. "7 Guidelines for the Conduct of Research at the National Institute of Health." Responsible Science, Volume II: Background Papers and Resource Documents. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 1993.
The following HTML text is provided to enhance online
readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML.
Please use the page image
as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.
Responsible Science: Ensuring the Integrity of the Research Process, Volume II
Policies and Guidelines Governing Appointments, Promotions, & Professional Activities of Faculty Members of The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
The Sponsored Projects Handbook
The Faculty Handbook of The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Guidelines of the Joint Committee on Clinical Investigation
Use of Experimental Animals at the Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions and University
Policy on Conflict of Commitment and Conflict of Interest
Rules and Guidelines for Responsible Conduct of Research
Procedures for Dealing with Issues of Professional Misconduct
Grievance Procedure for Faculty, Fellows, and the Student Body
All faculty members should have copies of these documents and should be familiar with their contents.1
As teachers and researchers, faculty should be informed about ethical issues in research. Because these issues have rarely been part of their formal training, both current and new faculty should devote some effort and time to their study. They will thus be better able to inculcate in their trainees a clear understanding of the principles of academic integrity. Faculty also serve as role models, and the manner in which they conduct their own research must be above reproach. Discussion of research ethics should be a regular part of department and division meetings.
The Office of the Registrar of the School of Medicine will distribute to each new faculty member the documents listed above and the booklet Honor in Science published by Sigma Xi. Faculty will be required to sign an acknowledgment of receipt of the above at the time they respond to their initial letter of appointment from the dean.
II.SUPERVISION OF STUDENTS, POSTDOCTORAL FELLOWS, AND OTHER RESEARCH PERSONNEL
Preceptors are responsible for the careful supervision of their trainees and other research personnel. The complexity of scientific methods and the need for careful experimental design, caution in