Questions? Call 888-624-8373

PAPERBACK
list:$49.00
Web:$44.10
add to cart

PDF BOOK
your price: $37.50
add to cart

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

Issues in Risk Assessment (1993)
Commission on Life Sciences (CLS)

Page
279
bottomleft bottomright

The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.


Issues in Risk Assessment

Appendix B
Workshop Organizing Subcommittee and Federal Liaison Group

Lawrence Barnthouse (Chairman)

Oak Ridge National Laboratory

Oak Ridge, TN

Dr. Douglas Buffington

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

Washington, DC

Dr. Robert J. Huggett

Virginia Institute of Marine Science

School of Marine Science of the College of William and Mary

Gloucester Point, VA

Dr. Ronald Kendall

Institute of Wildlife and Environmental Toxicology

Clemson University

Clemson, SC

Dr. Orie L. Loucks

Miami University

Oxford, OH

Alan Maki

Exxon Corporation

Houston, TX

D. Warner North

Decision Focus, Inc.

Mountain View, CA

Ian Nisbet

I.C.T. Nisbet & Company, Inc.

Lincoln, MA

Federal Liaison Group

Dr. Richard Parry, Jr.

U.S. Department of Agriculture

Beltsville, MD

Page
279
Front Matter (R1-R18)
Executive Summary (1-12)
Use of the Maximum Tolerated Dose in Animal Bioassays for Carcinogenicity (13-14)
1 Introduction (15-20)
2 Correlations Between Carcinogenic Potency and Other Measures of Toxicity (21-42)
3 Advantages and Disadvantages of Bioassys That Use the MTD (43-52)
4 Options Considered (53-60)
5 Conclusions and Recommendations (61-66)
References (67-78)
Appendix A: Workshop Summary - Maximum Tolerated Dose: Implications for Risk Assessment (79-90)
Appendix B: Workshop Organizing Subcommittee (91-92)
Appendix C: Workshop Federal Liaison Group (93-94)
Appendix D: Workshop Programs (95-96)
Appendix E: Workshop Attendees (97-110)
Appendix F: Correlation Between Carcinogenic Potency and the Maximum Tolerated Dose: Implications for Risk Assessment (111-172)
Appendix G: Informal Search for Supercarcinogens (173-184)
The Two-Stage Model of Carcinogenesis (185-186)
Issues in Risk Assessment (187-216)
References (217-222)
Appendix A: Workshop Summary - Two-Stage Modelsof Carcinogenesis (223-232)
Appendix B: Workshop Program (233-234)
Appendix C: Workshop Federal Liaison Group (235-236)
Appendix D: Workshop Attendees (237-238)
Appendix E: Workshop Organizing Task Group (239-240)
A Paradigm for Ecological Risk Assessment (241-242)
1 Introduction (243-246)
2 Scope of Ecological Risk Assessment (247-248)
3 Revision of 1983 Framework to Incorporate Ecological Risk Assessment (249-258)
4 Key Scientific Problems Limiting Application of Ecological Risk Assessment (259-264)
5 Conclusions (265-266)
6 Recommendations (267-268)
References (269-272)
Appendix A: Workshop Participants (273-278)
Appendix B: Workshop Organizing Subcommittee and Federal Liaison Group (279-280)
Appendix C: Workshop Introduction (281-282)
Appendix D: Opening Plenary Presentations (283-292)
Appendix E: Case Studies and Commentaries (293-308)
Appendix F: Breakout Sessions (309-336)
Appendix G: Contemplations on Ecological Risk Assessment (337-342)
Appendix H: Workshop Summary (343-346)
Appendix I: References for Appendixes (347-350)
Appendix J: Workshop Program (351-356)

Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 279
Issues in Risk Assessment Appendix B Workshop Organizing Subcommittee and Federal Liaison Group Lawrence Barnthouse (Chairman) Oak Ridge National Laboratory Oak Ridge, TN Dr. Douglas Buffington U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Washington, DC Dr. Robert J. Huggett Virginia Institute of Marine Science School of Marine Science of the College of William and Mary Gloucester Point, VA Dr. Ronald Kendall Institute of Wildlife and Environmental Toxicology Clemson University Clemson, SC Dr. Orie L. Loucks Miami University Oxford, OH Alan Maki Exxon Corporation Houston, TX D. Warner North Decision Focus, Inc. Mountain View, CA Ian Nisbet I.C.T. Nisbet & Company, Inc. Lincoln, MA Federal Liaison Group Dr. Richard Parry, Jr. U.S. Department of Agriculture Beltsville, MD

OCR for page 280
Issues in Risk Assessment Dr. Michael Slimak U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Washington, DC Dr. Maurice Zeeman U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Washington, DC

Representative terms from entire chapter:

federal liaison