National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: APPLICATIONS TO CHEMICAL WEAPONS DESTRUCTION
Suggested Citation:"ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES." National Research Council. 1993. Alternative Technologies for the Destruction of Chemical Agents and Munitions. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2218.
×
Page 272

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

I IONIZING RADIATION 272 compounds were destroyed to better than 85 percent but not better than 99 percent. Compounds containing carbon-phosphorus bonds were harder to destroy. Furthermore, it is not known whether the products from irradiations are indeed less hazardous than the feed materials. The major advantage of the radiation technique is that disassembly may not be required to render the contents of rockets or mines harmless. However, there is no experimental evidence indicating that such a level of destruction has been achieved. BY-PRODUCTS AND WASTE STREAMS After irradiation, the components containing agent, propellant, or munitions will need to be analyzed to ascertain that they may be opened and the products of radiation collected for conventional destruction. Conventional destruction includes any of the oxidation techniques such as molten salt, high temperature steam, fluidized-bed oxidation, or catalytic oxidation. Note that these munitions containers may be under substantial pressure from radiolytic production of gases in the closed containers. Leakage of these gases and containment become major concerns. It is very doubtful that complete destruction of agent is achievable (i.e., 99.9999 percent). It is not dear what the radiation products will be. It is possible that two phases will be recovered, namely, a radiolyric gas and polymerized solids. ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES The procedures for destroying agent by using penetrating nuclear radiation such as gamma rays or X-rays have the advantage that they may not need reverse assembly of weapons. There should be no thermal effects, thus reducing the possibility of explosions. The disadvantages of irradiations of other than penetrating radiation is that disassembly will be required. Thus, mixed radiation from spent fuel elements, electron irradiation, or beta rays will require less absorbing matter between the radiation and the agent. Other disadvantages are that radiation embrittlement of containers may become a problem at very high absorbed doses, and in conjunction with radiolytic gases, containers may have to withstand high stresses in embrittled containers.

Next: DEVELOPMENT NEEDS »
Alternative Technologies for the Destruction of Chemical Agents and Munitions Get This Book
×
 Alternative Technologies for the Destruction of Chemical Agents and Munitions
Buy Paperback | $95.00
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

The U.S. Army Chemical Stockpile Disposal Program was established with the goal of destroying the nation's stockpile of lethal unitary chemical weapons. Since 1990 the U.S. Army has been testing a baseline incineration technology on Johnston Island in the southern Pacific Ocean. Under the planned disposal program, this baseline technology will be imported in the mid to late 1990s to continental United States disposal facilities; construction will include eight stockpile storage sites.

In early 1992 the Committee on Alternative Chemical Demilitarization Technologies was formed by the National Research Council to investigate potential alternatives to the baseline technology. This book, the result of its investigation, addresses the use of alternative destruction technologies to replace, partly or wholly, or to be used in addition to the baseline technology. The book considers principal technologies that might be applied to the disposal program, strategies that might be used to manage the stockpile, and combinations of technologies that might be employed.

READ FREE ONLINE

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!