References

Agarwal, R., and A. Ohyama. (2013). Industry or academia, basic or applied? Career choices and earnings trajectories of scientists. Management Science, 59(4):950-970.

Agarwal, R., W. Ding, and A. Ohyama. (no date). Gender Difference in Job Mobility and Earnings of U.S. Scientists and Engineers. University of Maryland working paper.

Blume-Kohout, M. (2012). Effects of Changes in Federal Funding on Academic R&D in the Biomedical Sciences. Presentation at the SciSIP PI Conference, Washington, DC, September 20-21.

Bozeman, B. and D. Sarewitz. (2005). Public value failures and science policy. Science and Public Policy, 32(2):119-136.

Bozeman, B., and D. Sarewitz. (2011). Public value mapping and science policy evaluation. Minerva, 49(1):1-23.

Bradshaw, G. (2012). Science, the Little Bang, and Edison. Presentation at the SciSIP PI Conference, Washington, DC, September 20-21.

Branstetter, L., C. Chatterjee, and M. Higgins. (2013a). Regulation and Welfare: Evidence from Paragraph-IV Generic Entry in the Pharmaceutical Industry. Working paper, Scheller College of Business, Georgia Institute of Technology (NBER Working Paper: 17188).

Branstetter, L., C. Chatterjee, and M. Higgins. (2013b). Starving (or Fattening) the Golden Goose: Generic Entry and Incentives for Early-Stage Pharmaceutical Innovation. Georgia Institution of Technology working paper.

Brown, C., J. Lane, and T. Sturgeon. (2013). Workers’ views of the impact of trade on jobs. Industrial Relations, 52(1):1-21, January.

Brown, C., T. Sturgeon, and C. Cole. (2013). The 2010 National Organizations Survey: Examining the relationships between job quality and the domestic and international sourcing of business functions by United States organizations. IRLE Working Paper, UC Berkeley, Berkeley, CA. Available at: http://www.irle.berkeley.edu/workingpapers/ [November 2013].

Brunt, L., J. Lerner, and T. Nicholas. (2012). Inducement prizes and innovation. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 60(4):657-696.

Bus, J., and M-H. Nguyen. (2013). Personal data management: A structured discussion. In Digital Enlightenment Yearbook 2013: The Value of Personal Data. Amsterdam: IOS Press.

Chan, J., K. Fu, C. Schunn, J. Cagan, K. Wood, and K. Kotovsky. (2011). On the benefits and pitfalls of analogies for innovative design: Ideation performance based on analogical distance, commonness, and modality of examples. Journal of Mechanical Design, 133:081004-1-11.

Chan, J., S. Paletz, and C. Schunn. (2012). Analogy as a strategy for supporting complex problem solving under uncertainty. Memory & Cognition, 40:1352-1365.



The National Academies | 500 Fifth St. N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20001
Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use and Privacy Statement



Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 81
References Agarwal, R., and A. Ohyama. (2013). Industry or academia, basic or applied? Career choices and earnings trajectories of scientists. Management Science, 59(4):950- 970. Agarwal, R., W. Ding, and A. Ohyama. (no date). Gender Difference in Job Mobility and Earnings of U.S. Scientists and Engineers. University of Maryland working paper. Blume-Kohout, M. (2012). Effects of Changes in Federal Funding on Academic R&D in the Biomedical Sciences. Presentation at the SciSIP PI Conference, Washington, DC, September 20-21. Bozeman, B. and D. Sarewitz. (2005). Public value failures and science policy. Science and Public Policy, 32(2):119-136. Bozeman, B., and D. Sarewitz. (2011). Public value mapping and science policy evaluation. Minerva, 49(1):1-23. Bradshaw, G. (2012). Science, the Little Bang, and Edison. Presentation at the SciSIP PI Conference, Washington, DC, September 20-21. Branstetter, L., C. Chatterjee, and M. Higgins. (2013a). Regulation and Welfare: Evidence from Paragraph-IV Generic Entry in the Pharmaceutical Industry. Working paper, Scheller College of Business, Georgia Institute of Technology (NBER Working Paper: 17188). Branstetter, L., C. Chatterjee, and M. Higgins. (2013b). Starving (or Fattening) the Golden Goose: Generic Entry and Incentives for Early-Stage Pharmaceutical Innovation. Georgia Institution of Technology working paper. Brown, C., J. Lane, and T. Sturgeon. (2013). Workers’ views of the impact of trade on jobs. Industrial Relations, 52(1):1-21, January. Brown, C., T. Sturgeon, and C. Cole. (2013). The 2010 National Organizations Survey: Examining the relationships between job quality and the domestic and international sourcing of business functions by United States organizations. IRLE Working Paper, UC Berkeley, Berkeley, CA. Available at: http://www.irle.berkeley.edu/workingpapers/ [November 2013]. Brunt, L., J. Lerner, and T. Nicholas. (2012). Inducement prizes and innovation. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 60(4):657-696. Bus, J., and M-H. Nguyen. (2013). Personal data management: A structured discussion. In Digital Enlightenment Yearbook 2013: The Value of Personal Data. Amsterdam: IOS Press. Chan, J., K. Fu, C. Schunn, J. Cagan, K. Wood, and K. Kotovsky. (2011). On the benefits and pitfalls of analogies for innovative design: Ideation performance based on analogical distance, commonness, and modality of examples. Journal of Mechanical Design, 133:081004-1-11. Chan, J., S. Paletz, and C. Schunn. (2012). Analogy as a strategy for supporting complex problem solving under uncertainty. Memory & Cognition, 40:1352-1365. 81

OCR for page 81
82 REFERENCES Christensen, B., and C. Schunn. (2007). The relationship of analogical distance to analogical function and preinventive structure: The case of engineering design. Memory & Cognition, 35:29-38. Christopher, S., J. McCormick, and J. Owen-Smith. (2010). Federal policy and the use of pluripotent stem cells. Nature Methods, 11:866-867. Cook, L., and M. Ivanya. (2012). Bad International Relations but Better Science? Evidence from Soviet Inventors and the Boycott of the 1980 Moscow Olympics. Michigan State University working paper. Cozzens, S., P. Regan, and B. Rubin. (2007). Final Report: NSF Workshop on Social Organization of Science and Science Policy. Available at: http://www.nsf.gov/sbe/scisip/ses_sosp_wksp_rpt.pdf [December 2013]. Dou, W., R. Chang, X. Wang, and W. Ribarsky. (2011). ParallelTopics: A probabilistic approach to exploring document collections. Proceedings of IEEE VAST:231-240. Dou, W., X. Wang, D. Skau, and W. Ribarsky. (2012). LeadLine: Interactive visual analysis of text data through event identification and exploration. Proceedings of IEEE VAST:93-102. Drivas, K., Z. Lei, and B. Wright. (2013a). Academic Patent Licenses: Roadblocks or Signposts for Unlicensed Innovators? Working paper. Drivas, K., Z. Lei, and B. Wright. (2013b). Information Disclosure or Patent Grant: Which Matters More for Technology Licensing? Working paper. Feldman, M., and A. Graddy-Reed. (2013). Accelerating commercialization: A new model of strategic foundation funding. Journal of Technology Transfer. DOI 10.1007/s10961-013-9311- Feldman, M., and A. Graddy-Reed. (forthcoming). Local champions. In Handbook of Research on Entrepreneurs’ Transition to Philanthropy, D. Renz, R. Strom, and M. Taylor (eds.). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing. Finn, M.G. (2012). Stay Rates of Foreign Doctorate Recipients from U.S. Universities, 2009. Science Education Programs, Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education. Working paper. Fisher, E., and D. Schuurbiers. (2013). Midstream Modulation. In Opening Up the Laboratory: Approaches for Early Engagement with New Technology, I. van de Poel, M. E. Gorman, N. Doorn, and D. Schuurbiers (eds.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley- Blackwell. Flipse, S., M. van der Sanden, and P. Osseweijer. (2012). Midstream modulation in biotechnology industry: Redefining what is ‘Part of the Job’ of researchers in industry. Science and Engineering Ethics, 19(3):1-24. Freeman, R. (2006). Investing in the Best and Brightest: Increased Fellowship Support for American Scientists and Engineers. The Hamilton Project, Brookings Institution. Available at: http://www.hamiltonproject.org/files/downloads_and_links/Investing_in_the_Best _and_Brightest- _Increased_Fellowship_Support_for_American_Scientists_and_Engineers.pdf [January 2014]. Freeman, R. (2012). Collaborating with People Like me. Presentation at the SciSIP PI Conference, Washington, DC, September 20-21.

OCR for page 81
SCIENCE OF SCIENCE AND INNOVATION POLICY 83 Fu, K., J. Chan, C. Schunn, and J. Cagan. (2013). Expert representation of design repository space: A comparison to and validation of algorithmic output. Design Studies, 34(6):729-762. Fu, K., J. Chan, J. Cagan, K. Kotovsky, C. Schunn, and K. Wood. (2013). The meaning of “near” and “far”: The impact of structuring design databases and the effect of distance of analogy on design output. Journal of Mechanical Design, 135(2):021007. Fuchs, E. (2013). On the Relationship between Manufacturing and Innovation: Why not all Technologies are Created Equal. Carnegie Mellon Working Paper. Fuchs, E., and R. Kirchain. (2010). Design for location? The impact of manufacturing off-shore on technology competitiveness in the optoelectronics industry. Management Science, 56(12):2323-2349. Fuchs, E., F. Field, R. Roth, and R. Kirchain. (2011). Plastic cars in China? The significance of production location over markets for technology competitiveness. International Journal of Production Economics, 132:79-92. Gertner, J. (2012). The Idea Factory: Bell Labs and the Great Age of American Innovation. New York: Penguin Press. Gibbons, M., C. Limoges, H. Nowotny, S. Schwartzman, P. Scott, and M. Trow. (1994). The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Griffiths, T. L., C. Kemp, and J. B. Tenenbaum. (2008). Bayesian models of cognition. In Ron Sun (ed.), The Cambridge handbook of computational psychology, 59-100. Cambridge University Press. Haeussler, C., L. Jiang, J. Thursby, and M. Thursby. (2013). Specific and general information sharing among competing academic researchers. Research Policy, 43(3):465-475. Heinze, T., P. Shapira, J. Senker, and S. Kuhlmann. (2007). Identifying creative research accomplishments: Methodology and results for nanotechnology and human genetics. Scientometrics, 70(1):125-152. Husbands Fealing, K., J.I. Lane, J. Marburger, III, and S. Shipp (eds.). (2011). The Science of Science Policy: A Handbook. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. Kleinman, D.L., N.W. Feinstein, and G. Downey. (2012). Beyond commercialization: Science, higher education and the culture of neoliberalism. Science & Education, 4:1-17. Kremer, M. (2001). Creating new markets for vaccine, Part I: Rationale. In Innovation Policy and the Economy, Vol. 1, pp. 35-72, A.B. Jaffe, J. Lerner, and S. Stern, eds. National Bureau of Economic Research. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Lakhani, K.R., and L.B. Jeppesen. (2007). Getting unusual suspects to solve R&D puzzles. Harvard Business Review, 85(5):30-32. Landauer, T.K., P.W. Foltz, and D. Laham. (1998). An introduction to latent semantic analysis, Discourse Processes, 25:2-3, 259-284. Lane, J. (2010). Let’s make science metrics more scientific. Nature, 464(7288):488-489. Lane, J. (2012). Big Data, Science Metrics, and the Role of Science Policy. Presentation at the SciSIP PI Conference, Washington, DC, September 20-21. Leahey, E. (2012). Shaping Scientific Work: The Organization of Knowledge Communities. Commissioned paper written for the Steering Committee on the

OCR for page 81
84 REFERENCES Science of Science and Innovation Policy Principal Investigators’ Conference. Committee on National Statistics, National Research Council. Marburger, J., III. (2005). Speech at the American Association for the Advancement of Science Forum. Available at: http://scienceofsciencepolicy.net/reference/marburger-speech-aaas-forum- science-and-technology-policy. Maskus, K., A. Mobarak, and E. Stuen. (2013). Doctoral students and U.S. immigration policy. Science, 324:562-563. McCormick, J., J. Owen-Smith, and C. Scott. (2009). Distribution of human embryonic stem cell lines: Who, when, and where. Cell Stem Cell, 4:107–110. Mell, P., and T. Grance. (2011). The NIST Definition of Cloud Computing. NIST Special Publication 800-145. Available at: http://csrc.nist.gov/publications/nistpubs/800- 145/SP800-145.pdf [December 2013]. Moser, P. (2004). Determinants of innovation evidence from 19th century World Fairs. The Journal of Economic History, 64(2):548-552. Moser, P. (2005). How do patent laws influence innovation? Evidence from nineteenth- century World’s Fairs. American Economic Review, 94:1214-1236. Moser, P., and P.W. Rhode. (2011). Did Plant Patents Create the American Rose? (No. w16983). National Bureau of Economic Research. National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. (2007). Rising Above the Gathering Storm: Energizing and Employing America for a Brighter Future. Committee on Prospering in the Global Economy of the 21st Century: An Agenda for American Science and Technology. Committee on Science, Engineering, and Public Policy. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. National Bureau of Economic Research. (1962). The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Available at: http://papers.nber.org/books/univ62-1 [November 2013]. National Research Council. (2005). Measuring Research and Development Expenditures in the U.S. Economy. L.D. Brown, T.J. Plewes, and M.A. Gerstein, editors, Panel on Research and Development Statistics at the National Science Foundation, Committee on National Statistics. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. National Research Council. (2012a). Research Universities and the Future of America: Ten Breakthrough Actions Vital to our Nation’s Security and Prosperity. Committee on Research Universities, Board on Higher Education and Workforce, Policy and Global Affairs Division. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. National Research Council. (2012b). Rising to the Challenge: U.S. Innovation Policy for the Global Economy. C.W. Wessner and A.W. Wolff, editors, Committee on Comparative National Innovation Policies: Best Practice for the 21st Century, Board on Science, Technology, and Economic Policy, Policy and Global Affairs Division. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. National Science and Technology Council. (2010). The Science of Science Policy: A Federal Research Roadmap. Available at:

OCR for page 81
SCIENCE OF SCIENCE AND INNOVATION POLICY 85 http://www.scienceofsciencepolicy.net/sites/all/themes/sosp_theme3/userfiles/SoS P_Roadmap.pdf [January 2014]. National Science Foundation, Division of Science Resource Statistics. (2006). Advancing Measures of Innovation: Knowledge Flows, Business Metrics, and Management Strategies. Available at: http://www.nsf.gov/sbe/scisip/srs_innov_metrics_wkshp.pdf [December 2013]. Nguyen, M-H. (2013). Contextual privacy. Presented at the Federal Trade Commission Workshop, Internet of Things: Privacy and Security in a Connected World, November 19, 2013. Available at: http://www.ftc.gov/news-events/events- calendar/2013/11/internet-things-privacy-and-security-connected-world [January 2014]. Oh, S., Z. Lei, W-C. Lee, and J. Yen (2014). Patent evaluation based on technological trajectory revealed in relevant prior patents. Presented at the 18th Pacific-Asia Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (PAKDD 2014), Tainan, Taiwan, May 13-16. Oh, S., Z. Lei, W-C. Lee, P. Mitra, and J. Yen. (2013). CV-PCR: A context-guided value- driven framework for patent citation recommendation. Presented at the ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM 2013), San Francisco, CA, October. Owen-Smith, J., and J. McCormick. (2006). An international gap in human embryonic stem cell research. Nature Biotechnology, 24(4):391-392. Owen-Smith, J., C. Scott, and J. McCormick. (2012). Expand and regularize funding for human embryonic stem cell research. Journal of Policy Analysis & Management, 31(1):714-729. Paletz, S., and C. Schunn. (2010). A social-cognitive framework of multidisciplinary team innovation. Topics in Cognitive Science, 2:73-95. Paletz, S., C. Schunn, and K. Kim. (2013). The interplay of conflict and analogy in multidisciplinary teams. Cognition, 126:1-19. Pienta, A., G. Alter, and J. Lyle. (2011). The enduring value of social science research: The use and reuse of primary research data. iPRES2011 Proceedings. Porter, A., and Rafols, I. (2012). Interdisciplinarity: Its Bibliometric Evaluation and Its Influence in Research Outputs. Presentation at the SciSIP PI Conference, Washington, DC, September 20-21. Ribarsky, W. (2012). Analyzing the Impact of Science Funding Programs on the Evolution of Research Fields. Presentation at the SciSIP PI Conference, Washington, DC, September 20-21. Rodríguez, H., E. Fisher, and D. Schuurbiers. (2013). Integrating science and society in European Framework Programmes: Trends in project-level solicitations. Research Policy,42:1126-1137. Sarewitz, D. (2007). Does science policy matter? Issues in Science and Technology, Summer:31-38. Sarewitz, D. (2012). Extracting and Assessing the Public Values of Science and Innovation Policies: Or, Moving from Outputs to Outcomes in SIP Assessment. Presentation at the SciSIP PI Conference, Washington, DC, September 20-21. Schunn, C.D., P.B. Paulus, J. Cagan, and K. Wood. (2006). Final Report from the NSF Innovation and Discovery Workshop: The Scientific Basis of Individual and Team

OCR for page 81
86 REFERENCES Innovation and Discovery. Available at: http://www.nsf.gov/sbe/scisip/bcs_sosp_wkshp_rpt.pdf [November 2013]. Scott, C., J. McCormick, and J. Owen-Smith. (2009). And then there were two: Use of hESC lines. Nature Biotechnology, 27(8):696-697. Scott, C., J. McCormick, M. DeRouen, and J. Owen-Smith. (2011). Democracy derived: New trajectories in pluripotent stem cell research. Cell, 145(6):820-826. Shneiderman, B., C. Dunne, P. Sharma, and P. Wang. (2012). Innovation trajectories for information visualizations: Comparing treemaps, cone trees, and hyperbolic trees. Information Visualization, 11(2):87-105. Simonton, D. (2012). Assessing Scientific Creativity: Conceptual Analyses of Assessment Complexities. Commissioned paper written for the Steering Committee on the Science of Science and Innovation Policy Principal Investigators’ Conference. Committee on National Statistics, National Research Council. Stokes, D.E. (1997). Pasteur’s Quadrant: Basic Science and Technological Innovation. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press. Stuen, E. (2013). Aggregate evidence of localized academic knowledge transfer in the U.S. Economics Bulletin, 33:1468-1478. Stuen, E., A. Mobarak, and K. Maskus. (2012). Skilled immigration and innovation: Evidence from enrolment fluctuations in US doctoral programmes. The Economic Journal, 122:1143-1176. Sturgeon, T., P. Nielsen, G. Linden, G. Gereffi, and C. Brown. (2011). Direct measurement of global value chains: collecting product- and firm-level statistics on value added and business function outsourcing and offshoring. Chapter 9 in the World Bank volume The Fragmentation of Global Production and Trade in Value-Added - Developing New Measures of Cross Border Trade, based on a Trade Workshop held at World Bank Headquarters, June 9-10, 2011. Sun, J., and P. Wang. (2012). Community ecology for innovation concept: The case of cloud computing. In Proceedings of the 33rd International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS), Orlando, FL. Taylor, M.Z., and S. Wilson. (2012). Does culture still matter? The effects of individualism on national innovation rates. Journal of Business Venturing, 27:234-247. Teich, A.H. (2012). Making Policy Research Relevant to Policy. Commissioned paper written for the Steering Committee on the Science of Science and Innovation Policy Principal Investigators’ Conference. Committee on National Statistics, National Research Council. Teich, A.H., and I.Q. Feller. (2009). Toward a Community of Practice: Report on the AAAS-NSF SciSIP Grantees Workshop, March 24-25, 2009. American Association for the Advancement of Science report. Available at: http://www.aaas.org/spp/scisip/scisip_report.pdf [November 2013]. Teich, A.H., and I.Q. Feller. (2011). Building a Community of Practice II: Report on the Second AAAS-NSF SciSIP Workshop, October 19, 2010. American Association for the Advancement of Science report. Available at: http://www.aaas.org/spp/scisip/scisip_report2010.pdf [November 2013]. Yang, C., R. Nugent, and E. Fuchs. (2013). Gains from Other’s Losses: Technology Trajectories and the Global Division of Firms. Carnegie Mellon Working Paper.

OCR for page 81
SCIENCE OF SCIENCE AND INNOVATION POLICY 87 Young, N., J. Ioannidis, and O. Al-Ubaydli. (2008). Why current publication practices may distort science. PLoS Medicine, 5(10):e201. Youtie, J. (2012). Highly Creative Researchers’ Careers in Context. Presentation at the SciSIP PI Conference, Washington, DC, September 20-21. Youtie, J., P. Shapira, and J. Rogers. (2009). Blind matching versus matchmaking: Comparison group selection for creative researchers. In IEEE Conference Proceedings, Science and Innovation Policy, 2009 Atlanta Conference (downloaded on 09.09.11). Available at: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/freeabs all.jsp?arnumber=5367848. Youtie, J., J. Rogers, T. Heinze, P. Shapira, and L. Tang. (2013). Career-based influences on scientific recognition in the United States and Europe: Longitudinal evidence from curriculum vitae data. Research Policy, 42:1341-1355.

OCR for page 81