Finally, I must take note of a relevant aspect of the American political process. I would argue that despite all the strengths of this nation, we are increasingly fragmented; our political process makes it difficult to come to grips with complex issues. Divergent and fragmented interests have so many different sources of leverage in the formulation of policy that it will continue to be very hard, especially on contentious issues such as IPRs, to reach agreement and to implement those policies consistently in the international arena. I believe that we are not in a good position to handle this aspect of our role.
Edquist, C. and S. Jacobsson. 1988. Flexible Automation. Cambridge, England: Blackwell.
Ergas, H. 1987. Does technology policy matter? in Technology and Global Industry, H. Brooks and B. Guile, eds. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
Evenson, Robert. 1990. Intellectual property rights, R&D, inventions, technology purchase, and piracy in economic development: An international comparative study. In Science and Technology: Lessons for Development Policy, R.E. Evenson and Gustav Ranis, eds. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.
Levin, R.C., A.K. Kleverick, R.R. Nelson, and S.G. Winter. 1987. Appropriating the returns from industrial research and development. Pp. 783-820 in Brookings Papers on Economic Activity. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.
Mansfield, Edwin. 1986. Patents and innovation: An empirical study. Management Science 32:173-181.
Mansfield, Edwin. 1988. Industrial innovation in Japan and the United States. Science (September 30): 1769-1774.
Nevens, T. Michael, Gregory L. Summe, and Bro Uttal. 1990. Commercializing technology: What the best companies do. Harvard Business Review (May-June):155.
Weiss, Charles, Jr. 1990. Scientific and technological constraints to economic growth and equity. In Science and Technology: Lessons for Developing Economies, Robert Evenson and Gustav Ranis, eds. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.