National Academies Press: OpenBook

Assessing Health Care Reform (1993)

Chapter: Financing Reform

« Previous: Assuring the Quality of Care
Suggested Citation:"Financing Reform." Institute of Medicine. 1993. Assessing Health Care Reform. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2099.
×

Financing Reform

Many steps proposed to improve access can be expected to add significant new financial burdens for employers, governments, and some individuals (e.g., those who moved from low-risk insurance pools to average-risk pools). Whether the nation will accept such burdens and how they will be distributed are clearly political decisions. As this report is being drafted, it is not clear that policymakers will feel they have sufficient popular support for the increased taxes that the committee expects will be necessary to protect more individuals against the financial consequences of ill health. Certainly, financing policies will be influenced by many considerations other than the equity, efficiency, and similar arguments identified in summary form by the committee. Again, this discussion does not constitute an IOM proposal for financing health care reform but rather is an attempt to identify issues and options.

Broad options for financing improved access for the uninsured and underinsured include:

  • reducing expenditures on current health programs and services,

  • increasing the productivity of the health care system,

  • shifting resources from other areas of public spending, and

  • increasing revenues from income, payroll, or other taxes or from individual insurance premium contributions.

These options are not necessarily mutually exclusive, and a combination of them is likely to be necessary. For instance, reductions in wasteful and excessive administrative spending could be expected to

Suggested Citation:"Financing Reform." Institute of Medicine. 1993. Assessing Health Care Reform. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2099.
×

increase productivity as practitioners, managers, and others spend less time on paperwork and more time on patients. To cite another example, if some of the employer contribution to health insurance were treated as taxable individual income (as recommended earlier in this report), tax revenues would increase, although estimates of this increase vary depending on the assumptions about employer and employee responses. One desired effect of the change in tax policy is to reduce demand for generous health coverage, which would be expected, in turn, to reduce health services utilization and expenditures. The stronger this response, however, the less revenue might be expected from the tax cap, although that decrease would be offset to the extent that employers matched reduced health spending with higher wages as some economists would predict.3

In principle, the first step—cutting spending—may be achieved in many ways. The committee believes, however, that it is unrealistic to expect such good performance in reducing spending that all the costs of extending coverage could be offset, particularly in the short run. Given the great expansion in the share of national resources consumed by health care spending, it is also both unwise and unrealistic to argue that the nation can continue to draw resources away from other social objectives to the same degree it has in the past.

As a consequence, health care reform is likely to further burden financing arrangements that, in their current form, are often inequitable, inefficient, and poorly measured. For example, uncompensated care and underpayments by some public and private purchasers encourage crisis-oriented medical care, not prevention or timely therapeutic care, and they undermine the institutions that serve poor and vulnerable groups. Moreover, they increase costs for individuals and groups that lack the

3  

Tax caps are sometimes loosely grouped with several other kinds of financing strategies under the concept of means testing, whereby access to benefits is confined to certain categories of individuals (e.g., single mothers and their children) of limited means (i.e., income and assets). Medicaid is a classic example of a means-tested program. Although some have proposed that access to Medicare benefits should also be means-tested, more common—but still controversial—are proposals to link the beneficiary's share of the Part B premium (about 25 percent of the total) to income or to treat some of the government contribution to the Part B premium as taxable income.

Suggested Citation:"Financing Reform." Institute of Medicine. 1993. Assessing Health Care Reform. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2099.
×

political and economic leverage to protect themselves (IOM, 1993b). Many employers point out that their coverage of spouses subsidizes employers that do not offer coverage, and that cost-shifting associated with uncompensated care adds to this subsidy. To cite another example, the disparity in tax treatment of premiums for employed and self-employed individuals is inequitable and penalizes the self-employed. It may thereby promote overinsurance by the former and underinsurance by the latter.

Reform proposals should move the health care system toward more broad-based, efficient, equitable, and ''observable'' financing arrangements. They should be grounded in realistic estimates of expected expenditures and revenues and their distribution across population groups. Ad hoc efforts to compensate for overly optimistic forecasts tend to undermine program credibility and disrupt program stability. Likewise, inadequate recognition of how a proposal may affect different groups can create a "backlash," although the committee also recognizes that clarity about how burdens and benefits may be redistributed can compromise a proposal's chance of passage. The committee suggests that the projections of revenues and expenditures be subjected to review and audit by independent, nongovernmental sources.

To aid assessments of reform proposals, the committee recommends that proposals for health care reform should explicitly:

  • Describe anticipated sources of financing (e.g., income taxes, payroll taxes, "sin" taxes, or a "tax cap" on employer-paid health benefits that can be excluded from personal income tax). The description should include estimates of revenues expected from each source (for multiple years) and the distribution of the financing burden across different income and other relevant groups.

  • Identify the expected level, distribution, and timing of savings expected from administrative reforms, cost containment strategies, infrastructure changes, and other provisions.

  • Estimate the level and distribution of public and private expenditures (including tax expenditures) needed to implement the reform proposal over a period of several years.

Suggested Citation:"Financing Reform." Institute of Medicine. 1993. Assessing Health Care Reform. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2099.
×
  • State the assumptions, models, data, and similar elements used in developing the above estimates.

  • Describe financing not only for health care services but also for basic elements of the health care infrastructure including public health, research, education, and capital investments.

Just as steps to increase access will add some costs so will certain steps to strengthen the infrastructure for the health care delivery system. Some of these steps, for example, improvements in our knowledge about the impact of medical services and our spending for these services, may increase short-term costs but provide the basis for longer term savings. Others may only improve the quality of care, thereby providing better value without actually reducing costs. In the next section we discuss infrastructure issues that should be covered by proposals for health care reform.

Suggested Citation:"Financing Reform." Institute of Medicine. 1993. Assessing Health Care Reform. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2099.
×

FINANCING REFORM Key Statements

Reform proposals should move the health care system toward more broad-based, efficient, equitable, and "observable" financing arrangements. They should be grounded in realistic estimates of expected expenditures and revenues and their distribution across population groups.

Proposals for health care reform should explicitly:

  • describe anticipated sources of financing.

  • identify the expected level, distribution, and timing of savings expected from administrative reforms, cost containment strategies, infrastructure changes, and other provisions.

  • estimate the level and distribution of public and private expenditures (including tax expenditures) needed to implement the reform proposal over a period of several years.

  • state the assumptions, models, data, and similar elements used in developing the above estimates.

  • describe financing not only for health care services but also for basic elements of the health care infrastructure including public health, research, education, and capital investments.

    Projections of revenues and expenditures should be subjected to review and audit by independent, nongovernment sources.

Suggested Citation:"Financing Reform." Institute of Medicine. 1993. Assessing Health Care Reform. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2099.
×
This page in the original is blank.
Suggested Citation:"Financing Reform." Institute of Medicine. 1993. Assessing Health Care Reform. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2099.
×
Page 45
Suggested Citation:"Financing Reform." Institute of Medicine. 1993. Assessing Health Care Reform. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2099.
×
Page 46
Suggested Citation:"Financing Reform." Institute of Medicine. 1993. Assessing Health Care Reform. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2099.
×
Page 47
Suggested Citation:"Financing Reform." Institute of Medicine. 1993. Assessing Health Care Reform. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2099.
×
Page 48
Suggested Citation:"Financing Reform." Institute of Medicine. 1993. Assessing Health Care Reform. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2099.
×
Page 49
Suggested Citation:"Financing Reform." Institute of Medicine. 1993. Assessing Health Care Reform. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2099.
×
Page 50
Next: Improving the Infrastructure for Effective Change »
Assessing Health Care Reform Get This Book
×
Buy Paperback | $40.00
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

This book establishes a framework for assessing health care reform proposals and their implementation. It helps clarify objectives, identifies issues to be addressed in proposals, distinguishes between short- and long-term expectations and achievements, and directs attention to important but sometimes neglected questions about the organization and provision of health care services.

In addition, the volume presents a discussion and analysis of issues essential to achieving fundamental goals of health care reform: to maintain and improve health and well-being, to make basic health coverage universal, and to encourage the efficient use of limited resources.

The book is a useful resource for anyone developing or assessing options for reform.

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!