardner, M. Muyot, and L. Kroeker in press Task selection models for job performance measurement. Journal of Applied Psychology.

Ford, P., J. Doyle, S. Schultz, and R. Hoffman 1987 Development and Field Test of Hands-On and Knowledge Tests for Navy Radiomen. Contractor Report. Alexandria, Va.: Human Resources Research Organization.

Grizzle, H., II 1987 Needs Assessment for the Prototype Job Performance Measurement Data Base. Contractor Report. Alexandria, Va.: Federal Computer Performance Evaluation and Simulation Center.

1988 General Functional Requirements for a Job Performance Measurement Data Base. Contractor Report. Alexandria, Va.: Federal Systems Integration and Management Center.

Grizzle, H., II, and J. Keeneth 1986 Life-Cycle Automation Management Plan for the Job Performance Measurement Data Base. Contractor Report. Alexandria, Va.: Federal Computer Performance Evaluation and Simulation Center.

Needs Assessment Strategy for the Prototype Job Performance Measurement Data Base. Contractor Report. Alexandria, Va.: Federal Computer Performance Evaluation and Simulation Center.

Grizzle, H., II, J. Keeneth, H. Baker, and G. Laabs 1988 The Navy Job Performance Measurement Program (JPM): Life-Cycle Au-tomation Management Plan for a JPM Data Base. NPRDC TN 88-33. San Diego, Calif.: Navy Personnel Research and Development Center.

Hakel, M., E. Weil, and L. Hakel 1988 The Assessment of Social Work Behaviors and 25 Navy Occupational Ratings. NPRDC TN 88-57. San Diego, Calif.: Navy Personnel Research and Development Center.

Hiatt, C., and W. Simms 1981 Relating Enlistment Standards to Job Performance: A Pilot Study of Two Ratings. CNA Report 81-0048. Alexandria, Va.: Center for Naval Analysis.

Hunt, E., R. Frick, B. Laden, and G. Larson 1988 Augmentation of the Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery. NPRDC Special Report. San Diego, Calif: Navy Personnel Research and Development Center.

Kidder, P. 1987 Training simulators as a source of job performance information. Pp. 193-200 in H.G. Baker and G.J. Laabs, eds, Proceedings of the Department of Defense/Educational Testing Service Conference on Job Performance Measurement Technologies. Washington, D.C.: Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense (Force Management and Personnel).

Suggested Citation:"Appendix A: Service Bibliographies." National Research Council. 1991. Performance Assessment for the Workplace: Volume I. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1862.
×

Kidder, P, and G. Laabs 1988 An Application of Videodisc Technology for Job Performance Measurement . Paper presented at the meeting of the Society for Applied Learning Technology, Washington, D.C.

Kidder P., R. Nerison, and G. Laabs 1987 Navy Job Performance Measurement Program: An Examination of Data Bases, Programs, and Training Simulators as Sources of Job Performance Information . NPRDC TN 87-28. San Diego, Calif.: Navy Personnel Research and Development Center.

Kieras, D. 1989 A Cognitive Analysis of the Relations Between a Set of Hands-On Job Performance Test Tasks. NPRDC Contractor Report. Ann Arbor, Mich.: University of Michigan.

Kroeker, L. 1986 The Navy's Job Classification and Assignment System. Paper presented at the ORSA/TIMS annual meeting, Los Angeles, Calif.

1987 Evaluation of a Personnel Record Data Base as a Source of Job Performance Information. NPRDC MPPLR. San Diego, Calif.: Navy Personnel Research and Development Center.

1988a Broadening the Navy's Classification Decision Base. Paper presented at the ORSA/TIMS Annual Meeting, Washington, DC.

1988b Job Performance Measurement: Lessons Learned from the Machinist's Mates Analyses. Paper presented at the Conference on Training in Technology and Education Conference, Biloxi, Miss.

1988c Job Performance Measurement: Lessons Learned From the Machinist's Mates Analyses. Paper presented at the Conference on Training in Technology and Education, Biloxi, Miss.

1988d Reliability and Validity of Performance Measurement Data. Paper presented at the ORSA/TIMS annual meeting, Washington, D.C.

1989a Creating a random sampling design for job performance measurement . In J.P. Pass, chair, Task Selection for Performance Assessment. Symposium presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, New Orleans, La.

1989b Personnel classification/assignment models. Pp. 41-73 in M.F. Wiskoff and G. Rampton, eds., Military Personnel Measurement: Testing, Assignment, Evaluation. New York: Praeger.

Kroeker, L., and R. Beardon 1987 Predicting proficiency measures for machinist's mates. Pp. 193-200 in H.G. Baker and G.J. Laabs, eds, Proceedings of the Department of Defense/Educational Testing Service Conference on Job Performance Measurement Technologies. Washington, D.C.: Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense (Force Management and Personnel).

in press Analyses of Job Performance Data for Machinist's Mates. San Diego, Calif.: Navy Personnel Research and Development Center.

Kroeker, L., and G. Laabs 1986 The Navy's Contribution to Job Performance Measures and Standards. Paper

Suggested Citation:"Appendix A: Service Bibliographies." National Research Council. 1991. Performance Assessment for the Workplace: Volume I. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1862.
×

presented at the sixth annual conference on Personnel and Training Factors in Systems Eeffectiveness, National Security Industrial Association, San Diego, Calif.

1990 Relationships Among Actual and Surrogate Measures of Job Proficiency . Paper presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, Boston.

Kroeker, L., G. Laabs, and R. Beardon 1985 Developing and evaluating a hands-on performance test. In G. Laabs, chair, Issues in Performance Testing. Symposium presented at the conference of the Military Testing Association, San Diego, Calif.

Kroeker, L, G. Laabs, R. Vineberg, J. Joyner, and R. Zimmerman in press Development of a Hands-On Performance Measure for the Machinist Mate's Rating . San Diego, Calif.: Navy Personnel Research and Development Center.

Laabs, G. 1983 Performance testing in support of Navy personnel classification and assignment. In C. Curran, chair, Development of Military Job Performance Measures. Symposium presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, San Diego, Calif.

1985 Issues in Performance Testing (Chair). Symposium presented at the Conference of the Military Testing Association, San Diego, Calif.

1986a Applied performance testing and transfer of training. In V.E. Holt, ed., Issues in Psychological Research and Application in Transfer of Training . ARI TCN 86-647. Alexandria, Va.: U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences .

1986b Setting Standards in Performance Measurement (Chair). Symposium presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, Washington, D.C.

1986c Measuring job performance. In R. Dillon, Chair, Advances in Testing and Training: Improving Prediction and Attainment of Success in Technical Programs. Symposium presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, Calif.

1986d A Navy performance testing program to measure technical proficiency . In E. E. Diamond, chair, Measuring Up: The Role of Military Testing. Symposium presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, Calif.

1987a Applications of Generalizability Theory to Military Performance Measurement (Chair). Symposium presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Washington, D.C.

1987b Comparing Different Procedures for Task Selection. Paper presented at the Department of Defense/Educational Testing Service Conference on Job Performance Measurement Technologies, San Diego, Calif.

1987c Panel member in R.D. Ballentine, chair, Issues in the Implementation of a Job Performance Measurement Program . In H.G. Baker and G.J. Laabs, eds, Proceedings of the Department of Defense/Educational Testing Service Conference on Job Performance Measurement Technologies. Wash

Suggested Citation:"Appendix A: Service Bibliographies." National Research Council. 1991. Performance Assessment for the Workplace: Volume I. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1862.
×

ington, D.C.: Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense (Force Management and Personnel).

Laabs, G., and H. Baker 1989 Selection of critical tasks for Navy job performance measures. Journal of Applied Psychology 1(1): 3-16.

Laabs, G., and V. Berry 1987 The Navy Job Performance Measurement Program: Background and Inception . NPRDC TR 87-34. San Diego, Calif.: Navy Personnel Research and Development Center.

Laabs, G., H. Baker, L. Kroeker, and P. Kidder 1986 Navy job performance measurement program. In D.A. Harris, chair, Joint-Service Job Performance Measurement. Panel session presented at the Tenth Symposium on Psychology in the Department of Defense, Colorado Springs, Colo.

Laabs, G., V. Berry, R. Vineberg, and R. Zimmerman 1987 Comparing different procedures of task selection. Pp. 79-93 in H.G. Baker and G.J. Laabs, eds, Proceedings of the Department of Defense/Educational Testing Service Conference on Job Performance Measurement Technologies. Washington, D.C.: Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense(Force Management and Personnel).

Lammlein, S., and H. Baker 1987 Developing Performance Measures for the Navy Radioman (RM): Selecting Critical Tasks. NPRDC TN 87-13. San Diego, Calif.: Navy Personnel Research and Development Center.

Lammlein, S., N. Peterson, and R. Rosse 1988 Test of a Probabilistic Sampling Critical Task Selection Model for Performance Testing. NPRDC TN 88-13. San Diego, Calif.: Navy Personnel Research and Development Center.

Mackie, R., R. Ridihalgh, M. Seltzer, and T. Shultz 1981 Relationship Between the Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery and Surface Sonar Technician Performance. NPRDC TR 81-19. San Diego, Calif.: Navy Personnel Research and Development Center.

Morris, C., B. Best, and W. McDaniel 1985 Simulator/Device Based Performance Measurement. NTSC SR 85-002. Orlando, Fla.: Navy Training Systems Center, Training Analysis and Evaluation Group.

Motowidlo, S. 1988 Alternatives to Hands-On Performance Tests: Research Plan, Conceptual Framework, Theoretical Background, and Decision Criteria . Contractor Report. Minneapolis, Minn.: Personnel Decisions Research Institute.

Murphy, K. 1988 A Developmental Theory of Job Performance: Applications in Two Navy Ratings. NPRDC TN 88-36. San Diego, Calif.: Navy Personnel Research and Development Center.

Predictor-Based Taxonomy of Navy Ratings: A Preliminary Study. NPRDC TN 88-35. San Diego, Calif.: Navy Personnel Research and Development Center.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix A: Service Bibliographies." National Research Council. 1991. Performance Assessment for the Workplace: Volume I. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1862.
×

Murphy, K., and L. Kroeker 1988 Dimensions of Job Performance. NPRDC TN 88-39. San Diego, Calif.: Navy Personnel Research and Development Center.

Nugent, W. 1982 Ranking the Density and Criticality of Enlisted Navy Ratings. NPRDC TN 82-27. San Diego, Calif.: Navy Personnel Research and Development Center.

Pass, J. 1989 Task Selection for Performance Assessment (Chair). Symposium presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, New Orleans.

Pickering, E., and R. Beardon 1984 Job Performance Testing Research at the Navy Personnel Research and Development Center. NPRDC TR 84-36. San Diego, Calif.: Navy Personnel Research and Development Center.

Robertson, D. in press Source Data for Job Clustering with the Navy Enlisted Occupational Classification System. San Diego, Calif.: Navy Personnel Research and Development Center.

Schemmer, F., R. Bearden, and D. Gebhardt 1989 Development of job samples for the Navy electrician's mate rating. In J.P. Pass, chair, Task Selection for Performance Assessment. Symposium presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, New Orleans.

Schoenfeldt, L. 1988 Occupational Clustering: A Review and Synthesis. NPRDC TN 88-14. San Diego, Calif.: Navy Personnel Research and Development Center.

Van Hamel, S., R. Hinde, W. Tilton, H. Baker, and V. Berry in press Development of Hands-On Tests for the Navy Fire Controlman. San Diego, Calif.: Navy Personnel Research and Development Center.

Vineberg, R., and J. Joyner 1982 Prediction of Job Performance: Review of Military Studies. NPRDC TR 82-37. San Diego, Calif.: Navy Personnel Research and Development Center.

1985 Development of an Abstracted Knowledge Simulation of a Hands-On Test for Machinist's Mates. Contractor Report. Alexandria, Va.: Human Resources Research Organization.

Vineberg, R., and R. Zimmerman 1984 Selection of Job Tasks as Criteria for Performance Measurement. Contractor Report. Alexandria, Va.: Human Resources Research Organization.

Vineberg, R., J. Joyner, and R. Zimmerman 1985 Development of a Hands-On Job-Sample Test and Score-Training Materi als for Apprentices in the Machinist's Mate Rating. Contractor Report. Alexandria, Va.: Human Resources Research Organization.

Webb, N., and L. Kroeker 1987 A generalizability study of job performance measurements in the Navy . In G. Laabs, chair, Applications of Generalizability Theory to Military Per

Suggested Citation:"Appendix A: Service Bibliographies." National Research Council. 1991. Performance Assessment for the Workplace: Volume I. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1862.
×

formance Measurement. Symposium presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Washington, D.C.

Webb, N., and R. Shavelson 1987 Generalizability theory and job performance measurement. In H.G. Baker and G.J. Laabs, eds., Proceedings of the Department of Defense/Educational Testing Service Conference on Job Performance Measurement Technologies. Washington, D.C.: Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense (Force Management and Personnel).

Suggested Citation:"Appendix A: Service Bibliographies." National Research Council. 1991. Performance Assessment for the Workplace: Volume I. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1862.
×
Page 225
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A: Service Bibliographies." National Research Council. 1991. Performance Assessment for the Workplace: Volume I. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1862.
×
Page 226
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A: Service Bibliographies." National Research Council. 1991. Performance Assessment for the Workplace: Volume I. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1862.
×
Page 227
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A: Service Bibliographies." National Research Council. 1991. Performance Assessment for the Workplace: Volume I. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1862.
×
Page 228
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A: Service Bibliographies." National Research Council. 1991. Performance Assessment for the Workplace: Volume I. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1862.
×
Page 229
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A: Service Bibliographies." National Research Council. 1991. Performance Assessment for the Workplace: Volume I. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1862.
×
Page 230
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A: Service Bibliographies." National Research Council. 1991. Performance Assessment for the Workplace: Volume I. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1862.
×
Page 231
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A: Service Bibliographies." National Research Council. 1991. Performance Assessment for the Workplace: Volume I. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1862.
×
Page 232
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A: Service Bibliographies." National Research Council. 1991. Performance Assessment for the Workplace: Volume I. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1862.
×
Page 233
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A: Service Bibliographies." National Research Council. 1991. Performance Assessment for the Workplace: Volume I. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1862.
×
Page 234
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A: Service Bibliographies." National Research Council. 1991. Performance Assessment for the Workplace: Volume I. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1862.
×
Page 235
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A: Service Bibliographies." National Research Council. 1991. Performance Assessment for the Workplace: Volume I. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1862.
×
Page 236
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A: Service Bibliographies." National Research Council. 1991. Performance Assessment for the Workplace: Volume I. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1862.
×
Page 237
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A: Service Bibliographies." National Research Council. 1991. Performance Assessment for the Workplace: Volume I. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1862.
×
Page 238
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A: Service Bibliographies." National Research Council. 1991. Performance Assessment for the Workplace: Volume I. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1862.
×
Page 239
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A: Service Bibliographies." National Research Council. 1991. Performance Assessment for the Workplace: Volume I. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1862.
×
Page 240
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A: Service Bibliographies." National Research Council. 1991. Performance Assessment for the Workplace: Volume I. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1862.
×
Page 241
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A: Service Bibliographies." National Research Council. 1991. Performance Assessment for the Workplace: Volume I. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1862.
×
Page 242
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A: Service Bibliographies." National Research Council. 1991. Performance Assessment for the Workplace: Volume I. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1862.
×
Page 243
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A: Service Bibliographies." National Research Council. 1991. Performance Assessment for the Workplace: Volume I. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1862.
×
Page 244
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A: Service Bibliographies." National Research Council. 1991. Performance Assessment for the Workplace: Volume I. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1862.
×
Page 245
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A: Service Bibliographies." National Research Council. 1991. Performance Assessment for the Workplace: Volume I. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1862.
×
Page 246
Next: Appendix B: Biographical Sketches »
Performance Assessment for the Workplace: Volume I Get This Book
×
Buy Paperback | $75.00
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

Although ability testing has been an American preoccupation since the 1920s, comparatively little systematic attention has been paid to understanding and measuring the kinds of human performance that tests are commonly used to predict—such as success at school or work. Now, a sustained, large-scale effort has been made to develop measures that are very close to actual performance on the job. The four military services have carried out an ambitious study, called the Joint-Service Job Performance Measurement/Enlistment Standards (JPM) Project, that brings new sophistication to the measurement of performance in work settings.

Volume 1 analyzes the JPM experience in the context of human resource management policy in the military. Beginning with a historical overview of the criterion problem, it looks closely at substantive and methodological issues in criterion research suggested by the project: the development of performance measures; sampling, logistical, and standardization problems; evaluating the reliability and content representativeness of performance measures; and the relationship between predictor scores and performance measures—valuable information that can also be useful in the civilian workplace.

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!