VI. SCHEDULED REVIEW: DEFINITION AND EVALUATION QUESTIONS

Y

S

UN

N

CS MI

US MA

42.

Scheduled date for review or a procedure for arriving at such a date is provided

42.1. Quality of the scheduled review date or procedure for setting one

42.2. Lack of a scheduled review date or procedure for setting one

VII. MULTI-DISCIPLINARY PROCESS

Y

S

UN

N

CS

MI

DK

US

MA

43.

Participation of persons in appropriate clinical and methodologic disciplines

43.1. Quality of the multi-disciplinary approach

43.2. Lack of a multi-disciplinary process

Y

YQ

N

44.

Guideline document notes potential biases or conflicts of interest or indicates they were taken into account

Y

N

DK

45.

Balance of potential biases or conflicts of interest

Y

S

UN

N

CS

MI

 

US

MA

46.

Description of the methods used to solicit views of those not on the guidelines development

panel and to present those views to the panel

46.1. Quality of methods used

46.2. Lack of a description of methods used

SUMMARY JUDGMENT, OTHER COMMENTS, OR NEED FOR ADDITIONAL REVIEW:



The National Academies | 500 Fifth St. N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20001
Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use and Privacy Statement