National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: Research Protocol for Clinical Evaluation
Suggested Citation:"Exposures and Mechanisms." National Research Council. 1992. Multiple Chemical Sensitivities: Addendum to Biologic Markers in Immunotoxicology. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1988.
×

Exposures and Mechanisms

WORKING GROUP II

There are clinical reports of a syndrome which has been described as follows: Chemicals (odorous and nonodorous VOC's, solvents, pesticides, etc.) cause a 'sensitization' (induction phase) in a subset of individuals. Upon subsequent exposure to lower concentrations, these individuals may respond in a polysymptomatic fashion (triggering). This 'sensitivity'' may spread to other chemicals, foods or drugs. The underlying mechanism(s) is unknown at present but may include immunological, neurological, endocrinological, psychological, or other factors.

Currently, there is insufficient objective evidence for the entity called multiple chemical sensitivity caused by chemical exposures. Research is needed to test characteristics of the entity and define mechanisms that may be involved. Therefore the following research approaches are suggested.

HUMAN STUDIES

Following a comprehensive history, including environmental exposures, physical examination and appropriate laboratory testing, subjects diagnosed with MCS and control individuals, should be challenged by exposure to a mixture of offending agents determined historically. A double blind controlled procedure should be employed. The possible role of ''adaptation" and "deadaptation" should be considered in the protocol. Endpoints for response should include immunologic, neurologic, endocrinologic, psychologic, social, etc. markers or measures. Dose-response relationships should be examined.

A second approach could be evaluation of individuals, over time, in their usual environment.

OTHER EXPERIMENTAL APPROACHES

Animal models should be developed that manic the human syndrome. Exposures and

Suggested Citation:"Exposures and Mechanisms." National Research Council. 1992. Multiple Chemical Sensitivities: Addendum to Biologic Markers in Immunotoxicology. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1988.
×

parameters measured in the animal model should mimic those measured in humans wherever possible.

Tissues obtained by biopsy and necropsy from patients, animals and their controls should be evaluated for pathologic changes. In addition, functional and morphological changes in cells and tissues should be evaluated using in vitro techniques.

ADDITIONAL NEEDS

Attempts should be made to develop a data base of chemicals, foods and drugs, and associated signs and symptoms, which have been reported to be associated with MCS. Evaluation of this data base should be explored to identify possible linkages between exposure and mechanisms.

Suggested Citation:"Exposures and Mechanisms." National Research Council. 1992. Multiple Chemical Sensitivities: Addendum to Biologic Markers in Immunotoxicology. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1988.
×
Page 9
Suggested Citation:"Exposures and Mechanisms." National Research Council. 1992. Multiple Chemical Sensitivities: Addendum to Biologic Markers in Immunotoxicology. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1988.
×
Page 10
Next: Epidemiology »
Multiple Chemical Sensitivities: Addendum to Biologic Markers in Immunotoxicology Get This Book
×
Buy Paperback | $55.00
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

Use of the term "multiple chemical sensitivity" (MCS) as a diagnostic label has generated increasing controversy during the past few decades as a phenomenon related to exposure to chemical agents sustained both in indoor and outdoor environments.

This volume, prepared in conjunction with Biologic Markers in Immunotoxicology, contains the authored papers of a workshop held to develop an agenda to study the phenomenon of multiple chemical sensitivity. Authored by clinicians, immunologists, toxicologists, epidemiologists, psychiatrists, psychologists, and others involved in research or clinical activities relevant to the problem, the papers contain case evaluations and criteria for diagnosis, mechanisms potentially underlying MCS, and epidemiologic approaches to investigation.

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!