National Academies Press: OpenBook

National Issues in Science and Technology 1993 (1993)

Chapter: Science and Technology Leadership in American Government: Ensuring the Best Presidential Appointments

« Previous: Front Matter
Suggested Citation:"Science and Technology Leadership in American Government: Ensuring the Best Presidential Appointments." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, Institute of Medicine, and National Research Council. 1993. National Issues in Science and Technology 1993. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2096.
×

I
SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY LEADERSHIP IN
AMERICAN GOVERNMENT

Ensuring The Best
Presidential Appointments

NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES

NATIONAL ACADEMY OF ENGINEERING

INSTITUTE OF MEDICINE

Suggested Citation:"Science and Technology Leadership in American Government: Ensuring the Best Presidential Appointments." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, Institute of Medicine, and National Research Council. 1993. National Issues in Science and Technology 1993. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2096.
×
This page in the original is blank.
Suggested Citation:"Science and Technology Leadership in American Government: Ensuring the Best Presidential Appointments." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, Institute of Medicine, and National Research Council. 1993. National Issues in Science and Technology 1993. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2096.
×
Suggested Citation:"Science and Technology Leadership in American Government: Ensuring the Best Presidential Appointments." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, Institute of Medicine, and National Research Council. 1993. National Issues in Science and Technology 1993. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2096.
×
This page in the original is blank.
Suggested Citation:"Science and Technology Leadership in American Government: Ensuring the Best Presidential Appointments." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, Institute of Medicine, and National Research Council. 1993. National Issues in Science and Technology 1993. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2096.
×

SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY LEADERSHIP IN AMERICAN GOVERNMENT
Ensuringthe Best Presidential Appointments

A White Paper from the

NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES

NATIONAL ACADEMY OF ENGINEERING

INSTITUTE OF MEDICINE

December 1992

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

The new administration has emphasized the promise of science and technology (S&T) in helping to meet the social and economic challenges facing the Nation. To help deliver on this promise, it will be necessary to recruit approximately 78 outstanding and technically qualified individuals to top S&T positions in the federal government. Although they constitute only about twelve percent of presidentially appointed, Senate-confirmed positions, their successful recruitment will be critical to effective policymaking and management in key areas of government, including national security, energy, and health, to name only a few. To enhance the capacity of the executive branch to identify and recruit the very best people for these positions, the following measures should be undertaken:

  • The President's Science Advisor should be appointed early, and one of his or her major tasks should be recruitment of outstanding scientists and engineers for key positions.

  • The presidential personnel office should have specialized and experienced staff to work cooperatively with the Science Advisor and the department and agency heads in identifying and recruiting qualified appointees for S&T positions.

  • Unnecessary barriers to hiring the best talent should be addressed early. Conflict-of-interest laws, especially those governing postgovernment employment, have become so complex and restrictive that they deter honest, public-minded scientists and engineers from serving. It is possible to have and administer conflict-of-interest laws in ways that protect the integrity of government and also meet the public's interest in having highly qualified and motivated scientists and engineers from industry and academia in the public service. Where necessary, existing provisions to exempt critically needed scientific and technological experts should be used.

Suggested Citation:"Science and Technology Leadership in American Government: Ensuring the Best Presidential Appointments." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, Institute of Medicine, and National Research Council. 1993. National Issues in Science and Technology 1993. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2096.
×
  • Recruitment for positions that are primarily technical will be much easier if they are not unduly politicized but are insulated from daily partisan pressures. Some S&T positions have term appointments in recognition that they are usually held by individuals appointed for the technical qualifications and judgment and that continuity of leadership in long-term S&T positions is desirable. Incumbents normally should be allowed to serve their full terms, unless their performance was below par or they have politicized their positions in a manner contrary to the administration's policy positions, and appointees in other primarily technical positions should be considered on a case-by-case basis rather than removed automatically.

Suggested Citation:"Science and Technology Leadership in American Government: Ensuring the Best Presidential Appointments." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, Institute of Medicine, and National Research Council. 1993. National Issues in Science and Technology 1993. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2096.
×

SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY LEADERSHIP IN AMERICAN GOVERNMENT
Ensuringthe Best Presidential Appointments

A White Paper from the

NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES

NATIONAL ACADEMY OF ENGINEERING

INSTITUTE OF MEDICINE

December 1992

THE PROBLEM

There are approximately 78 top federal positions with important functional responsibilities in S&T policymaking and program management (see attached list). Although they constitute only about twelve percent of presidentially appointed, Senate-confirmed positions, the key S&T positions have an importance beyond their numbers on the Nation's ability to use science and technology to improve national security, public health, quality of life, and economic well-being.

In recent years, it has become increasingly difficult to fill such positions in a timely manner. This problem is most acute at the beginning of an administration, when many politically appointed positions must be filled in a very short period. The average time it takes to fill presidentially appointed positions has increased threefold since 1960. The average time from inauguration day to confirmation of PAS subcabinet positions was 2.4 months in the Kennedy administration, 5.3 months in the Reagan administration, and more than 8 months in the Bush administration. Some key positions took a year or more to fill—for example, the Director of the Office of Energy Research (22 months), the Director of the National Institutes of Health (18 months), and the Commissioner of the Food and Drug Administration (12 months). If the situation continues, the government's ability to make key decisions in the face of rapid scientific and technological change—and to design, carry out, and evaluate effective and responsive programs—will be seriously affected.

Recently the National Academies of Sciences and Engineering and the Institute of Medicine, with the support of the Carnegie Commission on Science, Technology, and Government, have studied the problems of recruitment and retention of science and engineering policy officials and have recommended steps to alleviate these problems. The study was conducted by a knowledgeable and experienced bipartisan group.1

1  

National Academy of Science, Science and Technology Leadershipin American Government: Ensuring the Best Presidential Appointments (Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press, 1992). The bipartisan panel that prepared the report was chaired by Kenneth W. Dam. The members with White House or Executive Office of

Suggested Citation:"Science and Technology Leadership in American Government: Ensuring the Best Presidential Appointments." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, Institute of Medicine, and National Research Council. 1993. National Issues in Science and Technology 1993. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2096.
×

CAUSAL FACTORS

Not only is it taking longer to fill key positions, especially at the beginning of new administrations, but it is also becoming harder to recruit top candidates. It has become less common to succeed in recruiting one of the top two or three candidates, and there have been cases where it was necessary to go to the tenth, twentieth, or even the thirtieth name on the list of desirable candidates. High turnover is also a concern. The Council for Excellence in Government found that the average tenure in top S&T positions is 2.5 years. These trends are disturbing because excellence and continuity are especially needed in S&T programs.

The factors making it harder to recruit highly qualified scientists, engineers, and medical experts for top government leadership include:

  • More stringent and confusing postgovernment employment restrictions;

  • The longer, more burdensome, and more intrusive nomination and Senate confirmation process;

  • Stricter and more costly conflict-of-interest provisions;

  • More detailed requirements for public financial disclosure;

  • Pay that is not competitive with comparable positions in the private and nonprofit sectors;

  • The high costs of moving to and living in Washington;

  • Increased public scrutiny of one's personal life;

  • Decreased capacity of government to carry out effective programs; and

  • Lower public esteem for and prestige of public service.

AMELIORATING ACTIONS

There are three areas for action that can enable the government to attract the talent it needs for top science and engineering positions:

  1. improve the outreach to the science and engineering community and use more effective techniques for recruiting leading scientists and engineers.

  2. reduce the hurdles of the appointment process and the disincentives to government service.

   

President experience were Anne Wexler, James B. Wyngaarden, E. Pendleton James, and Charles Schultze; those who had held S&T leadership positions included John M. Deutch, John S. Foster, Robert C. Seamans, and Dr. Wyngaarden; those who had had department positions overseeing S&T policymaking and programs were R. James Woolsey, William T. Coleman, and Mr. Dam. The panel heard additional testimony from individuals knowledgeable about the problems of recruiting top candidates for S&T-related posts from past or current positions in the Executive Office of the President, including Lloyd Cutler and Elliot Richardson. Also, panel member J. Jackson Walter was the first director of the Office of Government Ethics.

    Suggested Citation:"Science and Technology Leadership in American Government: Ensuring the Best Presidential Appointments." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, Institute of Medicine, and National Research Council. 1993. National Issues in Science and Technology 1993. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2096.
    ×
    1. restructure certain positions to make them more attractive to scientists and engineers.

    Improve Recruitment
    The President's Science and Technology Advisor as Recruiter

    Early designation of the President's Science Advisor will enablehis or her active involvement in the effort to identify and recruitoutstanding scientists and engineers for presidential appointments .

    One of the key roles of the science advisor should be to assist the President in recruiting the best scientific and engineering talent in the country for top positions in the S&T-intensive agencies. In recent decades, however, presidential science advisors have been chosen too late to participate in the all-important initial recruitment effort of new administrations, and they have too seldom played a strong role in recruitment once they were on board. The importance of presidential leadership in attracting the best scientists and engineers for leadership positions in the executive branch cannot be overemphasized, and the selection and role of the President's Science Advisor is crucial to this perception. If the President's Science Advisor is of high stature in the research community and participates personally in presidential recruiting, the acceptance rate of the most qualified scientists and engineers would be increased.

    Involvement of Departments and Agencies

    A new administration not only must conduct the search and negotiation process required to fill 78 or so presidentially appointed S&T positions but also the other 470 full-time PAS jobs, nearly 2,350 additional full-time positions and several thousand part-time appointments to boards and commissions. Without giving up their exclusive right tomake executive appointments, presidents should place greater relianceon cabinet secretaries and agency heads for active identificationand recruitment of candidates for subcabinet positions involvingS&T expertise. The White House and President's Science and Technology Advisor can concentrate on the highest priority positions while working cooperatively with the departments and agencies on the rest, scrutinizing the qualifications of those candidates put forth by Cabinet officers and agency heads.

    The White House cannot hope directly to fill the thousands of PAS and other political positions that must be filled at the beginning of an administration in a timely fashion or thoroughly supervise them thereafter. In any case, most appointed S&T positions are level IV or V, are primarily specialized in nature, and work primarily with department leadership, not the White House. The White House office of presidential appointments is likely to be under intense pressure to fill positions for political reasons, while department and agency heads have a large stake in filling S&T positions with people of high expertise. They are also better able to match the person with the job, and they are more likely than the White House presidential appointments office to be connected to the networks in which technical experts operate professionally.

    Suggested Citation:"Science and Technology Leadership in American Government: Ensuring the Best Presidential Appointments." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, Institute of Medicine, and National Research Council. 1993. National Issues in Science and Technology 1993. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2096.
    ×
    A Special S&T Unit in the White House Personnel Office

    Because some of the best scientists and engineers do not think of seeking a presidentially appointed position and have to be actively recruited, the White House office of presidential appointments shouldhave a special unit charged with assisting in the recruiting of outstandingscientists and engineers, and it should be given sufficient resourcesto ensure a high level of professionalism in recruitment.

    The most qualified scientists and engineers are probably not looking for appointed positions in the government. They are less likely to be living in the Washington area already or to be involved in partisan politics than are capable individuals outside the S&T community. It is essential to reach out actively to this special, limited pool of potential appointees. Also, in some recent cases, initial contacts with prestigious scientists and engineers have not been well handled, leading potential candidates to believe that inappropriate criteria were being used or that political criteria, while appropriate to some degree, were being overemphasized relative to technical qualifications.

    It is necessary and appropriate for the presidential appointments office in the White House to manage the overall confirmation process. A specialized and experienced staff unit, working in conjunction with the President's Science Advisor and concerned department and agency heads, would help the departments and agencies better perform the recruitment function.

    Reduce Hurdles and Disincentives

    The hurdles and disincentives in the presidential appointment process have become an ordeal that fewer and fewer of the most highly qualified scientists and engineers are willing to undergo. Some of the most important hurdles are conflict-of-interest laws that have proliferated. The integrity of government and public trust in government must be maintained, but, as a Nation, we also pay a high cost if top leadership positions are not filled by the most qualified and experienced experts.

    Adopt Reasonable Conflict-of-Interest and Postgovernment Employment Restrictions

    The unintended costs of broader conflict-of-interest restrictions—particularly those dealing with postgovernment employment of technical people—have reached the point where they substantially outweigh their benefits. It is possible to have fair and effective conflict-of-interest laws that are compatible with and would promote public service by highly qualified and motivated individuals from industry, academia, and other sectors.

    Federal officials must not have conflicts of interest arising from financial or other personal interests in matters relating to their official duties or activities of their agencies. Federal officials are expected to serve the public interest, and they should not abuse their positions to enrich themselves, their families, or any organization in which they have a financial or personal interest.

    Since the 1978 Ethics in Government Act set up the current procedures and established the Office of Government Ethics, cases where it has been impossible to resolve conflicts have been

    Suggested Citation:"Science and Technology Leadership in American Government: Ensuring the Best Presidential Appointments." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, Institute of Medicine, and National Research Council. 1993. National Issues in Science and Technology 1993. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2096.
    ×

    rare. Over time, however, there has been a natural tendency to resort to the most stringent ''cure''—for example, divestiture and recusal.

    In applying the conflict-of-interest laws, divestiture of assetsshould not be considered the primary remedy and therefore requiredroutinely. Recusal, coupled with full public financial disclosure,should be considered by the Senate, the Office of Government Ethics,and designated agency ethics officials as the primary remedy in mostcases. In many cases, recusal alone should be a sufficient remedy. If divestiture is necessary, it should not be coupled with recusal (unless the appointee retains some interest, such as pension rights). The public interest is better served if the least drastic—and least costly—remedy is used in each case, because it would improve recruitment of needed personnel.

    Recent efforts to create a scandal-proof government have gone so far that, on balance, they may be doing more harm than good by deterring talented and experienced scientific and engineering personnel from taking senior government positions. Where laws afford little additional ethical protection at very high cost, they are a bad bargain for the government and the public. Postemployment restrictions shouldbe revised to balance the public's interest in ensuring the integrityof government operations with its interest in attracting the besttalent to government service. At the same time, federal ethics laws,including postemployment restrictions, should be streamlined andclarified, and they should be contained in a single comprehensivesection of the U.S. Code. To accomplish this, appropriate legislationshould be submitted as soon as possible.

    In the meantime, since the new administration must conduct its initial and most important recruitment under existing laws, which are overlapping, conflicting, confusing, and in some respects overly broad, it should make full use of current provisions for waivers and exemptions fromthe postemployment laws that apply to critically needed scientificand technological experts to the fullest extent needed. In certaincases, this will require personal approval of the President.

    Reduce the Disincentives to Government Service

    The executive pay situation has eased considerably but will deteriorate again unless there are regular cost-of-living adjustments. The costs of entering the government service and staying there for an effective period of time, say four years, should be reasonable. This does not mean that the pay of appointees need be comparable to the private sector, but appointees should be able to meet their living costs. This principle may be more important for midcareer scientists and engineers than for other professionals, because they are not as likely to have accumulated much wealth and their government service will probably not boost their salaries as much after they leave government. The President and Congress should ensure that there are regular salaryreviews and pay increases, when justified by cost-of-living data,to avoid the large lapse in adequacy of executive pay that developedin the mid-1980s.

    Also, the pay-related flexibilities authorized by the Federal EmployeesPay Comparability Act of 1990 should be used selectively where necessaryto recruit and keep top candidates for key positions. These flexibilities include recruitment bonuses and retention allowances, special pay categories, and reimbursement for moving expenses.

    Suggested Citation:"Science and Technology Leadership in American Government: Ensuring the Best Presidential Appointments." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, Institute of Medicine, and National Research Council. 1993. National Issues in Science and Technology 1993. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2096.
    ×
    Streamline Administrative Actions

    The appointment process itself has become too elaborate and lengthy. This unnecessarily deters some potential candidates and hinders effective leadership. The sheer length and paperwork burden of the appointment process itself should be reduced. For example, background investigations of prospective nominees by the FBI add weeks and even months to the appointment process. To eliminate this source of significant delay, the President could direct the FBI only to conduct background investigationssince the last such investigation, where one exists.

    Nominees for PAS positions must fill out a series of separate, complicated, and incompatible financial disclosure and personal data forms for the Office of Personnel Management, the Office of Government Ethics, the FBI, and the White House and for the relevant Senate committee. This slows the process, imposes unnecessary legal and accounting costs on candidates, and multiplies the chance of error. The administrationshould work with the relevant Senate committees to simplify and standardizeforms and coordinate procedures used in the confirmation process.

    Make Jobs More Attractive

    The positions can be made more attractive to top scientists and engineers, chiefly by ensuring that incumbents, once appointed, can see that their expert knowledge and judgment are heard and coupled effectively with S&T policymaking and management decisionmaking.

    Unfortunately, there has been a growing belief in the scientific and engineering communities that the PAS jobs are becoming more difficult to do well. This belief stems in part from a perception that technical expertise and judgment are not given their due weight in making policy—or, sometimes, in making the appointments themselves. There have been many reports in recent decades (especially those associated with ideological or "litmus test" rejections of qualified potential nominees) that send a message that an incumbent's technical integrity may be compromised. There is also a perception that some positions have been pushed down too many layers in the decisionmaking structure to be effective.

    Politics cannot and should not be removed from the top S&T jobs. S&T appointees, like all presidential appointees, should be willing and able to support the President's policy positions. But the President is served if the best technical judgment on difficult public policy issues is heard, considered, and balanced with other considerations by decisionmakers. The basic function of presidentially appointed S&T leaders is to bring technical knowledge and informed judgment to the policy arena and to foster policies that are defensible on both political and technical grounds. It follows that other considerations should not be permitted to prevail—in reality or perception—without the scientific and technical considerations being carefully considered.

    There are ways to help ensure that technical expertise is heard and appropriately considered at top decisionmaking levels, and this would help to improve the attractiveness of S&T positions. For example, some positions have fixed terms and normally carry over from one administration to the next. These include the Surgeon General of the Public Health Service, the Director of

    Suggested Citation:"Science and Technology Leadership in American Government: Ensuring the Best Presidential Appointments." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, Institute of Medicine, and National Research Council. 1993. National Issues in Science and Technology 1993. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2096.
    ×

    the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the Director of the National Science Foundation, and the Chief Medical Director of the Department of Veterans Affairs. Fixed terms also promote continuity in policy and program management, which is often appropriate for S&T programs because they are typically long-term. For these reasons, incumbents of such positionswho were chosen primarily for their technical qualifications shouldbe allowed to serve their full terms, unless their performance wasbelow par or they have politicized their positions in a manner contraryto the President's policy positions.

    The political status, responsibilities and authorities, and reportingrelationships of the government's top S&T positions should be reviewedperiodically—and restructured as necessary—to ensure that the unbiasedscientific and engineering judgment of incumbents is preserved andis directly introduced into the policy process. Such a process would help maintain the effectiveness and relevance of these important positions, which in turn would ensure that highly qualified and capable individuals would want to serve in them. The reviews should be a responsibility of the President's Science Advisor, with staff assistance from the Office of Science and Technology Policy. Independent reviews should also be conducted periodically by a private organization or set of organizations concerned with the government's effectiveness in carrying out its scientific and engineering missions.

    Certain positions could be elevated in level and status to reduce "layering" and make them more effective in carrying out their responsibilities and thus more attractive to outstanding candidates. Some positions would be more attractive to highly qualified scientists and engineers if they were not subject to the presidential appointment process at all, but were filled through merit procedures. This was done successfully in the case of the assistant directors of the National Science Foundation, because political recruitment was taking too much time of the director and promising candidates were put off by the ordeal of the confirmation process in order to fill what they considered to be a professional position.

    Finally, working with the Congress, the President should carry outan overall reduction in political appointees (especially in ScheduleC and noncareer Senior Executive Service jobs, but also in PAS positions),as recommended by the National Commission on the Public Service andother bipartisan and nonpartisan groups.

    The proliferation of political appointees is part of the problem in effective governance. Political layering and excessive interference from Schedule C and political SES appointees who work for higher level officials constitute important disincentives for highly competent individuals to serve. This is especially a problem in the S&T policy and administration area, because too much layering of authority affects the input of technical considerations in decisionmaking.

    Suggested Citation:"Science and Technology Leadership in American Government: Ensuring the Best Presidential Appointments." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, Institute of Medicine, and National Research Council. 1993. National Issues in Science and Technology 1993. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2096.
    ×

    PRESIDENTIALLY APPOINTED SCIENCE-AND TECHNOLOGY-RELATED POSITIONS

    Unit

     

    Position Title

    Executive Pay Level

    Executive Office of the President

    Office of Science and Technology Policy

     

    Assistant to the President for Science and Technology

    II

    Associate Director for Policy and International Affairs

    III

    Associate Director for Life Sciences

    III

    Associate Director for Physical Sciences and Engineering

    III

    Associate Director for Industrial Technology

    III

    Council of Economic Advisors

     

    Chairman

    II

    Council on Environmental Quality

     

    Chairman

    IV

    Departments

     

    Agriculture

     

    Assistant Secretary for Science and Education

    IV

    Commerce

     

    Under Secretary, Technology

    III

    Assistant Secretary, Technology Policy

    IV

    Director, Census Bureau

    IV

    Assistant Secretary/Administrator, National Telecommunications and Information Administration

    IV

    Director, National Institute of Standards and Technology

    IV

    Under Secretary/Administrator, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

    III

    Assistant Secretary, Oceans and Atmosphere

    IV

    Chief Scientist, NOAA

    V

    Defense

     

    Director, Operational Test and Evaluation

    IV

    Under Secretary for Acquisition

    II

    Principal Deputy Under Secretary for Acquisition

    III

    Assistant to the Secretary of Defense (Atomic Energy)

    V

    Director of Defense Research and Engineering

    IV

    Assistant Secretary (Command, Control, Communications, and Intelligence)

    IV

    Assistant Secretary (Health Affairs)

    IV

    Air Force

     

    Assistant Secretary (Acquisition)

    IV

    Army

     

    Assistant Secretary (Research, Development and Acquisition)

    IV

    Navy

     

    Assistant Secretary (Research, Development and Acquisition)

    IV

    Suggested Citation:"Science and Technology Leadership in American Government: Ensuring the Best Presidential Appointments." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, Institute of Medicine, and National Research Council. 1993. National Issues in Science and Technology 1993. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2096.
    ×

    Education

     

    Assistant Secretary for Educational Research and Improvement

    IV

    Energy

     

    Director, Civilian Radioactive Waste Management

    IV

    Assistant Secretary for Environment, Safety and Health

    IV

    Assistant Secretary for Conservation and Renewable Energy

    IV

    Director, Office of Alcohol Fuels

    IV

    Director, Office of Energy Research

    IV

    Assistant Secretary for Defense Programs

    IV

    Assistant Secretary for Nuclear Energy

    IV

    Assistant Secretary for Fossil Energy

    IV

    Administrator, Energy Information Service

    IV

    Health and Human Services

     

    Assistant Secretary for Health

    IV

    Surgeon General, Public Health Service

    PHS

    Administrator, Alcohol, Drug Abuse, and Mental Health Administration

    IV

    Director, National Institutes of Health

    IV

    Director, National Cancer Institute

    PA

    Commissioner, Food and Drug Administration

    IV

    Housing and Urban Development

     

    Assistant Secretary for Policy Development and Research

    IV

    Interior

     

    Assistant Secretary—Fish and Wildlife, and Parks

    IV

    Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

    V

    Assistant Secretary for Water and Science

    IV

    Commissioner, Bureau of Reclamation

    V

    Director, Bureau of Mines

    V

    Director, U.S. Geological Survey

    V

    Justice

     

    Director, Bureau of Justice Statistics

    IV

    Labor

     

    Commissioner of Labor Statistics

    V

    Assistant Secretary for Occupational Safety and Health

    IV

    Assistant Secretary for Mine Safety and Health

    IV

    State

     

    Under Secretary for International Security Affairs

    III

    Assistant Secretary, Oceans and International Environmental and Scientific Affairs

    IV

    Under Secretary for Economic Affairs

    III

    Transportation

     

    Administrator, Federal Aviation Administration

    II

    Deputy Administrator, Federal Aviation Administration

    IV

    Administrator, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration

    III

    Veterans Affairs

     

    Chief Medical Director

    III

    Suggested Citation:"Science and Technology Leadership in American Government: Ensuring the Best Presidential Appointments." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, Institute of Medicine, and National Research Council. 1993. National Issues in Science and Technology 1993. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2096.
    ×

    Independent Agencies

    Agency for International Development

     

    Assistant Administrator, Science and Technology

    IV

    Consumer Product Safety Commission

     

    Chairman

    III

    Environmental Protection Agency

     

    Administrator

    II

    Deputy Administrator

    III

    Assistant Administrator for Water

    IV

    Assistant Administrator for Solid Waste and Emergency Response

    IV

    Assistant Administrator for Air and Radiation

    IV

    Assistant Administrator for Pesticides and Toxic Substances

    IV

    Assistant Administrator for Research and Development

    IV

    National Aeronautics and Space Administration

     

    Administrator

    II

    Deputy Administrator

    III

    National Science Foundation

     

    Director

    II

    Deputy Director

    III

    National Transportation Safety Board

     

    Chairman

    III

    Nuclear Regulatory Commission

     

    Chairman

    II

    Tennessee Valley Authority

     

    Chairman

    III

    U.S. Arms Control and Disarmament Agency

     

    Assistant Director, Verification and Implementation

    IV

    Assistant Director, Nonproliferation Policy

    IV

    NOTE: The list includes the 50 PAS positions profiled in the Council for Excellence in Government's recent publication, The Prune Book:The 60 Toughest Science and Technology Jobs in Washington, by John H. Trattner (Lanham, Maryland: Madison Books, 1992). The list also includes 34 PAS positions beyond those listed by the CEG. In most cases these are positions under those profiled in the Prune Book. Neither list includes cabinet secretaries (executive level I) or deputy secretary positions (level II).

    Suggested Citation:"Science and Technology Leadership in American Government: Ensuring the Best Presidential Appointments." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, Institute of Medicine, and National Research Council. 1993. National Issues in Science and Technology 1993. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2096.
    ×
    Page 1
    Suggested Citation:"Science and Technology Leadership in American Government: Ensuring the Best Presidential Appointments." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, Institute of Medicine, and National Research Council. 1993. National Issues in Science and Technology 1993. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2096.
    ×
    Page 2
    Suggested Citation:"Science and Technology Leadership in American Government: Ensuring the Best Presidential Appointments." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, Institute of Medicine, and National Research Council. 1993. National Issues in Science and Technology 1993. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2096.
    ×
    Page 3
    Suggested Citation:"Science and Technology Leadership in American Government: Ensuring the Best Presidential Appointments." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, Institute of Medicine, and National Research Council. 1993. National Issues in Science and Technology 1993. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2096.
    ×
    Page 4
    Suggested Citation:"Science and Technology Leadership in American Government: Ensuring the Best Presidential Appointments." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, Institute of Medicine, and National Research Council. 1993. National Issues in Science and Technology 1993. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2096.
    ×
    Page 5
    Suggested Citation:"Science and Technology Leadership in American Government: Ensuring the Best Presidential Appointments." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, Institute of Medicine, and National Research Council. 1993. National Issues in Science and Technology 1993. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2096.
    ×
    Page 6
    Suggested Citation:"Science and Technology Leadership in American Government: Ensuring the Best Presidential Appointments." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, Institute of Medicine, and National Research Council. 1993. National Issues in Science and Technology 1993. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2096.
    ×
    Page 7
    Suggested Citation:"Science and Technology Leadership in American Government: Ensuring the Best Presidential Appointments." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, Institute of Medicine, and National Research Council. 1993. National Issues in Science and Technology 1993. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2096.
    ×
    Page 8
    Suggested Citation:"Science and Technology Leadership in American Government: Ensuring the Best Presidential Appointments." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, Institute of Medicine, and National Research Council. 1993. National Issues in Science and Technology 1993. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2096.
    ×
    Page 9
    Suggested Citation:"Science and Technology Leadership in American Government: Ensuring the Best Presidential Appointments." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, Institute of Medicine, and National Research Council. 1993. National Issues in Science and Technology 1993. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2096.
    ×
    Page 10
    Suggested Citation:"Science and Technology Leadership in American Government: Ensuring the Best Presidential Appointments." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, Institute of Medicine, and National Research Council. 1993. National Issues in Science and Technology 1993. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2096.
    ×
    Page 11
    Suggested Citation:"Science and Technology Leadership in American Government: Ensuring the Best Presidential Appointments." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, Institute of Medicine, and National Research Council. 1993. National Issues in Science and Technology 1993. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2096.
    ×
    Page 12
    Suggested Citation:"Science and Technology Leadership in American Government: Ensuring the Best Presidential Appointments." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, Institute of Medicine, and National Research Council. 1993. National Issues in Science and Technology 1993. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2096.
    ×
    Page 13
    Suggested Citation:"Science and Technology Leadership in American Government: Ensuring the Best Presidential Appointments." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, Institute of Medicine, and National Research Council. 1993. National Issues in Science and Technology 1993. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2096.
    ×
    Page 14
    Suggested Citation:"Science and Technology Leadership in American Government: Ensuring the Best Presidential Appointments." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, Institute of Medicine, and National Research Council. 1993. National Issues in Science and Technology 1993. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2096.
    ×
    Page 15
    Suggested Citation:"Science and Technology Leadership in American Government: Ensuring the Best Presidential Appointments." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, Institute of Medicine, and National Research Council. 1993. National Issues in Science and Technology 1993. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2096.
    ×
    Page 16
    Next: Climate Change Policy: Establishing United States Leadership Under the Climate Change Convention »
    National Issues in Science and Technology 1993 Get This Book
    ×
    Buy Paperback | $40.00
    MyNAP members save 10% online.
    Login or Register to save!
    Download Free PDF

    This volume consists of four "white papers," prepared for the Clinton administration as it took office, on important national policy issues in which science and technology play a central role. Topics covered are science and technology leadership, climate change policy, technology policy and industrial innovation, and health care reform. Also included are brief summaries of ten potentially high impact reports issued by various committees of the National Research Council.

    1. ×

      Welcome to OpenBook!

      You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

      Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

      No Thanks Take a Tour »
    2. ×

      Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

      « Back Next »
    3. ×

      ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

      « Back Next »
    4. ×

      Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

      « Back Next »
    5. ×

      Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

      « Back Next »
    6. ×

      To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

      « Back Next »
    7. ×

      Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

      « Back Next »
    8. ×

      View our suggested citation for this chapter.

      « Back Next »
    9. ×

      Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

      « Back Next »
    Stay Connected!