National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

PAPERBACK
price:$27.00
add to cart

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

Food Labeling: Toward National Uniformity (1992)
Institute of Medicine (IOM)

Citation Manager

. "1 Summary." Food Labeling: Toward National Uniformity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 1992.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
10
bottomleft bottomright

The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.


Food Labeling: Toward National Uniformity

FDCA section

Determination of Implementation

Conclusion

Suggestions to FDA

403(i)(1)-Continued

 

Citrus

 

 

 

• Preempted under other NLEA provision not part of this study

• States should petition FDA to amend citrus standards of identity

 

 

Honey

 

 

 

• Exempt State requirements until FDA considers need for Federal requirement

 

 

 

Milk, milk products, and other dairy products

 

 

 

• Preempted under other NLEA provision not part of this study

 

 

 

Seafood

 

 

 

• Continue use of Fish List advisory opinion as Federal policy

 

 

 

• Consider origin definitions for catfish and other aquaculture seafood products

 

 

 

• Preempt State surimi requirements

 

 

 

maple syrup

 

 

 

• Preempted under other NLEA provision not part of this study

 

 

 

Olive and vegetable oils

 

 

 

• Related State requirements are candidates for preemption

 

 

 

Oriental noodles

 

 

 

• Related State requirements are candidates for preemption

 

Page
10
Front Matter (R1-R16)
1 Summary (1-26)
2 Background of the Study (27-34)
3 Contextual Factors Affecting the Regulation of Misbranded Food (35-62)
4 Criteria for Determining Adequate Implementation of the Federal Statute (63-84)
5 Comparison and Analysis of Federal and State Food Labeling Requirements (85-140)
6 Issues Raised By States, Consumers, and Industry (141-162)
Appendixes (163-164)
A Provision for the State Food Labeling Study Contained in the Nutrition Labeling and Education Act of 1990 (165-166)
B Participants at the Public Meeting Held by the Committee on State Food Labeling, May 30, 1991 (167-168)
C Letter of Request Sent to State and Local Regulators and Consumer Groups by the Committee on State Food Labeling (169-172)
D States Providing Written Response to the Six Questions from the Committee on State Food Labeling (173-174)
E Individuals from States That Provided Information to the Committee on State Food Labeling (175-182)
F State and Local Laws, Regulations, and Other Materials Submitted to the Committee on State Food Labeling (183-194)
G Areas of Discrepancy Between Federal and State Food Labeling Requirements Identified by States and Consumer and Industry Groups (195-202)
H State Food Labeling Requirements and Relationship to the Misbranding Provisions of Section 403 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (203-208)
I Case Study: Requirements for Labeling Bottle Water (209-218)
J Biographical Sketches of Committee Members and Staff (219-224)
Index (225-240)