National Academies Press: OpenBook
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." Institute of Medicine. 2015. Review of NASA's Evidence Reports on Human Health Risks: 2014 Letter Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18983.
×
Page R1
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." Institute of Medicine. 2015. Review of NASA's Evidence Reports on Human Health Risks: 2014 Letter Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18983.
×
Page R2
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." Institute of Medicine. 2015. Review of NASA's Evidence Reports on Human Health Risks: 2014 Letter Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18983.
×
Page R3
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." Institute of Medicine. 2015. Review of NASA's Evidence Reports on Human Health Risks: 2014 Letter Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18983.
×
Page R4
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." Institute of Medicine. 2015. Review of NASA's Evidence Reports on Human Health Risks: 2014 Letter Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18983.
×
Page R5
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." Institute of Medicine. 2015. Review of NASA's Evidence Reports on Human Health Risks: 2014 Letter Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18983.
×
Page R6
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." Institute of Medicine. 2015. Review of NASA's Evidence Reports on Human Health Risks: 2014 Letter Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18983.
×
Page R7
Page viii Cite
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." Institute of Medicine. 2015. Review of NASA's Evidence Reports on Human Health Risks: 2014 Letter Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18983.
×
Page R8
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." Institute of Medicine. 2015. Review of NASA's Evidence Reports on Human Health Risks: 2014 Letter Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18983.
×
Page R9
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." Institute of Medicine. 2015. Review of NASA's Evidence Reports on Human Health Risks: 2014 Letter Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18983.
×
Page R10

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Revieww of NASA’s N s Evideence Reeports on Huuman Health Riskks 2014 LETTER REPORT Committtee to Review w NASA’s EEvidence Reeports on Humman Health R Risks Board B on Heealth Sciencees Policy Carol E. H. Scott--Conner, Danniel R. Masyys, Catharyn C T. Liverman, and a Margareet A. McCoyy, Editors

THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS • 500 Fifth Street, NW • Washington, DC 20001 NOTICE: The project that is the subject of this report was approved by the Governing Board of the National Research Council, whose members are drawn from the councils of the National Academy of Sciences, the National Academy of Engineering, and the Institute of Medicine. This project was supported by Contract NNH13CK19B, Task Order NNH13CK20D, between the National Academy of Sciences and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. The views presented in this publication are those of the editors and attributing authors and do not necessarily reflect the view of the organizations or agencies that provided support for this project. International Standard Book Number-13: 978-0-309-31451-0 International Standard Book Number-10: 0-309-31451-8 Additional copies of this report available for sale from the National Academies Press, 500 Fifth Street, NW, Keck 360, Washington, DC 20001; (800) 624-6242 or (202) 334-3313; http://www.nap.edu. For more information about the Institute of Medicine, visit the IOM home page at: www.iom.edu. Copyright 2015 by the National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America The serpent has been a symbol of long life, healing, and knowledge among almost all cultures and religions since the beginning of recorded history. The serpent adopted as a logotype by the Institute of Medicine is a relief carving from ancient Greece, now held by the Staatliche Museen in Berlin. Suggested citation: IOM (Institute of Medicine). 2015. Review of NASA’s evidence reports on human health risks: 2014 letter report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

The National Acadeemy of Sciencces is a privatte, nonprofit, self-perpetuatiing y of distinguish society hed scholars en ngaged in scienntific and enginneering researcch, dedicatted to the furth herance of scieence and technnology and to their use for tthe generall welfare. Upoon the authority y of the charteer granted to it by the Congreess in 1863, the Academ my has a man ndate that reqquires it to addvise the fedeeral governnment on scieentific and tecchnical matterrs. Dr. Ralphh J. Cicerone is presideent of the Natio onal Academy of Sciences. The National Acadeemy of Engin neering was eestablished in 1964, under tthe charter of the Natio onal Academy of Sciences, as a parallel organization of nding engineerss. It is autonomo outstan ous in its adminnistration and iin the selectionn of its mem mbers, sharing with w the Nation nal Academy oof Sciences the responsibility ffor advisin ng the federal government. The T National Academy of E Engineering allso sponsorrs engineeringg programs aim med at meetinng national neeeds, encouragges educatiion and researcch, and recogn nizes the superrior achievemeents of engineeers. Dr. C. D. D Mote, Jr., is president of th he National Acaademy of Enginneering. The Institute of Med dicine was estaablished in 19770 by the Natioonal Academy of Sciencees to secure th he services of eminent membbers of approppriate professioons in the examination e of policy matterrs pertaining too the health off the public. T The Institutte acts under th he responsibilitty given to the National Acaddemy of Sciencces by its congressional c charter c to be an n adviser to thee federal goverrnment and, uppon its ownn initiative, to identify i issues of medical carre, research, annd education. D Dr. Victor J. Dzau is pressident of the In nstitute of Mediicine. The Na ational Resea arch Council wasw organizedd by the Natioonal Academy of Sciencees in 1916 to associate the broad b communnity of sciencee and technoloogy with th he Academy’s purposes of fu urthering know wledge and advvising the fedeeral governnment. Function ning in accordance with geneeral policies determined by tthe Academ my, the Counccil has becomee the principall operating ageency of both tthe National Academy of o Sciences an nd the Nationaal Academy off Engineering in providiing services to t the govern nment, the puublic, and thee scientific aand engineeering communiities. The Coun ncil is administtered jointly byy both Academ mies and thee Institute of Medicine. M Dr. Ralph R J. Ciceroone and Dr. C. D. Mote, Jr., aare chair annd vice chair, respectively, r of the National Research Counncil. www.nationaal-academies.oorg

COMMITTEE TO REVIEW NASA’S EVIDENCE REPORTS ON HUMAN HEALTH RISKS CAROL E. H. SCOTT-CONNER (Chair), University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City DANIEL R. MASYS (Vice Chair), University of Washington, Seattle SUSAN A. BLOOMFIELD, Texas A&M University, College Station KAREN S. COOK, Stanford University, Stanford, CA SUNDARESAN JAYARAMAN, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta CHERYL NICKERSON, Arizona State University, Tempe JAMES A. PAWELCZYK, Pennsylvania State University, University Park ROBERT L. SATCHER, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston RANDALL SHUMAKER, University of Central Florida, Orlando JACK STUSTER, Anacapa Sciences, Inc., Santa Barbara, CA GAYLE E. WOLOSCHAK, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL LAURENCE R. YOUNG, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge IOM Staff CATHARYN T. LIVERMAN, Study Director MARGARET A. MCCOY, Study Director CLAIRE F. GIAMMARIA, Research Associate JUDITH L. ESTEP, Program Associate ANDREW M. POPE, Director, Board on Health Sciences Policy v

Reviewers This report has been reviewed in draft form by individuals chosen for their diverse perspectives and technical expertise, in accordance with procedures approved by the National Research Council’s Report Review Committee. The purpose of this independent review is to provide candid and critical comments that will assist the institution in making its published report as sound as possible and to ensure that the report meets institutional standards for objectivity, evidence, and responsiveness to the study charge. The review comments and draft manuscript remain confidential to protect the integrity of the deliberative process. We wish to thank the following individuals for their review of this report: JAY C. BUCKEY, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center MARY L. CUMMINGS, Duke University PETER A. HANCOCK, University of Central Florida CHRISTINE E. KASPER, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences DAVID M. KLAUS, University of Colorado Boulder ANDREW LIU, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Man Vehicle Lab DEAN M. OLSON, Wright State University NEAL PELLIS, Universities Space Research Association Although reviewers listed above have provided many constructive comments and suggestions, they did not see the final draft of the report be- fore its release. The review of this report was overseen by GLORIA LEON, University of Minnesota, who served as the Coordinator and MARCIA J. RIEKE, University of Arizona, who served as the Monitor. vii

viii REVIEWERS Appointed by the Institute of Medicine, they were responsible for making certain that an independent examination of this report was carried out in accordance with institutional procedures and that all review com- ments were carefully considered. Responsibility for the final content of this report rests entirely with the authoring committee and the institution.

Contents COMMITTEE’S TASK AND OVERARCHING ISSUES 2 THE NASA HUMAN RESEARCH ROADMAP 5 RISK OF ADVERSE HEALTH EFFECTS DUE TO ALTERATIONS IN HOST-MICROORGANISM INTERACTIONS 5 RISK OF CREW ADVERSE HEALTH EVENT DUE TO ALTERED IMMUNE RESPONSE 15 RISK OF INADEQUATE DESIGN OF HUMAN AND AUTOMATION/ROBOTIC INTEGRATION 22 RISK OF INADEQUATE HUMAN-COMPUTER INTERACTION 27 RISK OF INCOMPATIBLE VEHICLE/HABITAT DESIGN 32 RISK OF INADEQUATE CRITICAL TASK DESIGN 39 RISK OF PERFORMANCE ERRORS DUE TO TRAINING DEFICIENCIES 46 SUMMARY 54 REFERENCES 57 ix

x CONTENTS APPENDIXES A Meeting Agendas 71 B Committee Biographical Sketches 75

Next: Review of NASA's Evidence Reports on Human Health Risks: 2014 Letter Report »
Review of NASA's Evidence Reports on Human Health Risks: 2014 Letter Report Get This Book
×
 Review of NASA's Evidence Reports on Human Health Risks: 2014 Letter Report
Buy Paperback | $44.00 Buy Ebook | $35.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

Review of NASA's Evidence Reports on Human Health Risks 2014 Letter Report is the second in a series of five reports from the Institute of Medicine that will independently review more than 30 evidence reports that the National Aeronautics and Space Administration has compiled on human health risks for long-duration and exploration space flights. This report builds on the 2008 IOM report Review of NASA's Human Research Program Evidence Books: A Letter Report, which provided an initial and brief review of the evidence reports.

This letter report reviews seven evidence reports and examines the quality of the evidence, analysis, and overall construction of each report; identifies existing gaps in report content; and provides suggestions for additional sources of expert input. The report analyzes each evidence report's overall quality, which included readability; internal consistency; the source and breadth of cited evidence; identification of existing knowledge and research gaps; authorship expertise; and, if applicable, response to recommendations from the 2008 IOM letter report.

READ FREE ONLINE

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!