APPENDIX A
Data Base of Federal Programs and Their Budgets for Fiscal Year 1990

IAN D. MACGREGOR

National Science Foundation

INTRODUCTION

In the management of federal science programs it is important to have a broad perspective of the range and scale of other comparable activities. This is particularly critical in the solid-earth sciences because federal agencies use a wide range of earth science subdisciplines to accomplish a variety of national goals. In order to gain a perspective and sense of the diversity I have collected a data base that provides information on the scope of the solid-earth science disciplines as they are supported and used by U.S. federal agencies in achieving their mission goals.

METHODOLOGY

A questionnaire (which appears at the end of this Appendix) was sent to all federal agencies that make use of or support the solid-earth sciences. In order to make the data as quantitative as possible, numerical data were requested for each category assigned in the questionnaire. The categories included identification of federal programs, total solid-earth science budgets, institutional distribution, subdisciplinary fields, functional goals, geographic region, and instrumentation and facilities. It is estimated that about 85 to 90 percent of the overall effort was captured.

QUALITY OF DATA

Any data base has its limitations and, correspondingly, the current effort needs to be used with caution. Problems that may be readily identified are listed below as follows.



The National Academies | 500 Fifth St. N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20001
Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use and Privacy Statement



Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 319
Solid-Earth Sciences and Society APPENDIX A Data Base of Federal Programs and Their Budgets for Fiscal Year 1990 IAN D. MACGREGOR National Science Foundation INTRODUCTION In the management of federal science programs it is important to have a broad perspective of the range and scale of other comparable activities. This is particularly critical in the solid-earth sciences because federal agencies use a wide range of earth science subdisciplines to accomplish a variety of national goals. In order to gain a perspective and sense of the diversity I have collected a data base that provides information on the scope of the solid-earth science disciplines as they are supported and used by U.S. federal agencies in achieving their mission goals. METHODOLOGY A questionnaire (which appears at the end of this Appendix) was sent to all federal agencies that make use of or support the solid-earth sciences. In order to make the data as quantitative as possible, numerical data were requested for each category assigned in the questionnaire. The categories included identification of federal programs, total solid-earth science budgets, institutional distribution, subdisciplinary fields, functional goals, geographic region, and instrumentation and facilities. It is estimated that about 85 to 90 percent of the overall effort was captured. QUALITY OF DATA Any data base has its limitations and, correspondingly, the current effort needs to be used with caution. Problems that may be readily identified are listed below as follows.

OCR for page 319
Solid-Earth Sciences and Society Definitions. Interpretation of the categories listed in the data tables (see questionnaire) have been left to the perception of the program officer providing the data. Correspondingly, the data suffers from the problem that program directors who provided data may use the defined categories somewhat differently leading to unconstrained overlap in definitions. Since a uniformly unambiguous acceptance of definitions is an intractable task, it was felt, that in the compromise between rigor and the efficacy of collecting the data, that a more flexible approach was acceptable. However, it should be noted that the program staff providing data are professionals, who have a comprehensive grasp of their fields and the diversity of federal support. In addition, a fair amount of information exchange and shared programs among the different program managers assures that each manager has a reasonable grasp of the scope and style of other federal programs leading to comparable definitions. Research Category under Agency Functional Goals. The category, ''Research," listed as one of the functional goals of the agencies has not been expanded to identify the ultimate purpose of the research. Correspondingly, it is not possible to identify how the research budget relates to the agencies' missions as shown in their functional categories. Classification of "Solid-Earth Sciences. " By design the classification of "solid-earth sciences" that has been used in very broad. For example the areas of soil science, cartography, and bathymetry have been included. The data base includes all applied areas that may benefit from the application of skills derived from training in the basic disciplines of the solid-earth sciences, or use basic solid-earth science information as essential components to accomplishing mission goals. But, the data base can be used more selectively, because separate categories can be individually identified. Programs Not Included in the Data Base. There are a few programs from which data were not collected and there is always the possibility that programs have not been identified. In terms of the total expenditures it is estimated that essentially 85 to 90 percent of the solid-earth science activities are reported. Unidentified programs are probably small because the major efforts are well known. These points caution judicious use of the data base. One may not expect accounting accuracy and the exact figures in each pigeon hole should be assigned some error. An estimate of error is difficult but is probably reasonable to expect that values are within ten percent of the true numbers. The best use of the data is to get a qualitative to semiquantitative estimate of the scope of the federal agencies in the solid-earth sciences. In the latter sense the data are the only comprehensive accumulation of solid-earth science information that is currently available. Moreover, the information has been accumulated at the working level where there is a high degree of knowledge for the technical and scientific contributions and programmatic content of the federal solid-earth science effort.

OCR for page 319
Solid-Earth Sciences and Society DATA The data are available on disk in spreadsheet format and each program or agency may be examined in terms of any of the parameters collected in the data base. As an illustration of the overall effort summary graphs of the distributions by Agency Function and Discipline are included for the total federal effort and for each agencies. The breakdown by Agency Function gives a visual description of the use of solid-earth scientists in accomplishing the missions of the agency, and the disciplinary divisions show the distribution of the types of skills that are needed. The Table gives a quantitative indication of the expenditures for each agency.

OCR for page 319
Solid-Earth Sciences and Society QUESTIONNAIRE I. Program Description     1. Hierarchical position within agency (top down)     Agency Organization Officer Telephone     2. Address   3. Narrative description of program (Short: 1 to 3 sentences)   4. Comments on collection/maintenance of solid-earth science data base II. Budget Information   1. Total Budget (in thousands)     Program level     For FY 1989, FY 1990, and FY 1991 list       Internal External Total     Element FTE/$ $ $   2. Budget devoted to solid-earth sciences (in thousands)     Program level     For FY 1989, FY 1990, and FY 1991 list       Internal External Total     Element FTE/$ $ $   3. Total external funds for solid-earth sciences (from #2), distributed by institution (industry, university, federally funded research laboratory) for FY 1989, FY 1990, and FY 1991 III. Subdisciplinary Fields of the Solid-Earth Sciences (FY 1990) Estimate percentage support of the total solid-earth science budget. ___Geochemistry   ___Analytical geochemistry     ___Isotopes       ___Stable       ___Radioactive     ___Rock/mineral/fluid major element chemistry     ___Rock/mineral/fluid trace element chemistry   ___Biogeochemistry (rock/organism interactions)   ___Cosmochemistry and meteoritics   ___Experimental geochemistry   ___Igneous geochemistry   ___Metamorphic geochemistry     ___High-temperature (>200° C)     ___Low-temperature (<200° C)   ___Organic geochemistry   ___Volcanology ___Geology   ___Archeology   ___Geomorphology   ___Mathematical geology and geostatistics   ___Quaternary geology   ___Sedimentology   ___Stratigraphy   ___Structural geology

OCR for page 319
Solid-Earth Sciences and Society   ___Surficial geology     ___Processes     ___Remote sensing   ___Tectonics ___Geophysics   ___Geophysical modeling   ___Mineral physics   ___Physical properties of rocks   ___Potential field     ___Geodesy and gravity     ___Geomagnetism and paleomagnetism     ___Heat flow   ___Seismology/acoustics ___Glaciology ___Hydrology ___Mineralogy/crystallography ___Paleobiology   ___Paleoecology   ___Paleontology     ___Invertebrate     ___Paleobotany     ___Vertebrate ___Other (specify) IV. Functional (Multidisciplinary Mission-Related) Goals of the Solid-Earth Sciences (FY 1990) Estimate percentage support of the total solid-earth science budget. ___Basic Research (Sensu strictu) ___Economic geology   ___Mineral resources     ___Metals     ___Nonmetals   ___Energy resources   ___Hydrocarbons     ___Coal     ___Oil and gas   ___Geothermal   ___Hydrological resources     ___Groundwater reservoirs     ___Surface reservoirs ___Education and Human Resources ___Engineering Geology   ___Construction   ___Land use/urban geology   ___Mining engineering   ___Mining technology/mineral extraction   ___Petroleum engineering ___Global Change Studies (solid-earth components only) ___Natural Hazard Reduction

OCR for page 319
Solid-Earth Sciences and Society   ___Earthquakes     ___Engineering     ___Geology/geophysics/geochemistry   ___Floods   ___Landslides     ___Engineering     ___Geology/geophysics/geochemistry   ___Subsidence     ___Engineering     ___Geology/geophysics/geochemistry   ___Volcanoes ___Planetology (exclusive of Earth)   ___Planetary surfaces   ___Planetary interiors ___Regulatory Geology   ___Environmental geology   ___Toxic wastes     ___Chemical     ___Radioactive ___Soils   ___Resources   ___Processes (chemical, physical, biogeochemical, and mineralogical) ___Other (specify) V. Geographic Classification of Solid-Earth Science Support (FY 1990) Estimate percentage support of the total solid-earth science budget. ___Extraterrestrial   ___Meteorites   ___Planets ___Terrestrial   ___Continental (non Polar regions)   ___Marine     ___Geology     ___Geophysics   ___Polar Regions     ___Arctic     ___Antarctic ___Other (specify) VI. Instrumentation and Facilities for the Solid-Earth Sciences (FY 1990) Estimate percentage support of the total solid-earth science budget. ___Instrumentation (Items < $500,000)   ___Geochemical   ___Geological   ___Geophysical ___Facilities (Items > $500,000)   ___Geochemical   ___Geological   ___Geophysical

OCR for page 319
Solid-Earth Sciences and Society TABLE A.1 Summary of Federal Agency Expenditures in the Solid-Earth Sciences (FY 1990) Agency Totals Facilities and Instrumentation Education   $ millions Percentage   $ millions Percentage   $ millions Percentage USDA 276.04 20.18 USDA 3.51 0.26 USDA   0 DOD 61.15 4.47 DOD 25.09 1.83 DOD   0 DOE 161.07 11.77 DOE 7.57 0.55 DOE 0.41 0.03 DOI 582.25 42.56 DOI 32.67 2.39 DOI 10.29 0.75 DOS 0.50 0.04 DOS   0 DOS 0.00 0 EPA 36.22 2.65 EPA 1.51 0.11 EPA 0.91 0.07 NASA 66.47 4.86 NASA 15.74 1.15 NASA   0 NOAA 41.85 3.06 NOAA 0.60 0.04 NOAA   0 NRC 7.77 0.57 NRC   0 NRC   0 NSF 134.70 9.85 NSF 52.46 3.83 NSF 2.75 0.20 Total 1368.01 100.00   139.16 10.17   14.37 1.05 USDA, U.S. Department of Agriculture; DOD, Department of Defense; DOE, Department of Energy; DOI, Department of the Interior; DOS, Department of State; EPA, Environmental Protection Agency; NASA, National Aeronautical and Space Administration; NOAA, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration; NRC, Nuclear Regulatory Agency; NSF, National Science Foundation. FIGURE A.1 Individual agency expenditures in the solid-earth sciences in FY 1990 expressed as a percentage of the total ($1,368 million); see Table A.1 for details.

OCR for page 319
Solid-Earth Sciences and Society FIGURE A.2 Percentage of the solid-earth science expenditures within selected agencies as related to their mission goals. A, DOE; B, DOI; C, EPA; D, NASA; E, NSF; F, all agencies in survey. The mission goals include research, soils, cartography, energy, regulatory geology, engineering geology, remediation, defense, natural hazards, mineral resources, global change, education and human resources, nuclear monitoring, land management, planetary geology, and other.

OCR for page 319
Solid-Earth Sciences and Society

OCR for page 319
Solid-Earth Sciences and Society FIGURE A.3 Percentage of the solid-earth science expenditures within selected agencies subdivided according to discipline. A, DOE; B, DOI; C, EPA; D, NASA; E, NSF; F, all agencies in survey.

OCR for page 319
Solid-Earth Sciences and Society