National Academies Press: OpenBook

Food Labeling: Toward National Uniformity (1992)

Chapter: Front Matter

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." Institute of Medicine. 1992. Food Labeling: Toward National Uniformity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2001.
×

FOOD LABELING

Toward National Uniformity

Donna V. Porter and Robert O. Earl, Editors

Committee on State Food Labeling

FOOD AND NUTRITION BOARD

INSTITUTE OF MEDICINE

NATIONAL ACADEMY PRESS
Washington, D.C.
1992

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." Institute of Medicine. 1992. Food Labeling: Toward National Uniformity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2001.
×

National Academy Press
2101 Constitution Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20418

NOTICE: The project that is the subject of this report was approved by the Governing Board of the National Research Council, whose members are drawn from the councils of the National Academy of Sciences, the National Academy of Engineering, and the Institute of Medicine. The members of the committee responsible for the report were chosen for their special competences and with regard for appropriate balance.

This report has been reviewed by a group other than the authors according to procedures approved by a Report Review Committee consisting of members of the National Academy of Sciences, the National Academy of Engineering, and the Institute of Medicine.

The Institute of Medicine was chartered in 1970 by the National Academy of Sciences to enlist distinguished members of the appropriate professions in the examination of policy matters pertaining to the health of the public. In this, the Institute acts under both the Academy’s 1863 congressional charter responsibility to be an adviser to the federal government and its own initiative in identifying issues of medical care, research, and education.

This study was supported by project no. 282-89-0022 from the Public Health Service, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

Library of Congress Catalog Card No. 92-60416

International Standard Book Number 0-309-04737-4

Additional copies of this report are available from:
National Academy Press
2101 Constitution Avenue, N.W. Washington, DC 20418

S585

Printed in the United States of America

The serpent has been a symbol of long life, healing, and knowledge among almost all cultures and religions since the beginning of recorded history. The image adopted as a logotype by the Institute of Medicine is based on a relief carving from ancient Greece, now held by the Staatlichemuseen in Berlin.

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." Institute of Medicine. 1992. Food Labeling: Toward National Uniformity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2001.
×

COMMITTEE ON STATE FOOD LABELING

J. PAUL HILE (Chair),

Phoenix Regulatory Associates, Ltd., Sterling, Virginia

MARY M. HESLIN (Vice Chair), Consultant,

Hartford, Connecticut

SANDRA O. ARCHIBALD,

Food Research Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, California

MARSHA N. COHEN,

Hastings College of the Law, University of California, San Francisco, California

JOHN W. ERDMAN, Jr.,

Department of Food Science and Division of Nutritional Sciences, College of Agriculture, University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois

JESSE F. GREGORY III,

Food Science and Human Nutrition Department, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida

TIMOTHY M. HAMMONDS,

Research and Education, Food Marketing Institute, Washington, D.C.

ALVIN J. LORMAN,

Akin, Gump, Hauer & Feld, Washington, D.C.

WALTER H. MEYER, Consultant,

Cincinnati, Ohio

PATRICIA M. MORRIS,

Public Voice for Food and Health Policy, Washington, D.C.

LAURA S. SIMS,

College of Human Ecology, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland

BAILUS WALKER, Jr.,

College of Public Health, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma

NANCY S. WELLMAN,

Department of Dietetics and Nutrition, Florida International University, Miami, Florida

Staff

DONNA V. PORTER, Project Director

ROBERT O. EARL, Staff Officer

BARBARA L. MATOS, Project Assistant

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." Institute of Medicine. 1992. Food Labeling: Toward National Uniformity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2001.
×

FOOD AND NUTRITION BOARD

M.R.C. GREENWOOD (Chair),

Office of Graduate Studies, University of California, Davis, California

DONALD B. McCORMICK (Vice Chair),

Department of Biochemistry, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia

DeWITT S. GOODMAN (Vice Chair) (deceased),**

Institute of Human Nutrition, Columbia University, New York, New York

PERRY L. ADKISSON,*

Department of Entomology, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas

LINDSAY ALLEN,

Department of Nutritional Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut

DENNIS M. BIER,

Pediatric Clinical Research Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri

EDWIN L. BIERMAN,**

Division of Metabolism, Endocrinology, and Nutrition, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington

MICHAEL P. DOYLE,

Department of Food Science and Technology, Georgia Experiment Station, University of Georgia, Griffin, Georgia

JOHANNA T. DWYER,

Frances Stern Nutrition Center, New England Medical Center Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts

JOHN W. ERDMAN, Jr.,

Department of Food Science and Division of Nutritional Sciences, College of Agriculture, University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois

NANCY FOGG-JOHNSON,

Consumer Healthcare Division, Miles, Inc., Elkhart, Indiana

CUTBERTO GARZA,

Division of Nutritional Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York

K. MICHAEL HAMBIDGE,

Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado Medical Center, Denver, Colorado

JANET C. KING,

Department of Nutritional Sciences, University of California, Berkeley, California

JOHN E. KINSELLA,

School of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences, University of California, Davis, California

LAURENCE N. KOLONEL,

Cancer Center of Hawaii, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii

SANFORD A. MILLER,

Graduate Studies and Biological Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, Texas

MALDEN C. NESHEIM,

Office of the Provost, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." Institute of Medicine. 1992. Food Labeling: Toward National Uniformity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2001.
×

ROY M. PITKIN (Ex Officio),**

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California

STEVE L. TAYLOR (Ex Officio),

Department of Food Science and Technology, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, Nebraska

*  

Member, National Academy of Sciences

**  

Member, Institute of Medicine

Staff

CATHERINE E. WOTEKI, Director

MARCIA S. LEWIS, Administrative Assistant

SUSAN M. WYATT, Financial Associate

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." Institute of Medicine. 1992. Food Labeling: Toward National Uniformity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2001.
×
This page in the original is blank.
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." Institute of Medicine. 1992. Food Labeling: Toward National Uniformity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2001.
×

Preface

The Committee on State Food Labeling was assembled in the spring of 1991 by the Food and Nutrition Board (FNB) of the Institute of Medicine (IOM) to conduct a study of selected Federal and State food labeling requirements. The study was initiated in response to the Nutrition Labeling and Education Act of 1990 (NLEA; P.L. 101–535). NLEA preempted all State and local misbranding laws and regulations on a fixed schedule in order to achieve national uniformity. One provision of Section 6 of NLEA required the Secretary of Health and Human Services to enter into a contract with a public or nonprofit private entity to conduct a study of State and local laws that require food labeling of the type mandated by certain misbranding provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act of 1938, as amended (FDCA)—that is, Sections 403(b), 403 (d), 403(f), 403(h), 403(i)(1), and 403(k). The study was also to consider whether the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has been adequately implementing those sections prior to the effective date of preemption of related State and local requirements.

FDA, the study's sponsoring agency, contracted with IOM based on the Institute's expertise in food labeling issues, which was demonstrated by the 1990 report Nutrition Labeling: Issues and Directions for the 1990s. The 13 members of the Committee of State Food Labeling were selected for their expertise in consumer affairs, dietetics, Federal and State food regulatory policy, food law, food production and marketing, food science, human nutrition, and public health.

From the first meeting of the Committee, its members realized that there was a broad array of issues to be explored, some of which were outside their areas of experience. Consequently, the Committee gathered additional needed information through a public meeting, panel discussions at

Page viii Cite
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." Institute of Medicine. 1992. Food Labeling: Toward National Uniformity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2001.
×

Committee meetings, requests to the States, and communications with public interest groups, trade associations, and organizations representing food and drug officials. The Committee welcomed information from all outside sources. Further, the Committee recognized that the study was not typical of those regularly conducted by the Institute of Medicine. Beyond an understanding of the food, nutrition, and public health sciences important to the study, there was a need to consider Federal administrative procedures, the policy relationships of different levels of government, the Federal regulatory process, economic issues and consumer concerns. The composition of the Committee established by the Academy was multidisciplinary in nature to meet these diverse needs.

The Committee aggressively pursued collection of the information it identified as necessary to accomplish the requirements of the study outlined in NLEA. The Committee requested the 50 States, selected larger municipalities, and FDA to provide copies of applicable laws, regulations, and other policy statements promulgated in implementing those statutes. The data received from these requests were voluminous; both the amount of individual effort expended and the number of documents exceeded all expectations. The Committee found, however, that there was no single comprehensive data source available for the compilation of relevant Federal, State, and local labeling and related regulatory requirements. As a consequence, the Committee cannot be certain that all relevant materials that might exist were reviewed. With these caveats, the data the Committee collected are perhaps the most extensive available, and have been categorized and analyzed thoroughly. Following completion of the study, the Committee has planned for all the materials collected from States, localities, and other interested parties to be provided to FDA to allow access by all who wish to review them.

The Committee went beyond the strict limits of its charge for several reasons. First, from a practical standpoint, it was difficult and sometimes impossible to separate the existing State and local requirements into six discrete packages to parallel exactly the six FDCA Sections that are the subject of this report. The Committee, therefore, felt it was necessary to review and comment on all State requirements, except those that were obviously not part of the charge—for example, State requirements that were clearly preempted by other provisions of NLEA (e.g., the definition of ice cream). Second, the NLEA language was ambiguous, leaving unanswered questions regarding the scope of the Committee's inquiry and the status of some current State requirements under its automatic preemption requirements. This ambiguity was particularly true for FDCA Section 403(h),

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." Institute of Medicine. 1992. Food Labeling: Toward National Uniformity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2001.
×

dealing with standards of quality and fill. Section 403(h) as enacted, presumes the existence of standards established under FDCA Section 401. Standards of identity established under Section 401, however, are clearly preempted by NLEA. The Committee decided early in its deliberations that such questions of statutory interpretation were beyond its charge.

Finally, a wide variety of views emerged from the information provided to the Committee on the adequacy of FDA's implementation of the six FDCA Sections. In this regard, the Committee decided to review all materials and comments that were submitted and, in turn, believed it had a responsibility to provide FDA with the results of that review. Therefore, the report speaks to the future, suggesting that if FDA implementation of the six FDCA sections under study is to continue to be viewed as adequate by its State counterparts and critics, the agency must manage the petition process in an efficient, timely manner and commit Federal resources to food labeling enforcement. The Committee views its observations regarding both the petition process and enforcement as important outcomes of this study, together with its conclusions regarding the adequacy of FDA implementation and the status of existing State requirements.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

It is difficult to find an appropriate way to acknowledge the many persons who contributed to the development and completion of this report. Data on existing labeling statutes and related regulations were received from the 50 States, and one local jurisdiction. The Committee also drew heavily on FDA and others knowledgeable in the field of food labeling. It is not unreasonable to conclude that literally hundreds of people were somehow involved in the effort. The gratitude of the Committee extends well beyond those few who receive special recognition in the following paragraphs.

First, the Committee thanks those individuals who made presentations at its public meeting on behalf of State, national, and public interest organizations, and food companies: Richard Frank, Sherwin Gardner, Dennis Johnson, Sharon Lindan, Allen Matthys, Dan Sowards, Merrill Thompson, and Francis Williams (see also Appendix B). Their presentations provided a solid base of information for the Committee's work Second, the Committee recognizes the critical contribution of all those at the State and local levels of government who provided data. These individuals are not all known to the Committee, but their contributions are no less appreciated. Third, the Committee thanks the staff of FDA, especially those in the Division of Nutrition and the Regulations and Industry Activities Branch of the Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, as well as the Division of Federal-

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." Institute of Medicine. 1992. Food Labeling: Toward National Uniformity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2001.
×

State Relations of the Office of Regulatory Affairs. These offices all provided materials and other assistance to help the Committee understand the agency's policies and procedures.

At several of its meetings, the Committee held panel discussions focused on specific issues. We therefore wish to thank the following individuals for their participation in discussing:

  • NLEA background and Federal implications—Heinz Wilms, Director, Division of Federal-State Relations, FDA; Peter Barton Hutt, Partner, Covington and Burling; and William Schultz, Counsel, Subcommittee on Health, Committee on Health and the Environment, U.S. House of Representatives;

  • perspectives of State regulators—Leroy Corbin, National Association of State Departments of Agriculture; Jim Sevchik, New York State Department of Agriculture and Markets; Dan Sowards, Association of Food and Drug Officials; and Betsy Woodward, Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services;

  • industry concerns—Sherwin Gardner, Grocery Manufacturers of America; and Allen Matthys, National Food Processors Association; and

  • consumer views—Bruce Silverglade and Sharon Lindan, Center for Science in the Public Interest; Amy Karas, New York City Office of Consumer Affairs; and Barry Rubin, the Advocacy Institute.

Special thanks go to Richard L. Frank and Christina M. Markus of Olsson, Frank, and Weeda, P.C., and Sharon Lindan of the Center for Science in the Public Interest for their assistance in the identification of additional State and local food labeling activities, laws, and regulations relevant to the Committee's charge. The Committee also is indebted to Tom Mullen and Shirley Murphy, students at Hastings College of the Law, University of California, for performing legal data base searches to double-check the Committee's work, and Chambers Bryson, former chief of the Food and Drug Branch, California Department of Health Services, for drafting a background paper on State enforcement and the process of petitioning FDA for exemptions/exceptions from food labeling statutes.

Ten food companies and trade associations must be thanked for providing information on the economic costs/savings of uniform food laws and regulations: Borden Foods, General Mills, Grocery Manufacturers of America, Kellogg Company, Kraft General Foods, Land O'Lakes, National Food Processors Association, Pepsico-Frito Lay, Procter & Gamble, and the Quaker Oats Company.

The Committee also wishes to thank the Institute of Medicines project staff who were critical to the completion of this report. Donna V. Porter,

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." Institute of Medicine. 1992. Food Labeling: Toward National Uniformity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2001.
×

Project Director, Robert O. Earl, Staff Officer, and Barbara L. Matos, Project Assistant, were thoughtful, insightful, and untiring in their support. Others within the IOM who were supportive of the project and understanding of its unique character were Catherine E. Woteki, FNB Director, and Enriqueta C. Bond, IOM Executive Director. IOM computer analyst Sabrina Montesa ensured proper manuscript and report preparation.

Finally, I wish to thank my 12 colleagues on the Committee on State Food Labeling. They were a most able team who accepted the challenge of reviewing, categorizing, and evaluating the plethora of gathered materials with the professional skills and good humor necessary to provide Congress with the study it requested and ensure the development of a thoughtful, useful report for FDA. It was a pleasure to be associated with them and serve as chairman of the Committee.

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." Institute of Medicine. 1992. Food Labeling: Toward National Uniformity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2001.
×
This page in the original is blank.
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." Institute of Medicine. 1992. Food Labeling: Toward National Uniformity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2001.
×

5

 

COMPARISON AND ANALYSIS OF FEDERAL AND STATE FOOD LABELING REQUIREMENTS

 

85

   

Complexity of the Analysis and Coverage

 

85

   

Food Under the Name of Another Food—Section 403(b)

 

87

   

Container Fill and Deceptive Packaging—Section 403(d)

 

90

   

Placement of Required Information—Section 403(f)

 

97

   

Standards of Quality and of Fill of Container—Section 403(h)

 

103

   

Common or Usual Name—Section 403(i)(1)

 

107

   

Labeling of Artificial Colorings, Flavorings, and Chemical Preservatives—Section 403(k)

 

126

6

 

ISSUES RAISED BY STATES, CONSUMERS, AND INDUSTRY

 

141

   

Enforcement as a Dimension of Implementation

 

142

   

State Action Under NLEA

 

144

   

Cooperative Relationships Between FDA and the States

 

147

   

Preemption and the Petition Process

 

149

   

Economic Impact of Nonuniformity

 

153

   

Committee Observations

 

159

 

 

APPENDIXES

 

163

   

A Provision for the State Food Labeling Study Contained in the Nutrition Labeling and Education Act of 1990

 

165

   

B Participants at the Public Meeting Held by the Committee on State Food Labeling, May 30, 1991

 

167

   

C Letter of Request Sent to State and Local Regulators and Consumer Groups by the Committee on State Food Labeling

 

169

   

D States Providing Written Response to the Six Questions from the Committee on State Food Labeling

 

173

   

E Individuals from States That Provided Information to the Committee on State Food Labeling

 

175

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." Institute of Medicine. 1992. Food Labeling: Toward National Uniformity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2001.
×
This page in the original is blank.
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." Institute of Medicine. 1992. Food Labeling: Toward National Uniformity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2001.
×
Page R1
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." Institute of Medicine. 1992. Food Labeling: Toward National Uniformity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2001.
×
Page R2
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." Institute of Medicine. 1992. Food Labeling: Toward National Uniformity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2001.
×
Page R3
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." Institute of Medicine. 1992. Food Labeling: Toward National Uniformity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2001.
×
Page R4
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." Institute of Medicine. 1992. Food Labeling: Toward National Uniformity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2001.
×
Page R5
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." Institute of Medicine. 1992. Food Labeling: Toward National Uniformity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2001.
×
Page R6
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." Institute of Medicine. 1992. Food Labeling: Toward National Uniformity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2001.
×
Page R7
Page viii Cite
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." Institute of Medicine. 1992. Food Labeling: Toward National Uniformity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2001.
×
Page R8
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." Institute of Medicine. 1992. Food Labeling: Toward National Uniformity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2001.
×
Page R9
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." Institute of Medicine. 1992. Food Labeling: Toward National Uniformity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2001.
×
Page R10
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." Institute of Medicine. 1992. Food Labeling: Toward National Uniformity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2001.
×
Page R11
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." Institute of Medicine. 1992. Food Labeling: Toward National Uniformity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2001.
×
Page R12
Page xiii Cite
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." Institute of Medicine. 1992. Food Labeling: Toward National Uniformity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2001.
×
Page R13
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." Institute of Medicine. 1992. Food Labeling: Toward National Uniformity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2001.
×
Page R14
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." Institute of Medicine. 1992. Food Labeling: Toward National Uniformity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2001.
×
Page R15
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." Institute of Medicine. 1992. Food Labeling: Toward National Uniformity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2001.
×
Page R16
Next: 1 Summary »
Food Labeling: Toward National Uniformity Get This Book
×
Buy Paperback | $48.95
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

The Nutrition Labeling and Education Act of 1990 (NLEA) changed the existing regulatory framework for food labeling requirements that was shared among federal, state, and local levels of government. In addition to creating a system of mandatory nutrition labeling for foods, NLEA provided a schedule for the preemption of state and local labeling requirements that were not identical to federal provisions. Six provisions were not to be preempted until a study on the adequacy of the federal implementation of those provisions was completed.

Food Labeling is the result of that study. It presents recommendations concerning the Food and Drug Administration's implementation of the six provisions that were studied, suggestions for the future disposition of relevant state and local food labeling requirements, and views on the continuing importance of the working relationship among the various levels of government in assuring that consumers are protected from misleading label information.

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!