Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter.
Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.
Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.
OCR for page 60
5
Applications and Ethical Considerations
Attempts to use the technologies described in this report as
well as others for applied purposes raise a number of ethical issues.
Most prominent In the public media are concerns about another
technology, the use of lie detectors, which is also based on the as-
sessment of physiological processes. Questions mclude how accurate
these devices are and whether they should be used for making ad-
munistrative decisions. Although the technologies discussed in this
report have not received a comparable amount of public attention,
their use raises the same issues of accuracy and ethics. With regard
to accuracy, In this chapter we discuss the nature of the data, the
"language of the brain, and psychological meaning. With regard to
ethics, we discuss the issues of invasion of privacy and the dangers of
commercialization.
Of primary interest to the Army are potential applications of the
technologies for purposes of selection and traming. We know of no
attempts to date to use any of the techniques discussed in this report
for these purposes. Although it is true that considerable progress has
been made in laboratory and field research, there are still a number of
problems to be resolved, as discussed earlier. Moreover, the necessary
development and implementation work has not been done. Until the
problems are resolved and progress is made in development, it would
be premature to use these technologies for operational purposes.
Nevertheless, the fact that the technologies are in the public domain
and have been used in clinical contexts makes it tempting to consider
adopting them for use in other applied settings. And the temptation
60
OCR for page 60
APPLICATIONS AND ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS
61
increases as rapid advances in engineering place new, more advanced
tools in the marketplace, further facilitating their use as quick fixes
to difficult problems. We address these issues below.
TO C,IT~O 11" ~C!~1U+~= 11= art To ~ ~ ~
1~OU~JO `~Jl~U - l B~= ~~BA
Consider the issues raised by the data on such ERP components
as the P300. There are any number of applications for such a proce-
dure. However, if one is offered a box in which a pointer is driven to
the right or to the left by the magnitude of the P300, which varies, in
turn, as a function of some mental process, two classes of questions
arise.
First, there is the question of utility. Does the technique re-
aBy work? To date there has not been an ecologically valid test of
the P30~based procedures, with the exception of some of the more
clinical applications. We know the procedures work weD In complex
laboratory arrangements, yet there has never been support for thor-
ough experimentation in normative situations. This issue is, to a
large extent, open.
Second, there is the issue of privacy. What ~ the degree to which
monitoring impinges on individual rights? Does it go beyond cur-
rently accepted interpretation of the rules? There Is a popular notion
that it will be possible to achieve the technical feat of making audi-
ble by mechanical means those thoughts that constitute our internal
speech. The metaphor driving the worry is that of eavesdropping.
Eavesdropping on the mind is unlikely. It would only be possible
if the signals we can record externally carry within them the richness
and the variety available in mental life. One can fantasize, of course,
that new technologies will increase the range of the monitoring. In-
deed, given the trends in increased computing power and reduced
size and cost, super minicomputers implemented on biological prin-
ciples might have the power and the savvy to interpret the signals to
a depth that matches the profundity of the task. However, even in
that case psychophysiological eavesdropping would not be possible.
To some extent, the constraints that could not be eliminated
stem from the fact that there is too much noise to develop a useful
eavesdropping technique. There are far too many processes all work-
ing in parallel and furiously interacting with each other for there to
be a possibility that an external manifestation of any of these pro-
cesses will "talks to a computer in the same language it "talks to
its counterparts in the system.
OCR for page 60
62
BRAIN AND COGNITION: SOME NEW TECHNOLOGIES
The matter of the language of the brain is crucial here. The
implementation of thought processes is ultunately a matter of neu-
rons communicating with other neurons. Indeed, it is most likely a
matter of millions of neurons talking to millions of other neurons for
any thought to occur. These neurons converse with each other, of
course, by whatever language is used for such communication. There
is no consensus as to the nature of the language. It is clear that
neurons affect other neurons by secreting tiny doses of chemicals
(the neurotransm~tters). These secretions are the consequence of the
conduction of neuronal unpuises across synapses and the integrative
activities of the dendritic membranes.
Cognitive psychophysiologists benefit from the fact that, when
occurring in the mass and in a highly synchronous manner, these
interneuronal transactions manifest themselves on the scalp in the
form of large integrated fields of potentials recorded as the EEG. If
labeled radioactively, they may manifest themselves to an imaging
device. However, this activity, while valuable as an index for the time
course and level of neuronal action, Is unlikely to serve as a source of
information on the specific nature of the vast exchanges in the neu-
ron's own language that have given rise to these psychophysiological
signals.
MONITORING PARADIGMS AND CONSTRAINTS
One can assume that psychophysiological signals will be useful
only if what is being monitored is defined scientifically. We do not,
and will not, eavesdrop on the mind. Rather, we are observing the
consequences of neural action and, by judicious construction of the
situation, we may be able to pose questions that the psychophysiolog-
ical signals may answer. Describing psychophysiological monitoring
as a process of seeking answers to specific questions is very important
because it underlines the principal condition for the success of such
monitoring. The value of the answer will depend on the sagacity
with which the question has been put. In other words, the key to the
usefulness of these approaches is the ability to pose useful questions
rather than the procurement of yet another measuring instrument.
Proper application of psychophysiological monitoring requires
that one realize that what is being monitored is the activity of
bodily systems. These systems are driven for physiological reasons
by the demancls on the system. These bodily organs serve more than
OCR for page 60
APPLICATIONS AND ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS
63
one function and therefore their activity cannot be presumed to be
uniquely related to any psychological construct.
The signals we record make sense, therefore, only in terms of the
situation. There is no deception wave a wave that no matter when
and under what circumstances it has been recorded indicates that a
person has lied. There is not even a wave that indicates unequivocally
that any emotion has occurred. Rather, the change in the physical
signal indicates the activation of a certain processor or processors.
If, and only if, this Is uniquely interpretable within the context of
the recording is it possible to make psychological inferences from the
data.
Thus, the degree to which psychophysiological signals can have
psychological meaning depends on the degree to which the system
is set to be driven in a unique fashion by the psychological vari-
ables. For example, the workload assessment techniques employing
the P300 depend on the establishment of a very sensitive relationship
between the conditions of measurement and the subject's understand-
ing of the situational demands. In other words, active participation
of the subject is a condition for the success of psychophysiological
monitoring. It is unlikely that it would be possible to apply a probe
that wiD intrude on the subject without, at some leYel, the sum
ject's accepting the structuring of the situation that constitutes the
question addressed to the system.
The above remarks should not be construed as casting doubt
on the usefulness of psychophysiological monitoring. The increasing
depth to which these signals are understood and the increasing so-
phLstication of cognitive models when coupled with the spectacular
developments in miniaturization, sensor technology, and data analy-
sis open a very broad scope for such monitoring. However, this will
be accomplished only within the constraints of good methodology.
Furthermore, whatever monitoring can be done will be constrained
by the nature of the biological and psychological systems involved.
One must steer clear of extravagant claims and avoid the unnecessary
fears that these might invoke.
DANGERS OF COMME:RCIA[IZATION
It must be emphasized that the remarks made in the previous
section pertain to the scientifically valid use of the techniques. We
must also point out that the limits that science and nature impose
on feasibility do not always serve as constraints on the selling of
OCR for page 60
64
BRAIN AND COGNITION: SOME NEW TECHNOLOGIES
technological marvels. Reason and proper scientific analysis suggest
that eavesdropping on the mind is unlikely. Unfortunately, this
does not imply that someone with a gadget and a good marketing
technology cannot attempt to persuade the public, as individuals
and through their government, that some technical marvel has been
achieved.
From snake oil to water divining to more contemporary panaceas,
those who peddle worthless solutions to serious problems have often
been able to induce belief in the efficacy of some technique despite
the caveats of science.
CONCLUSION
This chapter has addressed the msue of the scientific feasibility
and validity of monitoring individuab by certain psychophysiological
techniques. The conclusions reached should contribute to a more
cautious approach taken by policy makers in government and indus-
try. There is of course no guarantee that these cautions will in fact be
heeded. Policy makers are often under pressure to adopt techniques
that address specific problems that are not easily resolved. They may
be tempted by the availability of a variety of easy-to-use techniques
that purport to deal with those problems. Under such circumstances,
it is conceivable that vast systems for monitoring individuab could
be implemented. The fact that they are without scientific value will
not reduce their potential social impact.