Questions? Call 888-624-8373

PAPERBACK
list:$23.95
Web:$21.55
add to cart

PDF BOOK
your price: $18.50
add to cart

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

Science and the National Parks (1992)
Commission on Geosciences, Environment and Resources (CGER)

Page
40
bottomleft bottomright

The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.


Science and the National Parks

clusion has implications for the future of the NPS program. One way to strengthen the NPS science program will be to strengthen cooperative research elements.

By itself, an adequate research program will not eliminate the many, complex threats faced by the national parks. But it will allow faster identification of human perturbations, greater understanding of cause and effect, better insights into prevention, and more appropriate strategies for mitigation so that managers can maintain systems in a desirable condition or restore them where necessary. Virtually all parks have a backlog of unaddressed research questions. This is noted in NPS's own assessment of threats to the parks (NPS, 1980), and it is illustrated clearly in the long lists that typically appear in the "research needs" sections of park resource management plans. Science must be a permanent fixture within the NPS and that research must be an ongoing, iterative process.

Page
40