National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

HARDBACK
price:$54.95
add to cart

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

Global Dimensions of Intellectual Property Rights in Science and Technology (1993)
Office of International Affairs (OIA)

Citation Manager

. "6 Comparative National Approaches to Intellectual Property Rights." Global Dimensions of Intellectual Property Rights in Science and Technology. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 1993.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
171
bottomleft bottomright

The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.


Global Dimensions of Intellectual Property Rights in Science and Technology

would be allowed only after 1997), and which include biotechnology (including genetic procedures to obtain animal and plant species or their varieties), plant varieties, microorganisms, chemicals, and alloys. The duration of patent protection, which used to be 14 years from the granting of the patent, was extended to 20 years from the date of filing the application. Limitations on patentees' rights (e.g., the granting of compulsory licenses) were restricted to exceptional circumstances. Protection for trademarks and industrial designs was also enhanced, and the law introduced more explicit protection for trade secrets.

The new law is also intended to improve the conditions for enforcement of IPRs by creating a new institution to help the Mexican Patent and Trademark Office: the Industrial Property Institute. It is also worth mentioning that Mexico amended its copyright law in 1991 in an attempt to correct some of its perceived weaknesses. The main change in this context was the adoption of tougher penalties for copyright violations.

Among the Asian NIEs—which, in general, already had higher levels of protection than the Latin American NIEs by the mid-1980s—the last few years have also been characterized by additional reforms designed to strengthen IPR protection: (1) Singapore enacted a new Copyright Act in 1987, expanding its scope and significantly increasing penalties for infringement. (2) Taiwan's Patent Law was amended in 1986, reversing the burden of proof to the alleged infringer and increasing penalties for IPR infringements. In 1991, a new Fair Trade Law was enacted, which provides for protection of trade secrets. Copyright law is also being revised with the goal of strengthening protection to a level similar to the one prevailing among Berne Convention signatories. (3) Korea amended its Patent Act in 1986, extending the term of patent protection (from 12 to 15 years), reverting the burden of proof, and increasing the requirements for compulsory licensing. Enforcement efforts have significantly increased since then, and a trade secrets law is being drafted. (4) Malaysia in turn revised its copyright law and acceded to the Berne Convention in 1990.6

Finally, let us take a look at Brazil, which was one of the main opponents of the movement toward higher levels of IPR protection in the early 1980s. The Brazilian Software Law of 1987 extended copyright protection to computer programs. Enforcement efforts to protect IPR have increased significantly over the last few years, particularly with respect to software and home-video cassettes. In 1991, the Collor administration submitted to the Brazilian Congress a draft law reviewing Brazil's system of "industrial protection." Among the main changes proposed in the new law are the

6  

For further details on the IPR systems of the Asian NIEs, see Schumann (1990) and U.S. Trade Representative (several years).

Page
171
Front Matter (R1-R12)
I Introduction (1-2)
1 The Global Dimensions of Intellectual Property Rights in Science and Technology (3-18)
2 Intellectual Property Institutions and the Panda's Thumb: Patents, Copyrights, and Trade Secrets in Economic Theory and History (19-62)
II The Case For and Against a Uniform Worldwide Intellectual Property Rights System (63-64)
Introduction (65-67)
3 Why a Uniform Intellectual Property System Makes Sense or the World (68-88)
4 Harmonization Versus Differentiation in Intellectual Property Right Regimes (89-106)
5 Unauthorized Use of Intellectual Property: Effects on Investment, Technology Transfer, and Innovation (107-145)
Discussion (146-148)
III National and International Approaches to Intellectual Property Rights (149-150)
Introduction (151-154)
6 Comparative National Approaches to Intellectual Property Rights (155-174)
7 Update on international Negotiations on Intellectual Property Rights (175-182)
Discussion (183-186)
IV Scientific and Technological Advance and Its Impact on the Role of Intellectual Property Rights (187-188)
Introduction (189-191)
8 Trends in Global Science and Technology and What They Mean for Intellectual Property Systems (192-207)
9 Sectoral Views (208-220)
10 Intellectual Property Rights and Competitive Strategy (221-240)
Discussion (241-246)
V Adapting Intellectual Property Rights to New Technologies (247-248)
Introduction (249-255)
11 Adapting the Intellectual Property System to New Technologies (256-283)
12 A Case Study on Computer Programs (284-318)
13 Biotechnology Case Study (319-328)
14 Semiconductor Chip Protection as a Case Study (329-338)
15 Optoelectronics (339-350)
Discussion (351-354)
VI Global Intellectual Property Rights Issues in Perspective (355-356)
Introduction (357-359)
16 Global Intellectual Property Rights Issues in Perspective: A Concluding Panel Discussion (360-383)
Disccusion (384-390)
Coda: Issues for Future Research (391-394)
VII Appendix (395-396)
A: Conference Agenda (397-400)
B: Biographies of Contributors (401-418)
Index (419-442)