National Academies Press: OpenBook

The Government Role in Civilian Technology: Building a New Alliance (1992)

Chapter: F REFERENCES AND BIBLIOGRAPHY

« Previous: E COLLABORATIVE R&D: SELECTED EXAMPLES
Suggested Citation:"F REFERENCES AND BIBLIOGRAPHY." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. 1992. The Government Role in Civilian Technology: Building a New Alliance. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1998.
×

Battelle Memorial Institute. 1990. Government-Promoted Collective Research and Development in Japan: Analyses of the Organization Through Case Studies. Washington, D.C.: Pacific Northwest Laboratory.

Becker, J. V. 1980. The High-Speed Frontier, Case Histories of Four NASA Programs, 1920-1950. Washington, D.C.: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

Ben Franklin Partnership Board. 1987. 48-Month Progress Report, March 1, 1983-February 28, 1987. Philadelphia: Pennsylvania Technology Assistance Program, Ben Franklin Partnership Challenge Grant Program for Technological Innovation.

Benko, R. P. 1987. Protecting Intellectual Property Rights. Washington, D.C.: American Enterprise Institute.

Benningfield, D. 1988. MCC: A progress report. Austin, Tex.: Microelectronics and Computer Technology Corporation.

Besen, S., and G. Saloner. 1989. The economics of telecommunications standards. In Changing the Rules: Technological Change, International Competition, and Regulation in Communication, R. Crandall and K. Flamm, eds. Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution.

Bilstein, R. E. 1989. Orders of Magnitude: A History of the NACA and NASA, 1915-1990. Washington, D.C.: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

Bloch, E. 1991. Toward a U.S. Technology Strategy: Enhancing Manufacturing Competitiveness. Washington, D.C.: The Manufacturing Forum, National Academy of Engineering.

Boesman, W. C. 1991. Superconducting Super Collider: Current Issues and Legislation. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Research Service, U.S. Congress.

Boniface, Z. E., and R. Rimel. 1987. U.S. Funding for Biomedical Research. A report prepared for the Pew Charitable Trusts, Philadelphia, Penn.

Boskin, M. J., and L. J. Lau. 1990. Post-War Economic Growth in the Group of Five Countries: A New Analysis. Working papers. Stanford, Calif.: Department of Economics, Stanford University.

Bozdogan, K. 1989. The transformation of the U.S. chemical industry. MIT Commission on Industrial Productivity Working Papers, vol. I. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

Bozdogan, K. 1990. The Eureka Initiative in Europe, Implications for Technology Policy in the U.S. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Bozeman, B., and A. N. Link. 1984. Tax incentives for R&D: A critical evaluation. Research Policy 13(1):21-31.

Bozeman, B., A. N. Link, and A. Zardkooko. 1986. An economic analysis of R&D joint ventures. Managerial and Decision Economics 7:263-266.

Brooks, H. 1986. National science policy and technological innovation. In The Positive Sum Strategy, R. Landau and N. Rosenberg, eds. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.

Brooks, H., and M. E. Kelley. 1988. The State of Computerized Automation in U.S. Manufacturing. Cambridge, Mass.: John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University.

Carnegie Commission. 1990. New Thinking and American Defense Technology. A Report of the Carnegie Commission on Science, Technology, and Government, Washington, D.C.

Carnegie Commission. 1991. Technology and Economic Performance: Organizing the Executive Branch for a Stronger National Technology. Carnegie Commission on Science Technology, and Government, New York.

Center for Social and Economic Issues, Industrial Technology Institute, Solomon Associates, and J. D. Eveland. 1986. The Literature of Collaborative Research and Development: An Analytic Overview. Report submitted to the Office of Technology Assessment, U.S. Congress, Washington, D.C.

Chapman, R. E., M. K. Clark, and E. Dobson. 1990. Technology-Based Economic Development: A Study of State and Federal Technical Extension Services. U.S. Department of Commerce, NIST Special Publication 786. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

Suggested Citation:"F REFERENCES AND BIBLIOGRAPHY." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. 1992. The Government Role in Civilian Technology: Building a New Alliance. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1998.
×

Chapman, R. L., L. C. Lohman, and M. J. Chapman. 1989. An Exploration of Benefits from NASA "Spinoff". A report for the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Littleton, Colo.: Chapman Research Group, Inc.

Clark, K. B., and T. Fujimoto. 1991. Product Development Performance: Strategy, Organization, and Management in the World Auto Industry. Boston: Harvard Business School Press Publishers.

Clark, K. B., W. B. Chew, and T. Fujimoto. 1987. Product development in the world auto industry. In Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, vol. 3. Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution.

Clark, P. K. 1977. Capital formation and the recent productivity slowdown. Paper presented to the American Economic Association and the American Finance Association, December 30.

Clarke, M. K., and E. N. Dobson. 1989. Promoting Technology Excellence: The Role of State and Federal Extension Activities. Washington, D.C.: National Governors Association.

Cohen, S., and J. Zysman. 1987. Manufacturing Matters: The Myth of the Post-Industrial Economy. New York: Basic Books.

Colton, R. M. 1987. University/industry cooperative research centers are proving themselves. Research Management 30(2):34-37.

Commission of the European Communities. 1990. BRITE EURAM Programme: Synopses of Current Projects, 1989-1990. Brussels: Commission of the European Communities.

Committee to Advise the President on High Temperature Superconductivity. 1988. High-Temperature Superconductivity: Perseverance and Cooperation on the Road to Commercialization. Washington, D.C.

Computer Systems Policy Project. 1991. Perspectives on U.S. Technology Policy, Part II: Increasing Industry Involvement. Washington, D.C.

Cordes, J. 1984. A survey of research findings on the R&D tax credit. In The R&D Tax Credit: Issues in Tax Policy and Industrial Innovation, K. M. Brown, ed. Washington, D.C.: American Enterprise Institute.

Cordes, J. 1988. The effect of tax policy on the creation of new technical knowledge: An assessment of the evidence. In Impact of Technological Change on Employment and Growth, R. M. Cyert and D. C. Mowery, eds. New York: Harper.

Council of Economic Advisors. 1991. Economic Report of the President. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

Cox, W. A. 1991. Productivity, Competitiveness, and U.S. Living Standards. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Research Service, U.S. Congress.

Crease, R., and N. Samios. 1991. Managing the unmanageable. The Atlantic 267(1):80.

Cyert, R. M., and D. C. Mowery. 1987. Technology and Employment. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.

Cyert, R. M., and D. C. Mowery. 1988. The Impact of New Technologies on Employment and Economic Growth. Cambridge: Ballinger.

Decker, J. F. 1991. The Office of Energy Research's Approach to Improved Technology Transfer. Presented at the Department of Energy Transfer Orientation Seminar, Department of Energy, Office of Energy Research, Washington, D.C., January 24.

Defense Science Board. 1987. Technology Base Management. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Defense.

Delegation of the Commission of the European Communities. 1990. Important Progress for European Community Research. Brussels: European Economic Community.

De Long, J. B., and L. H. Summers. 1990. Equipment Investment and Economic Growth. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University and National Bureau of Economic Research.

Denison, E. F. 1979. Accounting for Slower Economic Growth: The U.S. in the 1970s. Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution.

Suggested Citation:"F REFERENCES AND BIBLIOGRAPHY." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. 1992. The Government Role in Civilian Technology: Building a New Alliance. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1998.
×

Denison, E. F. 1980. Discussion. In The Decline in Productivity Growth. Boston: Federal Reserve Bank of Boston.

Dermer, J., ed. 1986. Competitiveness through Technology: What Business Needs from Government. New York: Free Press.

Dertouzos, M. L. 1991. Building the information marketplace. Technology Review 94(1):28-40.

Dertouzos, M. L., and R. K. Lester. 1990. Made in America: Regaining the Productive Edge. New York: Harper.

Deutch, J. 1990. Commercializing Technology: What Should DoD Learn from DoE? Stanford, Calif.: Center for International Security and Arms Control, Stanford University.

Dimanescu, D., and J. Botkins, eds. 1986. The New Alliance: America's R&D Consortia. Cambridge, Mass.: Ballinger.

Dineen, G. P. 1988. Trends in international technological cooperation. In Globalization of Technology, International Perspectives, J. H. Muroyama and S. H. Guyford, eds. Washington, D.C.: National Academy of Engineering.

Eckstein, O. 1980. Core inflation, productivity, capital supply, and demand management. In The Economy and the President: 1980 and Beyond. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.

Edelson, B. I. 1990. The Need for a Civilian ARPA. Statement before the Senate Committee on Governmental Affairs, U. S. Congress, Washington, D.C., June 12.

Edelson, B. I., and R. L. Stern. 1989. The Operations of DARPA and Its Utility as a Model for a Civilian ARPA. Washington, D.C.: The Paul H. Nitze School for Advanced International Studies, The Johns Hopkins Foreign Policy Institute.

Edquist, C., and S. Jacobsson. 1988. Flexible Automation. Cambridge, Mass.: Blackwell.

The Egist Group. 1990. The Evaluation of Government and Industry Strategies for Technology. United Kingdom: Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex.

Eisner, R., S. Albert, and M. Sullivan. 1984. The new incremental tax credit for R&D: Incentive or Disincentive? National Tax Journal (June): 171-183.

Englander, S., and A. Mittelstadt. 1988. Total Factor Productivity: Macroeconomic and Structural Aspects of the Slowdown. OECD Economic Studies, No. 10. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.

Ergas, H. 1987. Does technology policy matter? In Technology and Global Industry: Companies and Nations in the World Economy , H. Brooks and B. Guile, eds. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.

Evenson, R. E., and W. E. Huffman. 1989. Agriculture. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 71(3):761-773.


Federal Laboratory Consortium. 1988. Report to Congress and the Federal Agencies: Activities of the FLC Pursuant to the Federal Technology Transfer Act of 1986. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

Federal Ministry of Research and Technology. 1990. VDI/VDE Technology Center for Information Technology, Microsystem Technology. Berlin: Federal Ministry of Research and Technology, Federal Republic of Germany.

Fields, C. 1991. Speech presented to the R&D Consortia Workshop, Academy-Industry Program, National Academy of Sciences, Washington, D.C., May 28.

Flamm, K. 1988a. Government's Role in Computers and Superconductors. Contract report for the Office of Technology Assessment, U.S. Congress, Washington, D.C.

Flamm, K. 1988b. The changing pattern of industrial robot use. In The Impact of Technological Change on Employment and Economic Growth, R. M. Cyert and D. C. Mowery, eds. Cambridge, Mass.: Ballinger.

Flamm, K., and T. McNaugher. 1989. Rationalizing technology investments. In Restructuring American Foreign Policy, J. D. Steinbruner, ed. Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution.

Suggested Citation:"F REFERENCES AND BIBLIOGRAPHY." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. 1992. The Government Role in Civilian Technology: Building a New Alliance. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1998.
×

Fosler, R. S., ed. 1988. The New Economic Role of the States: Strategies in a Competitive World Economy. New York: Oxford University Press.

Foster Associates. 1978. A Survey on the Net Rates of Return on Innovations, 3 vols. Report prepared for the National Science Foundation, Washington, D.C.

Furino, A., ed. 1988. Cooperation and Competition in the Global Economy: Issues and Strategies. New York: Harper.

Fusfeld, H. I., and C. S. Haklisch. 1985. Cooperative R&D for competitors. Harvard Business Review 63(6):60-76.

Gansler, J. 1988. Integrating civilian and military industry. Issues in Science and Technology 5(Fall):68-73.

Georgia Institute of Technology. 1987. Evaluation of Results and Benefits from Georgia Tech/Industrial Extension Assistance. Atlanta: Georgia Institute of Technology.

Giffi, C., A. V. Roth, and G. M. Seal. 1990. Competing in World-Class Manufacturing: America's 21st Century Challenge. Homewood, Ill.: Richard D. Irwin.

Gomory, R. E. 1983. Technology development. Science 220(May 6):576-580.

Gomory, R. E. 1988. Turning ideas into products. The Bridge 18(1):11-14.

Gomory, R. E. 1989. From the "Ladder of Science" to the product development cycle. Harvard Business Review 67(6):99-105.

Good, M. L. 1990. Industrial strategies: Conflict with national interests?" The Bridge 20(3):6-11.

Gould, S. 1991. Building the National Research Network. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Research Service.

Gravelle, J. G. 1985. The Tax Credit for Research and Development. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Research Service.

Gray, D., T. Solomon, and W. Hetzner, eds. 1986. Technological Innovation: Strategies for a New Partnership. Washington, D.C.: National Science Foundation.

Griliches, Z. 1964. Returns, expenditures, education, and the aggregate agricultural production function. American Economics Review 54:961.

Griliches, Z. 1989. Patents: Recent trends and puzzles. In Microeconomics, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, M. N. Baily and C. Winston, eds. Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution.

Grossman, G. M., and C. Shapiro. 1986. Research joint ventures: An antitrust analysis. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization 2(2):315-337.

Guy, K., and E. Arnold. 1987a. An Overview of Policy Initiatives in the United States' Information Technology Sector. United Kingdom: Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex.

Guy, K., and E. Arnold. 1987b. A Review of Policies Affecting the IT [Information Technology] Sectors of the USA, Japan, EEC, France, West Germany, and the UK. United Kingdom: Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex.

Guy, K., and P. Quintas. 1989. Alvey in Industry: Corporate Strategy and the Alvey Program. United Kingdom: Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex.

Guy, K., P. Quintas, and K. Hobday. 1990. Evaluation of the Alvey Software Engineering Program. United Kingdom: Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex.


Hagedoorn, J., and J. Schakenraad. 1989. Strategic Partnering and Technological Cooperation. The Netherlands: Maastricht Economic Research Institute on Innovation and Technology.

Haklisch, C. S. 1986. Technical Alliances in the Semiconductor Industry. New York: Center for Science and Technology Policy, New York University.

Hane, G. J. 1990. Government-Promoted Collective R&D in Japan—Analyses of the Organization Through Case Studies. Washington, D.C.: Pacific Northwest Laboratory, Battelle Memorial Institute.

Suggested Citation:"F REFERENCES AND BIBLIOGRAPHY." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. 1992. The Government Role in Civilian Technology: Building a New Alliance. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1998.
×

Hanna, K. 1989. Collaborative research in biomedicine. Paper prepared for Workshop on Government and Industry Collaboration in Biomedical Research and Education, Institute of Medicine, Washington, D.C.

Harrison, G. J. 1989. European Community: Issues Raised by 1992 Integration. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Research Service.

Hatsopoulos, G. N., P. R. Krugman, and L. H. Summers. 1988. U. S. competitiveness: Beyond the trade deficit. Science 241(July 15): 299-307.

Hill, C. 1990. Technology Policy: The Challenges of R&D Collaboration. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Research Service.

Holland, M. 1989. When the Machine Stopped, A Cautionary Tale from Industrial America. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

Hornbeck, J. F. 1990a. Maintaining Highway and Bridge Investments: What Role for Federal Grant Program? Washington, D.C.: Congressional Research Service.

Hornbeck, J. F. 1990b. The Bridge Crisis: An Economic Development Perspective. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Research Service.

Japan Key Technology Center. 1989. Program Prospectus. Tokyo, Japan.

Jones, B. 1986. State Technology Programs in the United States. St. Paul, Minn.: Governor's Office of Science and Technology, Minnesota Department of Energy and Economic Development.

Jorgenson, D. W. 1990. Productivity and Economic Growth. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard Institute of Economic Research, Harvard University.

Jorgenson, D. W. 1991a. Fragile Statistical Foundations: The Macroeconomics of Public Infrastructure Investment. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University.

Jorgenson, D. W. 1991b. Investing in productivity growth. In Technology and Economics. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.

Jorgenson, D. W., F. M. Gollop, and B. M. Fraumeni. 1987. Productivity and U.S. Economic Growth. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.


Kelley, M. R., and H. Brooks. 1988. The State of Computerized Automation in U.S. Manufacturing. Center for Business and Government, Harvard University, Cambridge, Mass.

Kendrick, J. 1980. Productivity trends in the United States. In Lagging Productivity Growth, S. Maital and N. M. Meltz, eds. Cambridge, Mass.: Ballinger.

Kerr, N. A. 1987. The Legacy, A Centennial History of the State Agricultural Experiment Stations, 1887-1987. Columbia: University of Missouri.

Kirk, L. 1991. MCC charting new course for the '90s. Austin American Statesman (June 9):E1.

Kline, S. 1985. Research, Invention, Innovation, and Production: Models and Reality. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University.

Kline, S. 1990. Models of Innovation and Their Policy Consequences. Report INN-4B. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University.

Kline, S., and N. Rosenberg. 1986. An overview of innovation. In The Positive Sum Strategy, R. Landau and N. Rosenberg, eds. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.

Kodama, F. 1990. Rival's participating in collective research: Its economic and technological rationale. Paper presented to the NISTEP International Conference on Science and Technology Policy Research, Shimoda, Japan, February 2-4.

Kopcke, R. W. 1980. Capital accumulation and potential growth. In The Decline in Productivity Growth. Boston: Federal Reserve Bank of Boston.

Krafcik, J. F., and J. P. MacDuffie. 1989. Explaining High-Performance Manufacturing. Cambridge, Mass.: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Kravis, I. B., and R. E. Lipsey. 1989. Technological Characteristics of Industries and the Competitiveness of the U.S. and Its Multinational Firms. Cambridge, Mass.: National Bureau of Economic Research.

Suggested Citation:"F REFERENCES AND BIBLIOGRAPHY." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. 1992. The Government Role in Civilian Technology: Building a New Alliance. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1998.
×

Kroch, E. 1991. Recent real income and wage trends in the United States. Federal Reserve Bank of New York Quarterly Review 16(Summer):36-39.

Krugman, P. R., and G. N. Hatsopoulos. 1987. The problem of U.S. competitiveness in manufacturing. New England Economic Review (January/February):18-29.

Ladendorf, K. 1991. MCC charting new course for the '90s. Austin American-Statesman (June 9):E1.

Landsberg, H. H. 1986. The death of synfuels. Resources 82(Winter):7-8.

Lee, T. H., and P. P. Reid, eds. 1991. National Interests in an Age of Global Technology. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.

Levy, J. D., and R. J. Samuels. 1989. The MIT Japan Program. Paper presented for the Conference on Oligopolies and Hierarchies, Asnière-sur-Oise, France, April 20-23. (Available from Center for International Studies, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Mass.)

Liebenau, J. 1987. Medical Science and Medical Industry. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University.

Lineback, J. R. 1987. Can MCC survive the latest defections? Electronics 60(2):30.


Mansfield, E. 1968. The Economics of Technical Change. New York: W. W. Norton.

Mansfield, E. 1984. Economic Effects of Research and Development: The Diffusion Process and Public Policy. In Planning for National Technology Policy, R. A. Goodman and J. Pavon, eds. New York: Praeger.

Mansfield, E. 1985. Studies of tax policy, innovation, and patents: A final report. Division of Policy Analysis and Research, National Science Foundation, Washington, D.C.

Mansfield, E. 1986. Microeconomics of technological innovation. In Positive Sum Strategy, R. Landau and N. Rosenberg, eds. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.

Mansfield, E. 1988a. Industrial R&D in Japan and the United States: A comparative study. American Economic Review 78(2):223-228.

Mansfield, E. 1988b. Industrial innovation in Japan and the United States. Science 241(September 30):1769-1774.

Mansfield, E. 1989. Technical change in robotics: Japan and the United States. Managerial and Decision Economics Special Issue (Spring): 19-25.

Mansfield, E., et al. 1977. Social and private rates of return from industrial innovations. Quarterly Journal of Economics 91(2):221-240.

March, A. 1989a. The U.S. commercial aircraft industry and its foreign competitors. In MIT Commission on Industrial Productivity Working Papers, vol. I. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

March, A. 1989b. The U.S. machine tool industry and its foreign competitors. In MIT Commission on Industrial Productivity Working Papers, vol. II. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

Massachusetts Institute of Technology. 1989. MIT Commission on Industrial Productivity Working Papers, vols. I and II. Cambridge, Mass.:MIT Press.

Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Commission Working Group on Consumer Electronics Industries. 1989. The decline of U.S. consumer electronics manufacturing: History, hypotheses, and remedies. In MIT Commission on Industrial Productivity Working Papers, vol. I. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Commission Working Group on the Materials Industry. 1989. The future of the U.S. steel industry in international markets. In MIT Commission on Industrial Productivity Working Papers, vol. II. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

McCauley, N., and S. A. Zimmer. 1989. Explaining international differences in the cost of capital. Federal Reserve Bank of New York Quarterly Review 14(2):7-28.

McLoughlin, G. J. 1989. The Europe 1992 Plan: Science and Technology Issues. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Research Service.

Suggested Citation:"F REFERENCES AND BIBLIOGRAPHY." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. 1992. The Government Role in Civilian Technology: Building a New Alliance. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1998.
×

McLoughlin, G. J. 1990. Japan's Science and Technology Strategies and Policies. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Research Service.

Mowery, D. C. 1983. The Impact of Federal Support of Transportation R&D: The Case of Aircraft. Paper presented at the Symposium on the Impact of Federal Support of R&D, National Academy of Sciences, Washington, D.C.

Mowery, D. C. 1985. Federal funding of R&D in transportation: The case of aviation. Paper presented at the Workshop on the Federal Role in Research and Development, National Academy of Sciences, Washington, D.C.

Mowery, D. C. 1987. The Diffusion of New Manufacturing Technologies. In The Impact of New Technologies on Employment and Economic Growth, R. M. Cyert and D. C. Mowery, eds. Cambridge, Mass.: Ballinger.

Mowery, D. C. 1988a. Collaborative Research: An Assessment of Its Potential Role in the Development of High Temperature Superconductivity. A report prepared for the Office of Technology Assessment, U.S. Congress, Washington, D.C.

Mowery, D. C. 1988b. Conclusions and policy implications. In International Collaborative Ventures in U.S. Manufacturing, D. C. Mowery, ed. Cambridge, Mass.: Ballinger.

Mowery, D.C. 1991. The challenge of international trade and investment to U.S. technology policy . Paper presented at National Academy of Engineering symposium on Linking Trade and Technology Policies, Washington, D.C. June 10-11.

Mowery, D. C. Forthcoming. The challenge of international trade to U.S. technology policy. In Linking Trade and Technology Policy: An International Comparison of the Policies of Industrialized Countries, National Academy of Engineering. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.

Mowery, D. C., and R. M. Cyert, eds. 1987. Technology and Employment: Innovation and Growth in the U.S. Economy. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.

Mowery, D. C., and N. Rosenberg. 1989a. New Developments in U.S. Technology Policy: Implications for Competitiveness and International Trade Policy. California Management Review 32(1):107-124.

Mowery, D. C., and N. Rosenberg. 1989b. Technology and the Pursuit of Economic Growth. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Munnell, A. H. 1990a. Why has productivity growth declined? Productivity and public investment. New England Economic Review (January/February):3-22.

Munnell, A. H. 1990b. How Does Public Infrastructure Affect Regional Economic Performance? Federal Reserve Bank of New York, New York City.

Nadiri, M. Ishaq. 1980. Sectoral productivity slowdown. American Economic Review (May):349-352.

Robert R. Nathan Associates. 1978. Net Rates of Return on Innovations, vols. 1 and 2. Report prepared for the National Science Foundation, Washington, D.C.

National Academy of Engineering. 1989. Assessment of the National Science Foundation's Engineering Research Centers Program. Washington, D.C.

National Academy of Engineering. 1991. National Interests in an Age of Global Technology. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.

National Academy of Engineering. 1992. Time Horizons and Technology Investments. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.

National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. 1983. Strengthening the Government-University Partnership in Science. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.

National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. 1986. New Alliances and Partnerships in American Science and Engineering. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.

Suggested Citation:"F REFERENCES AND BIBLIOGRAPHY." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. 1992. The Government Role in Civilian Technology: Building a New Alliance. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1998.
×

National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. 1987a. Balancing the National Interest. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.

National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. 1987b. Research Briefings 1987: Report of the Panel on High-Temperature Superconductivity. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.

National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. 1987c. Technology and Employment: Innovation and Growth in the U.S. Economy. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.

National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. 1988. Federal Science and Technology Budget Priorities: New Perspectives and Procedures. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.

National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. 1989. Assessment of the National Science Foundation's Engineering Research Centers Program. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.

National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. 1990a. Corporate Restructuring and Industrial Research and Development. Washington, D.C.: Academy Industry Program, National Academy of Sciences.

National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. 1990b. The Academic Research Enterprise Within the Industrialized Nations: Report of a Symposium. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.

National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. 1991a. Finding Common Ground: U.S. Exports Controls in a Changed Global Environment . Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.

National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. 1991b. Industrial Perspectives on Innovation and Interaction with Universities. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.

National Advisory Committee on Semiconductors. 1989. First Annual Report. Washington, D.C.

National Center for Manufacturing Sciences. 1991. 1990 Annual Report. Ann Arbor, Mich.

National Coalition for Advanced Manufacturing. 1991. Industrial Modernization: An American Imperative. Washington, D.C.

National Critical Technologies Panel. 1991. Report of the National Critical Technologies Panel. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

National Institute of Standards and Technology. 1990. The Manufacturing Technology Centers Program: A Report to the Secretary of Commerce by Visiting Committee on Advanced Technology, Gaithersburg, Md.

National Research Council. 1990. Learning the R&D System: Industrial R&D in Japan and the United States. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.

National Research Council. 1991. R&D Consortia and U.S.-Japan Collaboration: Report of a Workshop. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.

National Science Board. 1989. Science and Engineering Indicators-1989. Washington, D.C.

National Science Board. 1991a. Potential Causes of the Erosion in U.S. Technology Leadership. Washington, D.C.

National Science Board. 1991b. Science and Engineering Indicators-1991. Washington, D.C.

National Science Foundation. 1988. The Science and Technology Resources of Japan: A Comparison with the United States. Washington, D.C.

National Science Foundation. 1989a. International Science and Technology Update: 1988. Washington, D.C.

National Science Foundation. 1989b. National Patterns of R&D Resources: 1989. Washington, D.C.

Suggested Citation:"F REFERENCES AND BIBLIOGRAPHY." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. 1992. The Government Role in Civilian Technology: Building a New Alliance. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1998.
×

National Science Foundation. 1991. Federal Funds for R&D: Fiscal Years 1989, 1990, 1991. Washington, D.C.

National Science Foundation, Tokyo Office. 1989a. 1988 Survey of Research and Development in Japan. Tokyo, January 11.

National Science Foundation, Tokyo Office. 1989b. JFY 1988 R&D Budget of Japan's Ministry of International Trade and Industry (MITI). Tokyo, March 9.

National Science Foundation and American Association of Engineering Societies. 1990. The ERCs (Engineering Research Centers): A Partnership for Competitiveness. Report of a Symposium. National Science Foundation, Washington, D.C., February 28 to March 1.

Nelson, R. R., ed. 1982. Government and Technical Progress. New York: Pergamon Press.

Nelson, R. R. 1984. High-Technology Policies: A Five Nation Comparison. Washington, D.C.: American Enterprise Institute.

Nelson, R. R. 1989. What is private and what is public about technology? Science, Technology, and Human Values 14(Summer):229-241.

Nelson, R. R. 1990. U.S. technological leadership: Where did it come from and where did it go? Research Policy 19(2):117-132.

Nelson, R. R., and R. N. Langlois. 1983. Industrial innovation policy: Lessons from American history. Science 219(February 18):814.

Nelson, R. R., M. J. Peck, and E. D. Kalachek. 1987. Technology, Economic Growth, and Public Policy. Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution.

Noll, R. G., and L. R. Cohen. 1985. Economics, politics, and government research and development. Paper commissioned for Workshop on the Federal Role in Research and Development, National Academy of Sciences, Washington, D.C.

Nowack, J. A. 1989. The university policy environment for university-industry interactions. In Government and Industry Collaboration in Biomedical Research and Education, Institute of Medicine. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.

Office of Science and Technology Policy. 1991. Grand Challenges: High Performance Computing and Communications, Executive Summary. Washington, D.C.: Executive Office of the President.

Office of Science and Technology Policy. 1990a. Testimony of D. Allan Bromley, Director, before the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, Washington, D.C.

Office of Science and Technology Policy. 1990b. U.S. Technology Policy. Washington, D.C.: Executive Office of the President.

Office of the U.S. Trade Representative. 1991. Export Growth and the Importance of Fast Track. Washington, D.C.: Executive Office of the President.

Official Journal of the European Communities. 1990. Council decision of April 23. No. L117/28.

Okimoto, D. I. 1986. Regime characteristics of Japanese industrial policy. In Japan's High-Technology Industries, H. Patrick, ed. Seattle: University of Washington.

Optoelectronics Technology Research Laboratory. 1990. Key Technology for the 21st Century. Program Description. Tsukuba Science City, Japan.

Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. 1991. The International Development of Technology. Paris.

Osborne, D. 1987. Economic Competitiveness: The States Take the Lead. Washington, D.C.: Economic Policy Institute.


Palca, J. 1991. OTA challenges dogma on research funding. Science 251 (March 29):1555.

Pennsylvania Technical Assistance Program. 1986. Annual Report. The Pennsylvania State University and the Pennsylvania Department of Commerce. Harrisburg, Penn.: Pennsylvania Department of Commerce.

Suggested Citation:"F REFERENCES AND BIBLIOGRAPHY." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. 1992. The Government Role in Civilian Technology: Building a New Alliance. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1998.
×

Perry, G. L. 1987. Potential output and productivity. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, No. 1. Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution.

Physics Today. 1991. Roundtable: New Challenges for the Federal Labs. 44(2):24-35.

Pollard, M. R. 1989. Selected Examples of Government and Industry Collaboration in Pharmaceutical Research and Development. In Government and Independent Collaboration in Biomedical Research and Education, Report of a Workshop. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.

Porter, M. E. 1985. Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance. New York: The Free Press.

Porter, M. E. 1990. The Competitive Advantage of Nations. New York: The Free Press.

President's Council on Competitiveness. 1991. Report on National Biotechnology Policy. Washington, D.C.

Press, F. 1988. The Dilemma of the Golden Age. Speech presented at the National Academy of Sciences annual meeting, Washington, D.C., April 26.

Reese, J., and R. Oakey. 1984. The adoption of new technology in the American machinery industry. Regional Studies 18:489-504.

Reich, R. B. 1987. The rise of techno-nationalism. The Atlantic Monthly 259(5):62-69.

Reich, R. B. 1991. The Wealth of Nations: Preparing America for 21st-Century Capitalism. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

Roland, A. 1985. Model Research. vol. 2. Washington, D.C.: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

Rothwell, R., and M. Dodgson. 1989. Regional Technology Policies: The Development of Regional Technology Transfer Infrastructures. United Kingdom: Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex.

Rothwell, R., and M. Dodgson. 1990. Technology policy in Europe: Trends and impacts. In Science, Technology, and Free Trade, J. de la Mothe and L. M. Ducharme, eds. London: Pintner Publishers.


Samuels, R. J. 1987. Research Collaboration in Japan. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Schacht, W. 1988a. Commercialization of Technology and Issues in the Competitiveness of Selected U. S. Industries: Semiconductors, Biotechnology, and Superconductors. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Research Service.

Schacht, W. 1988b. Technology Transfer: Utilization of Federally Funded Research and Development. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Research Service.

Schriesheim, A. 1990. Toward a golden age of technology transfer. Issues in Science and Technology 7(2):52-58.

Shan, W., D. J. Teece, and G. Pisano. 1988. Joint ventures and collaboration in the biotechnology industry. In International Collaborative Ventures in U.S. Manufacturing, D. C. Mowery, ed. Cambridge, Mass.: Ballinger.

Shapira, P. 1989. The National Science Foundation's Engineering Research Centers: Changing the Culture of U.S. Engineering? Contract report for the Office of Technology Assessment, U.S. Congress, Washington, D.C.

Shapira, P. 1990a. Helping small manufacturers modernize. Issues in Science and Technology 7(1):49-54.

Shapira, P. 1990b. Modernizing Manufacturing. Washington, D.C.: Economic Policy Institute.

Shorter, E. 1987. The Health Century. New York: Doubleday.

Small Business Administration. 1991. Testimony of Richard Shane, Assistant Administrator, Office of Innovation Research and Technology, before hearing of the Small Business Committee, U.S. House of Representatives, on the Small Business Innovation Research Program, U.S. Congress, October 30.

Suggested Citation:"F REFERENCES AND BIBLIOGRAPHY." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. 1992. The Government Role in Civilian Technology: Building a New Alliance. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1998.
×

Solow, R. 1957. Technical change and the aggregate production function. Review of Economics and Statistics 23(August):101-108.

Steinmueller, W. E. 1988. International joint ventures in the integrated circuit industry. In International Collaborative Ventures in U.S. Manufacturing, D. C. Mowery, ed. Cambridge, Mass.: Ballinger.

Strickland, S. P. 1989. The Story of the NIH Grant Program. Lanham, Md.: University Press of America.

Technology Management Center. 1985. The Use of Advanced Manufacturing Technologies in Industries Impacted by Import Competition: An Analysis of Three Pennsylvania Industries. Philadelphia.

Teich, A. H. 1985. Federal Support of Applied Research and Development: A Review of the United States Experience. Paper Commissioned for a Workshop on the Federal Role in Research and Development, National Academy of Sciences, Washington, D.C., November 21-22.

Tornatzky, L. G., and D. Luria. 1990. Technology Policies and Programs in Manufacturing: Toward Coherence and Impact. Ann Arbor, Mich.: Industrial Technology Institute.

Thurow, L. 1987. A weakness in process technology. Science 238(December 18):1659-1663.


U.S. Congress, Congressional Budget Office. 1984. Federal Support for R&D and Innovation. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office .

U.S. Congress, Congressional Budget Office. 1987. The Benefits and Risks of Federal Funding for SEMATECH. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

U.S. Congress, Congressional Budget Office. 1989. The Scope of the High-Definition Television Market and Its Implications for Competitiveness. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

U.S. Congress, Congressional Budget Office. 1990. Using R&D Consortia for Commercial Innovation: SEMATECH, X-Ray Lithography, and High-Resolution Systems. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

U.S. Congress, Congressional Research Service. 1984. Congressional Research Service Review: Synthetic Fuels Corporation. Washington, D.C.

U.S. Congress, U.S. General Accounting Office. 1984. Federal Agencies' Actions to Implement Section 11 of the Stevenson-Wydler Technology Innovation Act of 1980. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

U.S. Congress, U.S. General Accounting Office. 1988. Technology Transfer: Constraints Perceived by Federal Laboratory and Agency Officials. Washington D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

U.S. Congress, U.S. General Accounting Office. 1989a. The SEMATECH Consortium's Start-up Activities. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

U.S. Congress, U.S. General Accounting Office. 1989b. Federal Research: Assessment of Small Business Innovation Research Programs. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

U.S. Congress, U.S. General Accounting Office. 1990. Federal Research: SEMATECH's Efforts to Strengthen the U.S. Semiconductor Industry. Report to the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology, U.S. House of Representatives. GAO/RECE-90-236. September.

U.S. Congress, U.S. General Accounting Office. 1991a. Diffusing Innovations: Implementing the Technology Transfer Act of 1986. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

U.S. Congress, U.S. General Accounting Office. 1991b. Small Business Innovation Research Program Shows Success, but Could be Strengthened. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

Suggested Citation:"F REFERENCES AND BIBLIOGRAPHY." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. 1992. The Government Role in Civilian Technology: Building a New Alliance. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1998.
×

U.S. Congress, U.S. General Accounting Office. 1991c. Federal Research: SEMATECH's Efforts to Develop and Transfer Manufacturing Technology. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

U.S. Congress, House of Representatives. 1981. Committee on Science and Technology. Implementation of P.L. 96-480, Stevenson-Wydler Technology Innovation Act of 1980. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

U.S. Congress, House of Representatives. 1986. Committee on Science and Technology, 99th Congress, 2nd Session. Japanese Technical Literature Act of 1986. Report to accompany S. 1073, Report 99-618. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

U.S. Congress, House of Representatives. 1988. Committee on Science, Space, and Technology, 100th Congress, 2nd Session. Technology Transfer and Its Effect on the National Economy. A report prepared by the Technology Policy Task Force. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

U.S. Congress, House of Representatives. 1988. Committee on Science, Space, and Technology, 100th Congress, 2nd Session. Commercialization of Federally Funded R&D: A Guide to Technology Transfer from Federal Laboratories. A Congressional Research Service report for the Subcommittee on Science, Research, and Technology. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

U.S. Congress, House of Representatives. 1989. Committee on Science, Space, and Technology. Subcommittee on Science, Research, and Technology. Hearings. The Adequacy, Direction, and Priorities for the American Science and Technology Effort. 101st Congress, 1st Session. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

U.S. Congress, House of Representatives. 1989. Committee on Science, Space, and Technology. Subcommittee on Science, Research, and Technology. Hearings. Superconductivity. 101st Congress, 1st Session. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

U.S. Congress, House of Representatives. 1989. The Trade and Technology Promotion Act. H.R. 3833. 101st Congress, 1st Session.

U.S. Congress, House of Representatives. 1990a. Committee on Science, Space, and Technology. Subcommittee on Science, Research, and Technology, 101st Congress, 2nd Session. Hearing. Transfer of Technology from the Federal Laboratories. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office .

U.S. Congress, House of Representatives. 1990b. Committee on Small Business, Subcommittee on Regulation, Business Opportunities, and Energy, 101st Congress, 2nd Session. Hearing. Technology Transfer Obstacles in Federal Laboratories: Key Agencies Respond to Subcommittee Survey. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

U.S. Congress, House of Representatives. 1990c. Committee on Public Works and Transportation, Subcommittee on Aviation, 101st Congress, 2nd Session. Hearing. Reauthorizing Programs of the Federal Aviation Administration (Future Airport Capacity Needs and Proposals). Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

U.S. Congress, House of Representatives. 1990d. The Technology Corporation of America Act of 1990. H.R. 4715. 101st Congress, 2nd Session.

U.S. Congress, House of Representatives. 1991. DoE's Enhanced Technology Transfer Program. Statement of W. Henson Moore, Deputy Secretary, Department of Energy; and testimony of Matthew B. Coffey, president, National Tooling & Machining Association, at a hearing before the Committee on Energy and Commerce, Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations, 102nd Congress, 1st Session, Washington, D.C., July 25.

U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment. 1986. Research Funding as an Investment: Can We Measure the Returns? Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment. 1988. Advance Materials by Design: New Structural Materials Technologies. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

Suggested Citation:"F REFERENCES AND BIBLIOGRAPHY." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. 1992. The Government Role in Civilian Technology: Building a New Alliance. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1998.
×

U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment. 1989. Holding the Edge: Maintaining the Defense Technology Base. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment. 1990a. Critical Technologies: Communications for the Future. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment. 1990b. Helping America Compete: The Role of Scientific and Technical Information. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment. 1990c. Making Things Better: Competing in Manufacturing. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment. 1990d. Rebuilding the Foundations: State and Local Public Works Financing and Management. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment. 1991a. Federally Funded Research: Decisions for a Decade. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment. 1991b. Seeking Solutions: High-Performance Computing for Science. Background paper. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

U.S. Congress, Senate. 1988. The National High-Performance Computer Technology Act of 1988 . S.2928. 100th Congress, 2nd Session.

U.S. Congress, Senate. 1989. The Trade and Technology Promotion Act of 1989. S.1978. 101st Congress, 1st Session.

U.S. Congress, Senate. 1990. The Economic Growth Act of 1990. S.2765. 101st Congress, 2nd Session.

U.S. Congress, Senate. 1990. Committee on Governmental Affairs, 101st Congress, 2nd Session. Hearings. Trade and Technology Promotion Act. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

U.S. Department of Commerce. 1988. Federal Government Initiatives with Policy Implications for Science and Technology. Technology Administration. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

U.S. Department of Commerce. 1989. The Federal Technology Transfer Act of 1986: The First Two Years. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

U.S. Department of Commerce. 1990a. Advanced Technology Program: Proposal Preparation Guidelines, Proposal Solicitation-ATP 90-01. Gaithersburg, Md.: Technology Administration, National Institute of Standards and Technology.

U.S. Department of Commerce. 1990b. Small Business Development Act: Seventh Year Results. U.S. Small Business Administration. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

U.S. Department of Commerce. 1990c. Emerging Technologies: A Survey of Technical and Economic Opportunities. Gaithersburg, Md.: Technology Administration, National Institute of Standards and Technology.

U.S. Department of Commerce. 1990d. SEMATECH 1990: A Report to Congress. Advisory Council on Federal Participation in SEMATECH. Report prepared for Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisitions by the Department of Commerce Under Secretary for Economic Affairs. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

U.S. Department of Commerce. 1991. Research, Services, Facilities: National Institute of Standards and Technology. Technology Administration, Washington, D.C.

U.S. Department of Commerce, National Institute of Standards and Technology. 1991. NIST Manufacturing Centers Technology Program: Questions and Answers. Washington, D.C.

U.S. Department of Defense. 1990. Critical Technologies Plan. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

Suggested Citation:"F REFERENCES AND BIBLIOGRAPHY." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. 1992. The Government Role in Civilian Technology: Building a New Alliance. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1998.
×

U.S. Department of Energy. 1990. Technology 1989. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

U.S. Department of Energy. 1991a. DOE's Enhanced Technology Transfer Program. Seminar, January 24.

U.S. Department of Energy. 1991b. Technology Transfer: A DOE and Industry Partnership for the Future. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

U.S. Department of Labor. 1986. International Comparisons of Manufacturing Productivity and Labor Cost Trends. Washington, D.C.: Office of Productivity and Technology, Bureau of Labor Statistics.

U.S. Department of Transportation. 1989. Selected Highway Statistics and Charts 1989. Federal Highway Administration. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration, FY 1989. Eighth Annual Report of Accomplishments Under the Airport Improvement Program. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

Uyehara, C. 1990. Appraising Japanese Science and Technology. Joint Economic Committee, 101st Congress, 2nd Session. Hearings, Japan's Economic Challenge.

Van Slyke, C. J. 1946. New Horizons in Medical Research. Science 104(December 13):561.

Vonortas, N. S. 1989. The Changing Economic Context: Strategic Alliances Among Multinationals. Troy, N.Y.: Center for Science and Technology Policy, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute.


Warner, J., and J. Bremer. 1991. Hard lessons in cooperative research. Issues in Science and Technology (Spring):44-49.

Washington Post. 1990. A new government role in key industries (April 26).

Wilson, J. S. 1987. Productivity and Competitiveness: Industrial Extension Services and Technology Transfer Programs in the U.S. Washington, D.C.: The World Bank.

Wilson, J. S. 1991. The Contribution of Infrastructure, Human and Physical Capital, and R&D Investments to Productivity Growth. Paper prepared for the Science, Technology, and Economic Policy Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C.

Wolff, E. 1981. The composition of output and the productivity growth slowdown of 1967-76. New York University, Department of Economics. Mimeograph.


Yoder, S. K. 1987a. Americans Spurn Japan's Research Offer. Wall Street Journal (December 30):14.

Yoder, S. K. 1987b. Western Research Labs Sprout in Japan as U.S. Firms Are Lured by High-Tech Boom. Wall Street Journal (November, 12):33.

Suggested Citation:"F REFERENCES AND BIBLIOGRAPHY." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. 1992. The Government Role in Civilian Technology: Building a New Alliance. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1998.
×

Index

A

Adams Act (1906), 54

Advanced Civilian Technology Agency, 124-125.

See also Civilian Technology Agency (CTA)

Advanced Manufacturing Initiative, 151-152

Advanced Technology Program (ATP), 2, 114, 119

cost-sharing provisions in, 117

description of, 66-67, 152, 195

establishment of, 170

panel conclusions regarding, 67

Agricultural extension programs, 49, 50, 53-54, 60, 93, 94

Agriculture Research Service, 70

Airbus consortium, 90

Aircraft industry

federal role in civilian, 57-58, 60

technology transfer in, 150

Alvey program, 90-91

American Technology Preeminence Act of 1992, 155

Antitrust restrictions, 159, 193

Appropriability, 19, 20, 51, 110, 114

ARCH Development Corporation, 76

Argonne National Laboratory, 76

Artificial intelligence, 193

Automotive electronics industry, 150-151

B

Balance of trade, U.S. in high-technology goods, 3

Basic research, 2, 80, 82, 84, 96, 110, 112, 135, 152, 157

in biotechnology industry, 146, 147

expenditures, 11, 18

in federal laboratories, 74-75

federal support for, viii, 12, 30, 32, 49-53, 92, 153

and the National Institutes of Health, 56

output of, 21

returns from, 49-51

strength of, 41

in universities, 31, 158, 164-166

Bell Communications Research, 80

Ben Franklin Partnership Program, 153

Biomedical industry

role of federal support in, 55-56

Suggested Citation:"F REFERENCES AND BIBLIOGRAPHY." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. 1992. The Government Role in Civilian Technology: Building a New Alliance. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1998.
×
Page 199
Suggested Citation:"F REFERENCES AND BIBLIOGRAPHY." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. 1992. The Government Role in Civilian Technology: Building a New Alliance. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1998.
×
Page 200
Suggested Citation:"F REFERENCES AND BIBLIOGRAPHY." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. 1992. The Government Role in Civilian Technology: Building a New Alliance. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1998.
×
Page 201
Suggested Citation:"F REFERENCES AND BIBLIOGRAPHY." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. 1992. The Government Role in Civilian Technology: Building a New Alliance. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1998.
×
Page 202
Suggested Citation:"F REFERENCES AND BIBLIOGRAPHY." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. 1992. The Government Role in Civilian Technology: Building a New Alliance. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1998.
×
Page 203
Suggested Citation:"F REFERENCES AND BIBLIOGRAPHY." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. 1992. The Government Role in Civilian Technology: Building a New Alliance. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1998.
×
Page 204
Suggested Citation:"F REFERENCES AND BIBLIOGRAPHY." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. 1992. The Government Role in Civilian Technology: Building a New Alliance. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1998.
×
Page 205
Suggested Citation:"F REFERENCES AND BIBLIOGRAPHY." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. 1992. The Government Role in Civilian Technology: Building a New Alliance. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1998.
×
Page 206
Suggested Citation:"F REFERENCES AND BIBLIOGRAPHY." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. 1992. The Government Role in Civilian Technology: Building a New Alliance. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1998.
×
Page 207
Suggested Citation:"F REFERENCES AND BIBLIOGRAPHY." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. 1992. The Government Role in Civilian Technology: Building a New Alliance. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1998.
×
Page 208
Suggested Citation:"F REFERENCES AND BIBLIOGRAPHY." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. 1992. The Government Role in Civilian Technology: Building a New Alliance. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1998.
×
Page 209
Suggested Citation:"F REFERENCES AND BIBLIOGRAPHY." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. 1992. The Government Role in Civilian Technology: Building a New Alliance. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1998.
×
Page 210
Suggested Citation:"F REFERENCES AND BIBLIOGRAPHY." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. 1992. The Government Role in Civilian Technology: Building a New Alliance. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1998.
×
Page 211
Suggested Citation:"F REFERENCES AND BIBLIOGRAPHY." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. 1992. The Government Role in Civilian Technology: Building a New Alliance. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1998.
×
Page 212
Suggested Citation:"F REFERENCES AND BIBLIOGRAPHY." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. 1992. The Government Role in Civilian Technology: Building a New Alliance. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1998.
×
Page 213
Next: INDEX »
The Government Role in Civilian Technology: Building a New Alliance Get This Book
×
Buy Paperback | $50.00
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

As U.S. industry faces worldwide challenges, policymakers are asking questions about the role of the federal government—not only in promoting basic research but also in ushering new innovations to the marketplace. This book offers an expert consensus on how government and industry together can respond to the new realities of a global marketplace.

The volume offers firm conclusions about policy and organizational changes with the greatest potential to improve our technological competitiveness—and presents three alternative approaches for a new federal role.

The volume examines:

  • How federal involvement in technology development affects the nation's economic well-being.
  • What we can learn from past federal efforts to stimulate civilian technology development—in the United States and among our major industrial competitors.
  • How trends in productivity, R&D, and other key areas have affected U.S. performance, and how we compare to the world's rising industrial economies.

Offering guidance on one of the 1990s most important issues, this volume will be indispensible to federal policymakers, executives in industry and technology, and researchers.

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!