The MOOC would be sponsored and designed jointly, but the impact evaluation could be conducted by each individual profession. The results could then be compared to see whether the learning was as effective with one profession as with another.

Developing the MOOC across health professional associations would in itself add to the collaboration of health professionals. For this to succeed, said Aschenbrener, each institution would have to engage faculty from different professions, which would likely build even stronger collaborations. These collaborations could be used for discussion forums and other collaborative opportunities.

ASSESSMENT OF TEAMS AND COLLABORATIONS IN COMMUNITY-BASED ACTIVITIES AND OUTPATIENT TEAMS

Lemmietta McNeilly opened her presentation by acknowledging the large number of challenges there are to assessing teams and collaborations outside of the inpatient, hospital setting. The difficulty of knowing who to include in the assessment is one example. In outpatient settings, practitioners would almost certainly be included, but for education and training purposes, faculty and students would be part of the assessment, and under all circumstances, the community would be involved. Another challenge is how to actively engage the learner at the policy, institutional, and individual level in collaborative efforts—across the education-to-work continuum—that maintains the community as the focal point. Patricia Hinton Walker then addressed the microlevel opportunities (see Table 5-2) within this area of assessment, and offered suggestions for making the best use of those opportunities.

The overall goal of McNeilly and Walker’s suggested approach to overcoming challenges to assessing community-based IPE (see Box 5-4) is to transform curricula and remove barriers so learners can pursue their passions. In doing, students and faculty facilitate change and provide leadership to address such issues as social justice, civic responsibility, and social accountability in communities. The definition of community could be local or global, but the essence of the curricula would remain the same: to provide opportunities and tools for developing leadership skills and agents for change. To create the envisioned change agents, said Walker, the experience would have to go beyond the brief clinical visits that often make up the experiences of health professional students and provide longitudinal, experiential learning opportunities. However, for this to be successful, systems that embrace continued input and participation of learners would need to be designed, said Walker. Letting students help shape the curriculum may be one way to actively engage them. Another way to engage students is to provide credit for service learning projects. These projects could involve



The National Academies | 500 Fifth St. N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20001
Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use and Privacy Statement