|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter.
Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.
Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.
OCR for page 319
Solid-Earth Sciences and Society
APPENDIX A
Data Base of Federal Programs and Their Budgets for Fiscal Year 1990
IAN D. MACGREGOR
National Science Foundation
INTRODUCTION
In the management of federal science programs it is important to have a broad perspective of the range and scale of other comparable activities. This is particularly critical in the solid-earth sciences because federal agencies use a wide range of earth science subdisciplines to accomplish a variety of national goals. In order to gain a perspective and sense of the diversity I have collected a data base that provides information on the scope of the solid-earth science disciplines as they are supported and used by U.S. federal agencies in achieving their mission goals.
METHODOLOGY
A questionnaire (which appears at the end of this Appendix) was sent to all federal agencies that make use of or support the solid-earth sciences. In order to make the data as quantitative as possible, numerical data were requested for each category assigned in the questionnaire. The categories included identification of federal programs, total solid-earth science budgets, institutional distribution, subdisciplinary fields, functional goals, geographic region, and instrumentation and facilities. It is estimated that about 85 to 90 percent of the overall effort was captured.
QUALITY OF DATA
Any data base has its limitations and, correspondingly, the current effort needs to be used with caution. Problems that may be readily identified are listed below as follows.
OCR for page 320
Solid-Earth Sciences and Society
Definitions. Interpretation of the categories listed in the data tables (see questionnaire) have been left to the perception of the program officer providing the data. Correspondingly, the data suffers from the problem that program directors who provided data may use the defined categories somewhat differently leading to unconstrained overlap in definitions. Since a uniformly unambiguous acceptance of definitions is an intractable task, it was felt, that in the compromise between rigor and the efficacy of collecting the data, that a more flexible approach was acceptable. However, it should be noted that the program staff providing data are professionals, who have a comprehensive grasp of their fields and the diversity of federal support. In addition, a fair amount of information exchange and shared programs among the different program managers assures that each manager has a reasonable grasp of the scope and style of other federal programs leading to comparable definitions.
Research Category under Agency Functional Goals. The category, ''Research," listed as one of the functional goals of the agencies has not been expanded to identify the ultimate purpose of the research. Correspondingly, it is not possible to identify how the research budget relates to the agencies' missions as shown in their functional categories.
Classification of "Solid-Earth Sciences. " By design the classification of "solid-earth sciences" that has been used in very broad. For example the areas of soil science, cartography, and bathymetry have been included. The data base includes all applied areas that may benefit from the application of skills derived from training in the basic disciplines of the solid-earth sciences, or use basic solid-earth science information as essential components to accomplishing mission goals. But, the data base can be used more selectively, because separate categories can be individually identified.
Programs Not Included in the Data Base. There are a few programs from which data were not collected and there is always the possibility that programs have not been identified. In terms of the total expenditures it is estimated that essentially 85 to 90 percent of the solid-earth science activities are reported. Unidentified programs are probably small because the major efforts are well known.
These points caution judicious use of the data base. One may not expect accounting accuracy and the exact figures in each pigeon hole should be assigned some error. An estimate of error is difficult but is probably reasonable to expect that values are within ten percent of the true numbers. The best use of the data is to get a qualitative to semiquantitative estimate of the scope of the federal agencies in the solid-earth sciences. In the latter sense the data are the only comprehensive accumulation of solid-earth science information that is currently available. Moreover, the information has been accumulated at the working level where there is a high degree of knowledge for the technical and scientific contributions and programmatic content of the federal solid-earth science effort.
OCR for page 321
Solid-Earth Sciences and Society
DATA
The data are available on disk in spreadsheet format and each program or agency may be examined in terms of any of the parameters collected in the data base. As an illustration of the overall effort summary graphs of the distributions by Agency Function and Discipline are included for the total federal effort and for each agencies. The breakdown by Agency Function gives a visual description of the use of solid-earth scientists in accomplishing the missions of the agency, and the disciplinary divisions show the distribution of the types of skills that are needed. The Table gives a quantitative indication of the expenditures for each agency.
OCR for page 322
Solid-Earth Sciences and Society
QUESTIONNAIRE
I.
Program Description
1. Hierarchical position within agency (top down)
Agency
Organization
Officer
Telephone
2. Address
3. Narrative description of program (Short: 1 to 3 sentences)
4. Comments on collection/maintenance of solid-earth science data base
II.
Budget Information
1. Total Budget (in thousands)
Program level
For FY 1989, FY 1990, and FY 1991 list
Internal
External
Total
Element
FTE/$
$
$
2. Budget devoted to solid-earth sciences (in thousands)
Program level
For FY 1989, FY 1990, and FY 1991 list
Internal
External
Total
Element
FTE/$
$
$
3. Total external funds for solid-earth sciences (from #2), distributed by institution (industry, university, federally funded research laboratory) for FY 1989, FY 1990, and FY 1991
III.
Subdisciplinary Fields of the Solid-Earth Sciences (FY 1990)
Estimate percentage support of the total solid-earth science budget.
___Geochemistry
___Analytical geochemistry
___Isotopes
___Stable
___Radioactive
___Rock/mineral/fluid major element chemistry
___Rock/mineral/fluid trace element chemistry
___Biogeochemistry (rock/organism interactions)
___Cosmochemistry and meteoritics
___Experimental geochemistry
___Igneous geochemistry
___Metamorphic geochemistry
___High-temperature (>200° C)
___Low-temperature (<200° C)
___Organic geochemistry
___Volcanology
___Geology
___Archeology
___Geomorphology
___Mathematical geology and geostatistics
___Quaternary geology
___Sedimentology
___Stratigraphy
___Structural geology
OCR for page 323
Solid-Earth Sciences and Society
___Surficial geology
___Processes
___Remote sensing
___Tectonics
___Geophysics
___Geophysical modeling
___Mineral physics
___Physical properties of rocks
___Potential field
___Geodesy and gravity
___Geomagnetism and paleomagnetism
___Heat flow
___Seismology/acoustics
___Glaciology
___Hydrology
___Mineralogy/crystallography
___Paleobiology
___Paleoecology
___Paleontology
___Invertebrate
___Paleobotany
___Vertebrate
___Other (specify)
IV. Functional (Multidisciplinary Mission-Related) Goals of the Solid-Earth Sciences (FY 1990)
Estimate percentage support of the total solid-earth science budget.
___Basic Research (Sensu strictu)
___Economic geology
___Mineral resources
___Metals
___Nonmetals
___Energy resources
___Hydrocarbons
___Coal
___Oil and gas
___Geothermal
___Hydrological resources
___Groundwater reservoirs
___Surface reservoirs
___Education and Human Resources
___Engineering Geology
___Construction
___Land use/urban geology
___Mining engineering
___Mining technology/mineral extraction
___Petroleum engineering
___Global Change Studies (solid-earth components only)
___Natural Hazard Reduction
OCR for page 324
Solid-Earth Sciences and Society
___Earthquakes
___Engineering
___Geology/geophysics/geochemistry
___Floods
___Landslides
___Engineering
___Geology/geophysics/geochemistry
___Subsidence
___Engineering
___Geology/geophysics/geochemistry
___Volcanoes
___Planetology (exclusive of Earth)
___Planetary surfaces
___Planetary interiors
___Regulatory Geology
___Environmental geology
___Toxic wastes
___Chemical
___Radioactive
___Soils
___Resources
___Processes (chemical, physical, biogeochemical, and mineralogical)
___Other (specify)
V. Geographic Classification of Solid-Earth Science Support (FY 1990)
Estimate percentage support of the total solid-earth science budget.
___Extraterrestrial
___Meteorites
___Planets
___Terrestrial
___Continental (non Polar regions)
___Marine
___Geology
___Geophysics
___Polar Regions
___Arctic
___Antarctic
___Other (specify)
VI. Instrumentation and Facilities for the Solid-Earth Sciences (FY 1990)
Estimate percentage support of the total solid-earth science budget.
___Instrumentation (Items < $500,000)
___Geochemical
___Geological
___Geophysical
___Facilities (Items > $500,000)
___Geochemical
___Geological
___Geophysical
OCR for page 325
Solid-Earth Sciences and Society
TABLE A.1 Summary of Federal Agency Expenditures in the Solid-Earth Sciences (FY 1990)
Agency Totals
Facilities and Instrumentation
Education
$ millions
Percentage
$ millions
Percentage
$ millions
Percentage
USDA
276.04
20.18
USDA
3.51
0.26
USDA
0
DOD
61.15
4.47
DOD
25.09
1.83
DOD
0
DOE
161.07
11.77
DOE
7.57
0.55
DOE
0.41
0.03
DOI
582.25
42.56
DOI
32.67
2.39
DOI
10.29
0.75
DOS
0.50
0.04
DOS
0
DOS
0.00
0
EPA
36.22
2.65
EPA
1.51
0.11
EPA
0.91
0.07
NASA
66.47
4.86
NASA
15.74
1.15
NASA
0
NOAA
41.85
3.06
NOAA
0.60
0.04
NOAA
0
NRC
7.77
0.57
NRC
0
NRC
0
NSF
134.70
9.85
NSF
52.46
3.83
NSF
2.75
0.20
Total
1368.01
100.00
139.16
10.17
14.37
1.05
USDA, U.S. Department of Agriculture; DOD, Department of Defense; DOE, Department of Energy; DOI, Department of the Interior; DOS, Department of State; EPA, Environmental Protection Agency; NASA, National Aeronautical and Space Administration; NOAA, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration; NRC, Nuclear Regulatory Agency; NSF, National Science Foundation.
FIGURE A.1 Individual agency expenditures in the solid-earth sciences in FY 1990 expressed as a percentage of the total ($1,368 million); see Table A.1 for details.
OCR for page 326
Solid-Earth Sciences and Society
FIGURE A.2 Percentage of the solid-earth science expenditures within selected agencies as related to their mission goals. A, DOE; B, DOI; C, EPA; D, NASA; E, NSF; F, all agencies in survey. The mission goals include research, soils, cartography, energy, regulatory geology, engineering geology, remediation, defense, natural hazards, mineral resources, global change, education and human resources, nuclear monitoring, land management, planetary geology, and other.
OCR for page 327
Solid-Earth Sciences and Society
OCR for page 328
Solid-Earth Sciences and Society
FIGURE A.3 Percentage of the solid-earth science expenditures within selected agencies subdivided according to discipline. A, DOE; B, DOI; C, EPA; D, NASA; E, NSF; F, all agencies in survey.
OCR for page 329
Solid-Earth Sciences and Society
Representative terms from entire chapter:
functional goals