National Academies Press: OpenBook

National Issues in Science and Technology 1993 (1993)

Chapter: Technology Policy and Industrial Innovation: The Federal Government's Role

« Previous: Climate Change Policy: Establishing United States Leadership Under the Climate Change Convention
Suggested Citation:"Technology Policy and Industrial Innovation: The Federal Government's Role." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, Institute of Medicine, and National Research Council. 1993. National Issues in Science and Technology 1993. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2096.
×

III
TECHNOLOGY POLICY AND INDUSTRIAL INNOVATION
The Federal Government's Role

NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES

NATIONAL ACADEMY OF ENGINEERING

INSTITUTE OF MEDICINE

Suggested Citation:"Technology Policy and Industrial Innovation: The Federal Government's Role." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, Institute of Medicine, and National Research Council. 1993. National Issues in Science and Technology 1993. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2096.
×
This page in the original is blank.
Suggested Citation:"Technology Policy and Industrial Innovation: The Federal Government's Role." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, Institute of Medicine, and National Research Council. 1993. National Issues in Science and Technology 1993. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2096.
×
Suggested Citation:"Technology Policy and Industrial Innovation: The Federal Government's Role." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, Institute of Medicine, and National Research Council. 1993. National Issues in Science and Technology 1993. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2096.
×
Suggested Citation:"Technology Policy and Industrial Innovation: The Federal Government's Role." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, Institute of Medicine, and National Research Council. 1993. National Issues in Science and Technology 1993. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2096.
×

TECHNOLOGY POLICY AND INDUSTRIAL INNOVATION
The Federal Government's Role

A White Paper from the

NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES

NATIONAL ACADEMY OF ENGINEERING

INSTITUTE OF MEDICINE

February 1993

As we approach the 21st century, national welfare will depend increasingly on federal policies that build on U.S. strengths in science and technology. Rapid economic growth, increased productivity, and improved standards of living require investments that leverage our comparative advantage in high technology. The federal government has a legitimate role in this process. At the same time, government policies must continue to safeguard the competitive dynamic and industrial efficiencies that market forces nurture.1

THE RATIONALE FOR CHANGE

By many measures, the United States remains strong in technology and continues to exhibit considerable industrial strength. We are the most productive nation in the world. Manufacturing output is increasing at a rapid rate. U.S. exports of high-technology manufactured goods are growing. As measured by indicators such as patents awarded and the balance of trade in high-technology goods and services, the innovative capacity of the United States remains unsurpassed.

Although the nation's technological performance is strong, this does not mean that U.S. policy should continue unaltered. The most important reason for a new technology policy, one that builds on our comparative strength in research and innovation, centers on productivity. The United States needs to improve its performance in all areas that promote productivity and long

1  

The National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine recently issued a report on technology policy, The Government Role in Civilian Technology: Building a NewAlliance. The final report was prepared at the request of Congress in Public Law 100-418, and provides a useful framework and economic rationale for government investment in R&D.

Suggested Citation:"Technology Policy and Industrial Innovation: The Federal Government's Role." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, Institute of Medicine, and National Research Council. 1993. National Issues in Science and Technology 1993. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2096.
×

term economic growth. Investment in R&D to achieve higher rates of technology commercialization and adoption should be a central part of the new administration's technology policy.

There is a sound economic rationale to support implementation of a federal strategy to facilitate industrial innovation. Government needs to create incentives for private investment in pre-commercial R&D beyond basic research in areas where firms cannot appropriate (capture) the economic benefits of investment. Just as the government acts to prevent underinvestment in basic research through federal funding, policymakers must recognize and should alleviate market failure downstream in pre-commercial R&D, as well.

STRENGTHENING CURRENT GOVERNMENT PROGRAMS

The first step in building a new alliance between government and industry in civilian technology is action to strengthen federal programs that facilitate private sector R&D, and the transfer or adoption of technology. Specifically,

  • the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency's role in dual-use technology development—especially in the area of information technology—should be reaffirmed;

  • only a small number of the 700 federal laboratories, those which are most appropriately qualified, should be selected to work with private firms in an effort to enhance technology transfer;

  • the scope of selected mission agency R&D programs should be enlarged to include pre-commercial projects;

  • funding for the Small Business Innovation Research program should be increased;

  • the Department of Commerce's Advanced Technology Program has had a promising start. It should be evaluated, by an independent group, to determine the desirable size of the program, and;

  • current industrial extension services provided by the Commerce Department should be expanded to speed technology adoption in industry.

PROMOTING INVESTMENT IN PRE-COMMERCIAL R&D

A new technology strategy for the post-Cold War era must include more than revisions in current federal programs. The government should act to correct the failure of private markets

Suggested Citation:"Technology Policy and Industrial Innovation: The Federal Government's Role." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, Institute of Medicine, and National Research Council. 1993. National Issues in Science and Technology 1993. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2096.
×

to support pre-commercial R&D. Moreover, the ability of U.S. companies to adopt new technologies, an important part of economic growth, is weak. As in the case of pre-commercial R&D, private markets fail to provide sufficient levels of investment at this stage of the technology development process.

In basic science there is a clear need for federal funding. Companies have little incentive to invest in basic R&D, because in many cases research results are widely available and firms cannot capture the economic benefits of basic science investments.

Beyond basic research, there is an area of science and engineering work that precedes product-or process-specific, applied R&D. At this pre-commercial stage, private sector estimates of commercial market potential are uncertain and appropriability of the fruits of investment are unclear. Technical obstacles in moving to the applied research or prototype development stage are present as well. Pre-commercial R&D is also often characterized by spillovers into the general knowledge base, where other firms can appropriate the economic benefits of another firm's investments. This R&D constitutes a public good, one that merits government financial support. To be effective, government-industry R&D ventures with public sector support should be guided by a set of principles which should include:

(1) Cost-Sharing Provisions

Cost sharing is especially important in pre-commercial R&D programs. Cooperative R&D projects between government and industry should ensure that public funds are used to build on corporate strengths in technology. Direct, 100 percent government subsidies to private firms for R&D projects run the risk of redirecting scarce resources, both financial and human, into unproductive channels. To ensure the commercial relevance of R&D funded by the government through cooperative ventures, private sector firms or institutions should cover at least 50 percent of total project costs.

(2) Project Initiation and Design by Private Firms

The long-term objective of any government financial commitment to pre-commercial R&D should be to enhance private sector productivity. To do this, R&D must be linked to commercial markets and channeled into areas with the potential for wide industrial application. Collaborative R&D ventures funded through government-industry partnerships should be proposed and structured by industry.

(3) Insulation from Political Concerns

To minimize improper political influence in the allocation of government funds, projects to be supported by government should be based on technical and economic assessments of the merits of each project. Evaluations of competing R&D proposals should be conducted by

Suggested Citation:"Technology Policy and Industrial Innovation: The Federal Government's Role." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, Institute of Medicine, and National Research Council. 1993. National Issues in Science and Technology 1993. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2096.
×

independent experts in the relevant scientific, technological, and economic areas. Political considerations should not influence technical output, the location of R&D facilities, or the management of research projects.

(4) A diversified Set of R&D Objectives

A broad portfolio of investments in a wide range of technical fields, including the biomedical sciences and biotechnology, materials sciences, manufacturing product and process technologies, and computer and telecommunications-related technologies, among others, is important to the success of any technology strategy. A broad-based technology program will help to ensure that government-sponsored R&D does not become captive to the interests of a particular technology champion or a set of companies.

(5) Rigorous Project Evaluations and Review

Detailed technical and economic evaluations are essential to any technology program, especially in pre-commercial R&D. Independent evaluation should be undertaken by non-governmental experts, including those with technical, managerial, and economic experience, in any new federal technology efforts. Current efforts to review government R&D programs are impeded, in some cases, because reports to Congress and president are often conducted by mission agency employees. These officials have a direct interest in ensuring the continuation of projects that they evaluate.

If the original objectives of a joint R&D venture sponsored with federal financial assistance are reached, or the results of a program do not justify the resources expended, programs should be automatically terminated. Federal agency officials and Congress should, as a matter of policy, follow recommendations by review panels, either to terminate or to extend a project.

(6) Projects Open to Foreign Firms Characterized by a SubstantialContribution to U.S. Gross Domestic Product (GDP)

Government should encourage the flow of technology and production capabilities of the most up-to-date and competitive kind to both U.S. and foreign corporations located within U.S. borders. There are significant benefits that accrue to the economy through the training, education, and skill enhancement offered by foreign-based corporations with U.S. affiliates, for example. Foreign-owned corporations located in the U.S. contribute directly to our national economic growth in other ways as well. One increasingly important contribution is through cooperative R&D work with U.S. firms.

Public policies that seek to close domestic markets to foreign goods and services, limit technology flows, or restrict foreign participation in government technology programs, therefore, damage U.S. economic interests. They serve to isolate the economy from scientific and

Suggested Citation:"Technology Policy and Industrial Innovation: The Federal Government's Role." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, Institute of Medicine, and National Research Council. 1993. National Issues in Science and Technology 1993. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2096.
×

technological advances made in other industrialized nations. Finally, it is important that U.S. firms gain access to foreign collaborative R&D programs and the benefits of participation in these ventures.

A CIVILIAN TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION

Many proposals have been introduced for organizing and managing federal technology investments in pre-commercial R&D. These include the creation of a new executive branch agency, or simply increasing current funding levels in existing agency budgets. Existing agency budgets should be selectively increased at agencies that have had success in past programs aimed at promoting commercial technology development efforts. This might include, for example, DARPA, the Department of Energy's support for energy research, and the National Institutes of Health.

Creation of a civilian technology agency, however, has several serious disadvantages. A technology agency would likely be dwarfed in size, budget, status, and influence by existing federal departments. Its establishment would face opposition from agencies and congressional committees anxious to guard prerogatives over technology areas. Unless its purpose were clearly defined and its authority affirmed, a new agency would add to the federal bureaucracy without achieving many concrete results. Moreover, a government technology agency would be subject to federal procurement guidelines, and civil service hiring rules, both of which would severely limit its effectiveness.

The most serious disadvantage of a civilian agency is its placement in the executive branch. This would increase the likelihood that support of projects would be influenced by special interest groups and parochial political concerns. An agency of the federal government, whether housed in an existing organization or independently controlled, would be a central part of the political process.

One effective way to promote substantial federal investment in pre-commercial R&D is through creation of a Civilian Technology Corporation (CTC). The goal of a CTC would be to increase the rate at which products and processes are commercialized in the U.S. This objective can be met by stimulating investment in the pre-commercial stage of technology development with high social rates of return, but where firms cannot appropriate sufficient benefits of R&D work. Higher levels of investment at this stage of the innovation process will, over the long term, translate into stronger U.S. performance in technology commercialization.

The CTC would be a quasi-governmental organization, funded through a one-time $5 billion congressional appropriation. A board of directors, appointed by the President and subject to Senate confirmation, would manage the corporation. The performance and operation of the CTC would undergo an independent review after the fourth and tenth years of operation.

Suggested Citation:"Technology Policy and Industrial Innovation: The Federal Government's Role." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, Institute of Medicine, and National Research Council. 1993. National Issues in Science and Technology 1993. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2096.
×
This page in the original is blank.
Suggested Citation:"Technology Policy and Industrial Innovation: The Federal Government's Role." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, Institute of Medicine, and National Research Council. 1993. National Issues in Science and Technology 1993. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2096.
×
Page 31
Suggested Citation:"Technology Policy and Industrial Innovation: The Federal Government's Role." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, Institute of Medicine, and National Research Council. 1993. National Issues in Science and Technology 1993. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2096.
×
Page 32
Suggested Citation:"Technology Policy and Industrial Innovation: The Federal Government's Role." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, Institute of Medicine, and National Research Council. 1993. National Issues in Science and Technology 1993. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2096.
×
Page 33
Suggested Citation:"Technology Policy and Industrial Innovation: The Federal Government's Role." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, Institute of Medicine, and National Research Council. 1993. National Issues in Science and Technology 1993. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2096.
×
Page 34
Suggested Citation:"Technology Policy and Industrial Innovation: The Federal Government's Role." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, Institute of Medicine, and National Research Council. 1993. National Issues in Science and Technology 1993. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2096.
×
Page 35
Suggested Citation:"Technology Policy and Industrial Innovation: The Federal Government's Role." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, Institute of Medicine, and National Research Council. 1993. National Issues in Science and Technology 1993. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2096.
×
Page 36
Suggested Citation:"Technology Policy and Industrial Innovation: The Federal Government's Role." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, Institute of Medicine, and National Research Council. 1993. National Issues in Science and Technology 1993. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2096.
×
Page 37
Suggested Citation:"Technology Policy and Industrial Innovation: The Federal Government's Role." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, Institute of Medicine, and National Research Council. 1993. National Issues in Science and Technology 1993. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2096.
×
Page 38
Suggested Citation:"Technology Policy and Industrial Innovation: The Federal Government's Role." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, Institute of Medicine, and National Research Council. 1993. National Issues in Science and Technology 1993. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2096.
×
Page 39
Suggested Citation:"Technology Policy and Industrial Innovation: The Federal Government's Role." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, Institute of Medicine, and National Research Council. 1993. National Issues in Science and Technology 1993. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2096.
×
Page 40
Next: Toward More Effective Health Care Reform: Selected Issues from Reports of the Institute of Medicine »
National Issues in Science and Technology 1993 Get This Book
×
Buy Paperback | $40.00
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

This volume consists of four "white papers," prepared for the Clinton administration as it took office, on important national policy issues in which science and technology play a central role. Topics covered are science and technology leadership, climate change policy, technology policy and industrial innovation, and health care reform. Also included are brief summaries of ten potentially high impact reports issued by various committees of the National Research Council.

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!