National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

HARDBACK
price:$39.95
add to cart

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

Ground Water Vulnerability Assessment: Predicting Relative Contamination Potential Under Conditions of Uncertainty (1993)
Commission on Geosciences, Environment and Resources (CGER)

Citation Manager

. "Index." Ground Water Vulnerability Assessment: Predicting Relative Contamination Potential Under Conditions of Uncertainty. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 1993.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
194
bottomleft bottomright

The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.


Ground Water Vulnerability Assessment: Contamination Potential Under Conditions of Uncertainty

C

CALF, 58

Calibration, 78, 79

California, 14, 28, 152, 153.

See also San Joaquin Valley

Cape Cod, Massachusetts, 9, 28, 35, 139-144, 165-166

Cartography. See Geographic information systems;

Maps and mapping;

Resolution;

Scales and scaling

Case studies

ground water vulnerability index for pesticides (GWVIP), 162-165

Cape cod, 139-144

Florida, 145-151

Hawaii, 156-161

Iowa, 135-138

San Joaquin Valley, 151-155

Cells and polygons, 7, 65, 67, 87, 91

and geostatistical methods, 62

in GIS databases, 87, 90

in land use and cover mapping, 127

in processed-based models, 59

in soil mapping, 10, 113, 177

Censored data, 60

Centralized Database System (CDBS), 125-126

Chemical databases, 10, 176

Chemigation, 18, 21

Circular A-16, 106, 108

Clay in soils, 2, 42-43, 90

and sampling, 85

Cleanup and control of contamination, 4, 14, 31, 34

Climate, databases, 9, 91, 123-126, 182

Climatic Data Access Facility, 125-126

Cluster analysis, 60, 61

CMLS, 54, 56, 57, 58

Compliance monitoring, 34

Computers and computing, 22, 39, 40

environments, 7-8, 86-87

errors in, 8, 66, 96

see also Geographic information systems;

Process-based simulation models

Concentrations of contaminants, 7, 19, 80

regulatory limits, 34

and sampling methods, 85-86

and statistical methods, 6, 45

Conceptual errors, 66

Conditions on site use, 34

Confidence intervals, and map cells, 7, 67, 77-78

Confinement over aquifers, 43, 48

Contaminant pathways. See Flow paths

Coordination among programs, 5, 39, 40

Federal, 105-108, 124

GIS facilitation of, 94

State and local, 108-109

weather data, 124-125

Counterintuitive situations, 11, 179

County assessments, 23, 37

soil databases, 90, 113

Coupled transport models, 6, 45, 53

Cracks, 3, 18, 21, 94

Cross-contamination, 22

D

Data Base Analyzer and Parameter Estimator (DBAPE), 90-91

Data collection activity, 7, 9, 27, 38, 40, 65, 105

federal, 9, 105-108

remote sensing, 112, 132

of states, 9, 108

see also Monitoring activities and data

Data quality and availability, 2-3, 4-5, 8, 9, 26, 27, 90

and method selection, 37-38

and overlay and index methods, 5-6, 38, 48, 50, 51, 52

and process-based models, 6, 27, 37-38, 53, 56, 94, 105

processing and storage errors, 7, 66

and statistical methods, 6, 38, 45, 60, 63

uncertainties and errors, 3, 7, 20, 38, 63-66, 76-77, 104-105

see also Data collection activity;

Databases;

Monitoring activities and data

Page
194