ACT. (2006). Reading between the Lines: What the ACT Reveals About College Readiness in Reading. Iowa City, IA: Author
Anderson, J.R. (1987). Skill acquisition: Compilation of weak-method problem solutions. Psychological Review, 94, 192-210.
August, D., and Shanahan, T. (2006). Developing Literacy in Second-Language Learners: Report of the National Literacy Panel on Language-Minority Children and Youth. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Berk, L., and Windschitl, M. (2013). Building a Repertoire of Literacy Support and Practices. Presentation at the Exploring the Overlap between “Literacy in Science” and the Practice of Obtaining, Evaluating, and Communicating Information: A Workshop, December 9-10, National Research Council, Washington, DC. Available: http://sites.nationalacademies.org/DBASSE/BOSE/DBASSE_086848 [July 2014].
Bloom, B.S. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Handbook I: The Cognitive Domain. New York: David McKay.
Brown, J.S. (1989). Towards a new epistemology for learning. In C. Frasson and J. Gauthiar (Eds.), Intelligent Tutoring Systems at the Crossroads of Artificial Intelligence and Education. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Cazden, C., and Mehan, H. (1989). Principles from sociology and anthropology: Context, code, classroom, and culture. In M. Reynolds (Ed.), Knowledge Base for the Beginning Teacher. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Cheuk, T. (2013). Relationships and Convergences among The Mathematics, Science, and ELA Practices. Refined Version of Diagram Created by the Understanding Language Initiative for ELP Standards. Stanford, CA: Stanford University.
Council of Chief State School Officers. (2012). Framework for English Language Proficiency Development Standards Corresponding to the Common Core State Standards and the Next Generation Science Standards. Washington, DC: Author.
Davis, E.A., and Bricker, L.A. (2013). Science and Literacy in Teacher Education: What Do Preservice Teachers Need to Know and Be Able to Do? Paper prepared for the Exploring the Overlap between “Literacy in Science” and the Practice of Obtaining, Evaluating, and Communicating Information: A Workshop, December 9-10, National Research Council, Washington, DC. Available: http://sites.nationalacademies.org/DBASSE/BOSE/DBASSE_086022 [July 2014].
Frayer, D., Frederick, W.C., and Klausmeier, H.J. (1969). A Schema for Testing the Level of Cognitive Mastery. Madison: Wisconsin Center for Education Research.
Garcia, E., and Cuellar, D. (2006). Who are these linguistically and culturally diverse students? Teachers College Record, 108, 2220-2246.
Goldman, S.R., and Rakestraw, J.A. (2000). Structural aspects of constructing meaning from text. In M.L. Kamil, P.B. Mosenthal, P.D. Pearson, and R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of Reading Research (Vol. II, pp. 311-335). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Graesser, A.C., McNamara, D.S., and Louwerse, M.M. (2003). What do readers need to learn in order to process coherence relations in narrative and expository text. In A.P. Sweet and C.E. Snow (Eds.), Rethinking Reading Comprehension (pp. 82-98). New York: Guilford.
Greenleaf, C., Brown, W., Goldman, S., and Ko, M-L. (2013). Designing at the Crossroads of NGSS and CCSS: Text-Based Investigations for Evidence-Based Argumentation in Science. Presentation at the Exploring the Overlap between “Literacy in Science” and the Practice of Obtaining, Evaluating, and Communicating Information: A Workshop, December 9-10, National Research Council, Washington, DC. Available: http://sites.nationalacademies.org/DBASSE/BOSE/DBASSE_086307 [July 2014].
Halliday, M.A.K. (1994). An Introduction to Functional Grammar (2nd ed.). London: E. Arnold.
Krajcik, J.S., Reiser, B.J., Sutherland, L.M. and Fortus, D. (2011). IQWST: Investigating and Questioning our World through Science and Technology. Middle School Science Curriculum Materials. Greenwich, CT: Sangari Active Science.
Lee, O., and Llosa, L. (2011-2015). Promoting Science among English Language Learners (P-SELL) Scale-up. Washington, DC: National Science Foundation, Discovery Research K-12.
Mehan, H. (1979). Learning Lessons: Social Organization in the Classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Miller, D., and Purohit, K. (2013). Reframing Science Literacy through Community Engagement. Presentation at the Exploring the Overlap between “Literacy in Science” and the Practice of Obtaining, Evaluating, and Communicating Information: A Workshop, December 9-10, National Research Council, Washington, DC. Available: http://sites.nationalacademies.org/DBASSE/BOSE/DBASSE_086310 [July 2014].
Moulding, B. (2013). Partnership for Effective Science Teaching and Learning: Gathering, Reasoning, and Communicating. Presentation at the Exploring the Overlap between “Literacy in Science” and the Practice of Obtaining, Evaluating, and Communicating Information: A Workshop, December 9-10, National Research Council, Washington, DC. Available: http://sites.nationalacademies.org/DBASSE/BOSE/DBASSE_086311 [July 2014].
National Governors Association and Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010a). Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts & Literacy in History/Social Studies, Science, and Technical Subjects. Available: http://www.corestandards.org/wp-content/uploads/ELA_Standards.pdf [March 2014].
National Governors Association and Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010b). Common Core State Standards for Mathematics. Available http://www.corestandards.org/wp-content/uploads/Math_Standards.pdf [March 2014].
National Research Council. (1996). National Science Education Standards. National Committee on Science Education Standards and Assessment. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
National Research Council. (1999). How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School. Committee on Developments in the Science of Learning. J.D. Bransford, A.L. Brown, and R.R. Cocking (Eds.). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
National Research Council. (2008). Ready, Set, SCIENCE! Putting Research to Work in K-8 Science Classrooms. S. Michaels, A.W. Shouse, and H.A. Schweingruber, Editors. Board on Science Education, Center for Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
National Research Council. (2012). A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas. Committee on a Conceptual Framework for New K-12 Science Education Standards. Board on Science Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next Generation Science Standards: For States, By States. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
Osborne, J. (2013). What Do Science Teachers Need to Know about Language in Science? Presentation at the Exploring the Overlap between “Literacy in Science” and the Practice of Obtaining, Evaluating, and Communicating Information: A Workshop, December 9-10, National Research Council, Washington, DC. Available: http://sites.nationalacademies.org/DBASSE/BOSE/DBASSE_086301 [July 2014].
Palincsar, A. (2013). The Next Generation Science Standards and the Common Core State Standards: Proposing a happy marriage. Science and Children, 51(1), 10-15.
Palincsar, A.S., Symons, C., and Schleppegrell, M. (2013). Teaching Functional Grammar Analysis as a Means to Support English Language Learners: Interactions with Informational Text. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.
Pauk, W., and Owens, R.J.Q. (2008). How to Study in College (9th ed.). Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
Pimentel, S. (2013). Next Generation Science Standards and the Common Core. Presentation at the Exploring the Overlap between “Literacy in Science” and the Practice of Obtaining, Evaluating, and Communicating Information: A Workshop, December 9-10, National Research Council, Washington, DC. Available: http://sites.nationalacademies.org/DBASSE/BOSE/DBASSE_086850 [July 2014].
Putnam, R.T., and Borko, H. (2000). What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning? Educational Researcher, 29(1), 4-15.
Romance, N.R., and Vitale, M.R. (2011). Interdisciplinary Perspectives for Linking Science and Literacy: Implications from Multi-Year Studies Across Grades K-5. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
Sadler, P.M., Sonnert, G., Coyle, H.P., Cook-Smith, N., and Miller, J.L. (2013). The influence of teachers’ knowledge on student learning in middle school physical science classrooms. American Educational Research Journal, 50(5), 1020-1049.
Schleppegrell, M.J. (2001). Linguistic features of the language of schooling. Linguistics and Education, 12(4), 431-459.
Schleppegrell, M.J. (2004). The Language of Schooling: A Functional Linguistics Perspective. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Schleppegrell, M.J., and Palincsar, A.S. (2013). What Do Teachers Need to Know about the Language of Science Text? Presentation at the Exploring the Overlap between “Literacy in Science” and the Practice of Obtaining, Evaluating, and Communicating Information: A Workshop, December 9-10, National Research Council, Washington, DC. Available: http://sites.nationalacademies.org/DBASSE/BOSE/DBASSE_086553 [July 2014].
Stage, E.K., Asturias, H., Cheuk, T., Daro, P. A., and Hampton. S.B. (2013). Opportunities and challenges in next generation standards. Science, 340(6130), 276-277.
Smith, F. (1978). Reading. New York: Teachers College Press.
Sweet, A.P., and Snow, C.E. (Eds.) (2003). Rethinking Reading Comprehension. Solving Problems in the Teaching of Literacy. New York: Guilford Press.
Vitale, M.R., and Romance, N.R. (2013). Science IDEAS: Integrated Reading/Language Arts within Science Instruction Across Grades K-5. Presentation at the Exploring the Overlap between “Literacy in Science” and the Practice of Obtaining, Evaluating, and Communicating Information: A Workshop, December 9-10, National Research Council, Washington, DC. Available: http://sites.nationalacademies.org/DBASSE/BOSE/DBASSE_086554 [July 2014].
Vygotsky, L. (1986) Thought and language: Revised edition. Journal of Mind and Behavior, 8, 175-177.
Walqui, A., Warren, T., and Ruiz, J. (2013). The Development of Scientific Literacies with English Language Learners: The INA-QTEL Collaboration. Presentation at the Exploring the Overlap between “Literacy in Science” and the Practice of Obtaining, Evaluating, and Communicating Information: A Workshop, December 9-10, National Research Council, Washington, DC. Available: http://sites.nationalacademies.org/DBASSE/BOSE/DBASSE_087376 [July 2014].
Webb, N. (2002). Depth-of-Knowledge Levels of Four Content Areas. Unpublished paper. Available: http://facstaff.wcer.wisc.edu/normw/All%20content%20areas%20%20DOK%20levels%2032802.pdf [June 2014].
This page intentionally left blank.
