|
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy. Second, there is no system of incentives to direct funding and capability, both public and private sector, in the direction of more coordination and greater efficiency. The creation of incentive systems will, among other things, make it attractive and perhaps even essential for the public and private sectors to work together in the spatial data infrastructure to a degree undreamed of in the past. REFERENCESAmerican Library Association (1978). Into the Information Age: A Perspective for Federal Action on Information, American Library Association, Chicago, 134 pp. Brown, K. (1990). Local Government Benefits from GIS, PlanGraphics, Inc., Lexington, Kentucky. Gillespie, S. R. (1992). The value of GIS to the federal government, in Proceedings: GIS/LIS '92 Annual Conference and Exposition, Anaheim, California, pp. 256–264. McLaughlin, J. (1991). Towards a national spatial data infrastructure, in Proceedings of the Canadian Conference on GIS, Ottawa, March 1991, pp. 1–25. Newton, Zwart, and Cavill, eds. (1992). Networking Spatial Information Systems, Belhaven Press, London. Rhind, D. (1992). The information infrastructure of GIS, in Proceedings, 5th International Symposium on Spatial Data Handling, International Geographical Union Commission on GIS, August 3–7, 1992, Charleston, South Carolina, pp. 1–19.
|
|
|||||||||||||||
