. "B: A PROVISIONAL INSTRUMENT FOR ASSESSING CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINES." Guidelines for Clinical Practice: From Development to Use. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 1992.
The following HTML text is provided to enhance online
readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML.
Please use the page image
as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.
Guidelines for Clinical Practice: From Development to Use
VI. SCHEDULED REVIEW: DEFINITION AND EVALUATION QUESTIONS
Y
S
UN
N
CS MI
US MA
42.
Scheduled date for review or a procedure for arriving at such a date is provided
42.1. Quality of the scheduled review date or procedure for setting one
42.2. Lack of a scheduled review date or procedure for setting one
VII. MULTI-DISCIPLINARY PROCESS
Y
S
UN
N
CS
MI
DK
US
MA
43.
Participation of persons in appropriate clinical and methodologic disciplines
43.1. Quality of the multi-disciplinary approach
43.2. Lack of a multi-disciplinary process
Y
YQ
N
44.
Guideline document notes potential biases or conflicts of interest or indicates they were taken into account
Y
N
DK
45.
Balance of potential biases or conflicts of interest
Y
S
UN
N
CS
MI
US
MA
46.
Description of the methods used to solicit views of those not on the guidelines development
panel and to present those views to the panel
46.1. Quality of methods used
46.2. Lack of a description of methods used
SUMMARY JUDGMENT, OTHER COMMENTS, OR NEED FOR ADDITIONAL REVIEW:
