National Academies Press: OpenBook
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2014. Rethinking the Components, Coordination, and Management of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Laboratories. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18950.
×

RETHINKING THE COMPONENTS,
COORDINATION, AND MANAGEMENT OF THE
U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency Laboratories

Committee on Strengthening the
US Environmental Protection Agency Laboratory Enterprise:
Phase 1—Priority Needs, Guiding Principles, and Overall Goals

Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology

Division on Earth and Life Studies

NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL
                          OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES

THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS

Washington, D.C.

www.nap.edu

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2014. Rethinking the Components, Coordination, and Management of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Laboratories. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18950.
×

THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS    500 Fifth Street, NW    Washington, DC 20001

NOTICE: The project that is the subject of this report was approved by the Governing Board of the National Research Council, whose members are drawn from the councils of the National Academy of Sciences, the National Academy of Engineering, and the Institute of Medicine. The members of the committee responsible for the report were chosen for their special competences and with regard for appropriate balance.

This project was supported by Contract EP-C-09-003 between the National Academy of Sciences and the US Environmental Protection Agency. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the view of the organizations or agencies that provided support for this project.

International Standard Book Number-13: 978-0-309-31237-0
International Standard Book Number-10: 0-309-31237-X

Additional copies of this report are available for sale from the National Academies Press, 500 Fifth Street, NW, Keck 360, Washington, DC 20001; (800) 624-6242 or (202) 334-3313; Internet, http://www.nap.edu/.

Copyright 2014 by the National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.

Printed in the United States of America.

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2014. Rethinking the Components, Coordination, and Management of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Laboratories. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18950.
×

THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES

Advisers to the Nation on Science, Engineering, and Medicine

The National Academy of Sciences is a private, nonprofit, self-perpetuating society of distinguished scholars engaged in scientific and engineering research, dedicated to the furtherance of science and technology and to their use for the general welfare. Upon the authority of the charter granted to it by the Congress in 1863, the Academy has a mandate that requires it to advise the federal government on scientific and technical matters. Dr. Ralph J. Cicerone is president of the National Academy of Sciences.

The National Academy of Engineering was establised in 1964, under the charter of the National Academy of Sciences, as a parallel organization of outstanding engineers. It is autonomous in its administration and in the selection of its members, sharing with the National Academy of Sciences the responsibility for advising the federal government. The National Academy of Engineering also sponsors engineering programs aimed at meeting national needs, encourages education and research, and recognizes the superior achievements of engineers. Dr. C. D. Mote, Jr., is president of the National Academy of Engineering.

The Institute of Medicine was established in 1970 by the National Academy of Sciences to secure the services of eminent members of appropriate professions in the examination of policy matters pertaining to the health of the public. The Institute acts under the responsibility given to the National Academy of Sciences by its congressional charter to be an adviser to the federal government and, upon its own initiative, to identify issues of medical care, research, and education. Dr. Victor J. Dzau is president of the Institute of Medicine.

The National Research Council was organized by the National Academy of Sciences in 1916 to associate the broad community of science and technology with the Academy’s purposes of furthering knowledge and advising the federal government. Functioning in accordance with general policies determined by the Academy, the Council has become the principal operating agency of both the National Academy of Sciences and the National Academy of Engineering in providing services to the government, the public, and the scientific and engineering communities. The Council is administered jointly by both Academies and the Institute of Medicine. Dr. Ralph J. Cicerone and Dr. C. D. Mote, Jr., are chair and vice chair, respectively, of the National Research Council.

www.national-academies.org

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2014. Rethinking the Components, Coordination, and Management of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Laboratories. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18950.
×

This page intentionally left blank.

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2014. Rethinking the Components, Coordination, and Management of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Laboratories. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18950.
×

COMMITTEE ON STRENGTHENING THE US ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY LABORATORY ENTERPRISE: PHASE 1—PRIORITY NEEDS, GUIDING PRINCIPLES, AND OVERALL GOALS

Members

MAXINE L. SAVITZ (Chair), Honeywell, Inc. (retired), Los Angeles, CA

JONATHAN Z. CANNON (Vice-Chair), University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA

PATRICIA A. BERGE, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA

LYNDA T. CARLSON, National Science Foundation (retired), Arlington, VA

PHILIP E. COYLE, III, private consultant, Sacramento, CA

FRANK W. DAVIS, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA

DONALD J. DEPAOLO, University of California, Berkeley, CA

PAUL GILMAN, Covanta Energy Corporation, Fairfield, NJ

CAROL J. HENRY, George Washington University, Washington, DC

PHILIP K. HOPKE, Clarkson University, Potsdam, NY

SALLY KATZEN, New York University School of Law, Washington, DC

GARY S. SAYLER, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN

DEBORAH L. SWACKHAMER, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN

MARK UTELL, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY

Staff

RAYMOND WASSEL, Senior Program Officer

KARA N. LANEY, Program Officer

MARK D. LANGE, Program Officer

NORMAN GROSSBLATT, Senior Editor

MIRSADA KARALIC-LONCAREVIC, Manager, Technical Information Center

RADIAH ROSE, Manager, Editorial Projects

ORIN LUKE, Senior Program Assistant

Sponsor

US ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2014. Rethinking the Components, Coordination, and Management of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Laboratories. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18950.
×

BOARD ON ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES AND TOXICOLOGY1

Members

ROGENE F. HENDERSON (Chair), Lovelace Respiratory Research Institute, Albuquerque, NM

PRAVEEN AMAR, Independent Consultant, Lexington, MA

RICHARD A. BECKER, American Chemistry Council, Washington, DC

MICHAEL J. BRADLEY, M.J. Bradley & Associates, Concord, MA

JONATHAN Z. CANNON, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA

GAIL CHARNLEY, HealthRisk Strategies, Washington, DC

DAVID C. DORMAN, Department of Molecular Biomedical Sciences, Raleigh, NC

CHARLES T. DRISCOLL, JR., Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY

WILLIAM H. FARLAND, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO

LYNN R. GOLDMAN, George Washington University, Washington, DC

LINDA E. GREER, Natural Resources Defense Council, Washington, DC

WILLIAM E. HALPERIN, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, Newark, NJ

STEVEN P. HAMBURG, Environmental Defense Fund, New York, NY

ROBERT A. HIATT, University of California, San Francisco, CA

PHILIP K. HOPKE, Clarkson University, Potsdam, NY

SAMUEL KACEW, University of Ottawa, ON, Canada

H. SCOTT MATTHEWS, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA

THOMAS E. MCKONE, University of California, Berkeley, CA

TERRY L. MEDLEY, E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Company, Wilmington, DE

JANA MILFORD, University of Colorado at Boulder, Boulder, CO

MARK A. RATNER, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL

JOAN B. ROSE, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI

GINA M. SOLOMON, California Environmental Protection Agency, Sacramento, CA

PETER S. THORNE, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA

DOMINIC M. DI TORO, University of Delaware, Newark, DE

JOYCE S. TSUJI, Exponent Environmental Group, Bellevue, WA

Senior Staff

JAMES J. REISA, Director

DAVID J. POLICANSKY, Scholar

RAYMOND A. WASSEL, Senior Program Officer for Environmental Studies

ELLEN K. MANTUS, Senior Program Officer for Risk Analysis

SUSAN N.J. MARTEL, Senior Program Officer for Toxicology

EILEEN N. ABT, Senior Program Officer

MIRSADA KARALIC-LONCAREVIC, Manager, Technical Information Center

RADIAH ROSE, Manager, Editorial Projects

_________________________

1This study was planned, overseen, and supported by the Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology.

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2014. Rethinking the Components, Coordination, and Management of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Laboratories. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18950.
×

OTHER REPORTS OF THE BOARD ON ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES AND TOXICOLOGY

Review of the Formaldehyde Assessment in the National Toxicology Program 12th Report on Carcinogens (2014)

Review of the Styrene Assessment in the National Toxicology Program 12th Report on Carcinogens (2014)

Review of EPA’s Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) Process (2014)

Review of the Environmental Protection Agency’s State-of-the-Science Evaluation of Nonmonotonic Dose–Response Relationships as They Apply to Endocrine Disruptors (2014)

Assessing Risks to Endangered and Threatened Species from Pesticides (2013)

Science for Environmental Protection: The Road Ahead (2012)

Exposure Science in the 21st Century: A Vision and A Strategy (2012)

A Research Strategy for Environmental, Health, and Safety Aspects of Engineered Nanomaterials (2012)

Macondo Well–Deepwater Horizon Blowout: Lessons for Improving Offshore Drilling Safety (2012)

Feasibility of Using Mycoherbicides for Controlling Illicit Drug Crops (2011)

Improving Health in the United States: The Role of Health Impact Assessment (2011)

A Risk-Characterization Framework for Decision-Making at the Food and Drug Administration (2011)

Review of the Environmental Protection Agency’s Draft IRIS Assessment of Formaldehyde (2011)

Toxicity-Pathway-Based Risk Assessment: Preparing for Paradigm Change (2010)

The Use of Title 42 Authority at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2010)

Review of the Environmental Protection Agency’s Draft IRIS Assessment of Tetrachloroethylene (2010)

Hidden Costs of Energy: Unpriced Consequences of Energy Production and Use (2009)

Contaminated Water Supplies at Camp Lejeune—Assessing Potential Health Effects (2009)

Review of the Federal Strategy for Nanotechnology-Related Environmental, Health, and Safety Research (2009)

Science and Decisions: Advancing Risk Assessment (2009)

Phthalates and Cumulative Risk Assessment: The Tasks Ahead (2008)

Estimating Mortality Risk Reduction and Economic Benefits from Controlling Ozone Air Pollution (2008)

Respiratory Diseases Research at NIOSH (2008)

Evaluating Research Efficiency in the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2008)

Hydrology, Ecology, and Fishes of the Klamath River Basin (2008)

Applications of Toxicogenomic Technologies to Predictive Toxicology and Risk Assessment (2007)

Models in Environmental Regulatory Decision Making (2007)

Toxicity Testing in the Twenty-first Century: A Vision and a Strategy (2007)

Sediment Dredging at Superfund Megasites: Assessing the Effectiveness (2007)

Environmental Impacts of Wind-Energy Projects (2007)

Scientific Review of the Proposed Risk Assessment Bulletin from the Office of Management and Budget (2007)

Assessing the Human Health Risks of Trichloroethylene: Key Scientific Issues (2006)

New Source Review for Stationary Sources of Air Pollution (2006)

Human Biomonitoring for Environmental Chemicals (2006)

Health Risks from Dioxin and Related Compounds: Evaluation of the EPA Reassessment (2006)

Fluoride in Drinking Water: A Scientific Review of EPA’s Standards (2006)

State and Federal Standards for Mobile-Source Emissions (2006)

Superfund and Mining Megasites—Lessons from the Coeur d’Alene River Basin (2005)

Health Implications of Perchlorate Ingestion (2005)

Air Quality Management in the United States (2004)

Endangered and Threatened Species of the Platte River (2004)

Atlantic Salmon in Maine (2004)

Endangered and Threatened Fishes in the Klamath River Basin (2004)

Cumulative Environmental Effects of Alaska North Slope Oil and Gas Development (2003)

Estimating the Public Health Benefits of Proposed Air Pollution Regulations (2002)

Biosolids Applied to Land: Advancing Standards and Practices (2002)

Page viii Cite
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2014. Rethinking the Components, Coordination, and Management of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Laboratories. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18950.
×

The Airliner Cabin Environment and Health of Passengers and Crew (2002)

Arsenic in Drinking Water: 2001 Update (2001)

Evaluating Vehicle Emissions Inspection and Maintenance Programs (2001)

Compensating for Wetland Losses Under the Clean Water Act (2001)

A Risk-Management Strategy for PCB-Contaminated Sediments (2001)

Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Selected Airborne Chemicals (seventeen volumes, 2000-2014)

Toxicological Effects of Methylmercury (2000)

Strengthening Science at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2000)

Scientific Frontiers in Developmental Toxicology and Risk Assessment (2000)

Ecological Indicators for the Nation (2000)

Waste Incineration and Public Health (2000)

Hormonally Active Agents in the Environment (1999)

Research Priorities for Airborne Particulate Matter (four volumes, 1998-2004)

The National Research Council’s Committee on Toxicology: The First 50 Years (1997)

Carcinogens and Anticarcinogens in the Human Diet (1996)

Upstream: Salmon and Society in the Pacific Northwest (1996)

Science and the Endangered Species Act (1995)

Wetlands: Characteristics and Boundaries (1995)

Biologic Markers (five volumes, 1989-1995)

Science and Judgment in Risk Assessment (1994)

Pesticides in the Diets of Infants and Children (1993)

Dolphins and the Tuna Industry (1992)

Science and the National Parks (1992)

Human Exposure Assessment for Airborne Pollutants (1991)

Rethinking the Ozone Problem in Urban and Regional Air Pollution (1991)

Decline of the Sea Turtles (1990)

Copies of these reports may be ordered from the National Academies Press
(800) 624-6242 or (202) 334-3313
www.nap.edu

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2014. Rethinking the Components, Coordination, and Management of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Laboratories. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18950.
×

Preface

The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is undertaking an integrated evaluation of its laboratories to strengthen the management, effectiveness, and efficiency of its laboratory network and to enhance its capabilities for research and other laboratory-based scientific and technical activities.2 EPA is collecting and analyzing data on the operating costs, workforce, facilities, and science contributions of its laboratory facilities. The evaluation is also intended to address US Government Accountability Office (GAO) recommendations that EPA improve cohesion in managing and operating agency laboratories and to help the EPA laboratory enterprise respond to change and be equipped to handle emerging scientific challenges.

As part of its effort, EPA sought independent expert advice from the National Research Council. In response, the National Research Council established the Committee on Strengthening the US Environmental Protection Agency Laboratory Enterprise: Phase 1—Priority Needs, Guiding Principles, And Overall Goals. The statement of task, developed in consultation with EPA, served as a guide for the committee’s work. The committee was asked to assess EPA’s highest-priority needs for mission-relevant laboratory science and technical support, to develop principles for the efficient and effective management of EPA’s laboratory enterprise to meet the agency’s mission needs and strategic goals, and to develop guidance for enhancing efficiency and effectiveness now and during the next 10 years. It was asked not to assess the organization, the facility-level and portfolio-level master plans, or the consolidation initiatives related to EPA’s laboratory enterprise, because such analysis is being undertaken in a separate effort.

The National Research Council assembled a committee of 14 members who had expertise in executive management and experience with multifacility laboratory organizations; environmental sciences; exposure science; health risk assessment; toxicology; environmental medicine; ecosystem services; ecologic risk assessment; environmental law, policy, regulation, and risk management; and environmental program design and management. The committee included members knowledgeable about the different types of EPA laboratories and their functions and contributions, relevant activities of other federal and state government and academic laboratories, and the nexus between laboratory science and decisions about risk assessment, protective human health and environmental standards, risk-management decisions, and regulations and EPA statutory requirements. We are grateful to the members of the committee for their efforts throughout this study.

In the course of preparing its report, the committee held public information-gathering sessions during four of its meetings. In addition to the information from those presentations, the committee requested written materials to describe the structure, function, and management of the EPA laboratories. Dale Pahl (EPA) coordinated the submission of extensive written materials in response to our request. We gratefully acknowledge the efforts made by those involved in providing us with that information.

In carrying out its task, the committee built on relevant previous reports of the National Research Council, GAO, and the EPA Science Advisory Board and Board of Scientific Counselors. The committee relied on its collective judgment and experience in identifying applicable aspects of the earlier reports in developing its principles and recommendations.

_________________________

2R. Perciasepe, US Environmental Protection Agency, presentation to the committee, September 17, 2013.

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2014. Rethinking the Components, Coordination, and Management of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Laboratories. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18950.
×

This report has been reviewed in draft form by persons chosen for their diverse perspectives and technical expertise in accordance with procedures approved by the National Research Council Report Review Committee. The purposes of the independent review are to provide candid and critical comments that will assist the institution in making its published report as sound as possible and to ensure that the report meets institutional standards of objectivity, evidence, and responsiveness to the study charge. The review comments and draft manuscript remain confidential to protect the integrity of the deliberative process. We thank the following for their review of this report: David A. Dzombak, Carnegie Mellon University; William H. Farland, Colorado State University, retired; W. Michael McCabe, McCabe & Associates; Mary D. Nichols, California Air Resources Board; Gordon H. Orians, University of Washington; Joel M. Schur, George Mason University; Martyn T. Smith, University of California at Berkeley; and John C. Wall, Cummins, Inc.

Although the reviewers listed above have provided many constructive comments and suggestions, they were not asked to endorse the conclusions or recommendations, nor did they see the final draft of the report before its release. The review of the report was overseen by the review coordinator, Edwin H. Clark II, Earth Policy Institute, and the review monitor, Lawrence T. Papay, Science Applications International Corporation, retired. Appointed by the National Research Council, they were responsible for making certain that an independent examination of the report was carried out in accordance with institutional procedures and that all review comments were carefully considered. Responsibility for the final content of the report rests entirely with the committee and the institution.

The committee is grateful for the assistance of the National Research Council staff in preparing this report. Staff members who contributed to the effort are Raymond Wassel, project director; James Reisa, director of the Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology; Mark Lange, program officer; Kara Laney, program officer; Constance Karras, research associate; Keri Stoever, research associate; Norman Grossblatt, senior editor; Mirsada Karalic-Loncarevic, manager of the Technical Information Center; Radiah Rose, manager of editorial projects; Ricardo Payne, program coordinator; and Orin Luke, senior program assistant.

Maxine L. Savitz, Chair

and

Jonathan Z. Cannon, Vice Chair

Committee on Strengthening the US Environmental Protection Agency

Laboratory Enterprise: Phase 1—Priority Needs, Guiding Principles, and Overall Goals

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2014. Rethinking the Components, Coordination, and Management of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Laboratories. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18950.
×

Abbreviations

ARPA-E Department of Energy’s Advanced Research Projects Agency – Energy
BOSC EPA Board of Scientific Counselors
CMAQ community multiscale air quality
DARPA Department of Defense’s Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency
E-ARPA Environmental Advanced Research Projects Alliance
EPA US Environmental Protection Agency
ERLN Emergency Response Laboratory Network
GAO US Government Accountability Office
GPRA Government Performance and Results Act
GRO EPA’s Greater Research Opportunities fellowships
NEIC EPA National Enforcement Investigations Center
NERL EPA ORD National Exposure Research Laboratory
NHEERL EPA National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory
NRMRL EPA ORD National Risk Management Research Laboratory
NVFEL National Vehicle & Fuel Emissions Laboratory
OAR EPA Office of Air and Radiation
OCSPP EPA Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention
OECA EPA Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance
ORD EPA Office of Research and Development
OSWER EPA Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response
SAB EPA Science Advisory Board
STAR Science To Achieve Results
VERA voluntary early retirement authority
VSIP voluntary separation incentive payment
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2014. Rethinking the Components, Coordination, and Management of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Laboratories. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18950.
×

This page intentionally left blank.

Page xiii Cite
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2014. Rethinking the Components, Coordination, and Management of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Laboratories. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18950.
×
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2014. Rethinking the Components, Coordination, and Management of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Laboratories. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18950.
×

Management

Communication and Partnerships

Ensuring Quality

Synergies with Other Organizations

REFERENCES

APPENDIXES

A STATEMENT OF TASK OF THE COMMITTEE

B BIOGRAPHIC INFORMATION ON THE COMMITTEE

C PRESENTERS AT THE COMMITTEE’S INFORMATION GATHERING SESSIONS

D RELEVANT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FROM PREVIOUS REPORTS

E SUMMARY OF EPA PERSONNEL BY LABORATORY TYPE FOR 2013

BOXES, FIGURES, AND TABLES

BOXES

1-1 Statement of Task

1-2 Current and Emerging Environmental and Human Health Challenges for EPA

3-1 EPA Processes for Managing and Acquiring Laboratory Equipment

5-1 Examples of Emerging Environmental Challenges with Potentially Large Effects on Human Health, Species, and Ecosystems

FIGURES

S-1 The overall laboratory enterprise, with an emphasis on lines and directions of communication that should be institutionalized

1-1 EPA regions in the United States

1-2 EPA laboratory workforce

2-1 The overall process, in generalized form, that connects EPA strategic goals with the laboratory enterprise

2-2 The portion of the overall process shown in Figure 2.1 that focuses on the role of the laboratory enterprise

2-3 Aligning agency strategic goals to the ORD portion of the laboratory enterprise

2-4 Aligning agency strategic goals with the regional office laboratories

2-5 Aligning agency strategic goals with the program office laboratories

3-1 Total federal EPA-laboratory employees in all EPA laboratories

3-2 Total nonfederal EPA-laboratory employees

3-3 Number of new postdoctoral scientists in EPA ORD by year, hired under R authority

4-1 Aligning agency strategic goals to the ORD portion of the laboratory enterprise

4-2 Aligning agency strategic goals with the regional office laboratories

4-3 Aligning agency strategic goals with the program office laboratories

4-4 The overall laboratory enterprise with emphasis on lines and directions of communication that should be institutionalized

TABLES

1-1 Summary of Major Pollution Laws Administered by EPA

1-2 Goals and Objectives in EPA’s Current Strategic Plan

1-3 Science Contributions from EPA Laboratories

4-1 EPA Lead Region Assignments

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2014. Rethinking the Components, Coordination, and Management of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Laboratories. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18950.
×
Page R1
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2014. Rethinking the Components, Coordination, and Management of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Laboratories. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18950.
×
Page R2
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2014. Rethinking the Components, Coordination, and Management of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Laboratories. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18950.
×
Page R3
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2014. Rethinking the Components, Coordination, and Management of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Laboratories. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18950.
×
Page R4
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2014. Rethinking the Components, Coordination, and Management of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Laboratories. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18950.
×
Page R5
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2014. Rethinking the Components, Coordination, and Management of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Laboratories. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18950.
×
Page R6
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2014. Rethinking the Components, Coordination, and Management of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Laboratories. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18950.
×
Page R7
Page viii Cite
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2014. Rethinking the Components, Coordination, and Management of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Laboratories. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18950.
×
Page R8
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2014. Rethinking the Components, Coordination, and Management of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Laboratories. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18950.
×
Page R9
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2014. Rethinking the Components, Coordination, and Management of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Laboratories. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18950.
×
Page R10
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2014. Rethinking the Components, Coordination, and Management of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Laboratories. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18950.
×
Page R11
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2014. Rethinking the Components, Coordination, and Management of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Laboratories. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18950.
×
Page R12
Page xiii Cite
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2014. Rethinking the Components, Coordination, and Management of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Laboratories. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18950.
×
Page R13
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2014. Rethinking the Components, Coordination, and Management of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Laboratories. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18950.
×
Page R14
Next: Rethinking the Components, Coordination, and Management of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Laboratories »
Rethinking the Components, Coordination, and Management of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Laboratories Get This Book
×
Buy Paperback | $48.00 Buy Ebook | $38.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) applies scientific results that have been provided by various parts of its own organization and by external organizations. The agency requires substantial high-quality inhouse scientific expertise and laboratory capabilities so that it can answer questions related to regulation, enforcement, and environmental effects of specific chemicals, activities, and processes. It is also usually faced with situations in which research or analytic work is time-critical, so it maintains dedicated laboratory staff and facilities that can respond quickly to such needs. In recent years, EPA has made several changes to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of its laboratories, such as the designation of national program directors to align the work of research laboratories with the needs of the agency's regulatory program offices. The agency is currently undertaking an integrated evaluation of it laboratories to enhance the management effectiveness and efficiency of its laboratory enterprise and to enhance its capabilities for research and other laboratory-based scientific and technical activities. The results of EPA's evaluation are expected to include options for colocation and consolidation of laboratory facilities.

Rethinking the Components, Coordination, and Management of U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Laboratories assesses EPA's highest-priority needs for mission-relevant laboratory science and technical support, develops principles for the efficient and effective management of EPA's laboratory enterprise to meet the agency's mission needs and strategic goals, and develops guidance for enhancing efficiency and effectiveness now and during the next 10 years. EPA's laboratories play a vital role in the agency's work. The findings and recommendations of this report will help EPA to develop an implementation plan for the laboratory enterprise.

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!